Log in

View Full Version : BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648

brogan
16th August 2009, 21:41
JDobbs, thanks for all the hard work. Love this app very much. W/the latest build, have been experiencing the same error when trying to rebuild a BD50 to BD25. I also now get this error w/earlier versions of BD-RB. I'm currently using Windows 7 Ultimate x64 w/a i920 & 6GB of triple channel memory. Have been able to rebuild a couple dozen movies before I started getting this error. I uninstalled Avisynth, Haali & ffdshow then reinstalled but I still get this error...can anyone help me?



-----------------------
[11:18:36] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: BLUE.THUNDER.1983.1080P.BLURAY.AVC.TRUEHD.5.1-HDC
- Input BD size: 32.22 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:56:00.616]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[11:18:36] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [11:18:36] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00513]
- [11:18:37] Reencoding: VID_00513 (1 of 11)
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00513.meta
- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851
[11:18:38] - Failed to build structure, aborted
-----------------------
[13:26:08] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: BLUE_THUNDER_-_BD
- Input BD size: 32.22 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:56:00.616]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[13:26:10] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [13:26:10] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00513]
- [13:26:10] Reencoding: VID_00513 (1 of 11)
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00513.meta
- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851
[13:26:11] - Failed to build structure, aborted
-----------------------
[16:32:26] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: THE_EMPIRE_STRIKES_BACK
- Input BD size: 39.37 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:17:29.991]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[16:32:28] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [16:32:28] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00002]
- [16:32:28] Reencoding: VID_00002 (1 of 5)
- [16:32:29] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00006]
- [16:32:30] Reencoding: VID_00006 (2 of 5)
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00006.meta
- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851
[16:32:30] - Failed to build structure, aborted

Furiousflea
16th August 2009, 22:19
JDobbs, thanks for all the hard work. Love this app very much. W/the latest build, have been experiencing the same error when trying to rebuild a BD50 to BD25. I also now get this error w/earlier versions of BD-RB. I'm currently using Windows 7 Ultimate x64 w/a i920 & 6GB of triple channel memory. Have been able to rebuild a couple dozen movies before I started getting this error. I uninstalled Avisynth, Haali & ffdshow then reinstalled but I still get this error...can anyone help me?



-----------------------
[11:18:36] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: BLUE.THUNDER.1983.1080P.BLURAY.AVC.TRUEHD.5.1-HDC - Input BD size: 32.22 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:56:00.616]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[11:18:36] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [11:18:36] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00513]
- [11:18:37] Reencoding: VID_00513 (1 of 11)
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00513.meta
- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851
[11:18:38] - Failed to build structure, aborted
-----------------------
[13:26:08] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: BLUE_THUNDER_-_BD
- Input BD size: 32.22 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:56:00.616]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[13:26:10] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [13:26:10] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00513]
- [13:26:10] Reencoding: VID_00513 (1 of 11)
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00513.meta
- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851
[13:26:11] - Failed to build structure, aborted
-----------------------
[16:32:26] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: THE_EMPIRE_STRIKES_BACK
- Input BD size: 39.37 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:17:29.991]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[16:32:28] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [16:32:28] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00002]
- [16:32:28] Reencoding: VID_00002 (1 of 5)
- [16:32:29] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00006]
- [16:32:30] Reencoding: VID_00006 (2 of 5)
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00006.meta
- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851
[16:32:30] - Failed to build structure, aborted

BLUE.THUNDER.1983.1080P.BLURAY.AVC.TRUEHD.5.1-HDC :rolleyes:

You want help with a pirated source?

Furthermore, The Empire Strikes Back isn't even available on Bluray...I suggest you sling your hook and don't post.

Just looked at your post history...

BDRB is not for backing up your downloaded Blurays, home made blurays...Its for backing up UNMODIFIED store bought blurays.

brogan
16th August 2009, 23:04
FF,

thanks for all your help, much appreciated
:p

focuspuller
16th August 2009, 23:25
Hi. I love the program and rarely get errors. I have now, however run into a problem that I don't know how to solve and was wondering if you could help me. The source is 12 Monkeys US. Do you need any other information?

-----------------------
[17:52:58] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: 12_MONKEYS_G51_GLO
- Input BD size: 39.53 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:37:09.816]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[17:53:02] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [17:53:02] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00009]
- [18:03:39] Reencoding: VID_00009 (1 of 2)
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Reached retry limit. Aborting.

Category 5
16th August 2009, 23:29
The one on the first page doesn't expire for over a a month from now... and it's running right now on my system. I think you're mistaken. Are you sure you're pointing to that version?

If the file has been modified/hacked in any way it might also cause that message. I'd suggest you do a virus scan on your system and then download again.

Hmm. Somehow my system date got set back 10 days. Resetting fixed it. Funny thing is, it didn't fix it until I redownloaded it after resetting the correct date. AT any rate its working now, so thanks.

jdobbs
17th August 2009, 04:00
Hi. I love the program and rarely get errors. I have now, however run into a problem that I don't know how to solve and was wondering if you could help me. The source is 12 Monkeys US. Do you need any other information?

