madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)

[Skwelcha]

nvm: a restart fixed it apperantly..

[Anime Viewer]

Not sure if its just me but when I played something on my tv which is 1080p thru hdmi I can't fill render queues. When I use my 1080p monitor thru dvi it works fine. This bug only happens with dx11 renderer. This is on amd 290.

Is Smooth Motion running in a different state (on or off) on one compared to the other? How about refresh rate, is one reporting a different screen hz than the other while running the video? Does it have the same problem when running in both the videos normal resolution and in full screen?

[6ari8]

Anyone else getting a black screen in "D3D11 exclusive (10 bit)" mode in Windows 10TP with the new 352.84 Nvidia drivers? It's fine when using 8 bit but 10 bit gives a black screen.

I was using the Windows 8.1 350.12 drivers before this and had no issues...

[huhn]

Anyone else getting a black screen in "D3D11 exclusive (10 bit)" mode in Windows 10TP with the new 352.84 Nvidia drivers? It's fine when using 8 bit but 10 bit gives a black screen.

I was using the Windows 8.1 350.12 drivers before this and had no issues...

i get a picture with 10 bit d3d11.
using a 760 and 352.84 on windows 10 10074
8 bit crashed my system after exit.

[avinab]

I am using latest madvr version.I am on windows 10,nvidia gtx 980 latest version(windows 10 driver)
I am not able to switch to NNEDI in chroma upscaling or use image doubling.It crashes.Can anybody confirm or look into it.
I am using nvidia version 352.84. I am using pot player 64 bit

[6233638]

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/geforce-352-86-whql-driver-released
New driver for Win7 SP1/Win 8.1 users.Huh, these drivers now let you select between an 8-bit and a 12-bit output as well.

I wonder - does that mean that madVR's 10-bit output will be converted to 12-bit?
My display does not report the bit-depth of the incoming signal.

[huhn]

I am using latest madvr version.I am on windows 10,nvidia gtx 980 latest version(windows 10 driver)
I am not able to switch to NNEDI in chroma upscaling or use image doubling.It crashes.Can anybody confirm or look into it.

works fine which driver version?

[huhn]

Huh, these drivers now let you select between an 8-bit and a 12-bit output as well.

I wonder - does that mean that madVR's 10-bit output will be upsampled to 12-bit?
My display does not report the bit-depth of the incoming signal.

it should just add some zero but yes. for some reason they "skipped" 10 bit. not sure if they use the highest possible or can't output 10 bit for a screen with 10 bit only (DP 1.2 UHD 60 Hz for example).

[nevcairiel]

it should just add some zero but yes. for some reason they "skipped" 10 bit. not sure if they use the highest possible or can't output 10 bit for a screen with 10 bit only (DP 1.2 UHD 60 Hz for example).

It offers 10-bit just fine as an option over DP for me. Didn't try HDMI yet.

[James Freeman]

Windows 7 x64 here.
I have 8 and 10 bit over DisplayPort with my screen, no 12.
Switching to 10bit, my monitor actually goes into 10bit mode so it actually works.
madVR FSE D3D11 10bit switches instantly so that's another sign that all is well.

I have tested and observed the following:
In 10bit mode "Adjust Desktop Color Setting" in control panel (nvidia) actually works in 10bit now, so moving the sliders generate no banding, Hurray!
Operating system Color Management (2DLut) still in 8bit because DWM (Desktop Window Manager) is also still in 8bit, so gradation and banding are generated when I switch on my ICC Porfile.
Windowed Mode in madVR still appears to be in 8bit even if it set to 10bit in madVR, this is again because it has to go through DWM.
Overlay mode is also in 8bit.
In short, EVERYTHING! the whole OS is still in 8bit although the output is in 10bit.

I guess high bit depth DWM is a privileged in windows 10 only, all the older DWM versions of windows (7, 8 , 8.1) are 8bit only.
Or is it? Anyone cares to try windowed mode in 10bit with madVR in 10bit and report is the gradients are visible?

EDIT:
I may be wrong, maybe madshi will be able to call 10bit in windowed mode if the desktop is already in 10bit...

