Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 [789] 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

ashlar42
13th September 2016, 12:56
I desided to try out the x64 version of MadVr + Smooth motion + 60 Hz to see if this could be as smooth or better than the x86 version + Reclock + 24 Hz on my TV and HTPC. Well it is not. Reclock + 24 Hz for my 23.976 fps content is way more smooth. So I guess I'm stuck with the x86 version then. Any others here who agree?I very humbly suggest you have a look here: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=173571
It works even when software decoding audio, not just bistreaming it.

sneaker_ger
13th September 2016, 14:44
Question about MVC files : I can't get MPC-HC (neither MPC-BE) + madvr play MVC files in stereo throug my GTX 960 to my Benq projector. I switched to Windows 10 just for its native capability to output MVC 3D through HDMI.
Stereoscopic works flawlessly, but I couln't not make MPCHC+Madvr work. I'm using two display, one with no 3D capability, and one with 3D activated in windows display settings panel.
Any idea how what's wrong? How to know whether madvr is responsible?
Did you tick the Intel MVC decoder option during LAV setup?

Paul Tronc
13th September 2016, 14:51
I don't think so. I had a radeon until this week, I was on Windows 7 until end july, I reinstalled Lav past month. Each time I tried to play MVC via MPC+Madvr : fail. I enabled the 3D feature in Madvr, but no change. Is FFDShow causing some trouble?

clsid
13th September 2016, 15:04
You can verify with the OSD (Ctrl+J) if madVR gets 3D input. It should show something like "NV12, 8bit, 4:2:0 (3D)".

LAV Video decoder must be connected directly to madVR. You can 't use ffdshow.

Paul Tronc
13th September 2016, 15:58
All right, that's it. I know what to do now. Thanks.

Kotik
13th September 2016, 20:33
the black crush sound more like an calibration issue with our TV.

TV can do this just by aging.

Would have been my 1st thing to suspect as well. But like i said on the same TV with my AMD gpu black 17 is blinking during the tests, barely but blinking. To make sure my TV is not the one to blame i did increase brightness on TV co trols and the only thing that happened was that lines after 18 became grey instead of black hence the idea of Intel mapping 17 as reference black instead of 16.

As a result there is a black shift on the rest of the pallet. So anyone else with a Skylake GPU that can run the black levels test file and confirm?

huhn
13th September 2016, 20:37
I don't think so. I had a radeon until this week, I was on Windows 7 until end july, I reinstalled Lav past month. Each time I tried to play MVC via MPC+Madvr : fail. I enabled the 3D feature in Madvr, but no change. Is FFDShow causing some trouble?

it doesn't work with ffdshow

Shiandow
14th September 2016, 00:16
I'd say, try some 720p content on a 1080p screen. It'll be like that.

ShiftyFella
14th September 2016, 00:41
Why wouldn't it? madvr scaling algos are great, I do most of my viewing on 1440p monitor, have no issue with 1080p content using SS. If you don't have fast enough gpu doing doubling is probably pointless at such small scaling factor and you're already benefiting from using upscaling refinements

Paul Tronc
14th September 2016, 03:15
You can verify with the OSD (Ctrl+J) if madVR gets 3D input. It should show something like "NV12, 8bit, 4:2:0 (3D)".

LAV Video decoder must be connected directly to madVR. You can 't use ffdshow.


Well, I can't get the "(3D)" text on the osd. Something's wrong. I disabled ffdshow, I just use LAV.

This is what madvr says

Filter : madVR - CLSID : {E1A8B82A-32CE-4B0D-BE0D-AA68C772E423}
Module : C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\madVR\madVR64.ax

- Connected to:

CLSID: {008BAC12-FBAF-497B-9670-BC6F6FBAE2C4}
Filter: MPC Video Decoder
Pin: Output

- Connection media type:

Video: dxva 1920x1080 23.976fps

AM_MEDIA_TYPE:
majortype: MEDIATYPE_Video {73646976-0000-0010-8000-00AA00389B71}
subtype: MEDIASUBTYPE_NV12 {3231564E-0000-0010-8000-00AA00389B71}
formattype: FORMAT_VideoInfo2 {F72A76A0-EB0A-11D0-ACE4-0000C0CC16BA}
bFixedSizeSamples: 1
bTemporalCompression: 0
lSampleSize: 3110400
cbFormat: 112

