Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

SamuriHL
30th November 2011, 20:46
No, that's absolutely NOT true. The option is the dynamic range. Madshi suggests that should be set to limited 16-whatever it is due to BTB and WTW. The pixel format should be RGB full 0-255.

azaze1
30th November 2011, 21:04
No, that's absolutely NOT true. The option is the dynamic range. Madshi suggests that should be set to limited 16-whatever it is due to BTB and WTW. The pixel format should be RGB full 0-255.

Roger that, I got similar clarification elsewhere saying the same thing. Thanks,

SamuriHL
30th November 2011, 21:07
Roger that, I got similar clarification elsewhere saying the same thing. Thanks,

NP. I assume you meant a post on AVS. Guess I missed that one. :) Hopefully the post you're referring to is cleared up, as well, cause if not that's how misinformation starts. And that's not good for anyone.

Plutotype
30th November 2011, 21:57
Hi,
Maybe somebody can confirm if madVR gamma processing ( Im using the 2.0 setting, not 2.2 ), does process the whole image or only the picture without the the black belts in 2.35 aspect ratio movies? Im just starting to setup my Panasonic VT30 plasma and I like how madVR is uncovering further details in the picture. VT30 is calibrated to 2.2. Setting madVR gamma to 2.2 and VT30s gamma processing to 2.0 makes the picture more detailed, but the black belts get more grey, which is probably not ok.

Thanks
Pluto

mindz
30th November 2011, 22:52
Is there any difference in PQ between ffdshow and LAV Video Decoder?

I was wondering if there is any difference in audio quality between ffdshow audio decoder and LAV audio decoder ;)?

SamuriHL
30th November 2011, 23:01
I was wondering if there is any difference in audio quality between ffdshow audio decoder and LAV audio decoder ;)?

Should be asked in the appropriate thread as audio has NOTHING to do with madVR whatsoever. ;)

azaze1
30th November 2011, 23:44
NP. I assume you meant a post on AVS. Guess I missed that one. :) Hopefully the post you're referring to is cleared up, as well, cause if not that's how misinformation starts. And that's not good for anyone.

It was actually from highdefjunkies.com forum for the Sharp Elite thread. The poster has taken a closer look and quickly cleared the air. We're all on the same page so I don't think there will be any misinformation this time unless people take excerpts without reading followups (guess that happens a lot too).

Anyways... I guess this just means I'll have to rely on MadVR to provide the proper colorspace since the incredibly expensive Elite doesn't appear to accept RGB 0-255... hard to believe.

SamuriHL
1st December 2011, 00:03
It was actually from highdefjunkies.com forum for the Sharp Elite thread. The poster has taken a closer look and quickly cleared the air. We're all on the same page so I don't think there will be any misinformation this time unless people take excerpts without reading followups (guess that happens a lot too).

Anyways... I guess this just means I'll have to rely on MadVR to provide the proper colorspace since the incredibly expensive Elite doesn't appear to accept RGB 0-255... hard to believe.

That's a shame. But madVR does awesome colorspace conversions, so, if that's what you need, it'll do it nicely.

omarank
1st December 2011, 06:36
I am using LAV filters + madVR + ReClock. I get 0 dropped frames, 0 delayed frames and no presentation glitches. madVR OSD reports 1 frame repeat/drop every 1.05 days or so. Even though the stats look so perfect, I feel the playback is not very smooth, especially when I play 23.976 fps and 25 fps videos. I have two displays: a monitor and an HDTV. Both have a native refresh rate of 60 Hz. I have forced a custom resolution of 72 Hz on my monitor and 48 Hz on my TV, for 23.976 fps videos and also for 25 fps videos (by speeding them down using ReClock). I don't understand why I am not getting supersmooth playback.

Is there anything which I need to adjust in the 3D settings of nvidia control panel? I have a GTX 260, by the way. I have set antialiasing and anisotropic filtering to application-controlled, antialiasing transparency Off, max pre-rendered frames to default 3 (though 0 looks better to me in games), and texture filtering to high quality.

