BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

[Lathe]

I'm looking at it. But with the amount of work involved, it may require a "Pro" version so I can recover costs. Donations have pretty much vanished in the last couple years (explaining the long times between versions). Even if I did a Pro version, though, I'd grandfather anyone who had already donated for BD-RB or DVD-RB or had substantially contributed through bug reports.

I think the most useful function would be importing 4K video and authoring it into a UHD BD.

No promises though, as I've just started researching it.

You should absolutely do a PRO version so you can get paid, period.

You should provide an up front purchase for those who want that, and you should also provide (my preference) a monthly subscription. The reason being is that if people want to use this excellent and now essential program, they need to cough up the monthly $5.99 or whatever. That ASSURES you a regular income; that is the only one that does in my lowly and wretched opinion.

That way, all the nice people here who use it, say 100 people hopefully, then you have a regular, recurring income of $600/month.

A no-brainer to me... :)

[AmigaFuture]

Is anyone else having trouble with this site? Everytime I come here I have to login again -- it doesn't remember me anymore.

I went through that recently after an Avast IS Un/Install. I think it screwed with my Firefox settings. I won't use another browser, Chrome tracks. However, Doom9 doesn't always inform my Email I have something new from here.

You should absolutely do a PRO version so you can get paid, period.

You should provide an up front purchase for those who want that, and you should also provide (my preference) a monthly subscription. The reason being is that if people want to use this excellent and now essential program, they need to cough up the monthly $5.99 or whatever. That ASSURES you a regular income; that is the only one that does in my lowly and wretched opinion.

That way, all the nice people here who use it, say 100 people hopefully, then you have a regular, recurring income of $600/month.

A no-brainer to me... :)

I agree with the self-deprecating one here.

[Lathe]

I agree with the self-deprecating one here.

Thanks kindly AF... :D

[MrVideo]

Wait...did I miss something? Last I remember it wasn't possible to rip 4K/UHD Bluray discs... is that part solved now?
Yep, for a little while now.

[zorro101]

Wait...did I miss something? Last I remember it wasn't possible to rip 4K/UHD Bluray discs... is that part solved now?
yes the aacs2 is broken
the tools deuhd work with 4k blu-ray

[zorro101]

Quite a bit for sure... for example, TSMUXER's output would have to be corrected since it uses different codes, etc...

i have try tsmuxer with input .m2ts uhd (from bd uhd) and:
dont create Blu-ray folder
can create .m2ts

[zorro101]

While on the surface it may look the same, the authoring of the disc is a little different. There are some differences in the features, which has to be handled by a new authoring program.

In other words, the engine under the hood of a UHD disk is a little different than the engine under the hood of a Blu-ray disk.
i hope for release

[staina]

Originally Posted by staina View Post
Application x264L - 64.exe me in different parts processing falls, see error dump from window below...

There is a lengthy discussion as to why X264L was necessary. Please review Rule 1a and use the "search" function.

This part thread I'm there given only to knew whither belongs to part below. Important is this part and answers for her. Thank you

A little I'm searched and to internet found same version codec X264, but with other size see. link.

http://www.digital-digest.com/softwa...story.html#471

This codec at processing not once no srasch. It is possible codecs version 2665 compare and give here know in what are other and whether it is possible use and me found codec without reduction in quality output videos?

Yet I'm found out that the at option "Use DirectshowSource frame serving" at two pass uses latest version codec X264 (file X264.exe) how for frame serving so and for encoding, but at options "Use X264s internal LAVF for frame serving" uses older versuses older version codec X264 (file X264L - 64.exe) how for frame serving so and for encoding.

Which option is then for quality better?

[jdobbs]

Wait...did I miss something? Last I remember it wasn't possible to rip 4K/UHD Bluray discs... is that part solved now?That's just one application. How about that family video you created with your UHD camera? Even the iPhone records UHD now.

[jdobbs]

i have try tsmuxer with input .m2ts uhd (from bd uhd) and:
dont create Blu-ray folder
can create .m2tsYep. There's a lot to be done.

