Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

mochevolete
31st January 2010, 20:08
ops, sorry, forgot to mention, just tried a couple of Blu-Ray encoded in AVC, CPU usage is about 55%

ok, in Codecs: H.264 > libavcodec
Output: Planar YUV > only YV12 is checked (is this ?)
Packed YUV has everything checked, so is RGB, do I have to uncheck all ?
No other filter is activated, nor Shader

I'll set the other things in MPC_HC,

thanks for now :)

noee
31st January 2010, 20:13
I would set h.264 to ffmpeg_mt for higher bitrate material
Uncheck all output formats except YV12

mochevolete
31st January 2010, 20:53
OK, the "trick" was to set ffdshow as external video decoder and .. to set ffmpeg_mt instead of libavcodec,
unfortunately is VERY prone to crash if I alt-tab to other apps, and once it crashes I have to restart the system coz the audio goes in loop.

BTW in fullscreen works perfectly, why madshi says it can't ?

Nik :)

mochevolete
31st January 2010, 21:10
re-reply, unfortunately it's not yet perfectly fluid compared do EVR custom and DXVA,
anyway, thanks for this great enhancement madshi !

Nik

Mark_A_W
31st January 2010, 21:23
Does FFDShow video queue output samples option work with MadVR?


madVR has it's own queue.

Hypernova
1st February 2010, 10:04
OK, the "trick" was to set ffdshow as external video decoder and .. to set ffmpeg_mt instead of libavcodec,
unfortunately is VERY prone to crash if I alt-tab to other apps, and once it crashes I have to restart the system coz the audio goes in loop.

BTW in fullscreen works perfectly, why madshi says it can't ?

Nik :)

I think he refer to exclusive fullscreen?

sepheas
1st February 2010, 18:05
For Nvidia users, Do we need a madvr update/fix or newer drivers ?

edison
1st February 2010, 18:49
For Nvidia users, Do we need a madvr update/fix or newer drivers ?

I think a madVR update will be much more exciting. :)

pie1394
3rd February 2010, 08:30
The madVR's color processing and Lanczos3 scaling make it still my preferred video renderer for AVC/H.264 contents. To me the most stable one is still v0.9 (especially for seeking). Fortunately the huge horse-powered 260GTX+ can handle it well under most situations.

For MPEG-2 contents(DVD, HDTV), I still feel the nVidia PureVideo MPEG2 video decoder + VMR9 renderless mode under WinXP produces better image output. For MPEG-2 1080i content which are native to my PDP TV display, any other combination w/i or w/o madVR never produces the same detailed and vivid-color output if compared to PureVideo decoder.

Unfortunately madVR cannot accept DXVA input, and thus it does not seem able to turn on most advanced video post-processing in GT200. (Ex: pixel adaptive deinterlace, de-ring, de-blocking, noise reduction...)


In addition I found that MPC-HC new EVR sync mode has improved a lot in D3D Exclusive mode under WinXP. It now runs smoothy for FILM content's frame playback at 1080p24 output unless the weird a/v sync logic sometimes still makes the screen frozen for several seconds. Anyway it does not produce such result if the output is 1080i60 or 1080p60 for FILM contents.

So I guess once madVR has the D3D Exclusive mode and functional OSD pin implementations, the entire playback system could become more mature with MPC-HC + madVR.

jmone
3rd February 2010, 11:00
FYI - JR Media Center is adding support for madVR - http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=55933.0

noee
4th February 2010, 16:46
Has anyone yet had the opportunity to try one of the "new" 5450 or 5570 cards with madVR?

chuuey
4th February 2010, 22:19
well i gave the renderer a shot again, still crazy tearing on my 9400 with latest 196 driver, but the videos start every time at least ;) hope this will work better with a new release, i really am looking forward to it :)

mikelebron
5th February 2010, 19:54
Yea.. its unusable with my 9400 also...

well i gave the renderer a shot again, still crazy tearing on my 9400 with latest 196 driver, but the videos start every time at least ;) hope this will work better with a new release, i really am looking forward to it :)

chuuey
5th February 2010, 23:59
Yea.. its unusable with my 9400 also...

well the 0.09 version has been working very well for me even with 24hz, unlike 0.11 which tears all over the place even on my 4890, i'm sure this will be fixed someday :)

cyberbeing
6th February 2010, 07:37
Personally I think the 9400GT is just too weak to use with madVR.
It only is able to hit 67.2 GFlops in shading performance and the 128bit memory controller only has 12.8GB/s of bandwidth.