There is one thing which I have noticed. ReClock and madVR OSD report a display refresh rate, for all custom resolutions in both the displays, which is not very exact. For example, when I run my monitor at 60 Hz native refresh rate, it is reported as 60.019 Hz. Likewise, 72 Hz is reported as 72.023 Hz. I wonder if there is a way to make them more accurate (upto two decimal places).

I have one specific issue with VC1 files and some m2ts files. Without ReClock, they run perfect with no frame drops (though CPU usage is high). With ReClock, there are a lot of dropped frames and the video is just not watchable.

I am new to this forum and it's really a long thread. I am slowly catching up. :)

@ Madshi: You are doing a great job!!

jmone
1st December 2011, 07:05
Deinterlacing Issue with Non-Square Pixel Material on Intel IGP3000? I was testing using LAV Video and madVR over a range of test files using a i7-2600K with HD3000 IGP to see how it would go. It went really well for most content (including up to AVC 1080/50i material). I did find an issue however with lots of dropped frames but only if the source material had non-square pixels (eg 1440x1080, or Anamorphic 720x576i). At first I thought it was only MPEG-2 but it is also DV-AVI. So a 4:3 720x576i is fine, but a 16:9 720x576i is not.

Queues look like this:
Decoder 26-28/28
Upload 12-15/24
Deinterlace 1-5/24
Render 1-3/24
Backbuffer 0-2/8

Things I tried:
* If I check "perform deinterlacing in seperate thread" then the Deinterlace queue goes to 21-24/24, but Render 1-3/24, and Backbuffer 0-1/8
* Exclusive mode makes no difference
* If I deinterlace in LAV Video (eg YADIF) then the issue goes away
* If I use a different GPU (eg nVidia 550Ti) then the issue goes away

If I change the default of Luma Upscaling from Lanczos to something like SoftCubic then the Intel IGP HD3000 has no issues and the queues are fine. Looks like the extra work on non-square pixels is just too much for this IGP with Lanczos

dansrfe
1st December 2011, 07:37
Can anyone point me to the dynamic range setting (that is being referred) in CCC? I can't find it anywhere.

Andy o
1st December 2011, 07:56
Hi,
Maybe somebody can confirm if madVR gamma processing ( Im using the 2.0 setting, not 2.2 ), does process the whole image or only the picture without the the black belts in 2.35 aspect ratio movies? Im just starting to setup my Panasonic VT30 plasma and I like how madVR is uncovering further details in the picture. VT30 is calibrated to 2.2. Setting madVR gamma to 2.2 and VT30s gamma processing to 2.0 makes the picture more detailed, but the black belts get more grey, which is probably not ok.

Thanks
Pluto

In blu-ray content, the 2.35:1 letterbox bars are part of the picture. I don't see why (or how) madVR would not process them.

FlashGordon
1st December 2011, 10:01
Just curious, I know the Video settings in ATI's CCC have an effect when madVR is deinterlacing, but is this still the case if madVR doesn't receive the interlace flag from the decoder?

SamuriHL
1st December 2011, 15:02
Can anyone point me to the dynamic range setting (that is being referred) in CCC? I can't find it anywhere.

Click on Video->Video Settings in CCC. Scroll down and enable Dynamic Range and set it to Limited (16-235).

G_M_C
1st December 2011, 16:05
In blu-ray content, the 2.35:1 letterbox bars are part of the picture. I don't see why (or how) madVR would not process them.

Yes, but thats blu-ray content, where the original picture indeed already contains the black bars. madVR processes the whole image, and in that case the black bars will also be part of the processing chain.

A MKV 960x408 for instance, is a different story. Assuming you have a 1920x1080 display, i think this is what happens with that particular MKV: I think madVR resizes the the MKV to 1920x816, and applies the 1920x816 image to a 1920x1080 canvas and then adds subtitles.

