Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 [770] 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

chros
2nd July 2016, 12:46
I haven't finalized the settings yet. But I did a quick comparison with my 980 Ti settings.

You can see it here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1V2aj45_h6nsCTYqY5H-1KEUS8hk97RIdYcnZuIWkQMA/

I also underclock my gfx cards to be 100% silent, meaning no noise from the fans what so ever (I am very picky about noise). So the gfx card speeds are not what you use out of the box.

All in all, very happy with the 1080 for madvr!

edit: I am able to bump the NNEDI3 image doubling from 64 to 128 now with the GTX 1080 for my main 1080p profile of typical 23.976fps content at 4k res.
Thanks for the comparison! There's a significant difference between the 2 cards. :)
I also like the idea of underclocking (I do it with my laptop as well). What util do you use for that? (I use nvidiainspector.)

ryrynz
2nd July 2016, 13:29
Madshi were you still interested in splitting the neuron pass settings up like in MPDN?

aufkrawall
2nd July 2016, 13:34
Underclocking doesn't make much sense without lowering voltage because power savings are very small. It would make more sense to lower the Powertarget of cards which you can't/don't want to undervolt, when Powertarget is limiting it also decreases voltage along with clock.
Lowering just voltage is not possible for GeForce cards without a modification of the videocard's bios (I assume this is still true for Pascal, but don't know for sure).
With Radeons, you can simply undervolt with any overclocking tool because voltage is basically unlocked.
I personally use MSI Afterburner (also got a MSI R9 390) and I'm very happy with it. I'm not sure Nvidia Inspector already supports overclocking for detailed Pascal Boost 3.0 features, you probably have to use latest Afterburner beta oder EVGA Precision X for this. But it probably is still fine for basic manual clock adjustments.
My undervolting settings:
http://abload.de/thumb/ab4kkeu.png (http://abload.de/image.php?img=ab4kkeu.png)
With AMD GPUs you can often lower voltage by a lot if you slightly decrease GPU clock (that's why I set up -20MHz).
Gives really good power savings, especially with madVR (I'm usually below 900rpm fan speed with custom curve).
Drawback of undervolting is that you have to check stability/corruption with demanding games (Witcher 3 is good for Maxwell, Hitman 2016 good for Hawaii). By just lowering Powertarget, there shouldn't be any stability problems (however can be though if you have a badly tested factory overclocked card).

CarlosCaco
3rd July 2016, 02:38
as ive already reported i having weird freeziing after pause a movie on FSE mode, i don t know how this started to happens, but tried everything, rolled back drivers and nothing changes this situation,
i cant pause a video on fullscreen exclusive, if i pauseafter the image freezes and sometimes the sound continues to play, the system stop to responding... and i have do force a restatr on my laptop...
does anyone having similar problem? i an on windows 8.1 x64 latest lav mpc-hc and mpc be and madvr...
nividia 930m

nzsjb
3rd July 2016, 06:37
Does madVR support windowless mode?

ryrynz
3rd July 2016, 06:57
as ive already reported i having weird freeziing after pause a movie on FSE mode

Reset madVR to defaults.

050970
3rd July 2016, 16:30
I was experimenting wit the excellent (IP) remote ability of MadVR (mad homecinemacontrol).

I was asking myself if I could talk directly to this API with my home automation system. (which can communicate with any UDP/TDP socket)

What is really interesting is that to the contrary of my mediaplayer (which uses MadVR) the mediaplayer itself does notpush player status..it has to be polled and further doesn't expose as much information as madvr does.

Listening to the right port I do get :

(first lines taken out on purpose)
(...) P+wsLDwnJycXQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADb29sk3t7eh8bGxtCoqKj0r6+v8MPDw
8mzs7OEoKCgGwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAEAAAAAEAAABAAAAA8A8AAMAHAACAAQAAgAEAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgAEAAIABAADgBwAA8A8AAA== mad.?(XmadVR i
hellomvrVersion=0.90.20.0 gpuName=Intel(R) HD Graphics 5500 monitorN
ame=Lenovo LP125WF2-SPB2 mad.=€X store:Chapters„{Gc@Q…‚@Hz
“@

