Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

THX-UltraII
12th October 2009, 08:36
I thought the 4xxx series was only HDMI 1.1 or HDMI 1.2? Are you sure that the 4xxx hardware can actually stream TrueHD and DTS-HD? LPCM yes, but TrueHD? Not even all HDMI 1.3 hardware can do it, AFAIK.

Albain is working on it right now but it seems that there a good chance the 4xxx series will support bitstreaming. With one of the beta's there are already some reports by users of
4xxx-cards that the 'True-HD' signal lights up on theri receiver. Only no sound is heard but again, Albain is working on that.

Weirdo
12th October 2009, 08:50
Has anyone tried the Nvidia 9500GT along with Cuda decoding? Can it handle madVR?

madshi
12th October 2009, 08:51
Albain is working on it right now but it seems that there a good chance the 4xxx series will support bitstreaming. With one of the beta's there are already some reports by users of
4xxx-cards that the 'True-HD' signal lights up on theri receiver. Only no sound is heard but again, Albain is working on that.
Well, that would be *very* cool!

THX-UltraII
12th October 2009, 08:59
Well, that would be *very* cool!

YUP! I know! I checking this forum 10 times in an hour to see if he came up with news! Check the FFdshow thread, this will keep you updated.

Anima123
12th October 2009, 09:18
I will check this thread at least 1 times in an hour since mandshi is back on working. BTW, I'm always looking forward to your next version that as promised can solve most stability issues.

namaiki
12th October 2009, 09:28
Has anyone tried the Nvidia 9500GT along with Cuda decoding? Can it handle madVR?
I can tell you that my GeForce 9600M GT (http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-9600M-GT.9449.0.html) stutters with CUDA + madVR, but I don't know how that compares to the desktop version.

Weirdo
12th October 2009, 09:34
I can tell you that my GeForce 9600M GT (http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-9600M-GT.9449.0.html) stutters with CUDA + madVR, but I don't know how that compares to the desktop version.
Thanks, I want to replace the ATI 2600 (unusable with madVR) but not quite sure how powerful a gpu is required here.
Guess I should aim for a higher-end (=noisy) card. The 9500 GT (http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_9500gt_us.html) seems more powerful than the 9600M GT (http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_9600m_gt_us.html).

namaiki
12th October 2009, 09:42
Only slightly more powerful:
thing - 9600M GT - 9500 GT
pipelines - 32 - 32
core - 500 - 550
memory - 800 - 800
shaders - 1250 - 1400
bus - 128 - 128

The solution is to simply not use CUDA.. :P

I still use CoreAVC, but have CUDA unchecked.

pirlouy
12th October 2009, 11:48
Are you sure that it's Overlay Mixer that is correct and all the other renderers that are incorrect? Maybe it's the other way round? You know, every display playback chain has its own delay values. Most displays add some delay, some receivers, too. So it's really difficult to find out who is responsible for a given audio sync mismatch.
In my case, I'm sure it's all these renderers with all their jobs which display videos with delay. Like Overlay mixer doesn't have jobs, it is always perfectly synchronized with audio.

But as I said, you perceive this delay only when you're with a 24Hz display. I understand it's not problematic since everybody use 48, 50, 72, 75, 96, 120 Hz and even a popular renderer like EVR from Microsoft is concerned. But as I know you like perfection, one day, I think you'll notice that, and maybe you will be able to add a delay for audio. :-)

yesgrey
12th October 2009, 13:04
How do we generate the custom gamma curves for the 3DLut?
We will talk about this when I release it...
So, what graphics card is recommended? 4770? Wait for a mid level 5xxx series? Powerstrip support is mandatory for me.
Mine is a GF8600GT and it runs fine, although is a bit on the edge...
I don't miss powerstrip. I have created my own tool to calculate my timings and create the resolutions with nvidia drivers. I have already promised several times to post it, but I haven't yet found the time for it...

stutters with CUDA + madVR
Don't use both, that's not a good idea. You have two applications "fighting" for you graphics card resources. If they are scarce, that would not be a good thing.;)

pie1394
12th October 2009, 15:37
Don't use both, that's not a good idea. You have two applications "fighting" for you graphics card resources. If they are scarce, that would not be a good thing.;)

With MSI Lightning GTX260+ (1792MB version), it just works fine for CoreAVC + CUDA (VP2) + most H.264 video clips + madVR with Lancozs4 scaling mode + dithering. It is still almost 2 times as fast as G80-based 8800GTS with madVR's usage on the same settings.