VIDEOINFOHEADER:
rcSource: (0,0)-(1920,1080)
rcTarget: (0,0)-(1920,1080)
dwBitRate: 0
dwBitErrorRate: 0
AvgTimePerFrame: 417083

VIDEOINFOHEADER2:
dwInterlaceFlags: 0x00000081
dwCopyProtectFlags: 0x00000000
dwPictAspectRatioX: 16
dwPictAspectRatioY: 9
dwControlFlags: 0x00002581
- VideoChromaSubsampling: 5
- NominalRange : 2 (16-235)
- VideoTransferMatrix : 0 (Unknown, used BT.709)
- VideoLighting : 0
- VideoPrimaries : 0
- VideoTransferFunction : 0
dwReserved2: 0x00000000

BITMAPINFOHEADER:
biSize: 40
biWidth: 1920
biHeight: 1080
biPlanes: 1
biBitCount: 12
biCompression: dxva
biSizeImage: 3110400
biXPelsPerMeter: 0
biYPelsPerMeter: 0
biClrUsed: 0
biClrImportant: 0


This is what the splitter says :

Filter : MPC MPEG Source - CLSID : {1365BE7A-C86A-473C-9A41-C0A6E82C9FA3}

- Connected to:

CLSID: {008BAC12-FBAF-497B-9670-BC6F6FBAE2C4}
Filter: MPC Video Decoder
Pin: Video

- Connection media type:

Video: H.264/AVC 1920x1080 23.976fps

AM_MEDIA_TYPE:
majortype: MEDIATYPE_Video {73646976-0000-0010-8000-00AA00389B71}
subtype: MEDIASUBTYPE_AVC1 {31435641-0000-0010-8000-00AA00389B71}
formattype: FORMAT_MPEG2_VIDEO {E06D80E3-DB46-11CF-B4D1-00805F6CBBEA}
bFixedSizeSamples: 0
bTemporalCompression: 1
lSampleSize: 1
cbFormat: 318

VIDEOINFOHEADER:
rcSource: (0,0)-(1920,1080)
rcTarget: (0,0)-(1920,1080)
dwBitRate: 0
dwBitErrorRate: 0
AvgTimePerFrame: 417083

VIDEOINFOHEADER2:
dwInterlaceFlags: 0x00000000
dwCopyProtectFlags: 0x00000000
dwPictAspectRatioX: 16
dwPictAspectRatioY: 9
dwControlFlags: 0x00000000
dwReserved2: 0x00000000

MPEG2VIDEOINFO:
dwStartTimeCode: 0
cbSequenceHeader: 186
dwProfile: 0x00000064
dwLevel: 0x00000029
dwFlags: 0x00000004

BITMAPINFOHEADER:
biSize: 40
biWidth: 1920
biHeight: 1080
biPlanes: 1
biBitCount: 24
biCompression: AVC1
biSizeImage: 6220800
biXPelsPerMeter: 0
biYPelsPerMeter: 0
biClrUsed: 0
biClrImportant: 0

Extradata: [removed]
- Enumerated media type 0:

Set as the current media type

- Enumerated media type 1:

Video: H.264/AVC 1920x1080 23.976fps

AM_MEDIA_TYPE:
majortype: MEDIATYPE_Video {73646976-0000-0010-8000-00AA00389B71}
subtype: MEDIASUBTYPE_H264 {34363248-0000-0010-8000-00AA00389B71}
formattype: FORMAT_MPEG2_VIDEO {E06D80E3-DB46-11CF-B4D1-00805F6CBBEA}
bFixedSizeSamples: 0
bTemporalCompression: 1
lSampleSize: 1
cbFormat: 321

VIDEOINFOHEADER:
rcSource: (0,0)-(1920,1080)
rcTarget: (0,0)-(1920,1080)
dwBitRate: 0
dwBitErrorRate: 0
AvgTimePerFrame: 417083

VIDEOINFOHEADER2:
dwInterlaceFlags: 0x00000000
dwCopyProtectFlags: 0x00000000
dwPictAspectRatioX: 16
dwPictAspectRatioY: 9
dwControlFlags: 0x00000000
dwReserved2: 0x00000000

MPEG2VIDEOINFO:
dwStartTimeCode: 0
cbSequenceHeader: 189
dwProfile: 0x00000064
dwLevel: 0x00000029
dwFlags: 0x00000004

