Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 [553] 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

Thunderbolt8
3rd November 2014, 13:51
Samsungs Cinema Smooth 96hz mode works better than madVR smooth motion at 60hz. There is a bit of sharpness loss with madVRs implementation because it blends frames. Cinema Smooth displays the video at 4:4 cadence.does that basically mean that the PQ (sharpness) of the smooth motion option can still be improved?

huhn
3rd November 2014, 14:13
does that basically mean that the PQ (sharpness) of the smooth motion option can still be improved?

playing it at even higher refresh rates could make it sharper and harder to spot.

smooth motion exist to make a file that can not be playback at there native refresh rate or a multiply of it to look smooth at the "wrong" refresh rate.
this option in samsung Tv is something totally different. it kind of fix a bug in the TV.

StinDaWg
4th November 2014, 11:35
smooth motion exist to make a file that can not be playback at there native refresh rate or a multiply of it to look smooth at the "wrong" refresh rate.
this option in samsung Tv is something totally different. it kind of ix a bug in the TV.
What? Playing 24p content at 4:4 cadence (96hz) isn't a bug, it's the proper output. Eliminates judder without messing with the picture by interpolating or blending frames.

huhn
4th November 2014, 11:55
What? Playing 24p content at 4:4 cadence (96hz) isn't a bug, it's the proper output. Eliminates judder without messing with the picture by interpolating or blending frames.

no playing 24p counted without judder isn't a bug.

but you say the Tv creates judder without this option so this option fix this issue. I add the missing F.

James Freeman
4th November 2014, 13:01
Youtube now supports 48 & 60 fps.

There is a cool program that lets you view youtube videos in MPC-HC/BE using madVR called SVPtube.
Since there is no (non-chinese) monitor that supports 48Hz, nor 96Hz nor 120 divides by 48, nor there is a 240 monitor yet, Smooth Motion will have to do for 48fps.

Youtube acceptance of HFR is a huge step toward HFR Cinema & TV and HFR in general.
Sooner than later we will begin to see movie trailers in HFR in youtube then in Cinemas then the scale will tilt and the old 24fps is a goner.
Amen.

Cheers

huhn
4th November 2014, 13:08
there are 144 Hz monitors.
and the program "livestreamer" supports tons of live streaming and video clip pages.

pirlouy
4th November 2014, 13:56
If 24Hz had to die, I'd prefer it would be for 60Hz, not 48Hz. Like you said, 60Hz is often the common refresh rate.
But I prefer 24p to 60i. (De)interlacing is boring.

StinDaWg
4th November 2014, 14:04
no playing 24p counted without judder isn't a bug.

but you say the Tv creates judder without this option so this option fix this issue. I add the missing F.
OK, since you seem to be unable to understand...

Cinema Smooth on=96hz refresh rate
Cinema Smooth off=60hz refresh rate

The tv doesn't "create" judder. 24p played back at 60 hz on any tv is going to have judder. That's what madVR smooth motion is for. If you select Cinema Smooth and play back at 96hz, then you don't need smooth motion. Panasonic plasmas have the same option.

huhn
4th November 2014, 14:44
so I said something different from you?

expect that when the settings is disabled and 23p is the input signal it will display it with 60 hz so creating judder.

so I will never understand why there is even a switch for this and not simply forced...

I got it after your first post really!

if you still think I don't get it feel free to make a new thread and I will answer there.

Cinema Smooth on=96hz refresh rate judder free 23p/24p playback
Cinema Smooth off=60hz refresh rate playing 23p/24p at 60 hz

got it. I guess.

Procrastinating
6th November 2014, 02:48
Looks like at least one AMD developer (http://developer.amd.com/community/blog/2014/11/04/what-do-you-need/) is looking to improve things, maybe someone can let him know about the current interop problems?

MysteryX
8th November 2014, 08:26
Today I tried playing videos with a projector and no image would come out at all with madVR. By disabling madVR, it would play though.

So... madVR doesn't work with projectors.