So the answer to the question would then be that madVR 'does it's thing' before the 2,35 black bars are there.

nand chan
1st December 2011, 16:48
Afaik madVR does color processing before the black bars are added. Or was it EVR? Damn, now I don't remember. Best test it yourself with a silly .3dlut that changes everything to red.

spuncut
1st December 2011, 19:26
Could someone drop an syntax-example on how to use "movie frame rate overwrite via file name" ?

kasper93
1st December 2011, 19:33
@spuncut: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1493804#post1493804

spuncut
1st December 2011, 20:10
@kasper93 : TNX
Has anyone considered giving madVR a whole forum, come on 500+ pages ?!?

dansrfe
1st December 2011, 20:24
@kasper93 : TNX
Has anyone considered giving madVR a whole forum, come on 500+ pages ?!?

There are threads with more pages than this one on doom9. (e.g. http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=123537)

pirlouy
2nd December 2011, 00:30
More than a forum, it's a kind of wiki page explaining settings which would help. I'm sure someone will start one someday (don't ask me, no website, English limited, skills limited, etc).

turbojet
2nd December 2011, 04:05
I am using LAV filters + madVR + ReClock. I get 0 dropped frames, 0 delayed frames and no presentation glitches. madVR OSD reports 1 frame repeat/drop every 1.05 days or so. Even though the stats look so perfect, I feel the playback is not very smooth, especially when I play 23.976 fps and 25 fps videos. I have two displays: a monitor and an HDTV. Both have a native refresh rate of 60 Hz. I have forced a custom resolution of 72 Hz on my monitor and 48 Hz on my TV, for 23.976 fps videos and also for 25 fps videos (by speeding them down using ReClock). I don't understand why I am not getting supersmooth playback.

Is there anything which I need to adjust in the 3D settings of nvidia control panel? I have a GTX 260, by the way. I have set antialiasing and anisotropic filtering to application-controlled, antialiasing transparency Off, max pre-rendered frames to default 3 (though 0 looks better to me in games), and texture filtering to high quality.

There is one thing which I have noticed. ReClock and madVR OSD report a display refresh rate, for all custom resolutions in both the displays, which is not very exact. For example, when I run my monitor at 60 Hz native refresh rate, it is reported as 60.019 Hz. Likewise, 72 Hz is reported as 72.023 Hz. I wonder if there is a way to make them more accurate (upto two decimal places).

I have one specific issue with VC1 files and some m2ts files. Without ReClock, they run perfect with no frame drops (though CPU usage is high). With ReClock, there are a lot of dropped frames and the video is just not watchable.

I am new to this forum and it's really a long thread. I am slowly catching up. :)

@ Madshi: You are doing a great job!!

I had the same issue with a 9500GT and an X300M and tried reclock as well. Have you tried lowering the queues and backbuffer?

My short 2 week experience with madvr is the auto queue doesn't work at all on the X300M, black screen and 100% cpu usage, freezes the computer for a few seconds. Setting it to 4 allows SD to be played with Lanczos3 but HD has many frame drops with all resizers.

With the 9500GT autoset queues of 12/8 allows SD but there's a lot of drops with HD. After setting queues to 4/4, HD plays with 0 frame drops/delays according to madvr but occasionally there was what appeared to be frame drops with SD and HD. Adjusting the back buffers to 1 fixed this problem. This is with Lanczos8.

It would be nice if in a later version the queues could be set lower in hopes that HD plays on an X300M with MadVR. Also more lanczos taps options would be nice, like 6 and would there be any advantage to more than 8 taps?

dansrfe
2nd December 2011, 05:28
I think the queue settings are broken in this latest madVR version.

omarank
2nd December 2011, 06:02
Have you tried lowering the queues and backbuffer?
My short 2 week experience with madvr is the auto queue doesn't work at all on the X300M


Yes, auto queue doesn't work for me either. Nor do lowering the queues and backbuffer help. I have played with the settings and found that these work best for me:
fullscreen exclusive mode [ticked]
use a separate device for presentation [ticked]
use D3D11 for presentation [unticked]
CPU queue size: 24
GPU queue size: 12

windowed mode settings: 8 backbuffers, flush, flush, flush, flush

exclusive mode settings: here I use Nevcairiel's settings -> present several frames in advance [ticked], 12, don't flush, flush, flush, flush & wait (sleep), run presentation in a separate thread [unticked].. in my setup, I have to tick the last two options for glitch free playback

However, even after trying many different combinations of settings, I can't get rid of those issues which I mentioned.