BITMAPINFOHEADER:
biSize: 40
biWidth: 1920
biHeight: 1080
biPlanes: 1
biBitCount: 24
biCompression: H264
biSizeImage: 6220800
biXPelsPerMeter: 0
biYPelsPerMeter: 0
biClrUsed: 0
biClrImportant: 0

Extradata: [removed]


Finally, this is what the decoder says (truncated) :

Filter : MPC Video Decoder - CLSID : {008BAC12-FBAF-497B-9670-BC6F6FBAE2C4}

- Connected to:

CLSID: {1365BE7A-C86A-473C-9A41-C0A6E82C9FA3}
Filter: MPC MPEG Source
Pin: Video - AVC (H.264), High Profile, Level 4.1, 1920x1080, 23.976 fps (1011,e0,00)

- Connection media type:

Video: H.264/AVC 1920x1080 23.976fps

ryrynz
14th September 2016, 05:36
I don't like content in e.g. 900p on 1080p screens, it just doesn't look right.

Pick a good upscaler or upscaler/downscaler combo and it'll look better than 1:1. It's quite noticeable with 1080 content on 4K screens but that is a rather large upscale. High quality upscaled content should be more preferable rather than less.

Aleksoid1978
14th September 2016, 06:01
Paul Tronc
Upload file or short sample - look's like it don't contain MVC(H.264 3D) stream, only H.264 2D.

P.S. About MPC-BE - built-in video decoder only recently adding support decode MVC stream. I think you using old version that it's can do. Install LAV and prefer it in MPC-BE.

Paul Tronc
14th September 2016, 09:45
@Aleksoid1978 : I've tried with MPC-HC 32 last build and MPC-BE 64 from june, but OK I'll update them, and maybe I'll add MPC-BE 32 to be sure. I forgot to precise that in the info properties of my SSIF file, MPC-HC show "Video : Stereo ... MVC", and in VLC I can see 2 video tracks. I'll try to find a SSIF sample, but I think my bluray SSIF is legit MVC 1080p. It's a pity that Stereoscopic player's trial period has been over for months.

By the way : you have the same PC setup than me. It could be interesting to compare how far you set madvr and other post processing filters with this CPU+GPU power.

chros
14th September 2016, 12:08
But like i said on the same TV with my AMD gpu black 17 is blinking during the tests, barely but blinking. To make sure my TV is not the one to blame i did increase brightness on TV co trols and the only thing that happened was that lines after 18 became grey instead of black hence the idea of Intel mapping 17 as reference black instead of 16.
That indeed confirms that Intel drivers do something strange.
Intel Input Range (Full RGB) ----> Intel Quantization (Full RGB)
What happens if you modify only these 2 settings?
Are you sure that they are doing anything at all? (e.g. bug in the drivers)
For example, I don't have any options regarding these settings in my intel driver, so I used "madLevelsTweaker.exe" in madvr (per display setting) to apply full range output.

ShiftyFella
14th September 2016, 12:18
Not sure, I've been living the pixel-perfect life for too long. ;)

I don't like content in e.g. 900p on 1080p screens, it just doesn't look right. 1440p is a pretty high resolution though, so I thought with some good up-scaling it wouldn't be as noticeable.

What image doubling settings are you using, on what GPU? Rendering times?

I'm curious what 1080p content would look like with quadruple luma res with some SuperRes. I'm currently on a GTX 1080.
Maybe you didn't use good scaler? Pixel perfect is not good enough:D bd50 files without any doubling on my tv look like crap and in general blurays are muddy and not sharp at all imo, I notice this even more on my monitor, as I sit much closer and resolution difference is more noticeable there. Doing doubling of 1080p on 1080p is essentially the same as doing it for 1440p screen, only difference is down scaling factor is less. I can see where you coming from as depending on the algo used it might work better with certain scaling factors or if madvr tried to do what video games do when they output lower res then your screen but madvr still renders that content at native res of the monitor and scaling algos are good enough where mixed resolutions of content\screen is not an issue.

My gpu is 290x and setting for 1080p24 content are Chroma: ReconSoft SR1, Doubling: Luma NNEDI3 128N Chroma NNEDI3 16N, Upscaling JincAR AR+SL, Upscaling refinement CE 0.7 ED 0.9 Refine after ever 2x step , Downcaling SSIM 1D 100% AR Relaxed LL, Error Diffusion 2. Render times are around 36-37ms, if I use super-xbr instead of NNEDI3 render times are down to 12ms. I still prefer NNEDI3 over super-xbr, as I feel it rids of aliasing much better but super-xbr with SR1 can be really good and on some content maybe even better then NNEDI3

sneaker_ger
14th September 2016, 12:23
@Aleksoid1978 : I've tried with MPC-HC 32 last build and MPC-BE 64 from june, but OK I'll update them, and maybe I'll add MPC-BE 32 to be sure.
Did you tick the Intel MVC decoder option during LAV setup now? Re-install LAV or it won't be able to decode MVC's second view.