[jdobbs]

I have updated the first post of this thread with a link to the most recent version (v0.50.25) of BD Rebuilder. Changes for this release: - Fixed an issue that could cause CRF value
prediction to jump dramatically on the
final value when using One-Pass CRF.
- Added a fix that prevents encoding from
failing when attempting to encode multipart
sources to ALTERNATE HEVC that have the
ATCDelta flag asserted.
- Modified the file import mechanism so it
fixes MKV inconsistencies caused by oddball
muxing engines. It "prepares" (remuxes)
MKV files before attemping import. This
fixes occasional sync issues with audio
during imports of MKV. This can be disabled
via the "Import/Quick-Play Settings" dialog
from the SETTINGS menu (to save time).
- Added a new IMPORT_CONVERT_FORCE hidden
setting. Forces imports to be reencoded
(to AVC) during import (even when it isn't
required).
- Added IMPORT_VFR_DISABLE as a hidden option
When set to "1", BD-RB ignores indicators
to the contrary, and assumes constant frame
rate.
- Corrected a rare issue that could occur
when performing file imports that require
conversion to AVC or VFR reencoding.
- Fixed an error in which ALTERNATE resizing
may not occur as specified on certain files
that have been imported into a pseudo-BD
structure.
- Updated the included version of X264.EXE to
the latest release (r2851).
- Updated the included version of X264-64.EXE
to the latest release (r2851).
- Other minor corrections and cosmetic fixes.

[jdobbs]

i have try tsmuxer with input .m2ts uhd (from bd uhd) and:
dont create Blu-ray folder
can create .m2tsI also noticed that a start code of x000001E0 is used in TSMUXER HEVC M2TS streams I've tested... while it appears UHD M2TS files use x000001E1 (at least on the one disc I have for testing). That means the entire output M2TS would likely have to be scanned and start codes rewritten. It's easy enough to do -- but certainly time consuming. It might be possible to patch TSMUXER, but I'm not sure if that's even allowable under its freeware license agreement.

If you use a 2160p source to mux, TSMUXER will accept it and write a BD structure, but flags it as 1080p in the MPLS and CLPI files. The headers on the the files (MPLS, CLPI, etc) would all have to be updated to version 3 as well.

[Mark_Venture]

That's just one application. How about that family video you created with your UHD camera? Even the iPhone records UHD now.Ahh yeah... I never thought about using BD Rebuilder for my phone videos...

[Ch3vr0n]

@jdobbs: can't download latest version. Asking for dl credentials

[kufo]

Can´t download file too. Page wants a special login, also im still logged in :rolleyes:
authentication required ?
There ist still 0.50.24 on the fist page, but download link is correct.

[DrinkLyeAndDie]

@jdobbs: can't download latest version. Asking for dl credentials

Likewise.

[MrVideo]

I have updated the first post of this thread with a link to the most recent version (v0.50.25) of BD Rebuilder. Changes for this release: - Added IMPORT_VFR_DISABLE as a hidden option
When set to "1", BD-RB ignores indicators
to the contrary, and assumes constant frame
rate.
Thanks.

[Lathe]

Ahh yeah... I never thought about using BD Rebuilder for my phone videos...

http://lathe-of-heaven.com/rotflmao.gif

[Lathe]

And, a big, sincere 'THANK YOU' for the new version JD! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/respect.gif

And, when I'm done with my current avid hobby of being POOR, I will send you something. Of course, I could EASILY afford a monthly subscription of $5.99! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gif

[jdobbs]

@jdobbs: can't download latest version. Asking for dl credentialsLikewise.Can´t download file too. Page wants a special login, also im still logged in :rolleyes:
authentication required ?
There ist still 0.50.24 on the fist page, but download link is correct.Argghhh... Sorry about that. Fixing it now -- it was a rights issue. Should be available in a few minutes.

[Lathe]

Argghhh... Sorry about that. Fixing it now -- it was a rights issue. Should be available in a few minutes.

http://lathe-of-heaven.com/thankyou2.gif

[soneca]

Thanks for the new version!

[kufo]

Tahanks jdobbs for the new version and fixing the download bug.:D

[zorro101]

I also noticed that a start code of x000001E0 is used in TSMUXER HEVC M2TS streams I've tested... while it appears UHD M2TS files use x000001E1 (at least on the one disc I have for testing). That means the entire output M2TS would likely have to be scanned and start codes rewritten. It's easy enough to do -- but certainly time consuming. It might be possible to patch TSMUXER, but I'm not sure if that's even allowable under its freeware license agreement.

