Log in

View Full Version : madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 [1154] 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329

Siso
22nd October 2019, 17:25
No idea then, unless you're using more than one monitor, which can cause similar issues.

Only one monitor and that's all. I'm thinking it might be happening after shutdown of the pc, tried with restart again and it was ok, I'll test with shutdown again later.

mclingo
22nd October 2019, 17:29
The current algos are great with light banding, no issues there are all, these can stay as they are. Howeve they are not suitable for near black macro blocking and other near black issues because the algo works on the entire picture so if you have to go heavy to deal with really bad near black issues it destroys the rest of the image.

We really need something that just works at near black, lighter areas of the picture dont get compressed as much and tend to look ok.

The final game of thrones seaon is a good example, it was totally unwatchable at times on OLED but it wasnt much better on high end LCD's either.

An example bluray is Snowpeircer, here is a clip, its all kinds of awful.

https://1drv.ms/v/s!AgvFafeelEBijd4jDEfXshvmKKfkWw?e=8p04yS

huhn
22nd October 2019, 18:08
a blu ray encoded with 1 ref frame and 11 mbit combined with 32 kbit mono AAC and cropped?
why do i even get a feeling this is CBR encoded from someone that has ittle to no clue what they are doing which will make dark scenes even worse.

mclingo
22nd October 2019, 19:11
yes its a quck and dirty rip, but hey, why not throw in a totally unnecessary insult , that always helps doesnt it....

its looks identical to the bluray which I also have.

mclingo
22nd October 2019, 19:19
bluray

https://1drv.ms/u/s!AgvFafeelEBij5kHF5JUgm0sdK6NKg?e=BWDUzW


dirty rip

https://1drv.ms/u/s!AgvFafeelEBij5kGitESdrI2luDFtA?e=xBYcGQ

huhn
22nd October 2019, 19:27
so having little to no clue what someone is doing in something like this is an insult?

an tool like mkvtoolkit can cut files without any reencoding and it should be faster too.

huhn
22nd October 2019, 19:38
can you plz make sure it is the same frame. you can navigate per frame by using control + arrow key left right in mpc-HC.
both are still cropped and that's not allowed on a blu ray.

BTW. you don't have to provide a sample from a blu ray your reencode is fine too but you should specify that because if you don't the first question should be if the encoded is bad because it is not a blu ray so a problem with an reencode.

edit: plz lossless images like png we want to judge rendered images not images that are again compressed.

mclingo
22nd October 2019, 19:43
you've pointed out a percieved inadequcy with a clip ive posted which turned out to be wrong, the clip was perfectly adequate for the intented purpose as you can see in the screen shots, therefore I knew exactly what I was doing when I made it several years ago, if I made it again now, it might be different but its totally fine.

But that isnt really the problem, its your abraisive manner, you could have simply said " are you sure that clip is a good enough representation of the bluray", but no, you want straight into accuse mode.

Do you even know when you are being abraisive, are you deliberately trying to wind people up or is there a language barrier here?

huhn
22nd October 2019, 19:47
you just posted jpg of different frames.

so again you have no clue what you are doing good day sir.

mclingo
22nd October 2019, 20:14
it should be clear to everyone that the compression artefacts are so bad that its irrelvant that they dont share the same frame, this was meant as a comparison shot to show that the clip was close enough to the bluray.

stop being so petty and puerile.

ryrynz
22nd October 2019, 21:10
This feature request has been brought up multiple times, we're all aware of the limitations of some sets and the likelihood we'll see anything addressing those in madVR in the short term. Didn't really need it brought up again, by the time anything is likely implemented you'll have a new TV.

Alexkral
22nd October 2019, 23:12
We really need something that just works at near black, lighter areas of the picture dont get compressed as much and tend to look ok.
The final game of thrones seaon is a good example, it was totally unwatchable at times on OLED but it wasnt much better on high end LCD's either.

My TV doesn't have a good enough contrast ratio, so I had to increase the brightness of your images a little to be able to see what you're talking about, and yet it doesn't seem too noticeable. So you say that these artifacts are very noticeable in an OLED in a not completely dark environment? In that case I guess that reducing the brightness a bit should help.

This feature request has been brought up multiple times, we're all aware of the limitations of some sets and the likelihood we'll see anything addressing those in madVR in the short term. Didn't really need it brought up again, by the time anything is likely implemented you'll have a new TV.

