Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 [360] 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

DragonQ
8th March 2013, 14:03
Dragon, does 1080p25 flagged as 1080i50 require inverse telecine? It's already progressive, any decent player will detect there is no movement in between the two fields in a frame and just weave them together, instead of bobbing each field.
Well playing it back as 1080p/25 is applying inverse telecine. It depends on your equipment though - as you say, a decent player will notice the lack of motion between adjacent even & odd fields and play it correctly. I know when using hardware deinterlacing on my nVidia GTS250 that it plays 1080p/25 in a 1080i/25 wrapper as 1080p/50 with every other frame being identical to the previous frame (which is essentially IVTC).

Q-the-STORM
8th March 2013, 15:40
anyone got any comparisons between Qdeo, or VXP chip upscaling and post processing vs. madVR, avisynth and ffdshow?
really wanna know what performs better..

pie1394
8th March 2013, 15:54
anyone got any comparisons between Qdeo, or VXP chip upscaling and post processing vs. madVR, avisynth and ffdshow?
really wanna know what performs better..

I don't have any av receiver equiped with Qdeo, VXP or Abt chipset. But the Sony 65HX920 builtin scaler does not perform as good as madVR Jinc3 + AR on 1280x720p anime contents displayed at 1920x1080p. It is still quite easy to tell the object edge's difference on such 65" panel viewed about 2.5 ~ 2.8m away.

fallengt
8th March 2013, 19:30
madshi has stated that he will create his own calibration solution for madVR... this year :D

Great news indead :D

leeperry
8th March 2013, 21:27
Talking about CMS, page 53 in the user manual (http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/assetDownloadController/BVM_E250-R3manual.pdf?path=Asset Hierarchy$Professional$SEL-yf-generic-153697$SEL-yf-generic-153718SEL-asset-299060.pdf&id=StepID$SEL-asset-299060$original&dimension=original) of this mastering grade 25" OLED monitor looks pretty bad *ss: Sony BVME250 Trimaster EL™ OLED Master Monitor (http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-monitors/cat-oledmonitors/product-BVME250/)

It can load LUT's from a thumb drive and provides a "Nonlinear Cubic Conversion color management system", whatever that means...but I'd love to have it in mVR too :D

dansrfe
9th March 2013, 02:37
Talking about CMS, page 53 in the user manual (http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/assetDownloadController/BVM_E250-R3manual.pdf?path=Asset Hierarchy$Professional$SEL-yf-generic-153697$SEL-yf-generic-153718SEL-asset-299060.pdf&id=StepID$SEL-asset-299060$original&dimension=original) of this mastering grade 25" OLED monitor looks pretty bad *ss: Sony BVME250 Trimaster EL™ OLED Master Monitor (http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-monitors/cat-oledmonitors/product-BVME250/)

It can load LUT's from a thumb drive and provides a "Nonlinear Cubic Conversion color management system", whatever that means...but I'd love to have it in mVR too :D

You should buy it and then take a picture of it with madVR running on it. Then we'll all feel like buying it and pretty soon Sony will be get millions of dollars from people in this thread that are buying this monitor. :D

ttnuagmada
9th March 2013, 06:42
It can load LUT's from a thumb drive and provides a "Nonlinear Cubic Conversion color management system", whatever that means...but I'd love to have it in mVR too :D

I think that's just a fancy way of describing a 3dlut.

The main problem that I've experienced, is that here are a limited amount of ways that you can make a 3dlut to work with MadVR, and that those methods are sketchy at best when using a plasma. Programs like Calman or LightSpace can make them for video processor's or monitors like the one you linked, but not for MadVR yet. However, I asked Calman's lead developer if adding MadVR support in the future is something they might consider, and he said it's a possibility. I imagine they'd be more inclined to do it if more people showed interest.

G_M_C
9th March 2013, 08:13
[...]
Sony BVME250 Trimaster EL™ OLED Master Monitor (http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-monitors/cat-oledmonitors/product-BVME250/)
[...]