-----------------------
[17:52:58] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: 12_MONKEYS_G51_GLO
- Input BD size: 39.53 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:37:09.816]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[17:53:02] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [17:53:02] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00009]
- [18:03:39] Reencoding: VID_00009 (1 of 2)
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Reached retry limit. Aborting.Whenever you see this error, immediately copy the command line from LASTCMD.TXT in the BD-RB directory and paste it into a command window. Then you will be able to see what error X264 is running into.

If you've recently upgraded to Win7 -- search the thread.

drmih
17th August 2009, 13:20
Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm only saying it to be sure that you're reporting a genuine bug

My suspicion is that you have downloaded the "original" and and mounted that as an ISO on your hard drive and run it on TMT3 and it works with the PiP audio intact (as it should). However you have only tried the ISO on your standalone after running it through BDRB and burning to BD25 and playing that on your standalone...Thereby experiencing the missing audio that happens on the Sony bluray players unless you have the audio output set to "Mix" in the setup menu.

Thus, jumping to the conclusion that the original wouldn't do this because it doesn't with TMT3 having never actually tested the original ISO with the Sony standalone since you don't have a BD50 disc.

Sorry dude for assuming this, but it's defo a likely scenario for some people ain't making a judgment on morals or anything here.

I appreciate that the Sony has a flaw / limitation and I hadn't tried the original on it for PiP - it's set to direct as I also have a LG which doesn't output 7 channels independently which does play the disc fine (again I've just checked it). I can honestly say I've never watched a PiP or intend to start but this issue was more to do with the Sony losing the main audio on bd-9 and perhaps it would be resolved with a 'proper' PiP structure. It's nonsense to suggest, as others have, that verifying the outputs with TMT on the pc first is somehow a flawed process. The ripped image, or playing the disc on a pc with TMT, works fine. The bd-25 version doesn't allow the secondary audio to be played - somehow there is a difference apart from encoding. It doesn't matter from my perspective regarding the bd-25, but as this thread is about identifying bugs it might be that some small tweak could impact on other functionality.

I didn't take this the wrong way as we all appreciate that problems caused from those who have downloaded corrupt versions.

Furiousflea
17th August 2009, 16:03
I appreciate that the Sony has a flaw / limitation and I hadn't tried the original on it for PiP - it's set to direct as I also have a LG which doesn't output 7 channels independently which does play the disc fine (again I've just checked it). I can honestly say I've never watched a PiP or intend to start but this issue was more to do with the Sony losing the main audio on bd-9 and perhaps it would be resolved with a 'proper' PiP structure. It's nonsense to suggest, as others have, that verifying the outputs with TMT on the pc first is somehow a flawed process. The ripped image, or playing the disc on a pc with TMT, works fine. The bd-25 version doesn't allow the secondary audio to be played - somehow there is a difference apart from encoding. It doesn't matter from my perspective regarding the bd-25, but as this thread is about identifying bugs it might be that some small tweak could impact on other functionality.

I didn't take this the wrong way as we all appreciate that problems caused from those who have downloaded corrupt versions.

:) does seem a bit weird, could you say which title is giving this issue. Maybe someone else has this disc.

drmih
17th August 2009, 17:14
Madagascar 2

nwg
17th August 2009, 20:07
Hi. I love the program and rarely get errors. I have now, however run into a problem that I don't know how to solve and was wondering if you could help me. The source is 12 Monkeys US. Do you need any other information?

-----------------------
[17:52:58] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: 12_MONKEYS_G51_GLO
- Input BD size: 39.53 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:37:09.816]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[17:53:02] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [17:53:02] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00009]
- [18:03:39] Reencoding: VID_00009 (1 of 2)
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Reached retry limit. Aborting.

I got the same problem and was down to a corrupted Haali Media Splitter. I reinstalled and it is fine now.

leChameleon
18th August 2009, 06:35
Is there a x264 build difference released in BD-RB v0.26.03 and v0.28.03?
If so what are the build numbers for each BD-RB release?

jdobbs
18th August 2009, 14:20
Is there a x264 build difference released in BD-RB v0.26.03 and v0.28.03?
If so what are the build numbers for each BD-RB release? Yes. It is documented in the change log ("changes.txt").

leChameleon
18th August 2009, 15:30
v0.26.03 uses x264 r1183, v0.28.03 uses r1206.

I was wondering if the command syntax is the same, at least for the "LASTCMD.TXT" commands BD-RB submits or where can one reference the x264 command syntax for each build? I don't see it listed on wiki or videolan's web site.

I want to see if I'm able to replace x264's exe for testing from v0.26.03 to v0.28.03.

leChameleon
18th August 2009, 16:05
dupe, sorry.

Kakashi Sensei
18th August 2009, 16:58
Hi Guys,

Just got my copy of Dexter Season 3 - RETAIL!! not from the newsgroups!!!!

And its working now on the 2 pass but it got stuck in a loop on the 1pass encode.