Qaq
8th November 2014, 10:11
So... madVR doesn't work with projectors.
Thats interesting. Let alone madVR autor uses a projector himself.

pirlouy
8th November 2014, 11:01
:D
dat deduction...

James Freeman
8th November 2014, 11:46
:D
dat deduction...
Life is simple, don't over complicate it. :)

MysteryX
10th November 2014, 02:48
Thats interesting. Let alone madVR autor uses a projector himself.

Then I guess various projectors have slight technical differences. It was a high-end 1080p JVC projector in a small theater room.

huhn
10th November 2014, 03:49
Then I guess various projectors have slight technical differences. It was a high-end 1080p JVC projector in a small theater room.

madVR is creating RGB picture and is giving them to the GPU. the end device doesn't matter. it's the job of the GPU to get the picture to the projector not madVR.

there was a miss configuration some where.

we can only guess. the used hardware of the PC, used connection and driver/OS would be a start.

jmonier
10th November 2014, 15:36
I believe that Madshi actually uses a JVC projector. I, myself, am currently using a JVC RS-4910 and I have used a RS-50 and RS-1X all with madVR successfully so I don't think that your problem is the projector (and, of course, Huhn is absolutely right in that the projector cannot affect madVR operation). If you would give ALL the details about your problem, it's likely that someone here can point you in the right direction.

To start with, look under "devices" in madVR settings and see if your projector (and AVR, if one is in the chain) is listed, and report on everything shown for them. Is there anything else in the chain between the video card and projector?

Qaq
10th November 2014, 18:00
I believe that Madshi actually uses a JVC projector.JVC X3 projector, to be exact. http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1632523&highlight=jvc#post1632523

burfadel
11th November 2014, 08:43
I still have problems with the madVR progress bar in full screen exclusive mode (I do NOT mean the standard MPC-HC progress bar). Before anyone says that there is no progress bar in fullscreen exclusive mode, there is! It's got a dark grey top thick transparent line, a light grey line where a blue progress indicator goes, and another dark grey transparent line at the bottom. If you haven't seen it then you have the same issue.

Now, I have two screens at 1920x1080, my main computer monitor and my Samsung TV that I play MPC-HC through. Straight out, the indicator bar does NOT show in 1920x1080 mode on the TV, but does show in some other lesser modes (including one where the scaling is off so not suitable either). If you play around with the settings quite annoying so, you may get it to work. At times, it simply never gets working in 1920x1080.

If you delete the TV from device manager, disable and re-enable the display driver adaptor, play around with the settings some more you may be lucky to get the progress/seek bar back!

I should also point out it is NOT an overscan/underscan issue. The seek bar is simply not there, it's not off the bottom of the screen.

I am pretty sure it's an error with madVR not MPC-HC, but in any case it looks like there's a bug somewhere. I'm guessing either I'm the only one experiencing it, or other people who experience it either have no idea that there is meant to be a progress indicator in fullscreen exclusive mode or don't care.

I guess I'll just have to keep mucking around with it if I install Windows again at some point. What upset it this time was a display driver update.

MysteryX
14th November 2014, 07:36
madVR is creating RGB picture and is giving them to the GPU. the end device doesn't matter. it's the job of the GPU to get the picture to the projector not madVR.

there was a miss configuration some where.

we can only guess. the used hardware of the PC, used connection and driver/OS would be a start.

I use Windows 7 x64 laptop with a Radeon HD7660M. The projector was plugged via HDMI in 1080p mode. HDMI output to TV works fine.

When the output is the projector, MPC-HC remains black when madVR is activated, and plays the video when deactivating it.

What else do you need to know?

jmonier
14th November 2014, 13:59
I use Windows 7 x64 laptop with a Radeon HD7660M. The projector was plugged via HDMI in 1080p mode. HDMI output to TV works fine.

When the output is the projector, MPC-HC remains black when madVR is activated, and plays the video when deactivating it.

What else do you need to know?

You might look at my post above and answer the questions posed there. What you've said here doesn't really tell us anything of significance that we didn't already know.