If you use a 2160p source to mux, TSMUXER will accept it and write a BD structure, but flags it as 1080p in the MPLS and CLPI files. The headers on the the files (MPLS, CLPI, etc) would all have to be updated to version 3 as well.
I don't know, but it would be nice!!
on my experiment with tsmuxer with 2160p hevc it was impossible produce Blu-ray (error: unsupported or similar)
only .m2ts output it works

this night i retry

[Sharc]

I have updated the first post of this thread with a link to the most recent version (v0.50.25) of BD Rebuilder. Changes for this release: ........
Thank you for the new version.
The --sar bug reported here (https://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1811223&postcount=26173) seems to have happily survived in 0.50.25, right? :)

[varekai]

And, a big, sincere 'THANK YOU' for the new version JD! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/respect.gif
And, when I'm done with my current avid hobby of being POOR...http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gifhttps://s1.postimg.org/2499yergbj/haha-you-are-poor.jpg

[MrVideo]

on my experiment with tsmuxer with 2160p hevc it was impossible produce Blu-ray
Of course it was impossible to produce a Blu-ray structured ISO file, or BD layout. HEVC is not supported on Blu-ray. No player would play it.

It would have to be recoded to H.264 and tsmuxer doesn't do encoding.

You can retry until you are blue-in-the-face. It ain't gonna happen.

[jdobbs]

Of course it was impossible to produce a Blu-ray structured ISO file, or BD layout. HEVC is not supported on Blu-ray. No player would play it.

It would have to be recoded to H.264 and tsmuxer doesn't do encoding.

You can retry until you are blue-in-the-face. It ain't gonna happen.Well... not with the old Blu-Ray standards. But with the new standard that supports UHD playback, HEVC is supported.

[DrinkLyeAndDie]

It would be nice to see BD Rebuilder add support for UHD be it size reduction, UHD to BD, UHD to DVD, or UHD to alternate movie-only output. Obviously, this requires work. It would be wonderful if a "Pro" version weren't necessary but there are obvious reasons why it would have to be. Count me as one of those interested.

Regardless of whether or not this path is gone down your hard work is always appreciated, jdobbs.

[MrVideo]

Well... not with the old Blu-Ray standards. But with the new standard that supports UHD playback, HEVC is supported.
Right, only if you purchased a new UHD/4K player. I knew I should have stipulated 1080p H.264 (best video :D ) Blu-ray players. The Blu-ray term is very confusing, since both players use Blu-ray media, but even the 4K BD media is a little different. Just that they both use the Blu-ray laser.

[MrVideo]

It would be nice to see BD Rebuilder support for UHD be it size reduction, UHD to BD, UHD to DVD, or UHD to alternate movie-only output.
Dumb question... Since 4K releases all come with a BD disc as well, who cares? Just rip the BD that comes in the release.

[DrinkLyeAndDie]

Dumb question... Since 4K releases all come with a BD disc as well, who cares? Just rip the BD that comes in the release.

Valid question/point. Over time I could see the BD/UHD combo sets not always being available. Just as we don't always see DVD/BD sets. In the end it would save studios money to not sell you both at the same time. If a BD disc was included in the purchase then, absolutely, dealing with the BD release would be more convenient in numerous ways. If not then you won't have a choice.

At present you can always use something like Handbrake or another program to convert a UHD m2ts to lower resolution output. You just have to get around the AACS first. That said, if I could use BD Rebuilder for something like this I would prefer it over something else. :)

Whether or not jdobbs wants go down this rabbit hole is his decision, of course, and I don't see there being a huge rush, at present. :)

[jdobbs]

It would be nice to see BD Rebuilder add support for UHD be it size reduction, UHD to BD, UHD to DVD, or UHD to alternate movie-only output. Obviously, this requires work. It would be wonderful if a "Pro" version weren't necessary but there are obvious reasons why it would have to be. Count me as one of those interested.

Regardless of whether or not this path is gone down your hard work is always appreciated, jdobbs. You can be sure that all those are possible and will be available at some point. As for UHD-BD to UHD-BD -- I'm still in the research mode for that one. First I will need to buy a UHD player -- but it costs $179 for the cheapest one I have seen, and wealthy is one of the things I can confidently say I am not. In the meantime I will continue in my research.

One other valid point... my experience has been that creating a backup from a higher resolution results in better quality than same-to-same. So I would think that a single layer 1080p BD made from a UHD source would look better than one made from a dual-layer BD source. Mostly just my humble opinion based on experience, though. I haven't done any testing to prove it.