Chapter 01Chapter 02Chapter 03Chapter 04mad.7^v9ˆX
store:Streamsvids€8›&€mFϴ€_l€mFϴ€_lauds€8›q,€mFϴ€_lŸXVοUYZauds€8›,€mFϴ€_lŸXVοUY‡&kK™441ž#™•CNu7}/=–7C;
}/=–7C;•41ž#™•CNu/;1#@@€(@~-@##!‚ € €eng# VobSub index file, v7 (do not modify this line!)
#
# This index block was generated by MakeMKV v1.9.10 win(x64-release
# which has no relation to VobSub software. The first

# line above is present for compatibility reasons.
#size: 720x576
org: 0, 0
alpha: 100%
smooth: OFF
fadein/out: 50, 50
align: OFF at LEFT TOP
time offset: 0
forced subs: OFF
langidx: 0
palette: ffffff, 6b6b6b, 1f1f1f, e63f07, 7e7e7e, bebebe, 14be
f3, ea12eb, faff1a, 000070, 067506, 731f03, 095f78, 750975, 7c950b, ffffff
#
# end
fre# VobSub index file, v7 (do not modify this line!)
#
# This index block was generated by MakeMKV v1.9.10 win(x64-release)
# which has no relation to VobSub software. The first # line above is present for compatibility reasons.
# size: 720x576
org: 0, 0
alpha: 100%
smooth: OFFf
adein/out: 50, 50
align: OFF at LEFT TOP
time offset: 0
forced subs: OFF
langidx: 0
palette: ffffff, 6b6b6b, 1f1f1f, e63f07, 7e7e7e, bebebe, 14bef3, ea12eb, faff1a, 000070, 067506, 731f03, 095f78, 750975, c950b,
ffffff
#
# end
undNo subtitlesV: English [eng] (mpeg2 main, yuv420p, 720x576)A: Stereo [eng] (ac3, 48000 Hz, stereo, 192 kb/s) [default]A: Stereo [fre] (ac3, 48000 Hz, stereo, 192 kb/s)S: English [eng] (vobsub) [default]S: French [fre] (vobsu
b)S: No subtitlesmad.;ŽXstore:GraphStateRunning


The information pushed out by MADVr is excellent and could be so helpfull for home automation purposes (feedback and control).

I was also experimenting how I could "send commands" to madvr. Clearly using the Mad homecinema pop-up I can change language, subtitles, play/pause....it would be excellent if one could adress these commands directly with a UDP/TDP command string.

As I'm PC savvy but a complete programming noob I'm maybe asking for something impossible right now.

It would be really excellent if the mad homecinemacontrol api could be elaborated further...it's potential is really huge

Ironclad
3rd July 2016, 19:14
Any progress on Vapoursynth integration? Being able to add motion interpolation and other scripts after upscaling would be awesome!

Currently, using SVP exponentially increases the workload on your GPU which makes using it alongside NNEDI3 and image doubling through madVR only possible on the very latest graphics cards. However most quad core CPUs could handle OpenCL based svpflow interpolating upscaled FullHD frames well above 60 fps, so it's obvious applying motion interpolation after upscaling would be more efficient for the vast majority of users. The only scenario where it would be worse I figure is with an extremely low end CPU, but even a 6 year old i3 can handle interpolating 1080p@24 fps videos to 60fps with a basic graphics card.
https://www.svp-team.com/wiki/FAQ#Which_CPU_is_better_for_SVP.3F

nevcairiel
3rd July 2016, 22:12
Any progress on Vapoursynth integration? Being able to add motion interpolation and other scripts after upscaling would be awesome!

Having to copy the image in high-bit-depth from the GPU to system memory and back after processing will take a significant part of the performance, so don't expect too much free magic.

CarlosCaco
4th July 2016, 02:02
Reset madVR to defaults.

that the only thing that i forgot to do, and works! thanks! so simply and i getting headaches for that...

seiyafan
4th July 2016, 02:29
Has anyone compared or had the knowledge of performance difference between the 1070 and Fury in MadVR?

shmizan
4th July 2016, 09:53
I have a problem that I can't see or track my mouse movements in FSE mode.
There is no typical mouse "arrow" visible any more as soon as FSE is enabled.
When moving my mouse blindly, I see the typical MadVR FSE time-bar, and clicking starts seeking.
So this part seems to work, but I can't choose to what time I seek because the mouse is completely invisible.
It's obviously an annoying thing !