The point is that this is not due to a limitation but because of a feature such as the contrast ratio that is likely to continue to improve on future TVs.

exuvo
22nd October 2019, 23:16
I recently added a new graphics card to my computer, a RX 5700 XT on PCIE3x8, in parallel with my older Radeon R9 290X on PCIE3x4. Both work fine with madVR except with the 5700 card it takes an additional 2 seconds to start video playback compared to the old card with exactly the same madVR settings. Seems unrelated to the file being played. I assumed this was shader cache related and tried clearing that from Radeon settings but nothing changed. I enabled "delay playback start until render queue is full" to avoid dropping frames at the start for now but would rather remove the delay.

Start time from when MPC-HC window appears to video playing:
On display connected to R9 290X: 1.3s
On display connected to RX 5700 XT: 3.1s

OS Windows 7 64-bit

Any ideas what could be causing it and how I could fix it?

I also seem to have been hit by coil whine with NGU (very high is very noticeable, others are slightly audible) but can almost completely (only audible if room is quiet or ear next to computer) resolve that by setting "don't flush after intermediate render steps". Combined with lowering GPU powerlimit to -50% (still plenty of performance left) it completely removes the coil whine (barely audible with ear next to GPU).

j82k
23rd October 2019, 04:02
My TV doesn't have a good enough contrast ratio, so I had to increase the brightness of your images a little to be able to see what you're talking about, and yet it doesn't seem too noticeable. So you say that these artifacts are very noticeable in an OLED in a not completely dark environment? In that case I guess that reducing the brightness a bit should help.

I think the problem is that he has a 2015 Oled.
2015/2016 Oleds had terrible near-black gradation. I've had a LG C6 before and that TV would show any near-black artifacts exaggerated.

Recent Oleds generally handle near-blacks much better but there are still some issues...

huhn
23rd October 2019, 05:49
My TV doesn't have a good enough contrast ratio, so I had to increase the brightness of your images a little to be able to see what you're talking about, and yet it doesn't seem too noticeable. So you say that these artifacts are very noticeable in an OLED in a not completely dark environment? In that case I guess that reducing the brightness a bit should help.
if you calibrate your system properly and in this case not clipping levels is enough to see compression artefacts
if an screen is unable to display this properly is just an completely different issue.

what so ever this file is not nice. deband high does a pretty good job on it but this is not fixable is just how much do you want to hide vs how much damage to the not dark part are fine to you. it's could be possible to trigger the dreaded black makro block flickering on these LG oleds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl_t3UQ3gAk

mastering screen are usually IPS 1000:1 screen like the eizo coloredge series there are other screen that are not IPS yes there are but that's not the point.
This feature request has been brought up multiple times, we're all aware of the limitations of some sets and the likelihood we'll see anything addressing those in madVR in the short term. Didn't really need it brought up again, by the time anything is likely implemented you'll have a new TV.
lowing the bit deep for dark scenes using dithering was talked before for oled but i can't remember dynamic post processing.

tony359
23rd October 2019, 17:57
Hi there

wondering if anybody could help on my last question I posted here (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1886695#post1886695)?

Thanks!

huhn
24th October 2019, 00:42
using HDR mode on projector is not recommended.

Since I'm here, another unrelated question: if I play some older videos (in my case a 720x480 video), picture is not upscaled to full screen. What am I missing?

that's a dvd resolution they don't have square pixels and can be used to displayed at 4:3 or 16:9 if this information is missing it will be displayed at 3:2 which is wrong if the file is for some reason supposed to be displayed like this it will have black boarders left and right.


you didn't by any chance added every resolution you could find under display mode didn't you?

Furgiuele
24th October 2019, 01:10
Hi. I'm Italian and new on this forum and I don't speak English very well.
I appreciate a lot the guide about MadVR and I'm trying to optimize it for my needs.
I have a htpc with MSI Z390A-pro mobo, I5-9600K cpu, 16 Gb ram, Nvidia 1660 gpu, bd drive, ssd and nas with a lot of concerts and movies ripped from br discs.
I have a Sony VPL-vw870es (calibrated BT2020) as projector and a Trinnov Altitude 16 as processor. I use Jriver Media Center 25 with MadVR, but I don't like to use more than one setup.
So I set MadVR with PC levels 0-255,10 bit, already calibrated BT2020 pure power curve 2.20, 2160p23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 50, 60, tone map HDR using pixel shaders, tp 100, BT2390, highlight medium, measure each frame's peak; if in doubt, deactivate deinterlacing, disable automatic source type, force video mode, only look at pixels in the frame center; chroma ups. NGU Antialias medium, image ups. luma NGU Sharp, luma qu. direct qudrupole very high, chroma high; "use Direct3D 11..." and " "present a frame for every VSync" flagged in general settings, smooth motion only if there would be motion judder; ordered dithering, no flag in trade for quality.
It works very fine with all 23.970 fps videos (4k hdr, fhd, etc.), without interlacing. But I've issue to watch 29.970 fps videos, with a lot of dropped frames, motion juddering and stuttering. I have a lot of concerts with this fps (Diana Krall, Carlos Santana, Miles Davis, ecc.).
Can someone help me?
Thanks.