EDIT: Here is a guide to using madVR:

http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=80253.0

Ignore the section that mentions Jriver and be aware that not everything in this guide is the best way to go. While there is probably a benefit to using madVR without changing any settings, the real benefit comes with understanding what it does and setting it up for best performance in your specific situation.

huhn
14th November 2014, 17:41
I use Windows 7 x64 laptop with a Radeon HD7660M. The projector was plugged via HDMI in 1080p mode. HDMI output to TV works fine.

When the output is the projector, MPC-HC remains black when madVR is activated, and plays the video when deactivating it.

What else do you need to know?

maybe the same issue as this one?
http://bugs.madshi.net/view.php?id=233

just a guess the information you have giving us is way to limited.

jkauff
17th November 2014, 09:08
I'm now running MPC-HC with madVR on my brand-new HP Stream 7 tablet I bought from the Microsoft Store for $99. This little thing manages to run a full version of 8.1 in 1GB RAM. Works fine and looks good, so far with default madVR settings, so next I'm going to see how much I can push the built-in Atom graphics. Anyway, it's cool to have it working on a 7" tablet.

MysteryX
18th November 2014, 22:05
You might look at my post above and answer the questions posed there. What you've said here doesn't really tell us anything of significance that we didn't already know.

EDIT: Here is a guide to using madVR:

http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=80253.0

Ignore the section that mentions Jriver and be aware that not everything in this guide is the best way to go. While there is probably a benefit to using madVR without changing any settings, the real benefit comes with understanding what it does and setting it up for best performance in your specific situation.
I hadn't gone into madVR configuration to configure the device as a projector, so perhaps that's what caused the problem.

huhn
18th November 2014, 23:41
I hadn't gone into madVR configuration to configure the device as a projector, so perhaps that's what caused the problem.

that's defiantly not the problem.

hashanga
20th November 2014, 03:24
@madshi
Hi,
This is a purely academic question (for my B.Sc. thesis).
Is it even remotely possible to do motion interpolation as in SVP by extracting motion information directly from h.264?
Or do you know any problem that I can work on for my research? (for which I am required to create an open-source software). Something that is useful. Maybe something that you don't have time to work with.

Thank you.

PS:Sorry for posting this here. Maybe I'm supposed to create a thread. (moderators may move this).

James Freeman
22nd November 2014, 09:39
Last night I had a dream that madshi surprises us and posts version 0.88 with nice improvements to play with.
Hope my dream is meaningful...

Anime Viewer
22nd November 2014, 16:18
Last night I had a dream that madshi surprises us and posts version 0.88 with nice improvements to play with.
Hope my dream is meaningful...

Based on posts madshi has made over the past three months I wouldn't expect a new version of madVR any time soon, and if one were to come out it likely wouldn't have any ground breaking huge improvements. Based on his past three months of posts he's been looking at/working on: shaders, XYsubfilter bug fix(es), and possibly recoding how/when certain scaling, passes, or effects take place in the order of operations. The third subject is the only one that would be directly connected to madVR and require a version update while the other two are independent and likely wouldn't require any changes to madVR.

Shiandow
22nd November 2014, 16:58
Based on posts madshi has made over the past three months I wouldn't expect a new version of madVR any time soon, and if one were to come out it likely wouldn't have any ground breaking huge improvements. Based on his past three months of posts he's been looking at/working on: shaders, XYsubfilter bug fix(es), and possibly recoding how/when certain scaling, passes, or effects take place in the order of operations. The third subject is the only one that would be directly connected to madVR and require a version update while the other two are independent and likely wouldn't require any changes to madVR.