Environment Info :
MPC-HC (latest)
madVR v0.87.13
LAV v0.64
OS : Windows 7 (x64)
CPU: Intel Core i7 970 @ 3.20GHz (6C/12T)
GPU: GeForce GTX 680 (8 EU) @ 1084 MHz (347.25)
anyone else having this? or had this?
I have the exact same problem. couldn't find a setting in MPC-HC for this. I use:
MPC-HC 1.70.10
madVR v0.90.21
LAV v0.68.1
OS : Windows 8.1 (x64)

jkauff
4th July 2016, 14:14
anyone else having this? or had this?
I have the exact same problem. couldn't find a setting in MPC-HC for this. I use:
MPC-HC 1.70.10
madVR v0.90.21
LAV v0.68.1
OS : Windows 8.1 (x64)
No problems here with the same setup and a GTX770. Third-party mouse driver problem, maybe?

Sunset1982
4th July 2016, 14:23
I'll get my hands on a GTX 1070 and an AMD RX480 at the end of the week. I'll compare their madvr performance against each other an will post the results here.

Anyone got some wishes or suggestions you'd like me to test?

My priority will be upscaling 1080p to 4k...



If I got enough time I will also add my old GTX 970 to the comparison.

aufkrawall
4th July 2016, 17:02
Would be neat if you could try out how well DXVA2 CB works together with madVR in windowed/borderless mode on the RX 480.
My render queues are a jumpy with DXVA2 CB on the R9 390 with 1080p 60fps (but playback is stable, at least since some newer driver) and native doesn't worky anymore at all with madVR without framedrops.
Classic question would be how much NNEDI3 neurons and SuperRes passes are possible for 1080p 30/60fps doubling. :)

Sunset1982
4th July 2016, 17:13
Would be neat if you could try out how well DXVA2 CB works together with madVR in windowed/borderless mode on the RX 480.
My render queues are a jumpy with DXVA2 CB on the R9 390 with 1080p 60fps (but playback is stable, at least since some newer driver) and native doesn't worky anymore at all with madVR without framedrops.
Classic question would be how much NNEDI3 neurons and SuperRes passes are possible for 1080p 30/60fps doubling.

ok, I'll do what I can and I will let you know.

Xello
4th July 2016, 20:46
Does anyone have much experience using a 2560x1440 monitor? Just got a PG279Q.

Having one issue, the refresh rate auto change on fullscreen.

I guess you can't put in 1440p23, 1440p24 etc on the list of display modes because it comes up as invalid. I have 1080p23, 1080p24 etc but MadVR wont switch my new monitor to that.

Asmodian
4th July 2016, 21:51
Does anyone have much experience using a 2560x1440 monitor? Just got a PG279Q.

Having one issue, the refresh rate auto change on fullscreen.

I guess you can't put in 1440p23, 1440p24 etc on the list of display modes because it comes up as invalid. I have 1080p23, 1080p24 etc but MadVR wont switch my new monitor to that.

Use 2560x1440p23, 2560x1440p24, etc. instead.

I have been using 2560x1440 for years now. :)

Xello
4th July 2016, 22:08
Use 2560x1440p23, 2560x1440p24, etc. instead.

I have been using 2560x1440 for years now. :)

Thanks, that does come up as valid. However, it still wont switch! :mad:

Asmodian
4th July 2016, 22:13
Thanks, that does come up as valid. However, it still wont switch! :mad:

The monitor probably doesn't support refresh rates that low.
From the spec sheet:
2) Signal Frequency
DisplayPort 34~209KHz(H)/30~165Hz(V)
HDMI: 30~140KHz(H)/24~60Hz(V)


Try using p48 or even p96 instead. You may need to setup custom resolutions.

Xello
4th July 2016, 22:18
The monitor probably doesn't support refresh rates that low.
From the spec sheet:



Try using p48 or even p96 instead. You may need to setup custom resolutions.

Yes I thought that was odd when i looked at the spec sheet, as this is a gsync monitor so it supports all refresh rates from 1 to max (165 in this monitor's case). I disabled gsync while i troubleshoot this issue though, just in case it was interfering with anything.

24hz is definitely supported as I can set it from Nvidia CP, playback content normally, and MadVR reports the 23.976hz in this situation. Will continue to test things out and report any oddities.

Note: btw I'm connecting through DP.

nevcairiel
4th July 2016, 22:26
Yes I thought that was odd when i looked at the spec sheet, as this is a gsync monitor so it supports all refresh rates from 1 to max (165 in this monitor's case).