Here is the log file. After i'm done the 2 pass i'm going to check the 1 pass again and see if this is still happening of if it was a random error. It basically got stuck in a loop analyzing the video:

[08:32:19] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: DEXTER_S3D1
- Input BD size: 42.06 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:33:11.612]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[08:32:20] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [08:32:20] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00004]
- [08:32:34] Reencoding: VID_00004 (1 of 6)
- Analyzing 18.95 22.50 23.00 23.50 23.20 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10
23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.05 [23.05]
- Aborted...

setarip_old
18th August 2009, 19:05
@Kakashi Sensei

Hi!RETAIL!! not from the newsgroups!!!!Why, oh why, would you go out of your way to (totally unnecessarily) mention this?

Kakashi Sensei
18th August 2009, 19:20
B/C i got it early and seen some people get flamed for DL'ing askin questions about Blurays they downloaded. Wanted to be clear it was retail.

Sorry if it was unnecessary, not my intention.

jc243
18th August 2009, 19:34
-----------------------
[22:17:18] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: DIEHXXX3_US
- Input BD size: 41,09 GB
- Approximate total content: [04:01:39.092]
- Target BD size: 22,80 GB
[22:17:20] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [22:17:20] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00001]
- [22:25:22] Reencoding: VID_00001 (1 of 22)
- [08:43:54] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00003]
- [08:44:25] Reencoding: VID_00003 (2 of 22)
- [09:13:42] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00004]
- [09:13:42] Reencoding: VID_00004 (3 of 22)
- [09:13:43] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00005]
- [09:14:16] Reencoding: VID_00005 (4 of 22)
- [09:44:12] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00006]
- [09:44:18] Reencoding: VID_00006 (5 of 22)
- [09:50:05] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00007]
- [09:50:13] Reencoding: VID_00007 (6 of 22)
- [09:58:35] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00008]
- [09:58:42] Reencoding: VID_00008 (7 of 22)
- [10:04:25] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00009]
- [10:04:28] Reencoding: VID_00009 (8 of 22)
- [10:06:59] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00010]
- [10:07:09] Reencoding: VID_00010 (9 of 22)
- [10:17:20] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00011]
- [10:17:46] Reencoding: VID_00011 (10 of 22)
- [10:31:44] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00012]
- [10:31:57] Reencoding: VID_00012 (11 of 22)
- [10:44:06] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00019]
- [10:44:12] Reencoding: VID_00019 (12 of 22)
- [10:48:36] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00020]
- [10:48:42] Reencoding: VID_00020 (13 of 22)
- [10:53:10] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00021]
- [10:53:10] Reencoding: VID_00021 (14 of 22)
- [10:53:12] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00022]
- [10:53:17] Reencoding: VID_00022 (15 of 22)
- [10:59:27] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00023]
- [10:59:28] Reencoding: VID_00023 (16 of 22)
- [11:01:07] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00024]
- [11:01:15] Reencoding: VID_00024 (17 of 22)
- [11:08:39] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00025]
- [11:08:41] Reencoding: VID_00025 (18 of 22)
- [11:10:38] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00026]
- [11:10:42] Reencoding: VID_00026 (19 of 22)
- [11:15:43] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00027]
- [11:15:51] Reencoding: VID_00027 (20 of 22)
- [11:26:23] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00028]
- [11:26:30] Reencoding: VID_00028 (21 of 22)
- [11:36:09] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00029]
- [11:36:09] Reencoding: VID_00029 (22 of 22)
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Reached retry limit. Aborting.
[11:36:11] - Failed video encode, aborted

VID_00029 ONLY 30KB IN M2TS SOURCE

jdobbs
18th August 2009, 20:16
v0.26.03 uses x264 r1183, v0.28.03 uses r1206.

I was wondering if the command syntax is the same, at least for the "LASTCMD.TXT" commands BD-RB submits or where can one reference the x264 command syntax for each build? I don't see it listed on wiki or videolan's web site.

I want to see if I'm able to replace x264's exe for testing from v0.26.03 to v0.28.03. No it isn't. Later versions of X264 use PRESET settings. When those were implemented I started using them instead of discrete settings.

jdobbs
18th August 2009, 20:17
Hi Guys,

Just got my copy of Dexter Season 3 - RETAIL!! not from the newsgroups!!!!

And its working now on the 2 pass but it got stuck in a loop on the 1pass encode.

Here is the log file. After i'm done the 2 pass i'm going to check the 1 pass again and see if this is still happening of if it was a random error. It basically got stuck in a loop analyzing the video:

[08:32:19] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: DEXTER_S3D1
- Input BD size: 42.06 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:33:11.612]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[08:32:20] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [08:32:20] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00004]
- [08:32:34] Reencoding: VID_00004 (1 of 6)
- Analyzing 18.95 22.50 23.00 23.50 23.20 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10
23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.10 23.05 [23.05]
- Aborted...

Ughh.. I'll look at it.

Lif3styl3
18th August 2009, 20:32
hi jdobbs,

is there another handling for fast blu ray encoding (with 25gb) regarding the audio stream ???

Using this option i'am getting the hd audio tracks, using the normal endocding i'am getting only dolby digital tracks.

tested with der_vorleser.