In fact I cannot imagine how powerful HD5870(RV870-based) or GT300 could be for madVR's usage.

yesgrey
12th October 2009, 16:09
With MSI Lightning GTX260+ (1792MB version)
This graphic card does not have scarce resources, it has plenty of them.;) but I believe something like a 9600GT can handle both also. Can anyone confirm?

leeperry
12th October 2009, 16:16
I don' think the CUDA+madVR stuttering problem is due to GPU usage, as CUDA uses the separate VP2 engine anyway...it's more like CUDA create latency(on high bitrate 1080p BD) that tends to make mVR tear...on my system at least, 720p is fine but BD tends to tear(fixed w/ software decoding). I have a 96SP 384MB GDDR3 GF9600GSO(rebadged G92 8800GS) on an o/c Q6600

yesgrey
12th October 2009, 16:32
I don' think the CUDA+madVR stuttering problem is due to GPU usage, as CUDA uses the separate VP2 engine anyway...
I've talked about graphics card resources, which means GPU and memory, and both use it. Even if CUDA uses primarily VP2, it also needs to use the GPU for the memory transfers.

leeperry
12th October 2009, 16:38
I've talked about graphics card resources, which means GPU and memory, and both use it. Even if CUDA uses primarily VP2, it also needs to use the GPU for the memory transfers.
I had the same tearing problem w/ HR(in RGB32HQ)...if someone can confirm that many high bitrate BD's work fine in mVR w/ CUDA, that will be a more tangible proof ;)

CUDA is nice because it puts the h264 decoding load on the GPU, but it also noticeably increases the latency...reason why I gave up on CoreAVC CUDA
Powerstrip support is mandatory for me.
everything pstrip does can be done in the nvidia drivers, and at least it's got native support...pstrip is reverse engineered, and it shows ;)

Weirdo
12th October 2009, 17:10
I'd really like to find a silent card who can handle madVR with Cuda flexibility and high bit-rate files... :)

sucht
12th October 2009, 21:46
I don't miss powerstrip. I have created my own tool to calculate my timings and create the resolutions with nvidia drivers. I have already promised several times to post it, but I haven't yet found the time for it...


please release it ;)
i can't get powerstrip to work with my nvidia GF :(
maybe with your tool it will work out nicely.

thanks!

Mark_A_W
13th October 2009, 00:12
everything pstrip does can be done in the nvidia drivers, and at least it's got native support...pstrip is reverse engineered, and it shows ;)


I run a custom Nvidia res on my TV htpc. The Nvidia custom res settings do work, but they are not as capable as powerstrip.

With Powerstrip you can:

- Create shortcuts to different refresh rates at the same res

- Drive the resolution selection via reclock (is there a way to do this with an nvidia card?)

- get 3 decimal places accuracy (can't remember offhand if nvidia will do it)

- AMD just seems to be more HTPC focused - powerstrip support, HDMI audio, etc. But my Nvidia card does work (and it's the only card that works with XBMC properly with a custom res).