Actually G-SYNCs minimum refresh is 30Hz, if your FPS drops below that it internally switches to something similar to ordinary VSYNC.
Most screens even have a higher minimum refresh above that due to panel requirements, typically in the 40Hz range somewhere.

Xello
4th July 2016, 22:37
Actually G-SYNCs minimum refresh is 30Hz, if your FPS drops below that it internally switches to something similar to ordinary VSYNC.
Most screens even have a higher minimum refresh above that due to panel requirements, typically in the 40Hz range somewhere.

Gotcha, MadVR is reporting correctly though right?

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/98455184/asus24hz.png

Asmodian
4th July 2016, 22:43
Actually G-SYNCs minimum refresh is 30Hz, if your FPS drops below that it internally switches to something similar to ordinary VSYNC.
Most screens even have a higher minimum refresh above that due to panel requirements, typically in the 40Hz range somewhere.

Actually that isn't how it works. The module in the monitor starts duplicating frames internally in a predictive manner, so it starts duplicating when the frame rate drops below something a bit above 30 so it almost never has to use the V-sync like mode, unless the frame rate fluctuates in a way it wasn't expecting. All G-sync displays I have seen have a min refresh rate of 30Hz but the Freesync displays often use something higher (35-47).

The G-sync refresh rates have nothing to do with what modes the monitor will accept however, that is still up to the EDID info like always. :p

My XB270HU has a 24Hz mode over displayport, so madVR will happily switch to 2560x1440p23, but it has the same min G-sync rate of 30Hz.

Personally I suggest setting your monitor to 165Hz and using smooth motion, no messing with things and having the monitor changing modes, the blended frames will not be onscreen long. ;)

Gotcha, MadVR is reporting correctly though right?

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/98455184/asus24hz.png

Odd, my list of refresh rates looks similar to yours (only missing the 165Hz option) but madVR will happily switch to 2560x1440p23. I am running Win10 pro x64.

madVR is reporting correctly, I assume the monitor is duplicating the frames internally.

Xello
4th July 2016, 22:46
Sigh..................

I was setting the display modes....................

Of my old display...................................

Just.............. :rolleyes:

Working fine now.

BTW that smooth motion suggestion made me vomit :P But I see your logic so might as well see what it looks like.
edit: doesn't look bad actually, I thought it was gonna cause the soap opera effect

Asmodian
5th July 2016, 00:23
Sigh..................

I was setting the display modes....................

Of my old display...................................

Just.............. :rolleyes:

Working fine now.

BTW that smooth motion suggestion made me vomit :P But I see your logic so might as well see what it looks like.
edit: doesn't look bad actually, I thought it was gonna cause the soap opera effect

MadVR's smooth motion is not frame interpolation, it works very well on high refresh rate displays without changing the frame rate of the source. It is nothing like all the new motion interpolation modes on TVs or SVP, etc. :)

Magik Mark
5th July 2016, 00:50
Why is it madvr reports my display refresh rates as 23.970 and my source filter (LAV) reports it as 23.976? Is there a way to correct this?

huhn
5th July 2016, 01:29
a custom resolution can change that. but if you are aiming at 23.976 than you are just wasting your time.

Asmodian
5th July 2016, 06:07
Why is it madvr reports my display refresh rates as 23.970 and my source filter (LAV) reports it as 23.976? Is there a way to correct this?

I have never been able to tune an Nvidia GPU to exactly 23.97602, or even that close.. the steps when creating a custom resolution were about 0.004 Hz, if I remember correctly. :p

chros
5th July 2016, 11:18
I'll get my hands on a GTX 1070 and an AMD RX480 at the end of the week. I'll compare their madvr performance against each other an will post the results here.

Anyone got some wishes or suggestions you'd like me to test?

My priority will be upscaling 1080p to 4k...
Thanks for the offer!
1. It'd be nice to see the power consumption of these cards during playback. (You can get a cheap power consumption meter with LCD display (for about 10 euros) and plug it in its own socket and read/take a note the values during test.)
2. Regarding to the 1st point, it would be also nice that you can try out these kind of sources:
- 720p h.264
- 1080p h.264
- 1080p h.265
- 2060p h.264
- 2060p h.265

Thanks

chros
5th July 2016, 11:19
Why is it madvr reports my display refresh rates as 23.970 and my source filter (LAV) reports it as 23.976? Is there a way to correct this?

a custom resolution can change that. but if you are aiming at 23.976 than you are just wasting your time.
Or if you can't use close enough value then use 24p instead of 23p with madVR. (That's what I'm doing.)