nsnhd
24th October 2019, 03:44
Are there benefits or harms by setting madVR for 2160p23, p24 in comparison with setting for 2160p59, p60 only ? Could that help to prolong the time a frame will repeat in...when the display switches to around 23.970 hz by playing 23.970 fps movies ?

huhn
24th October 2019, 03:57
if you play a 23p file at 59p you are "repeating" 12 frames every second.

3ll3d00d
24th October 2019, 09:24
I have noticed inconsistent behaviour when upscaling DVD to 4k, it behaves something like it isn't upscaling for some period of time and then it corrects itself and starts upscaling again. This can happen at arbitrary times, e.g. within a single scene without having touched any playback controls or changed any settings.

An example to illustrate, I created these by just replaying a scene on a loop. It rendered it "correctly" v few times, it is mostly looking bad. Look at the guy on the wire for the obvious difference. The fact this is two different frames is irrelevant btw as the effect occurs regularly on different content, i.e. it's not specific to one scene or one particular source file.

Anyone seen something like this before? Any tips on how to resolve?

Bad - https://ibb.co/7YLkcg9
Good - https://ibb.co/P6VwpKD

nevcairiel
24th October 2019, 10:02
Your screenshots are very low resolution, making it hard to judge anything, or even read the madVR OSD at all. Perhaps upload the original screenshots to a better image host?

Asmodian
24th October 2019, 10:04
This is not an issue with upscaling. It is due to deinterlacing working well or not. madVR either uses the GPU hardware for deinterlacing or it has its own IVTC algorithm if you put it in film mode. This behavior should depend on the DVD itself, is it telecined or true interlaced?

On that note, you do not want to use 25 Hz for this DVD. It is being deinterlaced to 50 fps, as indicated by the 20ms frame time.

Edit:
Your rendering times are very high for a 20ms frame time, perhaps the deinterlacer is getting confused due to performance issues? Try turning down the NGU 4x to medium, or maybe only double with NGU high, for testing. (maybe a problem with paused OSD... I shouldn't pay too much attention to the rendering times when paused. :o)

Your screenshots are very low resolution, making it hard to judge anything, or even read the madVR OSD at all. Perhaps upload the original screenshots to a better image host?

On desktop (Chrome) I got a link on the image to download the full resolution, which did get a good image.

nevcairiel
24th October 2019, 10:14
Oh now I see it. Thats some bad UX for an image host.

ryrynz
24th October 2019, 10:59
Yeah definitely upscaling correctly, the obvious NGU upscaling can be seen throughout the image, definitely a deinterlacing issue.
You may wish to change between deinterlacing types to see what yields the best result.

3ll3d00d
24th October 2019, 12:17
This is not an issue with upscaling. It is due to deinterlacing working well or not. madVR either uses the GPU hardware for deinterlacing or it has its own IVTC algorithm if you put it in film mode. This behavior should depend on the DVD itself, is it telecined or true interlaced?

thanks

I'm not 100% sure how to tell if it is telecined or not, mediainfo reports


Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 25.000 FPS
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First


with regards to the "deinterlacing on" or "deinterlacing off" message, am I correct in thinking this refers to whether madvr or upstream is doing the deinterlacing? i.e. if on then madvr is deinterlacing, if off then something upstream is doing it.