I have both, I'm not biased. But I want my next card in the "main" HTPC to be the best choice....I'll get what madshi gets probably ;)

I think we need a new thread "madVR Hardware Discussion".

yesgrey
13th October 2009, 00:19
get 3 decimal places accuracy (can't remember offhand if nvidia will do it)
To be correct, you can get full accuracy, the exact theoretical value. Powerstrip includes a tool very similar to mine that calculates the exact theoretical refresh rates.

leeperry
13th October 2009, 01:31
The Nvidia custom res settings do work, but they are not as capable as powerstrip.
dc.exe -width=1280 -height=768 -refresh=48 -quiet -apply
http://thumbnails19.imagebam.com/5215/03bb8f52141125.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/03bb8f52141125)http://thumbnails2.imagebam.com/5215/9797b452141126.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/9797b452141126)http://thumbnails21.imagebam.com/5215/fae48752141129.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/fae48752141129)

exactly the same! but better actually, because no need for any resident app, and it's all natively supported by the manufacter himself...no need for all these retarded resident apps written in Visual Basic(MOM.exe/CCC.exe)/pstrip.exe/the pstrip NT service and the two ATI Ati2evxx.exe services...now that's 5 resident .exe cloaking your system against *ZERO* on nvidia :devil:

anyway, to stay on topic...I just watched a 2H movie in 23.976@96Hz and it was dead smooth, not a single dropped frame. I will try 48Hz later this week, but the jitter bs in HR completely put me off using my HTPC...mVR in KMP might very well be the antidote, <clicky, clicky> and it works http://forum-images.hardware.fr/images/perso/zoubidawa.gif

KoD
13th October 2009, 17:30
Has anyone tried the Nvidia 9500GT along with Cuda decoding? Can it handle madVR?I can tell you that my GeForce 9600M GT (http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-9600M-GT.9449.0.html) stutters with CUDA + madVR, but I don't know how that compares to the desktop version.

I'm also using a 9600M GT, now on Win 7. On XP, I've been using v0.9 and playback was good (with CUDA on, obviously), except for the jerky pans, but on Win 7 I've only tried v0.11 and it's unusable with the same settings that worked nicely on XP. Also, the lag at the beginning of playback that was introduced with v0.10 and madshi said it was fixed in 0.11, is still there in 0.11 just that it doesn't take half a minute anymore.

Right now I'm using Haali's renderer, it works perfectly with CUDA and Aero enabled and vsfilter for subtitles rendering, smooth playback, no dropped frames whatsoever, the buffers are always full, playback is perfect even with other windows transparent over the video player (which happens to be ZoomPlayer).

madshi
13th October 2009, 18:49
In my case, I'm sure it's all these renderers with all their jobs which display videos with delay. Like Overlay mixer doesn't have jobs, it is always perfectly synchronized with audio.
It seems to me that you're just guessing here. Sure, Overlay mixer has less work to do than the other renderers, but that doesn't really have anything to do with whether audio is in sync or not.

But as I said, you perceive this delay only when you're with a 24Hz display.
I do have a 24Hz display, as have many other madVR users.

I have both, I'm not biased. But I want my next card in the "main" HTPC to be the best choice....I'll get what madshi gets probably ;)

I think we need a new thread "madVR Hardware Discussion".
Personally, I'd love to just get a really powerful GPU (e.g. the new AMD 5870) and be done with it. Unfortunately the GPU has to be content with passive cooling in my fully passively cooled HTPC. So that makes GPU choices much more limited. I guess I'll wait for the AMD 4670 replacement (Q1 2010) or maybe even for NVidias next generation (Q1/2 2010). A single slot 5750 would be sweet (but maybe too hot?)...

I'm also using a 9600M GT, now on Win 7. On XP, I've been using v0.9 and playback was good (with CUDA on, obviously), except for the jerky pans, but on Win 7 I've only tried v0.11 and it's unusable with the same settings that worked nicely on XP. Also, the lag at the beginning of playback that was introduced with v0.10 and madshi said it was fixed in 0.11, is still there in 0.11 just that it doesn't take half a minute anymore.
How long is the lag at the beginning for you now?

Performance wise I've always said that for budget GPUs there's a big improvement in store once I implement fullscreen exclusive mode. I'm quite sure that your 9600M GT will work nicely with madVR in fullscreen exclusive mode. v0.10 and v0.11 are probably more targetted at users with reasonably powerful GPUs.