CarlosCaco
5th July 2016, 14:30
Or if you can't use close enough value then use 24p instead of 23p with madVR. (That's what I'm doing.)

In your optimus system hdmi outputs by intel or nvidia?

Sunset1982
5th July 2016, 15:00
did some quick testing with my new amd rx480...


my first observations:

compared to my gtx970 I save about 3-6 ms through different tests with different settings.

rx480 gets a bit noisy when stressed with high settings

cant get 4K, HEVC, 10 Bit, HDR files running. Getting green screen. worked with gtx 970.

render ques are stable at 7-8/8 with copyback. Saw some quick jumps to 4-7/8 and back every 1-2 mins, but no dropped frames or glitches. Tested with crimson 6.2.2


Tomorrow I'll get my hands on a gtx1070. I will post the results of the complete test friday.

kanade
5th July 2016, 16:12
Hey madshi, I'm not able to send the crash report via error dialog to you as I keep getting this error message:
http://i.imgur.com/YStlEzr.jpg

I also didn't get bug report text file after closing the error dialog.

aufkrawall
5th July 2016, 18:39
compared to my gtx970 I save about 3-6 ms through different tests with different settings.

Probably GCN's madVR performance is a bit higher than the average of most games (or you have to take very GCN friendly games for comparing)?
I'd say my R9 390 can also cope really well compared to my previous GTX 980 OC.


cant get 4K, HEVC, 10 Bit, HDR files running. Getting green screen. worked with gtx 970.

With DXVA2 (CB) or even with software decoding?
In both cases I'd say: outsh!
Polaris driver totally bugged?


render ques are stable at 7-8/8 with copyback. Saw some quick jumps to 4-7/8 and back every 1-2 mins, but no dropped frames or glitches. Tested with crimson 6.2.2

Cool, thanks. I'm having those jumps very often with 1080p 60fps with Hawaii. Present queue with GTX 980 was totally stable (if driver didn't bug with clock adjustment for OpenCL...).


Tomorrow I'll get my hands on a gtx1070. I will post the results of the complete test friday.
Really good that you are testing such stuff. Results for madVR are totally rare in the web. :(

Sunset1982
5th July 2016, 18:58
With DXVA2 (CB) or even with software decoding?(


Edit: hevc file is working with software decoding, but not working with dxva2 cb. If I choose software decoding I can play HEVC files. But HEVC with 4k and hdr info is too much for my cpu. Can't get it running without stuttering like hell. amds hevc decoder seems to be buggy. don't know if it is a softwarebug in crimson drivers or a hardware bug.

Sunset1982
5th July 2016, 23:25
finished my comparison between the gtx970 and amd's rx480. tomorrow i will complete the comparison with the gtx 1070. For those who are interested in AMD's RX480, there you are...

MadVRComparison.xlsx (http://www.file-upload.net/download-11742487/MadVRComparison.xlsx.html)


with the rx480 you get a performance gain of 9-57 % compared to the good old gtx 970. Power consumption is a up and down. In some scenarios the rx 480 needs more power, sometimes less.

ispano
6th July 2016, 00:06
finished my comparison between the gtx970 and amd's rx480. tomorrow i will complete the comparison with the gtx 1070. For those who are interested in AMD's RX480, there you are...

MadVRComparison.xlsx (http://www.file-upload.net/download-11742487/MadVRComparison.xlsx.html)


with the rx480 you get a performance gain of 9-57 % compared to the good old gtx 970. Power consumption is a up and down. In some scenarios the rx 480 needs more power, sometimes less.

Thx for the comparison. My RX480 arrives today and am especially happy with the fact it can do modest 4k upscaling with NNEDI3. Running an HTPC build off a GTX 285 at the moment :p.

Sunset1982
6th July 2016, 07:47
Thx for the comparison. My RX480 arrives today and am especially happy with the fact it can do modest 4k upscaling with NNEDI3.

It seems to be a good card for madvr. Especially for that price. But I would wait for a custom design, because of the fan, which is a bit noisy under heavy load.