[mbordas]

FWIW I'm still getting 23.969 refresh rate whenever D3D 11 is on (ie FSE and D3D both enabled), even with 88.8 and the 352.86 nvidia driver. Doesn't matter if I set madvr & nvidia to either 8 or 10 bit, same result. I gather from the discussion earlier this is an issue with D3D 11, but just wondered if anyone else was seeing this. D3D 9 gives me 23.976 just fine.

[RainyDog]

FWIW I'm still getting 23.969 refresh rate whenever D3D 11 is on (ie FSE and D3D both enabled), even with 88.8 and the 352.86 nvidia driver. Doesn't matter if I set madvr & nvidia to either 8 or 10 bit, same result. I gather from the discussion earlier this is an issue with D3D 11, but just wondered if anyone else was seeing this.

I get 23.970 on my GTX 970 with D3D11.

I have a custom resolution set-up for nearly perfect 23.976 in D3D9 but it seems to be getting overridden in D3D11 exclusive mode for some reason.

[nevcairiel]

madVR 0.88.8 crashes when playback finishes (EOF) in JRiver Media Center. I got the madVR crash reporter box and tried to send a port, but sending failed, unfortunately.

Hitting "Stop" also crashes on that system.
NVIDIA GTX 660 (352.86), Windows 8.1.

Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce on another system, but then, it is my only system with only one screen attached, so that might be a relation.

Edit:
Crash report: http://pastebin.com/qCcV85HQ

[Asmodian]

Though the 10-bit output was working, I had to reduce this from 16 to 12 on my system to stop the queues being almost empty in the 10-bit DX11 FSE mode.
Only 10-bit was affected, 8-bit DX11 FSE worked just fine at 15. (16)

Windows 8.1 x64, GTX570 (350.12 and 347.88 tested), 32-bit madVR 0.88.8

EDIT: Actually this didn't fix the problem.
After 20-30 seconds of playback, every 5 seconds or so it started switching between full queues and almost-empty queues again, and stuttering while reporting a presentation glitch.
Reducing this even further (8) may have fixed the issue but I'd have to watch something reasonably long to confirm it.

EDIT2: After 30 minutes of playback, the queues remained full and there were no presentation glitches.
That may not solve it on everyone's system, but seems to have fixed the problem for me.

I noticed this same issue last night, with v0.88.8. I usually use lower buffers of 6 present and 8 render but I was experimenting with turning them up again. As soon as I go over 8 present the rendering queue gets stuck at 1-4 full and present stays similarly low. No dropped frames or anything though. With 8 or below presented in advance I can use 24 rendering buffers without any issues.

Win 8.1 x64, GTX Titan, 350.12. Watching 1080p in d3d11 windowed or full screen windowed.

[Razoola]

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/geforce-352-86-whql-driver-released

New driver for Win7 SP1/Win 8.1 users.

These new drivers are very sucky for me. I have lost the ability to choose the HDMI signal type and color range.

[daert]

To those having problems with framerate in FSE d3d11, try to use this tool: http://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thread-Custom-Resolution-Utility-CRU
I had the same issue as you and it solved my problem

[BetA13]

These new drivers are very sucky for me. I have lost the ability to choose the HDMI signal type and color range.

They moved it to the resolution section of the control panel.
there are teh settings now...

[huhn]

It offers 10-bit just fine as an option over DP for me. Didn't try HDMI yet.

so i guess everything is fine. very good to hear.

[huhn]

madVR 0.88.8 crashes when playback finishes (EOF) in JRiver Media Center. I got the madVR crash reporter box and tried to send a port, but sending failed, unfortunately.

Hitting "Stop" also crashes on that system.
NVIDIA GTX 660 (352.86), Windows 8.1.

Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce on another system, but then, it is my only system with only one screen attached, so that might be a relation.

there should be a crash report on the desktop.
and bug sending didn't worked for me a long time was kind of shocked it worked the last time.

[yok833]

They moved it to the resolution section of the control panel.
there are teh settings now...

Is it just me or with the Nvidia control panel when you create a custom resolution you cannot anymore select between full and limited & between rvb anc ycbcr444 ??

[mark0077]

Guys, do any of you use SVP, or regularly input 60fps into madVR. If so do you need to / or recommend increasing the "GPU queue size:". Just I have been using CPU queue of 16 and GPU queue of 8. Just I notice when I'm using a "reduce banding artifacts" -> "strength during fade in/out" setting of "high", then during scene changes, the render queue drops and I seem to lose exactly 3 frames during each scene change. My gpu and cpu usage are cpu: 40% and gpu load: 29% (Core i7 920 @ 3.6ghz and Asus GTX 980 Strix)

When I increase the GPU queue to 16 I no longer get any frame drops, but during each scene change I see the render queue drop from 15-16 to 10-16 each time.