Well, what I understood from madshi's ideas for more advanced control over shaders was pretty groundbreaking (although MPDN got there first :p). It would allow you to write add all kinds of processing and even new scaling algorithms. It didn't sound like it was close to completion, though.

pirlouy
22nd November 2014, 19:47
Last update 7 months ago. Man !
1) I hope next version will contain a whole movie with lots of special effects and a good scenario. If not, I rate it 1 star everywhere it is possible to star it.
2) In general it's in this time area that we insult madshi for not open-sourcing his work. Selfish guy. Noob. :D

Thunderbolt8
23rd November 2014, 12:23
I hope next version will contain a whole movie with lots of special effects and a good scenario. If not, I rate it 1 star everywhere it is possible to star it.:rolleyes:

...although I have to say it would indeed be nice to see a new version around christmas :D

cyberbeing
23rd November 2014, 23:19
It will likely be longer than that. I predict it won't be until March that he focuses heavily on madVR again.

A conservative timeline for madshi would probably look something like:

Considering Delphi XE7 was released only a couple months ago, his first order of business is likely pushing out updates for his paid software. (December-January)
Afterwords, since he's a responsible developer comes a month or two of dedicated support and bug-fixes for paid software updates. (January-February)
Once the need for support on his new releases dies down, then it's break time. (February-March)
Lastly comes madVR, where he'll begin eliminating bugs reported on his bug tracker in rapid fashion. (March-April)
New madVR release (???-???)


An aggressive timeline for madshi would probably look something like:

Prepared in advance for Delphi XE7, and has almost finished a new stable release of his paid software. (December)
Since he had a beta period, only a week or two of dedicated support and bug-fixes for paid software updates. (January)
No break time, he's tough.
Most bugs were already mostly fixed months ago, only a week or so needed to eliminate the rest of the critical bugs on his bug tracker. (January-February)
New madVR release (???-???)

So yeah, be patient and either way we'll likely see a slew of madVR updates in time for spring. ;)

foxyshadis
24th November 2014, 07:29
Last update 7 months ago. Man !
1) I hope next version will contain a whole movie with lots of special effects and a good scenario. If not, I rate it 1 star everywhere it is possible to star it.
2) In general it's in this time area that we insult madshi for not open-sourcing his work. Selfish guy. Noob. :D

That wasn't actually funny, it was just really uncool. That's one of the ways you can really piss off and demotivate a developer.

pirlouy
24th November 2014, 10:03
Well. I didn't think someone could take it seriously. I was wrong.
My apologies.

I never asked for an update. I have no feature request. I'm not an advanced user who needs special features.

ryrynz
24th November 2014, 10:59
demotivate a developer.

Can't imagine Madshi would be affected by pirlouy's teasing.

Zachs
24th November 2014, 11:20
Hi madshi, maybe I haven't been clear but I am not trying to compete with madvr in anyway, just offering an alternative way of video playback. It doesn't even have a lot of the things madvr has. I wouldn't call it a product too, it's more just a pet project :)

dansrfe
24th November 2014, 17:18
Just curious, would a multi-monitor setup with different refresh rates cause frames to be dropped in overlay vs exclusive mode?

e.g. primary monitor and composition rate is at 96Hz, secondary is at 60Hz. Playing in overlay mode on the secondary shows dropped frames while exclusive mode on secondary shows none.

Razoola
24th November 2014, 19:03
Just curious, would a multi-monitor setup with different refresh rates cause frames to be dropped in overlay vs exclusive mode?

e.g. primary monitor and composition rate is at 96Hz, secondary is at 60Hz. Playing in overlay mode on the secondary shows dropped frames while exclusive mode on secondary shows none.

That is normal, I see the same here since forever which is why I only ever use exclusive mode on a secondary display.

huhn
24th November 2014, 20:01
Just curious, would a multi-monitor setup with different refresh rates cause frames to be dropped in overlay vs exclusive mode?

e.g. primary monitor and composition rate is at 96Hz, secondary is at 60Hz. Playing in overlay mode on the secondary shows dropped frames while exclusive mode on secondary shows none.

this shouldn't be any problme with windows 8 or newer.

i was using a gaming PC with a 60 hz and a 120 hz screen for some time with windows 7 and got huge problem with the composition rate from aero.
it is a nvidia GPU so i could disbale aero and still tearing free playback. but this is not working with 2 screen too so i installed the window 10 preview and all issue where gone.

my trick be for was windows 7 overlay and no desktop composition but this sometimes makes problem with games.