Aside form all its prowess, it uses 145 Watts for a 25" monitor; Thats a lot.

Weren't we all told that OLED TV's/Monitors would use little energy? OLED is put in the market as the superior technology in that field. I don't see it here though ...

DragonQ
9th March 2013, 11:09
It's very early days though, things like that will obviously improve over the years.

Q-the-STORM
9th March 2013, 14:18
well the sony oled display has been on the market for almost 2 year, I imagine things have changed a bit....
there is no info on energy use for the 55inch LG 55EM9700 yet, I guess we'll have to wait until they deliver the panels to get more info...

tony359
9th March 2013, 19:16
Any ideas on why I am not reading the D65 white coordinates then?

Hi,

Any help on the above?
To recap, I have a professional colour meter. Using the AVS test disk, I was checking the results and I found that the grayscale after calibration reads the following x and y: 0.313 0.322. Is that the proper white point? I thought that rec 709 was 0.3127 0.3290. I'm happy with x, but what about y?

Thanks

6233638
9th March 2013, 19:30
You are correct about D65.
yCMS has a tendency to get you close, but not correct, and does not offer controls to fine-tune the calibration. I would suggest trying to get your display closer to D65 with its own controls before creating the LUT, if possible.
Unfortunately yCMS development seems to have halted, so we will have to wait for Madshi's new CMS implementation before we get anything like that.

tony359
9th March 2013, 19:42
Ok, thanks. I just wanted to make sure I was not missing anything. It's still close enough for the time being.
Thanks for your advice, my display is calibrated under Windows and before calibrating it using my probe (X-rite, then I have a professional calibrated one that I use professionally) I did tweak the monitor's controls to reduce the amount of calibration required.

Thanks for your help, looking forward to future development of yCMS and madVR

secvensor
9th March 2013, 23:57
I already asked, but whether this principle in algorithms will be introduced?
http://mrhaandi.blogspot.com/

cosmitz
10th March 2013, 12:47
Don't mean to be a bother, but can someone take a look over my post again?

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1618394#post1618394

Niyawa
10th March 2013, 13:58
Hey fellow madVR users. I have a little of issue and I need help with it, please lend me your strength...!

The thing is, another fellow user of my guide isn't able to take screenshots with MPC-HC and madVR. But he is basically using the same setup as me with the same settings, the only difference is our hardware which made me think of the possibility of a driver's issue or madVR bug. He's using Windows 8 x64 and a GTX 670. If the drivers or madVR can't be the problem, do anyone have any heads up about what could cause this?

DarkSpace
10th March 2013, 14:49
The thing is, another fellow user of my guide isn't able to take screenshots with MPC-HC and madVR.
Sounds like Overlay Mode is being used, as by now, player-based Screenshot capability has been integrated into madVR for some time already. Under "rendering -> general settings", untick "enable windowed overlay (Windows 7 and newer)" and see if that fixes it.

Niyawa
10th March 2013, 14:55
Sounds like Overlay Mode is being used, as by now, player-based Screenshot capability has been integrated into madVR for some time already. Under "rendering -> general settings", untick "enable windowed overlay (Windows 7 and newer)" and see if that fixes it.
I thought of the same thing but he still didn't reply if he was using Overlay mode or not. I'll make sure he has it disabled. Thanks.

Q-the-STORM
10th March 2013, 17:24
if everything else fails, there is always "print screen" and paste in paint...

DeadlyEmbrace
10th March 2013, 17:31
I thought of the same thing but he still didn't reply if he was using Overlay mode or not. I'll make sure he has it disabled. Thanks.

I also have Win 8 x64 with a GTX670 and even with overlay mode enabled I can use the alt+i combo to make screeenshots. It only goes awry if you use printscreen with overlay due to the way that overlay mode works.

DarkSpace
10th March 2013, 18:04
if everything else fails, there is always "print screen" and paste in paint...
Exactly that is what doesn't always work... as explained in the post below yours.