For nVidia's line, madVR really seems to need >200GFlop of shading performance and at least 512MB of memory with >50GB/s of bandwidth to use all its scaling options and features.

The 9600GSO 512, 9600GT, and GT 240 (DDR5 version) are probably the lowest common denominators of nVidia's line that will work well with madVR.

namaiki
6th February 2010, 11:26
My 9600M GT works fine with MadVR .11 @ 1920x1080 32-bit 60p with MadVR default settings(if there are more GPU intensive features, I can try them if you would like).

Specs:
32 Stream Processors.
500 MHz core clock.
1250 MHz shader clock.
800 MHz memory clock.
256MB VRAM.
128-bit memory interface.
25.6 GB/s memory bandwidth.

I think it's 120GFlops..

cyberbeing
6th February 2010, 12:59
Using a 3dlut:

Try scaling a 1920x1080 video to 1280x720 (or 1600x900) using Spline64 for luma and chroma.

Also try scaling a 1280x720 video to 1920x1080 using Spline64 for luma and chroma.

Try playing back a 1920x1080 video at 1920x1080 with Spline64 set for luma and chroma.

If you have a bigger display handy, try scaling a 1920x1080 video to 2560x1440 with Spline64 set for luma and chroma. This seems to require >512MB of ram.


If you really want to kill your GPU:

Try playing back a 1280x720 at 1280x720 60fps video using Spline64 for luma and chroma.

Try playing back a 1920x1080 at 1920x1080 60fps video using Spline64 for luma and chroma.

Try scaling a 1280x720 or 1920x1080 60fps video using Spline64 for luma and chroma.


If you see increasing dropped or delayed frames during playback and/or the render queue drops below 8/8 , your GPU isn't powerful enough.

chuuey
6th February 2010, 13:04
well that's strange, one time i launched the 0.11 version changed some settings and a movie played without a single hiccup with coreavc 2 and cuda enabled, i launched another one, choppy as hell, every resampler was set to bilinear, i don't know where this randomness comes from ;) if 9400 is weak, which i'm sure it is, it handles the 0.09 version at 24hz and cuda enabled very well, so unless something was drastically changed in the next versions i don't know why the latest ones shouldn't work, 256 mb vram on my setup

namaiki
6th February 2010, 13:09
If you have a bigger display handy, try scaling a 1920x1080 video to 2560x1440 with Spline64 set for luma and chroma. This seems to require >512MB of ram.
Yes, I know that from my experience 1920x1080 appears to be the limit of a 256MB card.

Using a 3dlut:
Try scaling a 1920x1080 video to 1280x720 using Spline64 for luma and chroma.
Fine without 3dlut. With 3dlut, render queue will drop. Oh well, it's my laptop and only computer with a half decent video card. :p

somy
9th February 2010, 16:27
I'm really looking forward to a new version of MadVR that works without Aero :)

JarrettH
9th February 2010, 20:00
Been 4 months :scared:

kostik
10th February 2010, 16:51
What pixel format is better to use with Madvr?
RGB limited
ycbcr 4:2:2
ycbcr 4:4:4
I just still dont get it which one gives better results.

I've got Pioneer 428XD Plasma which supports these formats and Ati hd4850.

thanks.

leeperry
10th February 2010, 17:08
What pixel format is better to use with Madvr?
more than likely both your graphic card and your HDTV work internally in 0-255 RGB...so avoid any lossy conversion and simply output full range RGB(or limited RGB if your HDTV doesn't allow full range).

cyberlolo
14th February 2010, 16:37
Hi. I have an ATI HD4850 and I'm trying to use madVR with MPC-HC. My problem is that when I play the AVCHD test pattern to calibrate the display, I have no flashing bars below 17, which would be ok, but I also don't have any flashing bar from 233, so it's definately clipping whites. I've tried to adjust the brightness and contrast in the AVIVO Video (CCC 9.12), but it has no effect, so I don't know how can i have wtw (and btb) preserved. Is there any way?