Kakashi Sensei
18th August 2009, 20:42
Ughh.. I'll look at it.

Just so you know I aborted it b/c it was in a loop, BD-RB didn't.

After its done a successful encode i'll test it out again in 1 pass. Anything you want me to do in particular that would help in troubleshooting?

jdobbs
18th August 2009, 21:19
v0.26.03 uses x264 r1183, v0.28.03 uses r1206.

I was wondering if the command syntax is the same, at least for the "LASTCMD.TXT" commands BD-RB submits or where can one reference the x264 command syntax for each build? I don't see it listed on wiki or videolan's web site.

I want to see if I'm able to replace x264's exe for testing from v0.26.03 to v0.28.03. You won't be able to use the older version because the newer command line (from BD-RB) needs PRESETs, and the older version has command options that are no longer supported in the newer versions.

leChameleon
19th August 2009, 02:11
BD-RB v0.28.03

WINDOWS 7 ENTERPRISE 64-bit
INTEL i7 940 @ 2.93GHz
CORSAIR 12 GB Triple Channel DDR3 RAM
EVGA X58 SLI Motherboard (not the Classified model)
===================================================
[12:09:36] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: VALKYRIE
- Input BD size: 39.96 GB
- Approximate total content: [05:24:24.653]
- Target BD size: 22.46 GB
[12:09:36] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [12:09:36] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00074]
- [12:15:00] Reencoding: VID_00074 (1 of 10)
- [12:15:00] Collecting video information
- Video: 1920x1080, 23.976fps, 173,130 frames
- Bitrate: 8,519 Kbs
- [12:15:00] Reencoding: VID_00074, Pass 1 of 2
- [13:37:31] Reencoding: VID_00074, Pass 2 of 2
- [17:42:26] Video Encode complete
- [17:42:26] Reencoding audio tracks (if req'd)
- [17:42:26] Multiplexing M2TS
- [17:47:07] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00172]
- [17:47:18] Reencoding: VID_00172 (2 of 10)
- [17:47:18] Collecting video information
- Video: 1920x1080, 29.970fps, 16,429 frames
- Bitrate: 6,451 Kbs
- [17:47:18] Reencoding: VID_00172, Pass 1 of 2
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Reached retry limit. Aborting.
[17:47:29] - Failed video encode, aborted

"D:\Downloads\BD-RB\BD-RBV02803\BD_Rebuilder\tools\x264.exe" "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00172.AVS" --preset slow --ref 4 --b-adapt 1 --bitrate 6451 --level 4.1 --sar 1:1 --fps 30000/1001 --aud --vbv-bufsize 25000 --keyint 24 --min-keyint 1 --ipratio 1.1 --pbratio 1.1 --vbv-maxrate 35000 --threads auto --thread-input --stats "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00172.AVS.MKV.stats" --pass 1 --output NUL

x264 [info]: using SAR=1/1
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.2
x264 [info]: profile Main, level 4.1
x264 [error]: x264_encoder_encode failed26 kb/s, eta 0:07:10

Questions:
1. Is it normal that BD-RB would write "--output NUL" in the command string?
2. BD-RB successfully completed "00074.m2ts" just before outputting this command. What might cause VID_00072 to fail? Both are MPEG-4 (AVC) files.

"D:\Downloads\BD-RB\BD-RBV02803\BD_Rebuilder\tools\x264.exe"
"K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00074.AVS"
--preset slow
--ref 4
--b-adapt 1
--bitrate 8519
--level 4.1
--sar 1:1
--fps 24000/1001
--aud
--vbv-bufsize 25000
--keyint 24
--min-keyint 1
--ipratio 1.1
--pbratio 1.1
--vbv-maxrate 35000
--threads auto
--thread-input
--stats "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00074.AVS.MKV.stats"
--pass 2
--output "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00074.AVS.MKV"

This created "00074.m2ts" at 12.93 GB under WORKFILES.

NOTE: VID_00174 is 1080p while VID_00172 us a 1080i.

I've tested the LASTCMD.txt with VC-1=diabled and VC-1=wmv9, both yield the same result.

leChameleon
19th August 2009, 02:15
Is there any way to capture all of BD-RB's commands it's submitting to x264?

focuspuller
19th August 2009, 04:05
Whenever you see this error, immediately copy the command line from LASTCMD.TXT in the BD-RB directory and paste it into a command window. Then you will be able to see what error X264 is running into.

If you've recently upgraded to Win7 -- search the thread.

Ok. Is this what You mean? :

[Options]
RESIZE=0
MODE=0
TARGET_SIZE=23450
ENCODE_QUALITY=5
QUICK_EXTRAS=0
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=eng;enm;
SUBS_TO_KEEP=eng;enm;
COLOR_BOOST=0
RESIZE_1080=0
DTS_REENCODE=0
AC3_REENCODE=0
AC3_640=1
KEEP_HD_AUDIO=1
AVCHD=0
REMOVE_WORKFILES=0
AUDIO_TRACK_LIMIT=1
SUBTITLE_TRACK_LIMIT=1
CUSTOM_TARGET_SIZE=23450
PRIORITY_CLASS=0
CRF_ENCODING=1
[Paths]
SOURCE_PATH=D:\12_MONKEYS\12_MONKEYS_G51_GLO\
WORKING_PATH=E:\WORK\

I have always used windows 7 while using this program and I have not once failed to shrink a single disc, until now. Any ideas?