I just honestly would have thought with 1080p content on a 1080p screen, with only chroma being upscaled using Jinc, that the default queue sizes would be fine for this GTX 980 but this debanding setting seriously hammers it on scene changes? I was just wondering is this expected, or is there something madVR could do differently in this situation to not drop frames / use the resources better. I'll increase my queues anyways, just thought it was worth mentioning incase theres a possibility of improvement in this area, with default queue sizes for 60fps content. If you could suggest any equivalent setting with Shiandow's deband algorithm I can try this if its of any interest from a performance point of view.

[nijiko]

For double videocards users, how to force one of them to render?

On Win8.1 64, HC64 + madVR64, both DX9 and DX11, why can't get into fullscreen exclusive mode?

[nevcairiel]

there should be a crash report on the desktop.
and bug sending didn't worked for me a long time was kind of shocked it worked the last time.

Unfortunately, there is not.
I did however manage to copy-paste the contents of the crash dialog.

http://pastebin.com/qCcV85HQ

[Asmodian]

Guys, do any of you use SVP, or regularly input 60fps into madVR. If so do you need to / or recommend increasing the "GPU queue size:". Just I have been using CPU queue of 16 and GPU queue of 8. Just I notice when I'm using a "reduce banding artifacts" -> "strength during fade in/out" setting of "high", then during scene changes, the render queue drops and I seem to lose exactly 3 frames during each scene change. My gpu and cpu usage are cpu: 40% and gpu load: 29% (Core i7 920 @ 3.6ghz and Asus GTX 980 Strix)

When I increase the GPU queue to 16 I no longer get any frame drops, but during each scene change I see the render queue drop from 15-16 to 10-16 each time.

I just honestly would have thought with 1080p content on a 1080p screen, with only chroma being upscaled using Jinc, that the default queue sizes would be fine for this GTX 980 but this debanding setting seriously hammers it on scene changes? I was just wondering is this expected, or is there something madVR could do differently in this situation to not drop frames / use the resources better. I'll increase my queues anyways, just thought it was worth mentioning incase theres a possibility of improvement in this area, with default queue sizes for 60fps content. If you could suggest any equivalent setting with Shiandow's deband algorithm I can try this if its of any interest from a performance point of view.

On a fade detection debanding re-renders 5 frames so the drop to 10/16 is expected. There is a "trade quality for performance option" to stop this. I also notice this feature can drop frames when using lower queue sizes.

[x7007]

The Asus G751JT is crappy LCD Monitor, I'm sure I had better monitor in the Asus G750JH . first I can't do 0-255, second when installing the new drivers 352 I have only 6 bcp option... and I can't check it on the G750JH because it is a ATI 5870M card. but I'm sure I could 0-255 without crash black on the laptop. asus screwed us totally. Can I still choose 8 bit in Madvr or should I use 6 bit ?


Monitor
Manufacturer............. LG Display
Plug and Play ID......... LGD046C
Data string.............. LP173WF4-SPD1
Serial number............ n/a
Manufacture date......... 2014, ISO week 0
Filter driver............ None
-------------------------
EDID revision............ 1.4
Input signal type........ Digital (DisplayPort)
Color bit depth.......... 6 bits per primary color
Color encoding formats... RGB 4:4:4, YCrCb 4:4:4
Screen size.............. 380 x 210 mm (17.1 in)
Power management......... Not supported
Extension blocs.......... None

[Patrik G]

this video renderer lives its own life ;)
before i had fullscren exclusive mode at 10 bit
now the it says "fullscreen exclusive" NEW PATH

what is that?
and why the does it change settings on its own?
i havnt changed anything.

[x7007]

this video renderer lives its own life ;)
before i had fullscren exclusive mode at 10 bit
now the it says "fullscreen exclusive" NEW PATH

what is that?
and why the does it change settings on its own?
i havnt changed anything.

I still don't get it how all of you get 10 bit.

you can only get it with Full Exclusive mode ?