Thanks in advance.

leeperry
14th February 2010, 17:33
if you set it on "TV levels", there's no levels conversion.

cyberlolo
14th February 2010, 18:34
Yes, but in that mode, I have to decrease brightness so much that the resulting image is too dark.

I have the HTPC connected via HDMI to a plasma TV (RGB Full Pixel Format). What do you recommend? PC Levels or TV Levels?

leeperry
14th February 2010, 18:42
I'd recommend to calibrate your display to D65/2.3 if that's not the case yet...you can get a cheapo Spyder2 second hand or better an Eye One Display 2.

and you'd also need to find out what your TV expects...PC or TV range, sometimes it also depends on the resolution/input format.

cyberlolo
14th February 2010, 19:21
I'd recommend to calibrate your display to D65/2.3 if that's not the case yet...you can get a cheapo Spyder2 second hand or better an Eye One Display 2.

I will have my TV calibrated (ISF) in a couple of months, because right now is too new and I have to wait for it to be settled down.

and you'd also need to find out what your TV expects...PC or TV range, sometimes it also depends on the resolution/input format.

What I want is very simple: to have clipped blacks from 0-16, and preserve whites until 254. With other renderers (like EVR CP), I can make that tweaking with the CCC Avivo Video settings (brightness and contrast). But with madVR, I can't do it. Am I losing info if I stick to PC Levels and have >235 clipped?

It would be great if madVR had it's brightness/contrast controls. I think that would solve the problem. Will that controls be included in the next version?

leeperry
14th February 2010, 21:41
ok, but a calibration will degrade over time...in a few months, it'll prolly be quite off.

and it'll be dependent on your graphic card/drivers version/resolution/refresh rate...change any of these and your calibration is very much likely to be off too.

why would you wanna clip anything? if your TV accepts full range RGB, set mVR to do the TV>PC conversion...it'll avoid lossy conversions in whatever your ATi drivers or your TV...plus it'll be far more accurate than a crappy IC in your TV doing the conversion.

if your TV only accepts TV levels, then it's a different story...if you only care for movies, disable any levels conversion in mVR/ATi drivers = movies will be 16-235 untouched, but windows will be messed up as it's only able to output 0-255 by design....or set mVR to do the levels conversion, and set your ATi drivers to RGB limited(a lot of useless lossy conversions here, though)

Mark_A_W
14th February 2010, 21:43
ok, but a calibration will degrave over time...in a few months, it'll prolly be quite off.

And that comment is based on what evidence?


My projector hasn't really changed in years. And yes, I have a HCFR setup to check it.

leeperry
14th February 2010, 21:52
And that comment is based on what evidence?
My projector hasn't really changed in years. And yes, I have a HCFR setup to check it.
you have a 3 eyed monster, maybe it's different...but a regular CRT, a flat screen or a UHP based display has a drifting colorimetry by design....anyone w/ a projector will tell you that, sometimes even those pesky ATi drivers versions can change the gamma curves(yes, it's been confirmed by many ppl).

HCFR? like the cheapo HCFR sensor? or you're using an Eye One Display of some sort?

mastering studios get their monitoring CRT's recalibrated using Minolta spectrophotometers on a weekly basis...figures?

cyberlolo
14th February 2010, 21:56
ok, but a calibration will degrave over time...in a few months, it'll prolly be quite off.

and it'll be dependent on your graphic card/drivers version/resolution/refresh rate...change any of these and your calibration is very much likely to be off too.

why would you wanna clip anything? if your TV accepts full range RGB, set mVR to do the TV>PC conversion...it'll avoid lossy conversions in whatever your ATi drivers or your TV...plus it'll be far more accurate than a crappy IC in your TV doing the conversion.

if your TV only accepts TV levels, then it's a different story...if you only care for movies, disable any levels conversion in mVR/ATi drivers = movies will be 16-235 untouched, but windows will be messed up as it's only able to output 0-255 by design....or set mVR to do the levels conversion, and set your ATi drivers to RGB limited(a lot of useless lossy conversions here, though)

Thanks in advance, Lee, you're helping me a lot...