I'm excited about the gtx1070. Will see how it performs today and if it worth the money in terms of madvr performance. Would be nice to have a bit of performance reserve for future madvr features and upscaling refinements, which (except for superres) I didn't use in my tests...

chros
6th July 2016, 11:22
In your optimus system hdmi outputs by intel or nvidia?
Intel (that's my "problem" :) )

finished my comparison between the gtx970 and amd's rx480. tomorrow i will complete the comparison with the gtx 1070. For those who are interested in AMD's RX480, there you are...

MadVRComparison.xlsx (http://www.file-upload.net/download-11742487/MadVRComparison.xlsx.html)
Thanks, but can you publish this/next one in an online form, e.g. on google docs? (It will be reserved for a long time, and I can't open it with Excel 2003 :) )

huhn
6th July 2016, 11:43
try openoffice.

and what is this rubbish? not possible, no HDMI 2.0

of cause the 970 has HDMI 2.0...

Mano
6th July 2016, 11:52
Sorry for the shameless question but what is the latest stable AMD driver version for madvr?

starlight2
6th July 2016, 11:52
Hi, I have a JVC HD350 Projector (RS10),i can use mkv to 4k in HDR ?(obviously in a limited way with respect to a panel HDR)

Sunset1982
6th July 2016, 12:13
and what is this rubbish? not possible, no HDMI 2.0

of cause the 970 has HDMI 2.0...

The MSI GTX 970 can't do UHD @60Fps... only the newer GTX960 and 980 can.

see:
https://de.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX-970-GAMING-4G.html#hero-specification

HDMI (version 1.4a)
Max Resolution: 4096x2160 @24 Hz

Xello
6th July 2016, 12:58
Anyone got experience using MadVR with multiple displays attached ? I'm getting presentation glitches in windowed mode (but not FSE mode), they stop happening if i disable the 2nd monitor.

:edit: nevermind, seem to have stopped happening now randomly. hope it stays that way!

huhn
6th July 2016, 13:59
The MSI GTX 970 can't do UHD @60Fps... only the newer GTX960 and 980 can.

see:
https://de.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX-970-GAMING-4G.html#hero-specification

HDMI (version 1.4a)
Max Resolution: 4096x2160 @24 Hz

Monitorausgang ber 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DL-DVI-I, 1x DL-DVI-D

they don't have HDCP 2.2 but they can send UHD at 60.

btw all nvidia GPU with kepler or newer can send UHD 60 fps 4:2:0.

nevcairiel
6th July 2016, 14:10
they don't have HDCP 2.2 but they can send UHD at 60.

btw all nvidia GPU with kepler or newer can send UHD 60 fps 4:2:0.

So he has the card in his system, and you are going to tell him what it can and cannot do? :)

Some vendors cheaped out on the 970 models and didn't offer full HDMI 2.0

Sarasa
6th July 2016, 14:19
So he has the card in his system, and you are going to tell him what it can and cannot do? :)

Some vendors cheaped out on the 970 models and didn't offer full HDMI 2.0Yeh, they also (sometime) sell them a little cheaper.
That why I bought a Asus, they are 2.0 ;)

Oh and question, anybody else have random BSOD when watching some video since the last windows security update (Vulnerability in Windows graphics component) ?

iSunrise
6th July 2016, 14:28
It seems to be a good card for madvr. Especially for that price. But I would wait for a custom design, because of the fan, which is a bit noisy under heavy load.

I'm excited about the gtx1070. Will see how it performs today and if it worth the money in terms of madvr performance. Would be nice to have a bit of performance reserve for future madvr features and upscaling refinements, which (except for superres) I didn't use in my tests...
Great comparison!

I am really looking forward to your results for the GTX1070, because it seems this card really is a great and powerful madVR card, which is also very well suited for gaming (just the like 970 was and then some, but more expensive unfortunately).

The icing on the cake would be results for the upcoming GTX1060, which should be out tomorrow as I am hearing.

Keep them coming!

huhn
6th July 2016, 14:37
So he has the card in his system, and you are going to tell him what it can and cannot do? :)

Some vendors cheaped out on the 970 models and didn't offer full HDMI 2.0

it doesn't matter it works with an 1.4 hdmi connector.

and it is a typo in the either the us or german specs: https://us.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX-970-GAMING-4G.html#hero-specification