You watch movies with it showing 10 bit ? or what do you do with it

[Anime Viewer]

I still don't get it how all of you get 10 bit.

you can only get it with Full Exclusive mode ?

You watch movies with it showing 10 bit ? or what do you do with it

If you're talking about it reading:
"D3D11 exclusive [10 bit]" in the OSD then yes, you'd have to set it to "enable automatic full screen exclusive mode" in the general settings area under rendering. The other things you'd need to get that OSD reading would be:
"use Driect3D 11 for presentation" in general, and "10 bit (or higher)" in "the native display bitdepth is:" area in the properties area of your screen under the devices area of madVR settings.

[XRyche]

Why are so many people intent on 10 bit to the display? I didn't think there were that many 10 bit capable displays/TVs owned out there. I haven't noticed any significant IQ improvement on my lowly 8 bit IPS monitor when using 10 bit. If any thing the pause and flicker in the switch between FSE and FS Windowed is a little annoying. Am I missing something?

[Ver Greeneyes]

You need at least a 10-bit monitor to take advantage of 10-bit output. Using it on your 8-bit monitor will give you worse quality since it will basically bypass madVR's dithering to fall back on the dithering of your display or GPU.

10-bit output is basically for people with displays advertising 'deep color' and things like that. With the advent of Blu-Ray there's quite a few of those these days. Also considering madVR is all about getting the best display quality 'at any cost' (so long as it can be done in realtime on high end hardware), this thread is probably not representative of the average adoption rate for 10-bit displays :)

[nijiko]

@huhn , does Lenovo Thinkpad use a 6bit displayer?

[James Freeman]

You need at least a 10-bit monitor to take advantage of 10-bit output. Using it on your 8-bit monitor will give you worse quality since it will basically bypass madVR's dithering to fall back on the dithering of your display or GPU.

Are you sure?

I think switching to 10bit in madVR does not disable dithering, but it does make the dithering less strong.
If madVR would have 16bit option with dithering enabled, on an 8bit monitor it would look completely undithered.
As an opposite to that statement, we already can see that if one selects a lower bit depth, the dithering is a lot stronger.

If I understand correctly, madVR does not dither the exact integer steps, but only the ones that do not match.
As a result if one selects 10bit in madVR, madVR will not dither the steps that should fall exactly on a 10bit display.
In other words, banding will be generated the higher the bit depth mismatch between the Display and the GPU output.

[The 8472]

There's a new superresolution upscaler for still images: https://github.com/nagadomi/waifu2x/ based on http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00092

There also is a webservice running that implementation which has been trained with anime-style images and provides very good results on that type of material, especially on fine lines that are barely a pixel wide and fairly aliased. It also seems to introduce fewer fake details on flat surfaces than nnedi.
If you run it on real life images you'll get oil paintings.
Specialization a specific kind of content seems to have a pretty big impact.

Source image (http://i.imgur.com/uWMu9zt.png)
new upscaler w/ noise reduction (http://i.imgur.com/WnHLPE4.png)
new upscaler w/o noise reduction (http://i.imgur.com/QG8aVtr.png)
NNEDI3 32 w/ SuperRes (http://a.pomf.se/ywwfia.png)
NNEDI3 64 w/o SuperRes (http://a.pomf.se/smpgig.png)


I figure it's too expensive to run this in realtime, thus my question is can we get madvr any closer to those results? E.g. by having separate live action / animation modes for nnedi3?

Edit: added needi w/o superres

[Ver Greeneyes]

Are you sure?

I think switching to 10bit in madVR does not disable dithering, but it does make the dithering less strong.
If madVR would have 16bit option with dithering enabled, on an 8bit monitor it would look completely undithered.
As an opposite to that statement, we already can see that if one selects a lower bit depth, the dithering is a lot stronger.

If I understand correctly, madVR does not dither the exact integer steps, but only the ones that do not match.
As a result if one selects 10bit in madVR, madVR will not dither the steps that should fall exactly on a 10bit display.
In other words, banding will be generated the higher the bit depth mismatch between the Display and the GPU output.Right, that's what I meant. madVR will only dither the least significant bit, so if you send a dithered 10-bit image to an 8-bit display, that will at most affect the display's (or GPU's) dithering decisions in representing this 10-bit image as an 8-bit one. madVR's dithering will likely do very little.

