Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 [1176] 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

SamuriHL
22nd February 2020, 01:11
It's clear you have no idea what I'm talking about so I'm just going to leave at that. Of course you can factory reset it back to defaults. I never said you couldn't. I didn't say the TV is permanently screwed up by a bad calibration. However, since us LG owners upload the LUTS directly to the TV, if you DON'T factory reset, you are stuck with a bad calibration until you do. What I SAID was that a bad calibration makes the picture quality worse. And the point of a calibration SHOULD be to get the picture as close to reference as possible. Anyway, you're just not getting what I'm saying so we'll leave it at that.

Manni
22nd February 2020, 01:17
Please could you take this off topic generic calibration discussion in another thread? Thanks :)

SamuriHL
22nd February 2020, 01:22
Don't need to, I'm done. :)

SamuriHL
22nd February 2020, 20:16
I have what is very likely a stupid question. But you know me, never afraid to ask! :D Windows has the idea of scaling when you set a fairly high resolution. For 1080p it tends to go to 150% and for 2160p it defaults to 300% on the desktop. When playing video full screen windowed mode, does that scaling apply to the video at all? Or does madvr's windowed mode "override" the scaling set on the desktop? As I said, probably a ridiculously stupid question on my part but I am curious. Thanks!

Manni
22nd February 2020, 20:47
I have what is very likely a stupid question. But you know me, never afraid to ask! :D Windows has the idea of scaling when you set a fairly high resolution. For 1080p it tends to go to 150% and for 2160p it defaults to 300% on the desktop. When playing video full screen windowed mode, does that scaling apply to the video at all? Or does madvr's windowed mode "override" the scaling set on the desktop? As I said, probably a ridiculously stupid question on my part but I am curious. Thanks!

The scaling is only for the GUI. I use 200% and that doesn't impact on video content.

SamuriHL
22nd February 2020, 20:49
Thanks, Manni. I figured that was probably the case but thought I'd ask cause I didn't know for sure.

Siso
22nd February 2020, 22:34
Guys, which scenario is right - NGU Sharp low+SSIM 1D 100 AR LL, or NGU Sharp medium+Bicubic 150 AR LL?

ryrynz
23rd February 2020, 00:13
There is no "right" but I would think most here would go with NGU Sharp Medium + Bicubic 150 AR LL for the higher quality upscaling and sharper resulting downscaled image but at the end
nobody knows your panel sharpness or your viewing distance and preferences so just pick what you like.

nevcairiel
23rd February 2020, 01:39
Thanks, Manni. I figured that was probably the case but thought I'd ask cause I didn't know for sure.

Actually, that depends on the player. If a player entirely ignores any Windows DPI handling, then the desktop scaling would in fact affect the video.

An application (ie. the player) would have to tell windows to not scale it, since it does its own scaling. Windows otherwise cannot scale selectively. It either scales the entire player, or nothing of it.

WuNgUn
23rd February 2020, 01:42
Actually, that depends on the player. If a player entirely ignores any Windows DPI handling, then the desktop scaling would in fact affect the video.



An application (ie. the player) would have to tell windows to not scale it, since it does its own scaling. Windows otherwise cannot scale selectively. It either scales the entire player, or nothing of it.Can someone help with my scaling...
Whenever I'm in 23Hz film mode, my TV overscans. The TV doesn't give me an option to resize and scaling from the nVidia CP just reduces the resolution to make the image fit...
What to do!?

SamuriHL
23rd February 2020, 02:03
Actually, that depends on the player. If a player entirely ignores any Windows DPI handling, then the desktop scaling would in fact affect the video.

An application (ie. the player) would have to tell windows to not scale it, since it does its own scaling. Windows otherwise cannot scale selectively. It either scales the entire player, or nothing of it.

Well, ok....you obviously know which player I use. :D Is this something I have to worry about with madvr in JRiver?

nevcairiel
23rd February 2020, 02:16
Well, ok....you obviously know which player I use. :D Is this something I have to worry about with madvr in JRiver?