Did you tick the Intel MVC decoder option during LAV setup?

Aleksoid1978
14th September 2016, 12:46
@Aleksoid1978 : I've tried with MPC-HC 32 last build and MPC-BE 64 from june, but OK I'll update them, and maybe I'll add MPC-BE 32 to be sure. I forgot to precise that in the info properties of my SSIF file, MPC-HC show "Video : Stereo ... MVC", and in VLC I can see 2 video tracks. I'll try to find a SSIF sample, but I think my bluray SSIF is legit MVC 1080p. It's a pity that Stereoscopic player's trial period has been over for months.

By the way : you have the same PC setup than me. It could be interesting to compare how far you set madvr and other post processing filters with this CPU+GPU power.

1 - download library from here http://mpc-be.org/Intel_MSDK/ libmfxsw32.dll - for 32 bit and libmfxsw64.dll for 64 bit. Place in folder with MPC-BE.
2 - Go Options->Internal Filters->Video Decoders and check H264 (MVC 3D).

Shiandow
14th September 2016, 13:58
Could it be that bad?

I feel like it isn't a very fair comparison though, considering 720p is such a low resolution from the start.


Well, the resolution isn't really what determines the quality, the scaling factor is more important. Scaling 720p to 1080p has a scaling factor of 1.5, while scaling 1080p to 1440p has a scaling factor of 1.33. I think these are close enough that there won't be a noticeable difference in quality between a 720p picture scaled to a 1080p screen or a 1080p image scaled to a 1440p screen.

Paul Tronc
14th September 2016, 14:03
About upscaling 1080p to 1440p : using jinc or NNEDI3 upscaling (without doubling), I prefer the pixel perfect 1080p result than the 1440p upscale. I tried doubling once, wasn't impressed about the result.

huhn
14th September 2016, 14:10
how are you using nnedi3 without doubling?

aufkrawall
14th September 2016, 14:12
I got 1440p as well and I don't notice any difference between 1080p NNEDI3 (it's always doubling, btw., at least per axis) and Jinc upscaling with real content.
Putting SuperRes 3 on top of Jinc and imho it looks ~indistinguishable from native 1440p for filmed content.

Btw: With my GTX 1070 and default queue lengths of 8, I sometimes get presentation glitches. Setting queues to 16 seems to make glitches disappear completely, even while heavy borderless fullscreen switching on and off.
Haven't checked yet if this might be related to DXVA2 CB.

Paul Tronc
14th September 2016, 14:17
how are you using nnedi3 without doubling?

Oups, I made a confusion, sorry

kalston
14th September 2016, 15:27
1080p to 1440p (27") with Jinc AR looks amazing in my experience. Never had any issue with any of my BDs or any other content (coming from a 1080p screen).

Kotik
14th September 2016, 17:42
That indeed confirms that Intel drivers do something strange.

What happens if you modify only these 2 settings?
Are you sure that they are doing anything at all? (e.g. bug in the drivers)
For example, I don't have any options regarding these settings in my intel driver, so I used "madLevelsTweaker.exe" in madvr (per display setting) to apply full range output.

I think u dont have these options cause ur TV doesnt send the "Support Full RGB" capability over EDID. In case it does and u applied the registry hack (madVR levels tweak) these settings wont be available unless u revert these settings. In other words Intel Control panel wont make these options available if the reg hack is active or if ur tv doesnt send the "Support Full RGB" info. To find out u can revert the tweak and install latest Intel drivers.

Now back to topic, Intel...... well its even more broken than my initial evaluation. DXVA decoding will produce worst level results than software decoding.

Steps to reproduce: Set LAV to software decoding and run the black clipping test file. 18 will be the 1st bar to blink so 16 + 17 are considered are reference black.... now set LAV to DXVA (Native or CB) and observe that now 16 + 17 + 18 are not blinking. So DXVA on Intel is even worse....

Imagine that i decided to go for a SkyLake cause they got 23.976 fixed, just to find out that they got levels totaly f..ed up.