[ryrynz]

I figure it's too expensive to run this in realtime, thus my question is can we get madvr any closer to those results? E.g. by having separate live action / animation modes for nnedi3?

I just did my own test with one of their test images and NNEDI3 is superior when used at higher neuron counts. What you're seeing as a difference there with your own shots is the SuperRes sharpening.. drop that and it'll look a lot closer. Plus that particular resizer has a smoothing function (hence the flatness) when I did the test I clicked no noise reduction for a fair test (madVR doesn't do that with NNEDI) and NNEDI3 delivered a nicer picture without the excessive sharpening I got from waifui2 which made the JPEG artifacts of their test image (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nagadomi/waifu2x/master/images/slide_result.png) even more "noisy"

TBH it looked quite terrible in comparison, it's not until you use their denoising filter (which wouldn't be something you'd use generally with video presentation these days (anyone still watch blocky MPEG video?)) that it looks any "good".

So NNEDI3 blows waifu2 away in the most important area (line construction) check out left side hair clip (nearest neighbour upscale? eww) and the hair outlines.
Sure waifu2 used with a blur is cleaner and sharper but it's totally overdone. madVR at some point may add an actual denoiser or deblocker but you could achieve better results than waifu easily using avisynth/ffdshow and combine that with NNEDI3. The only area I see where waifu2 does better is determining line accuracy in the deep corners (near right eye and right arm) If NNEDI3 could be modified to get the same results there that would be a nice improvement.

My results (http://imgur.com/a/HRgsW) with their test image.

[huhn]

You need at least a 10-bit monitor to take advantage of 10-bit output. Using it on your 8-bit monitor will give you worse quality since it will basically bypass madVR's dithering to fall back on the dithering of your display or GPU.

10-bit output is basically for people with displays advertising 'deep color' and things like that. With the advent of Blu-Ray there's quite a few of those these days. Also considering madVR is all about getting the best display quality 'at any cost' (so long as it can be done in realtime on high end hardware), this thread is probably not representative of the average adoption rate for 10-bit displays :)

displays alter the picture quite a lot. if it is chroma sub sampling color correction or other stuff. so sending 10 bit to a native 8 bit panel can help a lot. and displays can dither even my TV can do this.

@huhn , does Lenovo Thinkpad use a 6bit displayer?

i don't know. but these are laptops there displays are usually cheap.

[Ver Greeneyes]

displays alter the picture quite a lot. if it is chroma sub sampling color correction or other stuff. so sending 10 bit to a native 8 bit panel can help a lot. and displays can dither even my TV can do this.Sure, but the dithering quality isn't necessarily going to be very good. If it only accepts 4:2:0 input I could see 10-bit helping a lot though, yeah, assuming it uses the 10-bit information internally.

[The 8472]

I just did my own test with one of their test images and NNEDI3 is superior when used at higher neuron counts. What you're seeing as a difference there is the SuperRes sharpening.. drop that and it'll look a lot closer. Plus that particular resizer has a smoothing function (hence the flatness) when I did the test I clicked no noise reduction for a fair test
Good points, I'll add some more variants based on that to my previous post

NNEDI3 blows waifu2 away, no contest in the most important area (line construction) sure waifu2 used with a blur is cleaner and sharper but it's overdone.

I have difficulty parsing your statement there. Are you saying that NNEDI3 or that waifu2 performs better at line construction? In my eyes it's the latter. Especially regarding the scarf in my sample images.

[huhn]

Sure, but the dithering quality isn't necessarily going to be very good. If it only accepts 4:2:0 input I could see 10-bit helping a lot though, sure, assuming it uses the 10-bit information internally.

madVR used for years random dithering. and why should the dithering be bad? even with 8 bit RGB input a screen will dither/process it's not like the whole color correction and other stuff isn't applied anymore.

even my cheap old display accept 10/12 bit and is dithering it.

[Nevilne]

The 8472, your NNEDI3 images are 130kb jpegs.

[ryrynz]

I have difficulty parsing your statement there. Are you saying that NNEDI3 or that waifu2 performs better at line construction? In my eyes it's the latter. Especially regarding the scarf in my sample images.

I've edited my post, take a look. NNEDI3 is superior, don't confuse line sharpness with line construction ;)

[The 8472]

The 8472, your NNEDI3 images are 130kb jpegs.