Not usually. Things only get tricky if you mix screens with different scaling values. And the madVR OSD would tell you the resolution that madVR thinks its rendering to, if thats not the real screen res, then you know something is wrong.

huhn
23rd February 2020, 02:16
the madVR OSD is clear about this so you are fine browser have problem with this.

SamuriHL
23rd February 2020, 02:24
Thanks, guys. Much appreciated!

tp4tissue
23rd February 2020, 04:16
Guys, which scenario is right - NGU Sharp low+SSIM 1D 100 AR LL, or NGU Sharp medium+Bicubic 150 AR LL?

Obviously, you put everything you can into Luma, then consider chroma.

If it's downscaling, then it really doesn't matter what the chroma is because you're gonna have enough power to ngu both.

In the case of NGU then downscale, Unless it's from a very very small resolution to slightly higher than native res, then downscale, it doesn't really matter, because NGU makes posterized edges on these. And from a distance they look the same as cheaper algorithms

Klaus1189
23rd February 2020, 06:12
Can someone help with my scaling...
Whenever I'm in 23Hz film mode, my TV overscans. The TV doesn't give me an option to resize and scaling from the nVidia CP just reduces the resolution to make the image fit...
What to do!?

Manufacturer of TV? What Firmware version?

Siso
23rd February 2020, 09:53
In the case of NGU then downscale, Unless it's from a very very small resolution to slightly higher than native res, then downscale, it doesn't really matter, because NGU makes posterized edges on these. And from a distance they look the same as cheaper algorithms

I'm using image doubling for 1080p, then downscaling to 3440x1440p.

WuNgUn
23rd February 2020, 13:40
Manufacturer of TV? What Firmware version?It's a Samsung UN75RU8000FXZC, software version 1351.3
Pictire size settings in settings is just greyed out

Klaus1189
23rd February 2020, 15:44
There's a known bug introduced in firmware version 1290, last working was 1270.
Please try and play a 25fps file or 50 fps file and play it at 50 Hz. Picture should be also cut off.
The only refresh rate which is fine should be 60 Hz.

And what HDMI mode do you use? I assume PC mode for 4:4:4 color / RGB support.

WuNgUn
23rd February 2020, 16:31
There's a known bug introduced in firmware version 1290, last working was 1270.
Please try and play a 25fps file or 50 fps file and play it at 50 Hz. Picture should be also cut off.
The only refresh rate which is fine should be 60 Hz.

And what HDMI mode do you use? I assume PC mode for 4:4:4 color / RGB support.

Thanks for the reply... Typical swift Samsung updates to fix issues!
Seeing the issue on all refresh rates other than 60hz, correct.

Yes, PC mode on the HDMI input...

There is resizing in the nVidia control panel, but as I mentioned earlier, it isn't shrinking the overscanning, it's reducing the resolution... Which I don't think is something I wanna do. Native resolution only.

Klaus1189
23rd February 2020, 17:56
Yes you are right that you cannot fix this issue in driver settings on the gfx card, because the TV is simply cutting off the picture called overscan. I personally never really understood why TVs which only have digital inputs anymore have the overscan feature built in.
All HDMI signals I am aware of are free on anything that needs to be cut off other than old Video from VHS for example :)

tp4tissue
23rd February 2020, 18:18
Yes you are right that you cannot fix this issue in driver settings on the gfx card, because the TV is simply cutting off the picture called overscan. I personally never really understood why TVs which only have digital inputs anymore have the overscan feature built in.
All HDMI signals I am aware of are free on anything that needs to be cut off other than old Video from VHS for example :)

Cable boxes which receive broadcast with bad edges. None of us watch cable. but many still do. :scared:

WuNgUn
23rd February 2020, 18:24
I guess that makes sense... The TV should recognize the signal though, and treat it as such....

huhn
24th February 2020, 02:05
overscan is gone with UHD samsung should really fix this.

try in the nvidia driver display -> adjust desktop colour settings -> content type reported to display.

if they follow specs and you have something like graphic, desktop programs, games or similar you maybe able to beat it but you are most likely wasting your time.

tp4tissue
24th February 2020, 08:38
samsung can definitely disable overscan, Try PC mode.