Back to my R7 240 for me. Each time i believe that finally there is something better than AMD regarding HTPC i discover that messing with my system was a terrible idea :-) I just wonder how hard can it be to get basics working but then again it took Intel many years to fix 23.976 so maybe i ask for too much.
If someone could confirm my findings i would be greatfull.

P.S I did try playing with different levels combos. They result in either totally washed out picture (so they are actually working) or they demonstrate exactly the same issue (madvr limited--->intel full---->tv limited).

digitech
14th September 2016, 18:38
guys in your experience, do you think that svp or any frame interpolation is added to the MadVR video chain it really affects video quality? im deciding if i get rid of svp in my htpc

Q-the-STORM
14th September 2016, 20:20
guys in your experience, do you think that svp or any frame interpolation is added to the MadVR video chain it really affects video quality? im deciding if i get rid of svp in my htpc


depends...

if you run 24fps and interpolate to 60fps, SVP will definitely hurt quality, since it has to drop every second original frame...
if you interpolate to 48fps or 72fps etc (multiples of 24) it will not hurt quality, other than interpolated frames being softer in general...
you have to decide if you want to sacrifice a bit of sharpness for smoothness...

but obviously if you don't have good hardware and have to use lanczos when using SVP when you could have used nnedi3 or superxbr without SVP, that would be a qualitydrop in general... how noticeable would depend on your content...

I used SVP for 2 years, but since I bought a new 2160p TV, I dropped it.... to my eyes, my new TV has better interpolation than SVP and forcing madVR to upscale 60frames to 2160p would force me to use worse settings..

cnckane
14th September 2016, 20:58
Hi!

I would like to use AMD video enhancements (color, brightness) with madvr but as soon as I switch to fullscreen I can see the picture changes to darker.
I noticed it only happens with 1080p videos (I have an 1080p monitor so no upscaling needed), because if I set image upscaling to DXVA lower res videos are working well with the AMD video settings.

huhn
14th September 2016, 21:50
try DXVA native

Paul Tronc
14th September 2016, 23:22
You can verify with the OSD (Ctrl+J) if madVR gets 3D input. It should show something like "NV12, 8bit, 4:2:0 (3D)".

LAV Video decoder must be connected directly to madVR. You can 't use ffdshow.

Here I am. I did reinstall LAV with intel MVC checked. Now the display switch to 24Hz with a red /green cast.

http://image.prntscr.com/image/d84bdc3e78b74940adfbe752db901e0d.png


http://image.prntscr.com/image/db39548546194e45ae0b723f88167c0f.png

http://image.prntscr.com/image/fbebb39c862f4bb08faaf86cdf2b7c02.png

EDIT : Finally I got it working, I have to disable the dual screen before launching a SSIF file, because it causes what you can see on my screenshots. Stereoscopic player didn't show this bug.
Thank you to all people who helped.

Sunset1982
15th September 2016, 06:07
last night I watched a movie an suddenly my whole screen went green. Had to restart the file, then it worked flawless. Someone did have similar problems in the past?


Happened while using RX480, 16.9.1, latest lav, madvr 0.90.24

cnckane
15th September 2016, 07:12
try DXVA native

I'm using native now I tried copy-back but still the same.

deado
15th September 2016, 07:53
Just thought I would post my Nvidia GPU experiences with NNEDI3.

GTX 680, 780 and 960 = Works in MPC-HC x64, green or grey blocky artifacts in 32-bit
GTX 1060, 1070 = Works in all.

Different versions of Nvidia drivers, Mpc-hc and madvr seemed irrelevant. Glad I upgraded to Pascal. Need 32-bit player for Reclock.

Betroz
15th September 2016, 07:54
Just thought I would post my experience with NNEDI3.

GTX 680, 780 and 960 = Works in MPC-HC x64, green artifacts in 32-bit
GTX 1060, 1070 = Works in all.

Glad I upgraded to Pascal. Need 32-bit player for Reclock.