Ugh, imgur is compressing them. The originals are PNG. One minute, I'll replace them.

Edit: fixed

[leeperry]

If NNEDI3 could be modified to get the same results there that would be a nice improvement.
NNEDI3 would appear to be a black box whose secrets are only known by tritical himself (http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1721243&postcount=2069) and he hasn't released stuff in a while AFAIK so I wouldn't set my hopes too high.

[ryrynz]

NNEDI3 would appear to be a black box whose secrets are only known by tritical himself (http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1721243&postcount=2069) and he hasn't released stuff in a while AFAIK so I wouldn't set my hopes too high.

Apparently he was working on a NNEDI4? He's been contacted recently, so it might not be terribly hard to improve it.
Looks like the waifu code is available to use for anyone that wants it judging from the license.. I wonder if shiandow could adapt NNEDI3 with waifu2x's improved neural guesswork.

[The 8472]

I've edited my post, take a look. NNEDI3 is superior, don't confuse line sharpness with line construction ;)

Hum, ok, maybe my jargon is off.

Compare any of the nnedi3 images vs. the waifu2 I've posted and look at the scarf. scarf, stairs, nnedi (http://i.imgur.com/OqQgCkW.png)

What waifu2 seems to do better is avoiding the stairs effects on fine lines.

How would you call that? It's obviously more than just dumb smoothing/sharpening.

The stairs that nnedi "preserves" are what sticks out like a sore thumb to me, because that's an artifact of rasterization of finer lineart.

[huhn]

waifux2 is clear better in term of details at the cost of a lot of aliasing.

but the source has a ton of aliasing too so hard to judge

[ryrynz]

What waifu2 seems to do better is avoiding the stairs effects on fine lines.


Probably shouldn't continue much further with this discussion here but those words link to the same file.

waifux2 is clear better in term of details at the cost of a lot of aliasing.
but the source has a ton of aliasing too so hard to judge

Fine details judging from what 8472 says.. I guess we could open a new thread for more comparisons.

[XMonarchY]

I was right about 8bit + FRC NOT being the same as true 10bit. nVidia just added an option to select color depth in its latest 352.86 drivers and it will not let me select anything other than 8bit on my 8bit + FRC monitor (Eizo Foris FG2421 - using DisplayPort). True 10bit monitor would be allowed a setting of 10bit in nVidia CP. Using 10bit setting in madVR is a bad idea for 8bit + FRC monitors. I will either not work or make rendering quality worse than it would be if you selected 8bit. Bit depth selection and HDMI Full/Limit color range can be selected under "Change resolution" in nVidia CP in 352.86 drivers. Just scroll down and you will see the new options.

I have this odd problem. I can use Direct3D 11 with Sync sub-option underneath it on my 120Hz FG2421 monitor without ANY frame drops or problems. However, when I use my HDTV at 23Hz, I get constant frame drops with Direct3D 11 with or without the Sync sub-option underneath it. Why is that? Is it because ReClock works harder @ 23Hz or what? I thought 120Hz would be the one with problems because it requires faster rendering.

[huhn]

I was right about 8bit + FRC NOT being the same as true 10bit. nVidia just added an option to select color depth in its latest 352.86 drivers and it will not let me select anything other than 8bit on my 8bit + FRC monitor (Eizo Foris FG2421). True 10bit monitor would be allowed a setting of 10bit in nVidia CP. Using 10bit setting in madVR is a bad idea for 8bit + FRC monitors. I will either not work or make rendering quality worse than it would be if you selected 8bit.

P.S. Bit depth and HDMI Full/Limit color range can be selected under "Change resolution" in nVidia CP. Just scroll down and you will see the new options.

what connector are you using?
and if your device doesn't accept 10 bit input it's kind of worthless to send 10 bit to the driver.

but not all 8bit+ FRC doesn't accept 10 or 12 bit input.

[XMonarchY]

what connector are you using?
and if your device doesn't accept 10 bit input it's kind of worthless to send 10 bit to the driver.

but not all 8bit+ FRC doesn't accept 10 or 12 bit input.

I use DisplayPort. I guess its just my monitor that does not accept 10bit. I wonder if there is a way to force it... I mean there is DEFINITELY dithering going on on my monitor. I can see it easily.