el Filou
24th October 2019, 14:11
if in doubt, deactivate deinterlacing, disable automatic source type, force video mode [...]
I've issue to watch 29.970 fps videos, with a lot of dropped frames, motion juddering and stuttering. I have a lot of concerts with this fps (Diana Krall, Carlos Santana, Miles Davis, ecc.).Based on your description, what could be happening is those 29,970 fps concerts are telecined, and as you are forcing video mode they are deinterlaced with very bad quality to 59,94 fps and you have 3:2 motion judder, but it's hard to be sure without knowing what the source is: Blu-ray? DVD? TV?
Try to enable film mode for those concerts (you can assign a keyboard shortcut key to it) and see if it is better.
with regards to the "deinterlacing on" or "deinterlacing off" message, am I correct in thinking this refers to whether madvr or upstream is doing the deinterlacing? i.e. if on then madvr is deinterlacing, if off then something upstream is doing it.No, it just informs on what is the source of madVR's decision to deinterlace or not. In this case the upstream filter, i.e. video decoder, says it's interlace so madVR deinterlaces.
This looks to be a PAL DVD you're playing. In most cases with films on PAL DVDs you can just force disable deinterlacing and you will get a 25 fps progressive image (I've got only one PAL DVD in my film collection where this isn't the case). You will then see 'deinterlacing off' and 'frame time 40 ms'

Furgiuele
24th October 2019, 14:34
Hi. I post a question yesterday. Please, can someone help me?

Furgiuele
24th October 2019, 14:37
Hi. I'm Italian and new on this forum and I don't speak English very well.
I appreciate a lot the guide about MadVR and I'm trying to optimize it for my needs.
I have a htpc with MSI Z390A-pro mobo, I5-9600K cpu, 16 Gb ram, Nvidia 1660 gpu, bd drive, ssd and nas with a lot of concerts and movies ripped from br discs.
I have a Sony VPL-vw870es (calibrated BT2020) as projector and a Trinnov Altitude 16 as processor. I use Jriver Media Center 25 with MadVR, but I don't like to use more than one setup.
So I set MadVR with PC levels 0-255,10 bit, already calibrated BT2020 pure power curve 2.20, 2160p23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 50, 60, tone map HDR using pixel shaders, tp 100, BT2390, highlight medium, measure each frame's peak; if in doubt, deactivate deinterlacing, disable automatic source type, force video mode, only look at pixels in the frame center; chroma ups. NGU Antialias medium, image ups. luma NGU Sharp, luma qu. direct qudrupole very high, chroma high; "use Direct3D 11..." and " "present a frame for every VSync" flagged in general settings, smooth motion only if there would be motion judder; ordered dithering, no flag in trade for quality.
It works very fine with all 23.970 fps videos (4k hdr, fhd, etc.), without interlacing. But I've issue to watch 29.970 fps videos, with a lot of dropped frames, motion juddering and stuttering. I have a lot of concerts with this fps (Diana Krall, Carlos Santana, Miles Davis, ecc.).
Can someone help me?
Thanks.

Please, can someone help me?:thanks:

ashlar42
24th October 2019, 14:57
Please, can someone help me?:thanks:You need to be patient. Nobody is payed here to provide assistance. Everybody does it in his/her free time. Be patient and somebody capable enough will try to help you, I'm sure.

mclingo
24th October 2019, 15:00
Please, can someone help me?:thanks:

have you created a custom display mode in MADVR for 29.970?

disply modes/custom modes/add

Klaus1189
24th October 2019, 16:56
@Furgiuele:
See post #547 in AMD, Intel and Nvidia driver issues and last recommended version (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1883743#post1883743)
Don't use 25Hz, 29Hz and 30Hz modes, madvr picks these three first, so delete them, if you want to play properly interlaced content which has double "motion resolution" by creating fields (top field and bottom field) and not frames and store two fields in one frame.
But use 2160p for your setup, if you have "4K" Equipment ;)

huhn
24th October 2019, 17:02
I have noticed inconsistent behaviour when upscaling DVD to 4k, it behaves something like it isn't upscaling for some period of time and then it corrects itself and starts upscaling again. This can happen at arbitrary times, e.g. within a single scene without having touched any playback controls or changed any settings.

An example to illustrate, I created these by just replaying a scene on a loop. It rendered it "correctly" v few times, it is mostly looking bad. Look at the guy on the wire for the obvious difference. The fact this is two different frames is irrelevant btw as the effect occurs regularly on different content, i.e. it's not specific to one scene or one particular source file.

Anyone seen something like this before? Any tips on how to resolve?

Bad - https://ibb.co/7YLkcg9
Good - https://ibb.co/P6VwpKD

you are deinterlacing 25i to 50p which is the correct thing to do for a deinterlacer but you are displaying it at 25 which creates all kind of problems.

the next issue you are dropping frames and quite a lot of them because of some render spikes it seems hard to judge screens are from the paused state.

hardware deinteralcing needs to get a constant stream of frames not feeding it one frame my already break it so try a different player/decoder and it needs multiply frames to kick in so you can skip into the file and look at the frame it needs like 3 or frames to even start working.