No, i don't want to clip anything. I want 0-16 (reference black) to be all total black, and then begin to grow from 17. And in the other hand, I want the white point at 254, but if it's not possible, I would stick to have it at 235 (reference white).

And yes, my TV accepts full range RGB (it's a KURO KRP-500), and I have that pixel format selected. So with this configuration, you advice me to set mVR to do the TV>PC conversion. How do I do that? Selecting output settings to "PC levels" in madVR?

leeperry
14th February 2010, 22:28
yep, leave your ATi drivers on "full range RGB", check "PC levels" in mVR so it'll do the conversion, get your TV calibrated...and then get the calibration report from the ISF technician, input the RGB primaries coordinates in cr3dlut(to get a perfectly matched LUT)..and you'll be as close to colorgasm as you could possibly get http://forum-images.hardware.fr/images/perso/ayuluna.gif

US movies essentially need SMPTE-C gamut mapping, and EUR need EBU...the icing on the cake will be running Reclock in 24/48Hz :D

cyberlolo
14th February 2010, 23:00
yep, leave your ATi drivers on "full range RGB", check "PC levels" in mVR so it'll do the conversion, get your TV calibrated...and then get the calibration report from the ISF technician, input the RGB primaries coordinates in cr3dlut(to get a perfectly matched LUT)..and you'll be as close to colorgasm as you could possibly get http://forum-images.hardware.fr/images/perso/ayuluna.gif

US movies essentially need SMPTE-C gamut mapping, and EUR need EBU...the icing on the cake will be running Reclock in 24/48Hz :D

Regarding your explanation of the levels and calibration, thank you!!! Now I think I have it perfectly clear. Although I think it would be great if next version of madVR includes it's own brightness/contrast controls.

By the way, I'm not using Reclock because I'm not having any judder issues. I can output at 24, 50, and 60 Hz depending on the frame rate of the video I want to watch. Why would I need Reclock?

leeperry
14th February 2010, 23:10
if you're perfectly fine w/o Reclock, then be it! because once you're hooked to butter smooth playback, you are doomed.

cyberlolo
14th February 2010, 23:33
if you're perfectly fine w/o Reclock, then be it! because once you're hooked to butter smooth playback, you are doomed.

:) lol

Do you mean I will have a smoother playback with Reclock?

leeperry
15th February 2010, 00:11
try it in a 24Hz multiple, you'll see. run it for a week, then turn it off..if you dare :D

and mVR creates separate LUT's for PC/TV levels,but you can cheat and use one for SMPTE-C, one for EBU...and switch on the fly, pretty handy :)

cyberlolo
15th February 2010, 02:11
Ok, I'll give it a try.

Which version do you recommend me? In the web I've found a lot of them!

namaiki
15th February 2010, 02:14
The latest, or 1.8.6.1 and newer especially if you're going to use WASAPI.

Mark_A_W
15th February 2010, 07:43
you have a 3 eyed monster, maybe it's different...but a regular CRT, a flat screen or a UHP based display has a drifting colorimetry by design....anyone w/ a projector will tell you that, sometimes even those pesky ATi drivers versions can change the gamma curves(yes, it's been confirmed by many ppl).

HCFR? like the cheapo HCFR sensor? or you're using an Eye One Display of some sort?

mastering studios get their monitoring CRT's recalibrated using Minolta spectrophotometers on a weekly basis...figures?

Yeah, they all change, but unless you mess with the source end, it's gradual, not drastic.

And we compared (and calibrated) my HCFR sensor against a $5000 Colorfacts system and the result was basically identical. There is a difference between cheap and crap.

You need to stay grounded leeperry, and not overstate things - you make it sound like a calibration is needed every second day.

leeperry
15th February 2010, 11:13
Yeah, they all change, but unless you mess with the source end, it's gradual, not drastic.

And we compared (and calibrated) my HCFR sensor against a $5000 Colorfacts system and the result was basically identical. There is a difference between cheap and crap.