or with other words windows 7 is the problem.

leeperry
26th November 2014, 20:03
Looks like at least one AMD developer (http://developer.amd.com/community/blog/2014/11/04/what-do-you-need/) is looking to improve things, maybe someone can let him know about the current interop problems?
@madshi: not sure whether it's classified information but did AMD finally show any interest in assisting you with mVR? I plan on scoring an MSI 750Ti during BF as I don't wanna be stuck with the 13.12 drivers until the end of days(and their TF4 version would supposedly be as quiet as it gets), but if AMD finally decided to unlock the NNEDI3 latencies currently taking place then a passive 7790 might suddenly become an option :cool:

ryrynz
27th November 2014, 01:08
If AMD finally decided to unlock the NNEDI3 latencies currently taking place then a passive 7790 might suddenly become an option :cool:

Don't bother waiting IMO, get the 750 TI it's boss. Overclock the memory too for a bit of a speed boost too barely changing the heat profile.

I can do 64 neurons with most stuff around 720 and 128 neurons under 480. And if I unlocked it's power constraints I could get a lot more, but I'm happy with how quiet it is and it's performance.

StinDaWg
27th November 2014, 05:19
750Ti can't do 720p60->1080p60 NNEDI3 can it?

ryrynz
27th November 2014, 07:05
750Ti can't do 720p60->1080p60 NNEDI3 can it?

Unlikely. And as I've said earlier it's almost pointless (barring text) to upscale 1280x720 using NNEDI, such a waste of processing for such a marginal improvement, but it'll depend on your content. I'd recommend enabling it and taking screenshots to see if you find the difference worth justifying the purchase of a graphics card hefty enough to do it.

wolfman2791
27th November 2014, 10:21
I have a very strange issue: Madvr is causing sound distortion when i put on my headphones. Before you call me crazy... i spent an hour isolating the problem. I put MPC-HC at default setting and the sound was fine. Then i tried the stuff that i use one by one (LAV, etc.). The sound distortion only happened when i switched the renderer to Madvr.

Anyone have a clue as to why this would occur? I'm baffled.

StinDaWg
27th November 2014, 10:33
Unlikely. And as I've said earlier it's almost pointless (barring text) to upscale 1280x720 using NNEDI, such a waste of processing for such a marginal improvement, but it'll depend on your content. I'd recommend enabling it and taking screenshots to see if you find the difference worth justifying the purchase of a graphics card hefty enough to do it.
Pointless in your opinion. It's completely worth it to me as I watch a lot of 720p60 sports.

HD7850 level AMD gpu can do it, which is cheaper than a 750ti.

huhn
27th November 2014, 10:40
gpus on load can put some power on the case that effects onboard and none "high end" sound cards(not that rare have a PC that does this too). in my experience it affect the front speaker connector more than the one at the back panel.

huhn
27th November 2014, 10:49
Pointless in your opinion. It's completely worth it to me as I watch a lot of 720p60 sports.

HD7850 level AMD gpu can do it, which is cheaper than a 750ti.

I can get a 750 ti for less than the 7850 and on top it is a lot cheaper in the end thanks to the fact it uses a lot less power.

a sharper image is not a better one the downscaler adds aliasing and ringing nothing I like to see.

wolfman2791
27th November 2014, 11:07
gpus on load can put some power on the case that effects onboard and none "high end" sound cards(not that rare have a PC that does this too). in my experience it affect the front speaker connector more than the one at the back panel.Ah. Thanks. Not knowing what's up was getting on my nerves lol.

huhn
27th November 2014, 13:15
Ah. Thanks. Not knowing what's up was getting on my nerves lol.

please double check this. don't forget i'm just guessing.

you could use EVR and let a GPU benchmark run in the back ground and see if this audio issue is there too.

StinDaWg
27th November 2014, 13:57
a sharper image is not a better one the downscaler adds aliasing and ringing nothing I like to see.
No, and no. There is less aliasing with NNEDI3+downscale than straight up Jinc. It's the primary reason I use it.