Also more lanczos taps options would be nice, like 6 and would there be any advantage to more than 8 taps?

I use SoftCubic 100 for chroma and Lanczos 4 taps for luma up/downsampling. When you go beyond 4 taps in Lanczos, there is a little increase in sharpness at the expense of too much increase in ringing. So there are more disadvantages than advantages with Lanczos 4+ taps.

Mikey2
2nd December 2011, 06:48
I was just testing sending an RGB32 signal from ffdShow (instead of YV12 or NV12) and for some reason only the top half of the screen is rendered. What could be causing this?

I did all of the pertinent testing I could think of. It works fine using EVR as the Renderer, so it is most likely an issue with Madvr.

The only scenario that works correctly is when I am playing 1080P source material (i.e. something that does not need to be resized on my 1080P TV.) However, everything else, from MPEG2(DVD) to XVid, even to h264 720 HD material all have the bottom half of the screen chopped-off when feeding it an RGB signal.

I tried multiple configuration options in madVR, such as trying D3D11, rendering in a seperate thread, windowed/exclusive mode etc, but no matter what, it only displays the top half of the screen. Furthermore the PIN-info looks correct and the OSD claims it is correctly re-sizing it, the image itself is just missing the bottom.

See screenshot below:

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s297/mikeyurkus/FuturamaScreenCut2.png



Here is the same [correct] screenshot. Everything is exactly the same except this time I am feeding an NV12 signal into Madvr:

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s297/mikeyurkus/FuturamaScreenFull.png

Does anyone have an idea on what could be causing this?
Thanks much!

Andy o
2nd December 2011, 08:17
I have one specific issue with VC1 files and some m2ts files. Without ReClock, they run perfect with no frame drops (though CPU usage is high). With ReClock, there are a lot of dropped frames and the video is just not watchable.


Try the "clean-up video timings database" button in Reclock's advanced settings.

Also, info on your hardware/software/OS/drivers is always good to provide.

EDIT: if the above doesn't fix it, since you said CPU is high, maybe ReClock is maxing it out when doing resampling? Check ReClock's CPU usage and if possible lower the output sample rate and/or interpolation quality.

dansrfe
2nd December 2011, 08:50
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s297/mikeyurkus/FuturamaScreenFull.png

I know this is kind of off topic however I find it very odd that your refresh rate is set to 23.976Hz and the video is running at 29.970Hz. Unless it is flagged content or something.

EDIT: Never mind it is flagged content. I can see that based on the DVD resolution now.

How did you force madVR to change the refresh rate to 23.976Hz even though the source filter only claims 29.970fps (even though we know it is actually 23.976fps)?

omarank
2nd December 2011, 09:13
Try the "clean-up video timings database" button in Reclock's advanced settings.

Also, info on your hardware/software/OS/drivers is always good to provide.

EDIT: if the above doesn't fix it, since you said CPU is high, maybe ReClock is maxing it out when doing resampling? Check ReClock's CPU usage and if possible lower the output sample rate and/or interpolation quality.

I tried your suggestion. You guessed it right. CPU is the bottleneck in my system. When I changed the interpolation quality in ReClock from "best sync" to "fast sync", the video playback became perfect. :thanks:


System info:
nvidia GTX 260, Pentium D 3.0 GHz, Win 7 32 bit, mpc hc 1.5.3.3856, LAV filters + madVR + ReClock, nvidia driver version 285.62

Andy o
2nd December 2011, 10:21
madVR doesn't force refresh rates unless you specifically tell it to.

golagoda
2nd December 2011, 10:21
I was just testing sending an RGB32 signal from ffdShow (instead of YV12 or NV12) and for some reason only the top half of the screen is rendered. What could be causing this?