Right now I'm using Haali's renderer, it works perfectly with CUDA and Aero enabled and vsfilter for subtitles rendering, smooth playback, no dropped frames whatsoever, the buffers are always full, playback is perfect even with other windows transparent over the video player (which happens to be ZoomPlayer).
If Haali's renderer had done the trick for me, I'd never have started work on madVR. Unfortunately for me Haali's renderer tears, has incorrect colors, ghost lines when scaling and doesn't properly dither down to 8bit RGB. You can work around some of that, but I never got it to stop tearing for me, which obviously was a total deal killer...

namaiki
13th October 2009, 22:16
KoD, please tell me, what is the video resolution and what is the display resolution that you are or was using?

If I play something with CUDA that is 720P and have my screen also at 720P, I can also use CUDA and MadVR at the same time (0.10, 0.11), but if I need to resize from 720P to 1080P(native for my screen), then the above combination will freeze up every so often (lag like hell), but of course MadVR by itself is fine. I also run Windows 7 with Forceware 186.88.

nijiko
14th October 2009, 05:30
When enable the 3dlut, madVR 0.11 will crash. (Never before.)

VideoCrad:GF6600 128M
Driver:191.07 WHQL
MPC 1300
XP SP3 with all Updates

Andy o
14th October 2009, 08:22
Madshi, do you think using MPC-HC's internal sub renderer would be possible in a future version of madVR?

adam777
14th October 2009, 10:37
Hello all,
Newbe question ahead, so please behave :)
I'm running MPC-HC (latest x86 version from xvidvideo.ru), on Dell Studio 1555 which is equipped with Mobility Radeon HD4570 512MB card, P8600 processor, 4GB ram, and windows 7 x64 RTM.
I'm using the DivX H.264 decoder due to it being much faster than FFDShow's.
Question is, will I be able to use madVR as a renderer on my machine, and will I gain any benefit from using over, say, EVR custom, considering my screen is 1080p 15.6"?
Thanks in advance, Adam.

pirlouy
14th October 2009, 11:41
@Andy o: madshi says it is planned.

@adam777: I think you should just compare all renderers and choose the one which suits you better. Yes you can use madVR with your computer.

@madshi: if you don't perceive audio delay, then there's nothing you can do. :-)
As you said, maybe it's my computer (even if I don't think so). But maybe you'll notice this one day and you will have a solution.

adam777
14th October 2009, 12:11
Hello all,
Newbe question ahead, so please behave :)
I'm running MPC-HC (latest x86 version from xvidvideo.ru), on Dell Studio 1555 which is equipped with Mobility Radeon HD4570 512MB card, P8600 processor, 4GB ram, and windows 7 x64 RTM.
I'm using the DivX H.264 decoder due to it being much faster than FFDShow's.
Question is, will I be able to use madVR as a renderer on my machine, and will I gain any benefit from using over, say, EVR custom, considering my screen is 1080p 15.6"?
Thanks in advance, Adam.

Well, one question is answered - it seems like divx h.264 decoder and madVR is a no-go, I guess the decoder doesn't output YV12 as needed.
Anyone knows of a way around it, Divx's decoder is much more efficient than FFDShow's one... :thanks:

leeperry
14th October 2009, 12:25
Madshi, do you think using MPC-HC's internal sub renderer would be possible in a future version of madVR?
indeed, subs support would be really fantastic :o
if you don't perceive audio delay, then there's nothing you can do. :-)
As you said, maybe it's my computer (even if I don't think so). But maybe you'll notice this one day and you will have a solution.
how about adding delay in either ffdshow audio or video? I've never had any delay issue in any VR.
Well, one question is answered - it seems like divx h.264 decoder and madVR is a no-go, I guess the decoder doesn't output YV12 as needed.
Anyone knows of a way around it, Divx's decoder is much more efficient than FFDShow's one...
care to run some benchmarks w/ timecodec Vs ffdshow-mt, just to clear things up? I always thought it'd output YV12 tbh....I'm quite sure it does actually, as it worked w/ my YV12-only Avisynth scripts in ffdshow.