I also have Win 8 x64 with a GTX670 and even with overlay mode enabled I can use the alt+i combo to make screeenshots. It only goes awry if you use printscreen with overlay due to the way that overlay mode works.
That's why I thought that Overlay Mode may be the culprit. However, I don't have an nVidia Card, so thanks for confirming!

turbojet
10th March 2013, 20:14
secvensor and cosmitz: madshi is probably the only one that can help. He usually puts a lot of effort replying when he comes around (which must take hours) but if he misses your posts try posting again while he's active.

secvensor
11th March 2013, 01:20
turbojet
OK!

cyberbeing
11th March 2013, 07:39
No idea if this is what the people above are experiencing, but screenshots taken by MPC-HC's screenshot function will come out blank if smooth motion is active and the video is unscaled. Someone filed a bug (http://bugs.madshi.net/view.php?id=19) about that a few weeks ago.

MSL_DK
11th March 2013, 08:29
madshi is probably the only one that can help. He usually puts a lot of effort replying when he comes around (which must take hours) but if he misses your posts try posting again while he's active.

Yes, and very admirable and a big thanks to madshi for all the time he spends on this.

LigH
11th March 2013, 10:04
There is a report (http://forum.gleitz.info/showthread.php?46192-madVR-0-86-1-spielt-kein-Canopus-DV-mehr) in the german doom9/Gleitz forum that Canopus DV AVIs (FourCC: 'CDVC', decoded by Canopus DV decoder, neither ffdshow nor lav are installed) are not played with current versions of madVR via MPC-HC 1.6.5, but it worked with a very old version (0.09, from VideoHelp archives). Converted to MS DV, playback works.

Where might be the reason, are there raw video formats not supported anymore by madVR?

ryrynz
11th March 2013, 10:11
Just recently tried enabling Intelligent Frame Creation on my Panasonic Plasma along with Smooth Motion with animated content, for the most part I got amazing results but there was the odd time I had artifacts of particular areas spread out across multiple frames. Madshi you own a Panasonic Plasma don't you? Is this something that could be improved upon? or are the two just not really suitable being used together?

pie1394
11th March 2013, 11:21
Just curious if madVR could support the option of D3DFMT_A2R10G10B10 display buffer at FSE display mode ?

According to Microsoft, such mode is only valid at FSE for a display device. I am curious if there will be any further color processing rather than LUT on it --- when the display device is RAMDAC, DP or HDMI 1.3 deep-color?

secvensor
11th March 2013, 11:55
http://forum.themaister.net/viewtopic.php?id=127

DragonQ
12th March 2013, 18:47
Just recently tried enabling Intelligent Frame Creation on my Panasonic Plasma along with Smooth Motion with animated content, for the most part I got amazing results but there was the odd time I had artifacts of particular areas spread out across multiple frames. Madshi you own a Panasonic Plasma don't you? Is this something that could be improved upon? or are the two just not really suitable being used together?
If you're using a TV surely you can just use the native frame rate rather than Smooth Motion? It's only really needed when the monitor's refresh rate can't be matched to the frame rate (very common for PC monitors).

Niyawa
13th March 2013, 00:47
Hey guys, another question, this time it might be a little more easier but I need someone to confirm this to me: would a GTX 675M be able to run Jinc? There's this fellow who has an Alienware but always get dropped frames with Jinc. That's kinda strange since far as I know that same GPU is more powerful than a GTX 260.

Dodgexander
13th March 2013, 02:15
Hey guys, another question, this time it might be a little more easier but I need someone to confirm this to me: would a GTX 675M be able to run Jinc? There's this fellow who has an Alienware but always get dropped frames with Jinc. That's kinda strange since far as I know that same GPU is more powerful than a GTX 260.

I can run Jinc 3 chroma and upscaling using a wolfdale @ 3ghz with a 9600gt.