Siso
24th October 2019, 18:16
Can't remember which one is better for creating a custom resolution - nvidia control panel or cru 1.4.1.

3ll3d00d
24th October 2019, 18:17
you are deinterlacing 25i to 50p which is the correct thing to do for a deinterlacer but you are displaying it at 25 which creates all kind of problems.
what sort of problems?

I don't watch many DVDs admittedly but I haven't noticed any issues (apart from the deinterlacing one). I'm bandwidth constrained (due to HDBaseT) til I can run a new hdmi cable anyway.

the next issue you are dropping frames and quite a lot of them because of some render spikes it seems hard to judge screens are from the paused state.
there always seem to be a few dropped frames when playback starts, the stats shown are from pausing and jumping back and forth so aren't indicative of normal behaviour. i.e. it isn't regularly dropping frames in normal playback.

hardware deinteralcing needs to get a constant stream of frames not feeding it one frame my already break it so try a different player/decoder and it needs multiply frames to kick in so you can skip into the file and look at the frame it needs like 3 or frames to even start working.
It would stick in that state for a prolonged period of time as opposed to flickering in and out. As far as I can see, switching the config in LAV so madvr is presented with an already deinterlaced stream seems to produce a better result. I'm not sure exactly what is changing in this case though as I'm comparing my LAV config to the jriver packaged version (which they don't expose config for)

Klaus1189
24th October 2019, 18:25
@3ll3d00d
Take a look at my previous post, same issue here.

See post #547 in AMD, Intel and Nvidia driver issues and last recommended version (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1883743#post1883743)
Don't use 25Hz, 29Hz and 30Hz modes, madvr picks these three first, so delete them, if you want to play properly interlaced content which has double "motion resolution" by creating fields (top field and bottom field) and not frames and store two fields in one frame.
But use 2160p for your setup, if you have "4K" Equipment ;)

Furgiuele
24th October 2019, 19:57
You need to be patient. Nobody is payed here to provide assistance. Everybody does it in his/her free time. Be patient and somebody capable enough will try to help you, I'm sure.

Sorry! And thanks to all of you.

Furgiuele
24th October 2019, 20:15
[QUOTE=el Filou;1888560]Based on your description, what could be happening is those 29,970 fps concerts are telecined, and as you are forcing video mode they are deinterlaced with very bad quality to 59,94 fps and you have 3:2 motion judder, but it's hard to be sure without knowing what the source is: Blu-ray? DVD? TV?
Try to enable film mode for those concerts (you can assign a keyboard shortcut key to it) and see if it is better.

:goodpost: Thanks!!! It solves my issue. I disabled "automatically activate deinterlacing..." and I flagged "disable automatic source... force film mode... only look at pixels...". Now no dropped frames, no stutter, no judder"! Can I leave this settings for all my videos? I have all blu ray discs ripped (fhd and uhd)...

Furgiuele
24th October 2019, 20:22
Sorry, I have another question. I have a Sony vpl-vw870es prjector (laser lamp with 2200 lumen). MadVR v0.92.17. In devices, my device, hdr, I flagged "tone map HDR using pixel shaders", "measures each frame's peak..." and "output video in HDR format". How many nits I've to wright in "target peak nits"? Thanks.

Asmodian
24th October 2019, 20:31
Can I leave this settings for all my videos? I have all blu ray discs ripped (fhd and uhd)...

Anything that is actually interlaced will look bad but you might not have any real interlaced content.

Also, once you disabled automatically activating deinterlacing the other options don't do anything.

huhn
25th October 2019, 02:43
what sort of problems?
well you need rendertiems below 20 ms but oyu are not using these iamges true interlanced content can't be displayed correctly
I don't watch many DVDs admittedly but I haven't noticed any issues (apart from the deinterlacing one). I'm bandwidth constrained (due to HDBaseT) til I can run a new hdmi cable anyway.
cables have nothing todo with this every cable that has the bandwidth of hdmi 1.3 can do 50 hz at 4:2:0 but i have no clue what HDBaseT is.

there always seem to be a few dropped frames when playback starts, the stats shown are from pausing and jumping back and forth so aren't indicative of normal behaviour. i.e. it isn't regularly dropping frames in normal playback.

your OSD already shows 19 ms from the max of 20 and spikes with 50+
It would stick in that state for a prolonged period of time as opposed to flickering in and out. As far as I can see, switching the config in LAV so madvr is presented with an already deinterlaced stream seems to produce a better result. I'm not sure exactly what is changing in this case though as I'm comparing my LAV config to the jriver packaged version (which they don't expose config for)
maybe madVr is able to drop frames before they are rendered which could stop deinterlacing.