The newest nVidia drivers are more optimized for Pascal. For older cards, use older drivers.

foozoor
15th September 2016, 13:06
This is what I can see from the web these days and I really am worried about this.


lansurge's question from ranpha's website
Where is Madshi? He didn’t post anymore on Doom9.
That’s quite strange! Especially that next GPU generation arrived.
Is he working on a totally new renderer powered by DirectX12 or Vulkan?

ranpha's answer from his website
Don’t really think that would happen, else only Windows 10 users can use it.
Even LAV FIlters development has slowed down considerably for quite some time already.

anon from an imageboard website
I think mpc-hc is going to die/be suspended really soon.
The development of lavfilters (the main part of mpc-hc) has slowed down for quite some time.
Even madshi doesn't release any new madVR anymore.
Furthermore windows is now a true mess and includes tons of spyware and unwanted programs that are almost impossible to remove without disconnecting his computer from internet.


Do you have less dubious information to give us?

huhn
15th September 2016, 13:19
nothing unusual is going on right now.

this is not the first time this is happening.

YxP
15th September 2016, 14:26
This is what I can see from the web these days and I really am worried about this.



Do you have less dubious information to give us?

You are talking with over-enthusiastic people who get each other worked up over nothing. Both mpc-hc and lav nightlies are about 2 months old.

Sunset1982
15th September 2016, 16:18
it's nothing unusual. Madshi sometimes takes a timeout to concentrate on programming or his real life maybe. But he'll be back, that's for sure. Madvr is his baby, so I think he'll move on with this project.

Warner306
15th September 2016, 18:27
When madshi goes back to his real life, even for three weeks, someone suggests he is done programming?

People need to have more patience. Monthly releases would be fine for most of us given how mature madVR has become.

The man has to have a real job where he earns real money.

JarrettH
15th September 2016, 19:58
As someone who has followed madvr from its earliest stages - madshi always returns.

We should be more worried about MPC-HC as it's coming up to a year from the last release and the development team are listed as mostly inactive on the website. I'm not interested in following nightlies.

aufkrawall
15th September 2016, 19:58
People could simply put their mind at ease by checking his doom9 forum profile, he's been online even today.
And this program probably is bug-free for most of its users (just like LAV Filters, btw.).

Sarasa
15th September 2016, 21:16
Well People sometime forget that it need time to implement new function or improve them, and after that finding if it doesn't crash/bug, etc... ;)

And they also forget that sometime programmer need to do something else to not "burn" them-self :)

CarlosCaco
15th September 2016, 23:04
The newest nVidia drivers are more optimized for Pascal. For older cards, use older drivers.



Do you know what driver version should be good with madVRfor a GTX 570 on Windows 8.1?

Stereodude
15th September 2016, 23:16
People could simply put their mind at ease by checking his doom9 forum profile, he's been online even today.
And this program probably is bug-free for most of its users (just like LAV Filters, btw.).
FWIW, he's actively posting on other forums about other topics. madVR seems to be working well for most people, so I'm not sure why his lack of posting here day in and day out is of concern to some. He's not getting paid for this. Besides, usually when he disappears for a while he comes back from his secret underground lair with some new killer new feature.

Betroz
16th September 2016, 07:12
Do you know what driver version should be good with madVRfor a GTX 570 on Windows 8.1?

Try 327.23 and use DX9 Windowed mode. Or try the 353.xx drivers.

chros
16th September 2016, 11:35
Do you know what driver version should be good with madVRfor a GTX 570 on Windows 8.1?
I'm using 355.98 with my mobile Kepler based GPU, yours is Fermi, so you can give it a try as well.

Sunset1982
16th September 2016, 17:19
Is windowed overlay mode possible with latest amd cards / crimson or is it still just nvidia/intel which can do this?

Ge'in
16th September 2016, 18:25
@ Madshi

Have you look at this paper ?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.00092v3.pdf
It's about SuperRes on CNN

Github : https://github.com/nagadomi/waifu2x
Test on web site : http://waifu2x.udp.jp/index.fr.html

Anima123
16th September 2016, 21:10
This has been reviewed several months ago.

As I remembered, it's too complicated to be used in real time, as a doubler in madVR for example.

AngelGraves13
16th September 2016, 21:42
Here's an image of the pixelation and corruption that appears sometimes when using Jinc with SuperRes for Chroma. Changing Chroma to anything else removes issue. Also rewinding the file fixes the issue.

https://s17.postimg.org/3u9h4382z/2016_09_16.png (https://postimg.org/image/3u9h4382z/)

Asmodian
16th September 2016, 21:51
This has been reviewed several months ago.

As I remembered, it's too complicated to be used in real time, as a doubler in madVR for example.

I thought it wasn't that interesting because while it isn't any harder than NNEDI3 but also not any better; it offers similar quality to super-xbr.