Using CUDA helps a lot I think. Was amazed to see that work for me.

pie1394
13th March 2013, 02:32
Hey guys, another question, this time it might be a little more easier but I need someone to confirm this to me: would a GTX 675M be able to run Jinc? There's this fellow who has an Alienware but always get dropped frames with Jinc. That's kinda strange since far as I know that same GPU is more powerful than a GTX 260.

There might be something wrong in his setup...
What's his setup and player programs?

With recent GeForce driver + such powerful GPU, I think all madVR FLUSH options can be safely turned off. I have turned all of them OFF for my ION system (Win7x64, 314.07, DVI 1920x1200p60, VSync ON). No dropped / repeated / delayed frame is observed if the GPU is not overloaded.


The GTX675M is obviously at least twice as powerful as the GTX260 in raw performance. The architecture improving part is not even included yet. The GTX260+ OC has been already capable of handling more than 30 fps Jinc3+AR to 1920x1080 while there is no GPU-based HQ deinterlacing loading.

GTX675M, GF114 Fermi-core 384 SP, 620 / 1240 MHz, 256-bit GDDR5-6000 (192GB/s)

GTX260, GT200 Tesla-core 192 SP, 576 / 1242 MHz, 448-bit GDDR3-2000 (110GB/s)

GTX260+ OC, GT200b Tesla-core 216 SP, 680 / 1466 MHz, 448-bit GDDR3-2100 (115GB/s)

wanezhiling
13th March 2013, 03:48
Because that Alienware guy's madVR runs on Intel GPU.:p
http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1570847&postcount=10533

leeperry
13th March 2013, 05:48
Oh well, I don't mean to get OT but one thing that shouldn't overlooked IMHO is the performance/watt ratio(and even more so within an HTPC environment): http://www.hardware.fr/articles/879-6/consommation-performances-watt.html

This site doesn't allow pictures hotlinking so I can't provide a translated url, but the 650Ti delivers 67 fps/100W in Battlefield3 and the 660 only 54fps :o

I really can't wrap my head around tossing 180€ on a 660, especially when the 660SE is around the corner and that I don't care about games...so I'm pulling the trigger on a 90€ lightly used 1GB 650Ti http://forum.slysoft.com/images/smilies/cool2.gif

Buying used 5xx doesn't much sense as these are far less power efficient(34 fps/100W in B3 for the 560Ti :rolleyes:), second hand warranties aren't nearly as long anymore and their prices just aren't competitive(560Ti's regularly go for +100€ used).

Surely the 650Ti runs on a 128bit power controller but I'm quite sure it'll still be plenty fast in mVR anyway http://forum.slysoft.com/images/smilies/agreed.gif

turbojet
13th March 2013, 07:06
I'm having a bit of a problem with the display mode changer. Currently have 60, 72 and 75 resolutions set up, they all look fine. In madvr this is in the mode changer: 1680x1050p60, 1680x1050p72, 1680x1050p75 It works fine for 24->72 and 30->60 but with 25 fps sources it insists on setting 60hz even if the monitor is set to 75hz. Then I installed reclock, set it to slowdown 25 to 24 and in madvr treat 25 fps as 24. I get 24 fps according to madvr status but it always changes to 60hz. When 75hz is set, madvr/reclock displays 74.984. Any idea what could be going on?

Also with 24 fps source, 72hz refresh rate (71.99139 in madvr status) with smoothmotion set to only when judder, it's enabled even though with it disabled there is no judder.

artios
13th March 2013, 07:48
There might be something wrong in his setup...
What's his setup and player programs?

With recent GeForce driver + such powerful GPU, I think all madVR FLUSH options can be safely turned off. I have turned all of them OFF for my ION system (Win7x64, 314.07, DVI 1920x1200p60, VSync ON). No dropped / repeated / delayed frame is observed if the GPU is not overloaded.


The GTX675M is obviously at least twice as powerful as the GTX260 in raw performance. The architecture improving part is not even included yet. The GTX260+ OC has been already capable of handling more than 30 fps Jinc3+AR to 1920x1080 while there is no GPU-based HQ deinterlacing loading.