[ggtop]

I have updated the first post of this thread with a link to the most recent version (v0.50.25) of BD Rebuilder.
small comestic issue: According to a newly created INI file BD-RB reports itself as version 0.50.0.24 instead of 25:
[Options]
VERSION=0.50.0.24
ENCODER=0
MODE=0
ENCODE_QUALITY=0
ONEPASS_ENCODING=2
AUTO_QUALITY=1


ggtop

[Lathe]

https://s1.postimg.org/2499yergbj/haha-you-are-poor.jpg

Thanks a lot... http://lathe-of-heaven.com/rolleyes2.gif

[DrinkLyeAndDie]

You can be sure that all those are possible and will be available at some point. As for UHD-BD to UHD-BD -- I'm still in the research mode for that one. First I will need to buy a UHD player -- but it costs $179 for the cheapest one I have seen, and wealthy is one of the things I can confidently say I am not. In the meantime I will continue in my research.

Completely understandable concerning costs, etc, and why a Pro version would be necessary, IMHO. Nonetheless, you still have to put in the up-front investment in money, research, testing, etc, when UHD hasn't penetrated that deep into the market yet. At this point there's no rush but it would be useful for some.

One other valid point... my experience has been that creating a backup from a higher resolution results in better quality than same-to-same. So I would think that a single layer 1080p BD made from a UHD source would look better than one made from a dual-layer BD source. Mostly just my humble opinion based on experience, though. I haven't done any testing to prove it.

Absolutely. I've also had similar experiences with BD to DVD backups where the converted output is clearly better than the actual retail DVD release, IMO.

[jdobbs]

small comestic issue: According to a newly created INI file BD-RB reports itself as version 0.50.0.24 instead of 25:
[Options]
VERSION=0.50.0.24
ENCODER=0
MODE=0
ENCODE_QUALITY=0
ONEPASS_ENCODING=2
AUTO_QUALITY=1


ggtopMy mistake. I failed to update the header info. You'll find that right clicking on the EXE and looking at "Details" will also show the wrong version. No big deal, as you said -- it's just cosmetic.

[zorro101]

I also noticed that a start code of x000001E0 is used in TSMUXER HEVC M2TS streams I've tested... while it appears UHD M2TS files use x000001E1 (at least on the one disc I have for testing). That means the entire output M2TS would likely have to be scanned and start codes rewritten. It's easy enough to do -- but certainly time consuming. It might be possible to patch TSMUXER, but I'm not sure if that's even allowable under its freeware license agreement.

If you use a 2160p source to mux, TSMUXER will accept it and write a BD structure, but flags it as 1080p in the MPLS and CLPI files. The headers on the the files (MPLS, CLPI, etc) would all have to be updated to version 3 as well.

Hi
i have retry and: you were right :)
tsmuxer can produce blu-ray folder (i had seen the error but it was just a warning: "Warning! HEVC codec is not standard for BD disks!")
remain the problem that you have described

-- but it costs $179 for the cheapest one I have seen, and wealthy is one of the things I can confidently say I am not. In the meantime I will continue in my research.

if I can give you an advice, you do not need an uhd reader/writer
to do the tests just download a rip and try to work with it
to burn, then, just a normal blu-ray DL burner

The first step, if I can afford it, would be to eliminate the languages and subtitles that do not interest you to drop the size of blu-ray UHD (usually 66Gb) into a 50GB blu-ray
in the test I did last night with "passengers" using tsmuxer, the total size (choosing only one language and one subtitle) dropped from 58GB to 45GB
perfect for entering a BD-R DL. unfortunately, as we know, the output of tsmuxer is not good for UHD!
this would already be a great thing!
I doubt, but if you need to do some tests, I'm available

whatever happens you are a big one and thanks for all

[jdobbs]

if I can give you an advice, you do not need an uhd reader/writer
to do the tests just download a rip and try to work with it
to burn, then, just a normal blu-ray DL burner I wasn't talking about a reader/writer. I was talking about a player. There's no way to know if the structure created is workable unless a UHD player accepts it and plays it (even if using a standard BD disc).