I did all of the pertinent testing I could think of. It works fine using EVR as the Renderer, so it is most likely an issue with Madvr.

The only scenario that works correctly is when I am playing 1080P source material (i.e. something that does not need to be resized on my 1080P TV.) However, everything else, from MPEG2(DVD) to XVid, even to h264 720 HD material all have the bottom half of the screen chopped-off when feeding it an RGB signal.

I tried multiple configuration options in madVR, such as trying D3D11, rendering in a seperate thread, windowed/exclusive mode etc, but no matter what, it only displays the top half of the screen. Furthermore the PIN-info looks correct and the OSD claims it is correctly re-sizing it, the image itself is just missing the bottom.

See screenshot below:

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s297/mikeyurkus/FuturamaScreenCut2.png



Here is the same [correct] screenshot. Everything is exactly the same except this time I am feeding an NV12 signal into Madvr:

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s297/mikeyurkus/FuturamaScreenFull.png

Does anyone have an idea on what could be causing this?
Thanks much!
Who knows if it's the problem but in the screenshot that isn't working properly notice how the OSD says that it's Full range as reported by ffdshow and in the working screenshot it says limited range.

Only thing that becomes immediately apparent to me.. not much info given and it's just a stab in the dark :p

dansrfe
2nd December 2011, 11:19
madVR doesn't force refresh rates unless you specifically tell it to.

But my question is how he managed to get madVR to use 23.976Hz refresh rate with the information of 29.970fps from the source filter?

omarank
2nd December 2011, 11:22
Try the "clean-up video timings database" button in Reclock's advanced settings.

Also, info on your hardware/software/OS/drivers is always good to provide.

EDIT: if the above doesn't fix it, since you said CPU is high, maybe ReClock is maxing it out when doing resampling? Check ReClock's CPU usage and if possible lower the output sample rate and/or interpolation quality.

I tried your suggestion. You guessed it right. CPU is the bottleneck in my system. When I changed the interpolation quality in ReClock from "best sync" to "fast sync", the video playback became perfect. :thanks:

My system info:
nvidia GTX 260, Pentium D 3.0 GHz, Win 7 32 bit, mpc hc 1.5.3.3856, LAV filters + madVR + ReClock, nvidia driver version 285.62

nevcairiel
2nd December 2011, 11:35
But my question is how he managed to get madVR to use 23.976Hz refresh rate with the information of 29.970fps from the source filter?

He never claimed to use auto refresh rate switching.

Matching_Mole
2nd December 2011, 14:04
But my question is how he managed to get madVR to use 23.976Hz refresh rate with the information of 29.970fps from the source filter?

I have the same kind of question. I mean, I understood (but I'm maybe wrong) that Madvr "analyse" the real framerate received by it and can so overwrite the framerate announced by the source filter or something like that, a functionality near of the FTC of the evr custom renderer of MPC. But currently I'm not sure because no information about the "real" framerate expected by Madvr when a IVTC filter is used is displayed.

Madshi, can you just tell us what is exactly the behavior of Madvr in such case?

NanoBot
2nd December 2011, 15:09
Hi,

I would like to suggest a ( small ) new feature concerning the auto refresh rate switching:

How about an additional tick box, which enables or disables the auto refresh rate feature while keeping the refresh rates filled in. ATM, the only possibility to temporarily disable the autorefresh is to remove the rates from the text field and to fill them in again later. Sometimes I would like to have a quick overview over a couple of video clips with different frame rates, and in this situation the small pause / black frame between the videos caused by the auto refresh rate adjustment is a little bit annoying.

dansrfe
2nd December 2011, 16:24
Does anyone know how to change a specific monitor's refresh rate and resolution with a batch file?