GTX675M, GF114 Fermi-core 384 SP, 620 / 1240 MHz, 256-bit GDDR5-6000 (192GB/s)

GTX260, GT200 Tesla-core 192 SP, 576 / 1242 MHz, 448-bit GDDR3-2000 (110GB/s)

GTX260+ OC, GT200b Tesla-core 216 SP, 680 / 1466 MHz, 448-bit GDDR3-2100 (115GB/s)

Hello, I am the member that Niyawa talked about.

I understand that my card is powerful. When I use the Intel GPU to play the following file
32.2 GB
Total Bitrate: 31.06 Mbps
Video: MPEG-4 AVC Video / 23275 kbps / 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1

I am getting maybe 3-4 drops per minute. The Nvidia decided to lock the mpc-hc.exe to Intel GPU. The renaming trick worked to use nvidia GPU but unfortunately I am getting more drops this way. I think its short of incompatibility or settings issue.

Can I try madVR through another program to see if its not mpc-hc related?

also madVR settings show me that "Sharpness" needs to be dealt with (is in green color)

Mangix
13th March 2013, 08:06
Using CUDA helps a lot I think. Was amazed to see that work for me.

madVR does not use CUDA in any way.

Niyawa
13th March 2013, 08:10
I can run Jinc 3 chroma and upscaling using a wolfdale @ 3ghz with a 9600gt.
I know! I've seen people use a Intel HD 4000 for that too.

There might be something wrong in his setup... What's his setup and player programs?
Basically my guide itself. MPC-HC + madVR + LAV Filters blah blah, you know the drill.

Because that Alienware guy's madVR runs on Intel GPU.:p
http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1570847&postcount=10533
As you can see from his own comment, he tried that, didn't work at all. I still believe it's a setting matter but apparently he tried everything and nothing.

Dodgexander
13th March 2013, 13:52
madVR does not use CUDA in any way.

You're missing the point. Deinterlacing etc is done by LAV Cuda decoder. Frees up more room to leave the video card too process Jinc3.

Same would apply to software decoding.

I have an a better AMD system, but it can't handle dxva or dxva copy back with the same MadVr settings, even though its more powerful. I have to stick that on software decoding in LAV.

Try using different decoders and different modes.

DragonQ
13th March 2013, 22:42
You're missing the point. Deinterlacing etc is done by LAV Cuda decoder. Frees up more room to leave the video card too process Jinc3.
Doesn't make any difference. Using CUDA on my laptop so the HD4000 only has to do scaling doesn't let me use any higher settings in MadVR, compared to using the HD4000 for everything.

pie1394
14th March 2013, 02:44
Hello, I am the member that Niyawa talked about.

I understand that my card is powerful. When I use the Intel GPU to play the following file
32.2 GB
Total Bitrate: 31.06 Mbps
Video: MPEG-4 AVC Video / 23275 kbps / 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1

I am getting maybe 3-4 drops per minute. The Nvidia decided to lock the mpc-hc.exe to Intel GPU. The renaming trick worked to use nvidia GPU but unfortunately I am getting more drops this way. I think its short of incompatibility or settings issue.

Can I try madVR through another program to see if its not mpc-hc related?

also madVR settings show me that "Sharpness" needs to be dealt with (is in green color)

Did you use 23.976 / 24 Hz signal output or still 60 Hz like your NB LCD panel? How about EVR renderer?

The hybrid display design on most notebooks might cause some issues. It really depends how the board circuit is designed. For example the output ports like LVDS / HDMI might be hard-wired to Intel's GPU even the selected one is nVidia / AMD(ATi) ... As a result, it creates extra latency and needs PCI-e bandwidth to transmit the displayed contents between 2 GPUs.