Sorry, I have another question. I have a Sony vpl-vw870es prjector (laser lamp with 2200 lumen). MadVR v0.92.17. In devices, my device, hdr, I flagged "tone map HDR using pixel shaders", "measures each frame's peak..." and "output video in HDR format". How many nits I've to wright in "target peak nits"? Thanks.

is not recommended to output HDR as HDR on projector thanks to the very basic HDR tone mapping.
i can't give you a nit number to many changes on a topic i don't care yet.

on an old madVR build 2x output nits where ok no clue about projector that would be in the 100-300 range.

Furgiuele
25th October 2019, 08:56
is not recommended to output HDR as HDR on projector thanks to the very basic HDR tone mapping.
i can't give you a nit number to many changes on a topic i don't care yet.

on an old madVR build 2x output nits where ok no clue about projector that would be in the 100-300 range.

Many thanks.
Anyway I can't flag "use direct 3D 11 for presentation", else I've random skip in motion (altough without dropped frames).
Do you think I've to change my gpu (GTX1660) with RTX 2060 or AMD RX 590 to have a better rendering?:thanks:

Fandangos
26th October 2019, 16:17
Can you guys tell me if users with Ryzen integrated gpus have any kind of problem outputing the correct color space to the display using MadVR renderer?

HDR metadata is correctly triggered but color space remains in bt.709?
Or is this a non existent problem?

Klaus1189
26th October 2019, 17:37
What driver version do you use? What display/projector do you use? What player do you use? MPC-BE, MPC-HC, ...

huhn
26th October 2019, 20:50
Many thanks.
Anyway I can't flag "use direct 3D 11 for presentation", else I've random skip in motion (altough without dropped frames).
Do you think I've to change my gpu (GTX1660) with RTX 2060 or AMD RX 590 to have a better rendering?:thanks:

can't be judged with these informations.
there are a lot of possible setting combination and a 1660 can clearly do d3d11.

the equivalent to a 2060 is the rx 5700 not the rx 590 i can't recommend them.

Warner306
27th October 2019, 10:01
Can you guys tell me if users with Ryzen integrated gpus have any kind of problem outputing the correct color space to the display using MadVR renderer?

HDR metadata is correctly triggered but color space remains in bt.709?
Or is this a non existent problem?

There have been at least two Ryzen users who were failing to get anything other than BT.709 from HDR passthrough. The Ryzen drivers may have an issue identifying the color coordinates sent by madVR and change the color space.

DMU
27th October 2019, 10:36
There have been at least two Ryzen users who were failing to get anything other than BT.709 from HDR passthrough. The Ryzen drivers may have an issue identifying the color coordinates sent by madVR and change the color space.

There may be an issue with the entire AMD Vega GPU architecture, which are used in the iGPU embedded in the Ryzen processors. This can be verified by users of Vega 56/64 and Radeon VII.

Furgiuele
27th October 2019, 13:11
can't be judged with these informations.
there are a lot of possible setting combination and a 1660 can clearly do d3d11.

the equivalent to a 2060 is the rx 5700 not the rx 590 i can't recommend them.
I can't use D3D11! Don't know why. On Nvidia setup I use 3840 x 2160 60hz res, Nvidia color curve Ycbcr444, 8bit depth and I can't flag anything else.
I have a Sony vpl-vw870es projector (actually the best of Sony). Now I order from Amazon a Gigabyte RTX 2060 mini ITX OC6G and next week I'll see if I can use D3D11 without skip in motion. But I don't know if I can keep it because my psu is 350 watt 80 plus gold.
I hope you can give me a good suggestion...
Thanks

Owyn
27th October 2019, 14:31
yesterday madvr was working fine but today mpc-hc videoplayer just closes itself after long "opening file" when I try to play anythig with madvr selected as renderer
I didn't update anything (perhaps windows did? (thought after checking update log it shows nothing for at least two weeks))

here's the debug log after activating the debug mode: https://pastebin.com/82X68xn4

edit: after todays cumulative update for .Net it started working again yay

wolfman2791
27th October 2019, 17:12
Just wanted to chime in here... a lot of the issues have to do with Windows updates. I finally had to refresh my windows 10 install and it fixed everything with madvr (i run jriver). If you're like me and you tweak your windows, it creates problems.

But before you do that, uninstall the latest windows updates one by one and see where the break occurs. That's how i noticed it was a windows issue.