In either case I love the program and use it a lot. I can't say that enough.

jdobbs
19th August 2009, 04:19
BD-RB v0.28.03

WINDOWS 7 ENTERPRISE 64-bit
INTEL i7 940 @ 2.93GHz
CORSAIR 12 GB Triple Channel DDR3 RAM
EVGA X58 SLI Motherboard (not the Classified model)
===================================================
[12:09:36] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: VALKYRIE
- Input BD size: 39.96 GB
- Approximate total content: [05:24:24.653]
- Target BD size: 22.46 GB
[12:09:36] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [12:09:36] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00074]
- [12:15:00] Reencoding: VID_00074 (1 of 10)
- [12:15:00] Collecting video information
- Video: 1920x1080, 23.976fps, 173,130 frames
- Bitrate: 8,519 Kbs
- [12:15:00] Reencoding: VID_00074, Pass 1 of 2
- [13:37:31] Reencoding: VID_00074, Pass 2 of 2
- [17:42:26] Video Encode complete
- [17:42:26] Reencoding audio tracks (if req'd)
- [17:42:26] Multiplexing M2TS
- [17:47:07] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00172]
- [17:47:18] Reencoding: VID_00172 (2 of 10)
- [17:47:18] Collecting video information
- Video: 1920x1080, 29.970fps, 16,429 frames
- Bitrate: 6,451 Kbs
- [17:47:18] Reencoding: VID_00172, Pass 1 of 2
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Reached retry limit. Aborting.
[17:47:29] - Failed video encode, aborted

"D:\Downloads\BD-RB\BD-RBV02803\BD_Rebuilder\tools\x264.exe" "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00172.AVS" --preset slow --ref 4 --b-adapt 1 --bitrate 6451 --level 4.1 --sar 1:1 --fps 30000/1001 --aud --vbv-bufsize 25000 --keyint 24 --min-keyint 1 --ipratio 1.1 --pbratio 1.1 --vbv-maxrate 35000 --threads auto --thread-input --stats "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00172.AVS.MKV.stats" --pass 1 --output NUL

x264 [info]: using SAR=1/1
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.2
x264 [info]: profile Main, level 4.1
x264 [error]: x264_encoder_encode failed26 kb/s, eta 0:07:10

Questions:
1. Is it normal that BD-RB would write "--output NUL" in the command string?
2. BD-RB successfully completed "00074.m2ts" just before outputting this command. What might cause VID_00072 to fail? Both are MPEG-4 (AVC) files.

"D:\Downloads\BD-RB\BD-RBV02803\BD_Rebuilder\tools\x264.exe"
"K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00074.AVS"
--preset slow
--ref 4
--b-adapt 1
--bitrate 8519
--level 4.1
--sar 1:1
--fps 24000/1001
--aud
--vbv-bufsize 25000
--keyint 24
--min-keyint 1
--ipratio 1.1
--pbratio 1.1
--vbv-maxrate 35000
--threads auto
--thread-input
--stats "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00074.AVS.MKV.stats"
--pass 2
--output "K:\BD25 4\VALKYRIE (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00074.AVS.MKV"

This created "00074.m2ts" at 12.93 GB under WORKFILES.

NOTE: VID_00174 is 1080p while VID_00172 us a 1080i.

I've tested the LASTCMD.txt with VC-1=diabled and VC-1=wmv9, both yield the same result. I don't have a clue what point you're trying to make with this long post????

Yes it is normal for the output to be converted from "i" to "p" -- if you look at the AVS file you'll see the conversion.

Yes it is normal for the first pass to output to NUL -- it saves time, and all that is really need for pass two is the stats info.

Just as a test, try opening VID_00172.AVS with the media player and see what is displayed. It may be that the AVISYNTH filters aren't working correctly.

jdobbs
19th August 2009, 04:22
Ok. Is this what You mean? :

[Options]
RESIZE=0
MODE=0
TARGET_SIZE=23450
ENCODE_QUALITY=5
QUICK_EXTRAS=0
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=eng;enm;
SUBS_TO_KEEP=eng;enm;
COLOR_BOOST=0
RESIZE_1080=0
DTS_REENCODE=0
AC3_REENCODE=0
AC3_640=1
KEEP_HD_AUDIO=1
AVCHD=0
REMOVE_WORKFILES=0
AUDIO_TRACK_LIMIT=1
SUBTITLE_TRACK_LIMIT=1
CUSTOM_TARGET_SIZE=23450
PRIORITY_CLASS=0
CRF_ENCODING=1
[Paths]
SOURCE_PATH=D:\12_MONKEYS\12_MONKEYS_G51_GLO\
WORKING_PATH=E:\WORK\

I have always used windows 7 while using this program and I have not once failed to shrink a single disc, until now. Any ideas?