pirlouy
14th October 2009, 12:35
how about adding delay in either ffdshow audio or video? I've never had any delay issue in any VR.
This delay is not the same between videos. I can add delay in ffdshow or MPC but it's easier to use 50 or 60Hz and not perceive this delay. :-)

Maybe it has something to do with the fact I use motherboard sound chipset. I'll do test when I get an AV receiver (not soon I think).

leeperry
14th October 2009, 12:42
Maybe it has something to do with the fact I use motherboard sound chipset.
update to the latest drivers from the chip manufacturer maybe, Realtek likes to release updates on a weekly basis.

adam777
14th October 2009, 12:54
care to run some benchmarks w/ timecodec Vs ffdshow-mt, just to clear things up? I always thought it'd output YV12 tbh....I'm quite sure it does actually, as it worked w/ my YV12-only Avisynth scripts in ffdshow.

I'm basing my conclusion on the simple fact, that when using DivX decoder and madVR in MPC-HC, when right clicking on a played movie, the "filters" menu shows "video filter" (or something of that sort). I think it's some kind of VMR.
This oppsed to using FFDShow (forcing YV12 output) and madVR, in which case, the filters menu shows "madVR video renderer" (or something of that sort).

Should there be a formal way to check DivX decoder output colorspace, do tell.

leeperry
14th October 2009, 12:59
Should there be a formal way to check DivX decoder output colorspace, do tell.
if you force ffdshow, it'll tell you the input colorspace

adam777
14th October 2009, 13:08
Sorry, leeperry, I'm loosing you.
As far as I understand, I'm using one decoder (either FFDShow or DivX) to feed a video renderer.
I've already seen FFDShow works with madVR as expected (it outputs YV12 and madVR launched as expectesd), but the problem is I don't know, when using DivX, how to check which colorspace it outputs to the video renderer and I couldn't find a way how to set it.

leeperry
14th October 2009, 13:16
I hope you're more "losing" me than "loosing" me :D

in ffdshow config, at the bottom of the decoders settings select "all supported" for "raw video" and for "h264" select "disabled"...it will add ffdshow between the divx decoder and madVR, then you can look up the input colorspace.

anyway, it's really nice to work in YV12, I don't think I even need to o/c my Q6600 anymore...RGB32HQ was mandatory in HR as its REC601/709 are plain wrong, but o/c means higher energy bills and more heat/noise.

adam777
14th October 2009, 13:25
Losing, indeed :)
That's a nice trick... and it turns out that the DivX decoder is outputting YUY2.
If I understand correctly, in this configuration the DivX decoder is doing the actual decoding and FFDShow is used only for the colorspace conversion (YUY2->YV12), for feeding madVR.
Question is, do I gain the quality benefits of madVR renderer this way? (It seems, there's not much performance hit).

leeperry
14th October 2009, 13:44
you might wanna ask in the divx thread, maybe there's a registry key or something like that to force YV12...it should output YV12: http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1182785&postcount=3

YV12>YUY2 is not lossy I think, but YUY2>YV12 is..

but run timecodec benchmarks, divx/ffmpeg-mt/core avc are tied up on most systems.

adam777
14th October 2009, 14:12
OK, thanks, I've opened a thread regarding the colorspace issue.
And judging by real life viewing, not timecodec benchmarks, divx performs much better for me comparing to ffmpeg-mt (unless I somehow manage to use it the wrong way...).

Thunderbolt8
14th October 2009, 16:11
Can you change refresh rate to 48Hz instead of 24Hz? Maybe that helps. Final fix will be fullscreen exclusive mode (not implemented yet).not to 48, but I changed it to 60Hz on my computer to which I connect to the screen and now tearing is gone (same 60Hz as my PC screen uses).

EDIT: or almost gone, theres still little vertical tearing in between, but not really much and all that horizontal tearing has gone.

Grafisher
14th October 2009, 22:43
This renderer is awesome, thanks!