Colomba
2nd December 2011, 16:37
I get horizontal artifacts at the top of the screen in non lettebox movies and tv-shows, how do I remove them?

noee
2nd December 2011, 16:38
@dansfre
With ATI, you can setup a profile for the refresh rate, then run the profile from a batch file. There are a few free tools that you can call from the cmdline in a batch file. Some players support it, for example, jrMediaCenter supports a command line call to modify monitor settings that can be called in a batch file. There are numerous ways.

Andy o
2nd December 2011, 16:47
I get horizontal artifacts at the top of the screen in non lettebox movies and tv-shows, how do I remove them?

screenshots, hardware, software, OS, samples, etc.?

Colomba
2nd December 2011, 16:53
screenshots, hardware, software, OS, samples, etc.?
They are hard to capture, they only appear when paning. It's like the picture splits in the top, I've seen it before but don't remember how to remove it.

Win7 X64, MPC-HC, madVR, CoreAVC, GTX285.

JAMESE
2nd December 2011, 17:20
That's good.
it is a great information for me.
Thanks for sharing.

spuncut
2nd December 2011, 20:11
Hi,

I would like to suggest a ( small ) new feature concerning the auto refresh rate switching:

How about an additional tick box, which enables or disables the auto refresh rate feature while keeping the refresh rates filled in. ATM, the only possibility to temporarily disable the autorefresh is to remove the rates from the text field and to fill them in again later. Sometimes I would like to have a quick overview over a couple of video clips with different frame rates, and in this situation the small pause / black frame between the videos caused by the auto refresh rate adjustment is a little bit annoying.

I would like that too ;)

@dansrfe : Maybe this will help you :

http://www.sevenforums.com/graphic-cards/28354-dual-monitors-quick-hdmi-switch.html

spuncut
2nd December 2011, 20:13
Hi,

I would like to suggest a ( small ) new feature concerning the auto refresh rate switching:

How about an additional tick box, which enables or disables the auto refresh rate feature while keeping the refresh rates filled in. ATM, the only possibility to temporarily disable the autorefresh is to remove the rates from the text field and to fill them in again later. Sometimes I would like to have a quick overview over a couple of video clips with different frame rates, and in this situation the small pause / black frame between the videos caused by the auto refresh rate adjustment is a little bit annoying.

I would like that too ;)

@dansrfe : Maybe this will help you :

http://www.sevenforums.com/graphic-cards/28354-dual-monitors-quick-hdmi-switch.html

Andy o
2nd December 2011, 21:09
They are hard to capture, they only appear when paning. It's like the picture splits in the top, I've seen it before but don't remember how to remove it.

Win7 X64, MPC-HC, madVR, CoreAVC, GTX285.

How have you tested and concluded it's madVR? Have you tried other decoders? It could also be a certain combination of filters or settings.

Andy o
2nd December 2011, 21:10
But my question is how he managed to get madVR to use 23.976Hz refresh rate with the information of 29.970fps from the source filter?

besides what nev said about the guy not using the auto refresh rate option, you can actually do this manually by adding a "23p" to the name of the file (of course you have to have auto refresh rate enabled and set a 23/24p resolution as well).

Mikey2
2nd December 2011, 23:03
How did you force madVR to change the refresh rate to 23.976Hz even though the source filter only claims 29.970fps (even though we know it is actually 23.976fps)?

LOL, by no means was I trying to talk about this with those screenshots, but since I have been having trouble with .79 and de-interlacing, I have been tinkering with refresh rates a lot in the past few weeks.

Short answer: The followup responses were correct...since most of my DVD's are actually 23.976 at the source (and only report 29.970fps because of 3:2 pull-down) so far I found it best just to set "1080p23, 1080p24" under display-modes in Madvr. (Or I just leave it blank.) I just use ReClock and manually change my monitor from to 59/60hz if I actually need to (which is rare.)