DMU
24th February 2020, 09:56
In PC mode with a frequency of 23, 24, 25, 50 Hz will be overscan. With frequencies 29, 30, 59, 60 the image will be fit to screen.

Klaus1189
24th February 2020, 12:00
It can but there is bug that other than 60 Hz in pc mode overscan is always cutting off the image. 1270 is last working fine.

WuNgUn
24th February 2020, 12:45
It can but there is bug that other than 60 Hz in pc mode overscan is always cutting off the image. 1270 is last working fine.Is this older firmware available online? Can the TV be downgraded?

Klaus1189
24th February 2020, 16:30
No, I asked Samsung but it can‘t be downgraded.

tp4tissue
24th February 2020, 17:10
No, I asked Samsung but it can‘t be downgraded.

obviously it can, but they won't tell us how.

But don't sweat it, the 60hz works mode works fine. perfect cadence is over-rated. :D

For future reference, Roku platform tvs are the BEST behaved for monitor use. everything just works, and they don't have any crazy image processing stuff that destabilizes the display response..

My samsung doesn't even support 444 in 23/24hz mode. but on my $200 roku tv no problem,

Klaus1189
24th February 2020, 18:28
I created a new thread, so this thread can be releaved on TV issues:
Television issues and firmware bugs and buyers guide for your next TV (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=180421)

traykov77
25th February 2020, 11:56
On samsung tv you can try to use not pc mode and in picture options set full pixell, not 16:9.

madjock
25th February 2020, 12:27
If only there was a TV Thread. :confused:

WuNgUn
25th February 2020, 12:44
On samsung tv you can try to use not pc mode and in picture options set full pixell, not 16:9.I don't see where you can change HDMI input mode... Just stays as PC

traykov77
25th February 2020, 13:40
I don't see where you can change HDMI input mode... Just stays as PC

on every hdmi input you can edit name and set pc, dvi, receiver .... or just hdmi. when hdmi is not on pc mode you have full option on picture settings enabled.

el Filou
27th February 2020, 21:25
For me 113 has improved significantly. And I think my gtx1060 can hold for longer time.
the problem is the rendertimes are not correct anymore 23p may work with 42 ms don't think about it just take it.He claims the render times are more accurate in 113 than they were in the past and that even though they've "increased" they were in reality always that high.
I've done some tests with v113 on my HTPC and while I didn't notice lower GPU usage in "low load" scenarios, what I'm seeing is much more stable GPU clocks. For example when watching 576p on 1080 with NGU Very High, where before GPU was varying a lot between ~1533 and ~1721 MHz it nows stays put at 1620.
The better performance is real, I can now use the live tone mapping to watch HDR instead of measurement files. :cool:
Not sure about the inaccuracy of rendering times. On one test I did they were ~40-41 ms for 25p and it couldn't keep the render queue full so they seemed accurate. The GPU certainly can keep up much better with really high loads now.
Shame for the smooth motion bug but if you don't use it it's a very good build indeed.

SamuriHL
27th February 2020, 23:56
Yea my experience with the build has shown slightly higher render times on my 2070 (I've not played too much on my 2080 laptop yet) but very much stable. I've had a couple times where I had to reboot the machine because I was getting really whacked dropped frames. I think that was just my machine being weird rather than some madvr issue. Overall, I've loved 113 VERY much. The PQ we get on dynamic tone mapping is insane. Yes, smooth motion not working sucks for a lot of OLED users. I'm one of those framerate matching people so it hasn't impacted me.

chros
28th February 2020, 10:40
I've done some tests with v113 on my HTPC and while I didn't notice lower GPU usage in "low load" scenarios
That's what I noticed as well: there's no change in GPU usage, but I haven't tested them very much.

brad86
28th February 2020, 16:13
If I were to keep settings the same, there is a rather large GPU usage jump when going from the older stable release to 112b when doing HDR tone-mapping.