In either case I love the program and use it a lot. I can't say that enough. That's good info - but not what I was requesting. It's probably too late now, as I'm not sure what you have done since the error occurred.

focuspuller
19th August 2009, 07:50
That's good info - but not what I was requesting. It's probably too late now, as I'm not sure what you have done since the error occurred.

I have made no changes to the computer since I have been using BD Rebuilder, other then using upgrades. I even tried using a few older versions of the program, same result. To recap, I backed-up the disc using ANYDVD and then tried to shrink it. No sucess yet. My guess is that Haali Media Splitter is somehow related to the problem.

ArcticFox
19th August 2009, 08:02
Having problems shrinking Firefly, i did Lost Season 1 and didnt have any issues at all.

-----------------------
[07:54:13] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: RIPPEDBLURAY
- Input BD size: 43.77 GB
- Approximate total content: [04:11:04.023]
- Target BD size: 7.72 GB
- RESIZE 1080p to 720p enabled
[07:54:14] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [07:54:14] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00001]
- Error in attempt to extract audio/subs.
- Unexpected byte
[07:54:20] - Failed to retrieve audio, aborted

---

[Status]
LABEL=RIPPEDBLURAY
VERSION=v0.28.03 (beta)
SOURCE_SIZE=46993282576
SOURCE_VIDEO_SIZE=46765621248
TARGET_SIZE=8294236160
REDUCTION=.172489418866535
RESIZE_1080=-1
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=eng;
SUBS_TO_KEEP=eng;enm;
BACKUP_MODE=0
QUICK=0
[00001]
AUDIO=10000
PGS=100000

Has it corrupted when ripping?

leChameleon
19th August 2009, 09:13
I don't have a clue what point you're trying to make with this long post????

Yes it is normal for the output to be converted from "i" to "p" -- if you look at the AVS file you'll see the conversion.

Yes it is normal for the first pass to output to NUL -- it saves time, and all that is really need for pass two is the stats info.

Just as a test, try opening VID_00172.AVS with the media player and see what is displayed. It may be that the AVISYNTH filters aren't working correctly. 1. I'm trying to understand why only running 64-bit seems to fail. In doing so I'm noting the differences between BD-RB builds, the commands it's submitting to x264 and the differences in the the video content being processed.


2. K:\Bd25 4\Valkyrie (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00172.AVS is < 1kb in size and WMP12 does not recognize the file and is unable to play it.

Directory of K:\Bd25 4\Valkyrie (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES

8/18/2009 05:47 PM 15,349,376 00172.track_4352.ac3
8/18/2009 05:47 PM 266 AUD_00172.meta
8/18/2009 05:47 PM 262 AUD_00172_4352.AVS
8/18/2009 05:47 PM 309 VID_00172.AVS
8/18/2009 06:33 PM 258,048 VID_00172.AVS.MKV.stats.mbtree.temp
8/18/2009 06:33 PM 4,096 VID_00172.AVS.MKV.stats.temp


3. The original video content VID_00074 is 1080p and BD-RB v0.28.03 processes just fine where VID_00172 is 1080i and fails. I was wondering if there was any special way the "interlaced" content is required to be processed using a 64-bit platform. Noted in my previous post I've tested setting both VC-1 (disabled and wmv9) but the results are the same. The same exact job running XP SP3 32-bit works perfectly with ffdshow's default settings.
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/6826/tmpe.jpg

Furiousflea
19th August 2009, 13:48
1. I'm trying to understand why only running 64-bit seems to fail. In doing so I'm noting the differences between BD-RB builds, the commands it's submitting to x264 and the differences in the the video content being processed.


2. K:\Bd25 4\Valkyrie (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES\VID_00172.AVS is < 1kb in size and WMP12 does not recognize the file and is unable to play it.

Directory of K:\Bd25 4\Valkyrie (2008)\BD-RBV02803_64\WORKFILES

8/18/2009 05:47 PM 15,349,376 00172.track_4352.ac3
8/18/2009 05:47 PM 266 AUD_00172.meta
8/18/2009 05:47 PM 262 AUD_00172_4352.AVS
8/18/2009 05:47 PM 309 VID_00172.AVS
8/18/2009 06:33 PM 258,048 VID_00172.AVS.MKV.stats.mbtree.temp
8/18/2009 06:33 PM 4,096 VID_00172.AVS.MKV.stats.temp


3. The original video content VID_00074 is 1080p and BD-RB v0.28.03 processes just fine where VID_00172 is 1080i and fails. I was wondering if there was any special way the "interlaced" content is required to be processed using a 64-bit platform. Noted in my previous post I've tested setting both VC-1 (disabled and wmv9) but the results are the same. The same exact job running XP SP3 32-bit works perfectly with ffdshow's default settings.
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/6826/tmpe.jpg

64 bit version of Windows 7 shouldn't cause a problem. I use it with no problems at all.

Looks just like a codec issue to me. You do realise that getting ffdshow or any "seperate" codec to work where Windows 7 already has one is a pain in the backside?