For the comparison, how about NOT using DXVA2 HW H.264 decoding on this content? I guess the CPU of your NB should be powerful enough for such BD stream's decoding.

baii
14th March 2013, 06:17
You can always flash a unlocked bios and disable optimus as last resort.

artios
14th March 2013, 09:36
Hello, I am the member that Niyawa talked about.

I understand that my card is powerful. When I use the Intel GPU to play the following file
32.2 GB
Total Bitrate: 31.06 Mbps
Video: MPEG-4 AVC Video / 23275 kbps / 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1

I am getting maybe 3-4 drops per minute. The Nvidia decided to lock the mpc-hc.exe to Intel GPU. The renaming trick worked to use nvidia GPU but unfortunately I am getting more drops this way. I think its short of incompatibility or settings issue.

Can I try madVR through another program to see if its not mpc-hc related?

also madVR settings show me that "Sharpness" needs to be dealt with (is in green color)

Hi, I figured out what was wrong.

In order Nvidia high speed processor to be used at Jinc, the laptop must be charging. Not possible to nvidia to handle Jinc whilst laptop is on battery, even at simple tv rips of 720p I experience constant frame drops.

Sorry I didn't figure it out sooner. Kind of odd though as it can handle with ease Bicubic and Lanczos on battery.

Can anyone confirm that? Is there a workaround?

DragonQ
14th March 2013, 11:49
In order Nvidia high speed processor to be used at Jinc, the laptop must be charging. Not possible to nvidia to handle Jinc whilst laptop is on battery, even at simple tv rips of 720p I experience constant frame drops.

Sorry I didn't figure it out sooner. Kind of odd though as it can handle with ease Bicubic and Lanczos on battery.

Can anyone confirm that? Is there a workaround?
Change your Windows power settings for running on battery. In the advanced settings there's a part where you can set "When playing video" in "Multimedia settings" to "Optimise video quality" - this will let you use the same settings on battery as when charging.

artios
14th March 2013, 11:55
Change your Windows power settings for running on battery. In the advanced settings there's a part where you can set "When playing video" in "Multimedia settings" to "Optimise video quality" - this will let you use the same settings on battery as when charging.

when playing video was already in optimize video quality mode.

I changed:

Graphic Processor > on battery > changed from balanced mode to Max performance

and I thought that did the trick but it didn't. I am getting unusual frame drops only on battery and only using Jinc.

It has to be plugged in. Is there anyone with Alienware notebook to verify this?

Asmodian
14th March 2013, 19:02
Look for other power settings, maybe you need to allow active cooling while on battery? There are a lots of power saving features that might push Jinc over the edge.

Jinc takes a lot more GPU power and memory bandwidth than the other resizers, it isn't at all unusual that you are only having issues with it. Your laptop must be throttling something to save power when on battery.

jkauff
14th March 2013, 23:09
The GPU itself may have some power-saving features built in, and you probably can't modify them.

Dodgexander
15th March 2013, 02:43
Doesn't make any difference. Using CUDA on my laptop so the HD4000 only has to do scaling doesn't let me use any higher settings in MadVR, compared to using the HD4000 for everything.

How does this apply to what I was saying? You're talking about two different devices.

I am talking about using software decoding on one pc and Cuda on another allowing for more room for gpu with madVr.

If I use dxva, the settings I usually use create dropped frames until I turn them down.

I'm guessing either you're integrated graphics is already hitting a wall, or the behavior of a mixed system or Intel dxva is different.

Sent from my Blade S using Tapatalk 2

Mangix
15th March 2013, 03:18
You're missing the point. Deinterlacing etc is done by LAV Cuda decoder. Frees up more room to leave the video card too process Jinc3.

Same would apply to software decoding.

I have an a better AMD system, but it can't handle dxva or dxva copy back with the same MadVr settings, even though its more powerful. I have to stick that on software decoding in LAV.

Try using different decoders and different modes.

LAV is not madVR. madVR supports DXVA deinterlacing.

And yes, DXVA sucks on AMD platforms.

I use LAV's CUDA decoder to free up CPU for SmoothVideo.