I have just two minor issues to report (most likely reported previously):
When you pause the playback, the window is not repainted when needed, so you can easily erase it by another window. When switching between fullscreen and windowed mode, the video stutters briefly.

I use Zoom Player and Reclock, and these are confirmed to be madVR issues.

Otherwise, I tested it with many videos, and I have no performance or tearing problems (8600GTS). v0.10 has minor stability problems indeed.

VHT
15th October 2009, 08:52
Thanks Madshi for great renderer with awesome PQ. As said PQ is top notch and smooth, but I've got audio sync issues with 24hz display and Realtek chip SPDIF out. With 50hz and 60Hz everything is OK. With other renderers (EVR,HR,Overlay) audio is in sync also with 24hz 23,976fps material but not with MadVR. The amount of delay in audio varies,so it's impossible to fix it by delaying audio stream for instance 100ms in AC3filter.

(Using 32bit Vista SP2,8800gt with 185.85WHQL drivers,CoreAVC,KMplayer/MPC-HC)

pirlouy
15th October 2009, 11:45
@VHT: There are some similitudes with problem I mentioned earlier. Except I use Analog output (not spdif) and this delay is also present with other renderers except "overlay mixer". Maybe a problem with Realtek...

I use Win7

Thunderbolt8
15th October 2009, 18:49
This is probably a miscommunication between the decoder and madVR. The various decoders out there all behave slightly different. Sometimes if I adjust madVR to "understand" one decoder better, this breaks things with another decoder... :( So I'd suggest that you try out some other decoders. Some will probably work just fine. I might find a solution which works with all decoders at some time, but my focus is on other things right now.just to add, the same problem unfortunately also occurs with 1440x1080 interlaced H.264 files from BBC HD

Weirdo
16th October 2009, 12:22
Works great with 720/1080 material, 15-30% cpu usage (Cuda=ON) with Core2Duo E6750. Will soon test with 1080 uncompressed BD sources. Video quality is of course unprecedented - thanks madshi. ;)
When Cuda is enabled, 5 out of 10 times the player will lock up immediately and crash.

namaiki
16th October 2009, 12:30
Weirdo, is that the version with 64-unified shaders?

Weirdo
16th October 2009, 14:10
Weirdo, is that the version with 64-unified shaders?
Hmm... I think so. Same as "Cuda Cores=64"? Specs are here (http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_9600gt_us.html) and here (http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/VGA/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=VGA&ProductID=3078&ProductName=GV-N96TSL-1GI).

I didn't find a way to use madVR with DVD's though, also tried with Cyberlink's PDVD 8 navigator, through ZoomPlayer.
Is this still an issue, requiring mkv remuxes to play dvd material?

namaiki
16th October 2009, 14:48
I didn't find a way to use madVR with DVD's though

Appears to work fine for most of my DVDs. I'm using MPCHC's internal codecs, or whatever CCCP defaults are, + Reclock, MadVR and AnyDVD. I haven't tried without AnyDVD though.. but I do get an error message, though it generally plays fine after I click the message away.

Mark_A_W
17th October 2009, 02:11
Appears to work fine for most of my DVDs. I'm using MPCHC's internal codecs, or whatever CCCP defaults are, + Reclock, MadVR and AnyDVD. I haven't tried without AnyDVD though.. but I do get an error message, though it generally plays fine after I click the message away.


XP, Vista or W7?

namaiki
17th October 2009, 03:05
Windows Vista, now W7.

edit3: sorry, it's only working with my R1 DVDs through AnyDVD..

leeperry
17th October 2009, 12:59
does "load external audio" work in MPC? because in KMP, it crashes...KMP tries to close the DS graph then recreate it, but because mVR doesn't close properly...I just get a DrWatson error msg in the XP event viewer and KMP crashes :(

I dunno what the priorities are for madshi, but proper closing down of the renderer and subs support would be really great http://forum-images.hardware.fr/images/perso/otakonleboss.gif