Look back in my post history, about 4-8 posts ago I linked to a post containing a guide someone had made to get BDRB to use ffdshow codecs and TMT2 codec for VC1 (since this is one of the only ways to decode 1080i hybrid video)

There is no "free" software that can decode those hybrid interlaced VC1 material to my knowledge.

EDIT - Just seen that the VC1 decoding isn't the problem...but the first part of my post is relevent still as it will allow you to use ffdshow decorder as maybe Windows 7 decoder can't handle that interlaced stream.

leChameleon
19th August 2009, 15:48
64 bit version of Windows 7 shouldn't cause a problem. I use it with no problems at all.

Looks just like a codec issue to me. You do realise that getting ffdshow or any "seperate" codec to work where Windows 7 already has one is a pain in the backside?

Look back in my post history, about 4-8 posts ago I linked to a post containing a guide someone had made to get BDRB to use ffdshow codecs and TMT2 codec for VC1 (since this is one of the only ways to decode 1080i hybrid video)

There is no "free" software that can decode those hybrid interlaced VC1 material to my knowledge.

EDIT - Just seen that the VC1 decoding isn't the problem...but the first part of my post is relevent still as it will allow you to use ffdshow decorder as maybe Windows 7 decoder can't handle that interlaced stream.Thank you for confirming my suspicions...

To my recollection the TMT2 workaround supports 32-bit only, but I could be mistaken.

If BD-RB v0.27.01 or later fails on a Windows 64-bit architecture using Encode Settings: HIGHEST or HIGH QUALITY, the easy solution to:
A) Use BD-RB v0.26.03
B) Use BD-RB v0.28.03 or later on a 32-bit machine if one has access.

Note in general (not directed toward you):
I think it would be a good idea to start a Known Problems & Solutions document that is released with BD-RB noting potential issues and/or suggested solutions one my try as well as which OS and bit depth they are for. I find there is quite a bit of information captured in this forum but it would be nice to see it captured in one document. I know this might entail additional work for someone, or some volunteers but the benefit should out weigh the work then can easily be maintained going forward.

leChameleon
19th August 2009, 15:59
Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit ships with WMP12, I'm not yet been able to find out which decoder it uses. I'm unclear if one must install WMP9 or WMP11 when attempting to use ffdshow or it has its own codec for wmv9 contained within it's installation.

The odd part is that ffdshow "ffdshow_rev2661_20090207_clsid.exe" referenced on page one of this forum hasn't changed. BD-RB v0.26.03 and prior releases complete successfully Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit. It's only the releases after that that fail. I'm unable to determine, since I'm unable to capture the commands BD-RB submits to 3rd party software, if the problem lies in a newer 3rd party software packaged with BD-RB or the new command syntax or extracted files on the BD-RB side that may cause the 3rd party software to fail for some reason. If there was a way to capture BD-RB's commands submitted to 3rd party software I could test this independently to definitively know where the problem is.

I wish there was a debug mode/option that would output and retain all information, this would be very useful.

Furiousflea
19th August 2009, 18:20
Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit ships with WMP12, I'm not yet been able to find out which decoder it uses. I'm unclear if one must install WMP9 or WMP11 when attempting to use ffdshow or it has its own codec for wmv9 contained within it's installation.

The odd part is that ffdshow "ffdshow_rev2661_20090207_clsid.exe" referenced on page one of this forum hasn't changed. BD-RB v0.26.03 and prior releases complete successfully Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit. It's only the releases after that that fail. I'm unable to determine, since I'm unable to capture the commands BD-RB submits to 3rd party software, if the problem lies in a newer 3rd party software packaged with BD-RB or the new command syntax or extracted files on the BD-RB side that may cause the 3rd party software to fail for some reason. If there was a way to capture BD-RB's commands submitted to 3rd party software I could test this independently to definitively know where the problem is.

I wish there was a debug mode/option that would output and retain all information, this would be very useful.

Windows 7 x64 works just fine with the TMT2 decoding dll files that are needed for decoding via directshow as BDRB does. It's just the actual TMT2 player that doesn't work ;)

Adbear
19th August 2009, 18:44
Actually BD rebuilder already manages to convert VC-1 1080i as I've used it to convert all my Torchwood and Dr Who which uses field based 1080i VC-1, it just has a problem on Dual Xeoon i7 with hyperthreading turned on, works fine with hyper threading off or on a standard single i7 system

Capsbackup
19th August 2009, 21:16
I can also confirm BD-RBV02803 had no trouble with field based VC-1 interlaced files, as a full movie backup to BD-25 of the movie 300 worked perfectly. There were six **.m2ts files on this disc, all processed with no trouble on my I7 920, XP Pro, 32bit.

chudm
20th August 2009, 00:39
I can also confirm BD-RBV02803 had no trouble with field based VC-1 interlaced files, as a full movie backup to BD-25 of the movie 300 worked perfectly. There were six **.m2ts files on this disc, all processed with no trouble on my I7 920, XP Pro, 32bit.

i had no problems doing 300 several weeks ago with previous betas

saphire199
20th August 2009, 05:21
Um, I just downloaded the newest beta, 28.0.3. I extracted it and went to run it and i get the message "this beta has expired". I made sure that I was running the correct exe version, in fact when I drag the message out of the way, it says 28.0.3. What could be causing this?

saphire199

sorry - I mean v0.28.03

Capsbackup
20th August 2009, 05:43
@saphire199;

The one on the first page doesn't expire for over a a month from now... and it's running right now on my system. I think you're mistaken. Are you sure you're pointing to that version?