That being said, my trusty old GTX 960 doesn't go past 70% usage worst-case-scenario, most likely due to sticking with Bicubic 75 for all downscale / upscale options. Anything like NGU seems like a complete waste on my 1080p display. Only so much you can do to filter a DVD or similar lower resolution sources. Not doubting that it might be good for upscaling 1080 to 2160 though, but thankfully I don't need to worry about that.

el Filou
28th February 2020, 18:43
There really has been a lot of development between the last official release and the latest test builds, even when not using the new features, so the jump in GPU usage is understandable.

I quite like NGU Sharp with 576p to 1080 as long as the source is good. There are ok DVDs and bad DVDs, on a good one I can see the difference easily between Jinc and NGU Sharp even on a plasma watching from 3 meters away.

mrmojo666
28th February 2020, 19:57
Hi mates,

sorry fot the OT question but after a week of reading around internet I'm totally confused.

I've got (a friend lends me for some weeks) a spyderx pro probe, I've tried to move first step in calibration by following some guides, but those guides are old or confused, do you have directions to find a good example of workflow to follow or guide or whatever you think can help me? I know you would discuss about this probe, but it's for free so i think can be good start.

Thank you

huhn
29th February 2020, 00:05
https://www.avsforum.com/forum/139-display-calibration/1471169-madvr-argyllcms.html

dated but correct.

tp4tissue
29th February 2020, 04:34
Hi mates,
Thank you

First, sell the spyderx, it's not good on dark reads. Get i1display pro or colormunki display.

Spyderx is good enough for IPS (@ minimum 200nits), but will error out on VA and OLED.

huhn
29th February 2020, 04:50
it can read down to 0.028 nits so you can use it for most LCDs and even if you have a deeper black than this there are ways to workaround it by not reading them.

madjock
29th February 2020, 07:16
First, sell the spyderx

I would have thought that his friend would be quite annoyed if he sold it.

mrmojo666
29th February 2020, 09:09
LOL

thank you guys :)

I was sure that someone discuss the probe :D but actually it is lend and i have a IPS LCD ...... so at the moment it's fine, in the future i'll take something different

that link is interesting, but focused on LUT, i woud like to calibrate the tv as best as possible with his controls (i have not only the htpc). But i think to have found enough information to start.

Flavio61
29th February 2020, 21:04
In my madVR configuration I have two separate profiles for the "Screen Config" and two profiles for "Properties". With the two profiles of the "Screen Config" I select based on the AR one profile for 16: 9 and one for 21: 9. These two profiles automatically activate (through the "Activate lens memory ..." parameter) the relative lens configuration on my JVC. In the two profiles of "properites" I select if a film is in SDR or in HDR and depending on the selected profile I send a command to through the software JVCControl.exe to activate the relative Picture Mode on the JVC. The problem is that if the two settings are active at the same time, only one works, or the lens setting is activated or the picture mode setting is activated, I cannot make them function together. Is there any solution?

Dogway
1st March 2020, 17:31
There are errors ("profiling has not been finished") after running long patches (above 79) with madTPG, this doesn't happen when using DisplayCAL patches. I'm unsure if this has to do with the probe sleep mode or something because it affects different models:
https://hub.displaycal.net/forums/topic/aborted-profiling-has-not-been-finished/
https://hub.displaycal.net/forums/topic/profile-has-not-been-finished-madvr-3d-lut/

Megalith
1st March 2020, 22:34
How do you determine the minimum rendering time that's required to display video as intended? In most of the media I've played, I don't seem to notice any real stutter or lag as long as rendering is under 35 ms or so, but Gemini Man (60 FPS) only seems to look right when rendering is under 10 ms.

ashlar42
1st March 2020, 23:04
How do you determine the minimum rendering time that's required to display video as intended? In most of the media I've played, I don't seem to notice any real stutter or lag as long as rendering is under 35 ms or so, but Gemini Man (60 FPS) only seems to look right when rendering is under 10 ms.Divide 1000ms by frames per second.

At 60 fps you need to stay comfortably below 16.67ms per frame.
At 24 fps you need to stay comfortably below 41.67ms per frame.

Edit: madVR OSD (CTRL+J by default I think) gives you the value you are looking for on the vsync, frame line. The value is the frame one.