You need to stay grounded leeperry, and not overstate things - you make it sound like a calibration is needed every second day.
of course it's gradual...I never said it wasn't, but the ΔE will be down the drain after a few months(and again, new ATi drivers version could completely screw up your calibration)...besides you have the most innacurate sensor on the market, so I find it funny that you talk to me like that :D

the HCFR sensor is blind w/o a "driver" file, and these are very innacurate too(I can give you links on the HCFR forum where its designer MLill was VERY honest about it)...I am well aware of how this 50 EUR sensor works, as I used to own one. You could try reading what real world users and the ARGYLLCMS coder have to say about it: http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/instruments.html#HCFR
The accuracy of this instrument does not seem to be comparable to the commercial instruments

keep thinking that your 50 EUR sensor is great if you like, and that calibrations never worsen up...that's cool w/ me!

professionals get their CRT screens recalibrated on a weekly basis using calibrated spectrophotometers, and I like to recalibrate every month using my i1d2...do it every year if you like, at least it'll make noticeable improvements by then :p

kostik
15th February 2010, 18:13
Leeperry I've got a question.

I have the color coordinates in this format:
0.8479866, 0.1455006, 0.0065128, 0,
0.0127898, 0.9873329, -0.0001228, 0,
0.0108641, 0.0219475, 0.9671884, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0
I made it for pixel shader in mpc which looked this way:

BT701 pioneer 428



sampler s0 : register(s0);
float4 p0 : register(c0);

static float4x4 r2r =
{
0.8479866, 0.1455006, 0.0065128, 0,
0.0127898, 0.9873329, -0.0001228, 0,
0.0108641, 0.0219475, 0.9671884, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0

};

float4 main(float2 tex : TEXCOORD0) : COLOR
{
float4 c0 = tex2D(s0, tex);
c0 = pow(c0, 1/0.45);
c0 = mul(r2r, c0);
c0 = saturate(c0);
c0 = pow(c0, 0.45);

return c0;
}

How do I put those coordinates in the right forman in cr3dlut?
thnx

leeperry
15th February 2010, 18:53
How do I put those coordinates in the right forman in cr3dlut?
you used the .xls file to create this script...get the coordinates directly from it, or recalibrate your display...as previously discussed your display colorimetry is not stable by a long shot.

kostik
15th February 2010, 20:38
you used the .xls file to create this script...get the coordinates directly from it, or recalibrate your display...as previously discussed your display colorimetry is not stable by a long shot.

the problem is that I dont know how to get the direct coordinates :(
Can you help me? My friend helped me to do this and we are not talking anymore hehe

leeperry
15th February 2010, 20:42
the problem is that I dont know how to get the direct coordinates :(
Can you help me? My friend helped me to do this and we are not talking anymore hehe
I've got no idea how you can get the coordinates back from the final coeffs....try asking on AVS in its own thread maybe? but it doesn't seem possible.

cyberlolo
15th February 2010, 20:56
yep, leave your ATi drivers on "full range RGB", check "PC levels" in mVR so it'll do the conversion, get your TV calibrated...and then get the calibration report from the ISF technician, input the RGB primaries coordinates in cr3dlut(to get a perfectly matched LUT)..and you'll be as close to colorgasm as you could possibly get http://forum-images.hardware.fr/images/perso/ayuluna.gif

US movies essentially need SMPTE-C gamut mapping, and EUR need EBU...the icing on the cake will be running Reclock in 24/48Hz :D

Hi again Lee. I've installed Reclock and you were right. The video is smoother now, and the sound has also improved a lot with Wasapi. Now I have 2 doubts:

1) You said to try it at 48 Hz. How can I do that? The PC outputs at 24 Hz (or 50, or 60), and ReClock doesn't have any option to change the refresh rate...

2) Regarding the sound, I've configured ReClock in 24 padded to 32/192kHz, as you advised in head-fi forums. As I'm using it with AC3Filter, how do I have to set AC3Filter output (PCM24, PCM32, PCM Float)?

Thanks in advance again!