If the file has been modified/hacked in any way it might also cause that message. I'd suggest you do a virus scan on your system and then download again.

His shortcut is probably aimed at an older version. I've done that several times. :)

Here's a couple suggestions, just a few pages back. :)

saphire199
20th August 2009, 11:40
@saphire199;





Here's a couple suggestions, just a few pages back. :)

Thanks, I am doing a full scan but I do not believe this is the case - I had JUST downloaded it, extracted it and used it. And I did not create a shortcut, I am trying to open the exe file by double clicking on it and it definitely says v0.28.03.

saphire199

saphire199
20th August 2009, 11:55
ok, this is solved - and anyone that has problems with this, you need to check your system dates. I found out my girlfriend was checking out future dates on calendar and had hit apply - effectively making the date 2 months into the future. I didn't even think to check that, but that's what it was. Category 5 had the same issue. Sorry this even came up.

saphire199

jdobbs
20th August 2009, 20:17
Um, I just downloaded the newest beta, 28.0.3. I extracted it and went to run it and i get the message "this beta has expired". I made sure that I was running the correct exe version, in fact when I drag the message out of the way, it says 28.0.3. What could be causing this?

saphire199

sorry - I mean v0.28.03 The only thing that can cause it is for the date on your system to be wrong -- or if the EXE has been changed in any way.

[Edit] Whoops. I see you'd already corrected it a few posts down.

focuspuller
21st August 2009, 00:20
So I tried something different and started again. I reripped the Disc (again using ANYDVD) but this time I upgraded my computer to the official release version of Windows 7. It still didn't work, but the results were different. This is what I got:
[Options]
RESIZE=0
MODE=0
TARGET_SIZE=23450
ENCODE_QUALITY=5
QUICK_EXTRAS=0
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=eng;enm;
SUBS_TO_KEEP=eng;enm;
COLOR_BOOST=0
RESIZE_1080=0
DTS_REENCODE=0
AC3_REENCODE=0
AC3_640=1
KEEP_HD_AUDIO=1
AVCHD=0
REMOVE_WORKFILES=0
AUDIO_TRACK_LIMIT=1
SUBTITLE_TRACK_LIMIT=1
CUSTOM_TARGET_SIZE=23450
PRIORITY_CLASS=0
CRF_ENCODING=0
VERBOSE_STATUS=0
[Paths]
SOURCE_PATH=E:\12_MONKEYS\12_MONKEYS_G51_GLO\
WORKING_PATH=E:\WORK\
-----------------------
[18:35:14] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: 12_MONKEYS_G51_GLO
- Input BD size: 39.53 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:37:09.816]
- Target BD size: 22.90 GB
[18:35:16] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [18:35:16] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00009]
- [18:52:02] Reencoding: VID_00009 (1 of 2)
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00009.meta
- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851
[18:52:03] - Failed to build structure, aborted
-----------------------

I've never gotten this error before. Could you tell me what it means?

leChameleon
21st August 2009, 02:09
So after installing Acrsoft TotalMedia Theater 2 and updating it to v2.1.6.130 how does one set it as the decoder for BD-RB?

I've attempted to follow the other instructions posted but Arcsoft is not listed under 64-bit using Win7DSFilterTweaker v1.4. Some of the other links are dead.

I don't see anything in BD-RB's *.ini file either.

focuspuller
21st August 2009, 02:19
Now I can't get any copy to work! With every project I get this:

- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851

Please help!

focuspuller
21st August 2009, 02:32
I just read that you're not supporting Windows 7. While I am disappointed, I have been grateful how bieng able to use the program this long. Windows 7 aside, Is there anyway to get around this particular error?

Thank you very much for your time.

jdobbs
21st August 2009, 04:34
I'll have to support it eventually... but not until it is officially released and all the bugs/incompatibilities are worked out. There's a price to pay for jumping on a bandwagon too soon.

focuspuller
21st August 2009, 05:30
I'll have to support it eventually... but not until it is officially released and all the bugs/incompatibilities are worked out. There's a price to pay for jumping on a bandwagon too soon.

Well, as I've said I've enjoyed using the program so far and I look forward to when you do support it. Thank you for your obviously hard work.

Is there anyway around this?

"- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851"

Perhaps it's not a Windows 7 problem. Any ideas?

HWK
21st August 2009, 06:07
Well, as I've said I've enjoyed using the program so far and I look forward to when you do support it. Thank you for your obviously hard work.

Is there anyway around this?

"- This is not an EBML file (id=0/440786851"

Perhaps it's not a Windows 7 problem. Any ideas?

No, It is not problem of windows 7 it also happen in windows vista. Also i use Win 7 without any problems for about a week.