Longer answer: Notice for that screen-shot, I am directly playing the VOB file in MPC, rather than opening it up as a DVD. I normally do not do this because it will incorrectly report any DVD as 29.970, regardless of the source file's "true" refresh rate. On the other hand, opening it up as a DVD will read the info based on the IFO file and correctly report 23.970 up through the chain. (However, this is counter-intuitive to me since MediaInfo reports 29.970 in the IFO file and 23.976 in the .VOB (even if the VOB is reporting 2:3 "pull-up" being performed to make the encode)...but that is a question for another board at another time. ;) )

Anyway, back on-topic: golagoda - Good eye on seeing that difference in ranges. However, I am pretty positive that is irrelevant. That has to do with color-spaces (0-255=="full" and 16-235=="limited".) When using RGB mode, one explicitly sets the output colorspace in ffdShow or whatever filter is doing the conversion (which is 0-255 in my case.) However, YV12/NV12 and other "raw" FOURCC's do not report nor set this, thus the OSD is showing a "best guess." Unfortunately that "guess" is wrong, but it is no big deal since I explicitly set my display to 0-255 in madVR.

...On second thought that is not "back on-topic" at all. :devil:

I apologize for that (and the long-winded response.) Thanks everyone for your responses and your help. But for now I think I will stick to NV12/YV10, which is the de-facto standard in most situations anyway (especially when we start seeing more 10-bit encodes and I can start using P010 ;).)

The only reason I was even attempted this in the first place is that after hours of testing, I am pretty sure that my .79/de-interlace frame-drop problems are the result of my GPU's limited RAM (256MB) and processing power, and from what I understand, the RGB format pushes even more processing away from the GPU and back to the CPU...it was a shot in the dark anyway and probably will not solve my problem.

In any case, if it is a bug in Madvr itself, I figured it would not hurt to report it.

Thanks again!
MikY

Skwelcha
2nd December 2011, 23:18
Got my new Denon AVR-1912 Receiver today and encountered a new problem... Before i used the HDMI passthrough of the receiver to get my signal to the TV my configuration was like this: ATI CCC set to 4:4:4 Full RGB output, lav video set to untouched levels, madvr set to 0-255 output and for my TV the same, RGB 0-255. When I took a look on a black clipping test video with this configuration i could see the flashing fields from like 16 to 25(which is the maximum of this test pattern). But now with the new a/v receiver i can't see clipping even on 25 with the same configuration... When i set madvr now to 16-235, the flashing fields get visible again from about 15 to 25... Does that mean the receiver cant output FULL RGB?

SamuriHL
2nd December 2011, 23:22
Don't set madVR to 16-235. Set the dynamic range in CCC to Limited 16-235 and see if that fixes your issue.

Xaurus
2nd December 2011, 23:23
Got my new Denon AVR-1912 Receiver today and encountered a new problem... Before i used the HDMI passthrough of the receiver to get my signal to the TV my configuration was like this: ATI CCC set to 4:4:4 Full RGB output, lav video set to untouched levels, madvr set to 0-255 output and for my TV the same. When took a look on a black clipping test video with this configuration i could see clipping from like 16 to 25(which was the maximum). Now with the new a/v receiver i can't see clipping even on 25 with the same configuration... When i set madvr to 16-235, the clipping gets visible again from about 15 to 25... Does that mean the receiver cant output FULL RGB?
My Marantz SR5006 can only pass through 0-255 yCbCr, not 0-255 RGB.

Since many of the same components are in Denon and Marantz products (same owner) there might be a relation here.

6233638
2nd December 2011, 23:33
Also more lanczos taps options would be nice, like 6 and would there be any advantage to more than 8 taps?With more taps, aliasing goes down, but ringing increases by a huge amount.

When scaling 1080p content to 4K though, pretty much all of the upsampling algorithms suck, which I think shows that there's probably a lot more that can be done for DVD to 1080p right now.

Lanczos8 gave the best results (ringing aside) if I remember correctly though, so more taps would probably be a good thing if something could be done about ringing. (it would be nice if something could be done about aliasing when using linear light scaling too)

They are hard to capture, they only appear when paning. It's like the picture splits in the top, I've seen it before but don't remember how to remove it.Sounds like screen tearing. Do you have v-sync forced off in your driver settings? Are you not using full-screen exclusive mode?