Mark_A_W
15th February 2010, 21:25
of course it's gradual...I never said it wasn't, but the ΔE will be down the drain after a few months(and again, new ATi drivers version could completely screw up your calibration)...besides you have the most innacurate sensor on the market, so I find it funny that you talk to me like that :D

the HCFR sensor is blind w/o a "driver" file, and these are very innacurate too(I can give you links on the HCFR forum where its designer MLill was VERY honest about it)...I am well aware of how this 50 EUR sensor works, as I used to own one. You could try reading what real world users and the ARGYLLCMS coder have to say about it: http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/instruments.html#HCFR


keep thinking that your 50 EUR sensor is great if you like, and that calibrations never worsen up...that's cool w/ me!

professionals get their CRT screens recalibrated on a weekly basis using calibrated spectrophotometers, and I like to recalibrate every month using my i1d2...do it every year if you like, at least it'll make noticeable improvements by then :p

You are full of FUD again.

You did not say it was gradual, you said it was drastic. In a few months it will only be off a tiny bit, not "way off". It will change most with a bulb projector as the bulb settles in, so always, one should wait a bit before calibration, but once the display has a run a while, it will be reasonably stable.

Every 6 months or a year it will need a "tweak", but it will not be far off, in general. Home use is not the same as professional use.


I'll say it again. My HCFR setup, measured basically identically to a Colorfacts setup. The "driver" file was created for my projector using the Colorfacts system by my friend and me, not downloaded.

It measures the same as Colorfacts because we set it that way, although it wasn't far off before we created the driver file.

In the real world, the difference between the calibrations using either setup was not noticable.


Next thing you'll be telling me you can hear the difference between op-amps. :rolleyes:

leeperry
15th February 2010, 21:43
1) You said to try it at 48 Hz. How can I do that? The PC outputs at 24 Hz (or 50, or 60), and ReClock doesn't have any option to change the refresh rate...

2) Regarding the sound, I've configured ReClock in 24 padded to 32/192kHz, as you advised in head-fi forums. As I'm using it with AC3Filter, how do I have to set AC3Filter output (PCM24, PCM32, PCM Float)?
1) any multiple of 24Hz is cool, if 48Hz(might need to create custom res.) is not possible 24Hz is fine...the higher the refreh rate the more stable the picture, but many displays actually show 24Hz at 48 or 96(some even go up to 240Hz in the Sony VPL-VW serie)

cinema projectors show 24fps@48Hz....I like it old school :D

2) you should always feed lossy audio as 32float to Reclock to avoid rounding errors....but the dts decoder in ac3filter sounds terrible, compare it w/ libavcodec in ffdshow, you'll see what I mean.

and the resampler DLL in Reclock b58 sounds much better to my ears than in b60+, but YMMV ;)

cyberlolo
15th February 2010, 22:46
1) any multiple of 24Hz is cool, if 48Hz(might need to create custom res.) is not possible 24Hz is fine...the higher the refreh rate the more stable the picture, but many displays actually show 24Hz at 48 or 96(some even go up to 240Hz in the Sony VPL-VW serie)

cinema projectors show 24fps@48Hz....I like it old school :D

2) you should always feed lossy audio as 32float to Reclock to avoid rounding errors....but the dts decoder in ac3filter sounds terrible, compare it w/ libavcodec in ffdshow, you'll see what I mean.

and the resampler DLL in Reclock b58 sounds much better to my ears than in b60+, but YMMV ;)

You're right with the refresh rate. My TV has a mode that shows 24Hz at 72Hz, so I've activated it and it's quite smooth.

Regarding the sound, I'll give a try to ffdshow instead of ac3filter.

Cheers again for your great help, Lee.

cyberlolo
16th February 2010, 12:50
Hi again Lee.

I've disabled AC3Filter and gave a try to ffdshow, but I'm having problems using ffdshow to decode the audio of the videos (mainly ac3 contained in mkvs). Can you post here your ffdshow audio decoder settings so I can see if I'm doing anything wrong?

Btw, you say KMPlayer is the best player for audio/video (althought I'm only interested in videos). Right now I'm using MPC-HC, but I wanted to try KMPlayer and I'm having a weird issue: when I set Reclock as audio renderer, I get no sound and the Reclock icon doesn't load in taskbar, but if I select DirectSound Default Device as audio renderer, then I get the sound back, and Reclock loads ok. So you know why is this?