[zorro101]

I wasn't talking about a reader/writer. I was talking about a player. There's no way to know if the structure created is workable unless a UHD player accepts it and plays it (even if using a standard BD disc).

sorry, I did not understand :(:(:(

Powerdvd 17 can read Blu-ray UHD (form disk and from folder)
certainly not the same as a player

[jdobbs]

sorry, I did not understand :(:(:(

Powerdvd 17 can read Blu-ray UHD (form disk and from folder)
certainly not the same as a playerYeah. PowerDVD is okay for playback (when it works) -- but it isn't reliable enough for testing.

[zorro101]

Yeah. PowerDVD is okay for playback (when it works) -- but it isn't reliable enough for testing.
I hope for soon news

for now, thanks for technical conversation


ps. if you decide to sell the new product, i can buy (for low price ;) )

[Mark_Venture]

yes the aacs2 is broken
the tools deuhd work with 4k blu-rayI wasn't aware that it was 100% reliable and worked on all 4K/UHD discs. From what I've read Deuhd only works on certain titles.. and some reviews have not shown 100% success rate with "supported" titles.

[Sharc]

@jdobbs
When the name of a file for import contains letters like ä, ö, ü ..... BD-RB throws an error:
ERROR: Gathering source file information. Aborted.
Are there any specific codeset/language rules for filenames?

[jdobbs]

@jdobbs
When the name of a file for import contains letters like ä, ö, ü ..... BD-RB throws an error:
ERROR: Gathering source file information. Aborted.
Are there any specific codeset/language rules for filenames?Yes. But they are defined by the operating system -- or at least the MS DLLs called by BD-RB rather than BD-RB itself. I should probably find them do a conversion myself to eliminate the offending characters.

[zorro101]

I wasn't aware that it was 100% reliable and worked on all 4K/UHD discs. From what I've read Deuhd only works on certain titles.. and some reviews have not shown 100% success rate with "supported" titles.

yes, as you say is correct, but on internet can you found bd-uhd full rip of disk not released from deuhd.
i think that exist another sw (the first bd-uhd rip are released before deuhd)

anyway, the deuhd can now support more that 50 bd-uhd. is good start

[andref4]

Hi jdobbs,

I have some encoding problems with a few new German/EU Reg. B Blu-Ray movies (see log). All movies are multipart and the 3D movie is multipart and multiangel! And the movies are all from Sony!
BAYWATCH, ARRIVAL and THE SMURFS THE LOST VILLAGE 3D.

[10.19.17] BD Rebuilder v0.50.25
[01:24:36] Source: BAYWATCH
- Input BD size: 45,05 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:17:07.147]
- Target BD size: 23,63 GB
- Windows Version: 6.1 [7601]
- Auto Quality: Good (Very Fast), ABR
- Decoding/Frame serving: DirectShow
- Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=640
[01:24:37] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [01:24:37] Processing: VID_00097 (1 of 39)
- [01:24:37] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00097]
- [01:24:42] Reencoding video [VID_00097]
- [01:24:42] Keeping original video (no reencode)
- [01:24:42] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:24:42] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:24:46] Processing: VID_00148 (2 of 39)
- [01:24:46] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00148]
- [01:24:54] Reencoding video [VID_00148]
- [01:24:54] Keeping original video (no reencode)
- [01:24:54] Processing audio tracks
- [01:24:54] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:24:57] Processing: VID_00254 (3 of 39)
- [01:24:57] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00254]
- [01:25:04] Reencoding video [VID_00254]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 841 frames
- Bitrate: 12.881 Kbs
- [01:25:04] Reencoding: VID_00254, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:25:31] Video Encode complete
- [01:25:31] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:25:31] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:25:35] Processing: VID_00351 (4 of 39)
- [01:25:35] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00351]
- [01:26:07] Reencoding video [VID_00351]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 8.374 frames
- Bitrate: 4.594 Kbs
- [01:26:07] Reencoding: VID_00351, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:28:39] Video Encode complete
- [01:28:39] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [01:28:39] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:28:58] Processing: VID_00358 (5 of 39)
- [01:28:58] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00358]
- [01:30:01] Reencoding video [VID_00358]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 31.057 frames
- Bitrate: 10.304 Kbs
- [01:30:01] Reencoding: VID_00358, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:44:56] Video Encode complete
- [01:44:56] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:44:56] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:45:15] Processing: VID_00407 (6 of 39)
- [01:45:15] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00407]
- [01:45:22] Reencoding video [VID_00407]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 1.038 frames
- Bitrate: 10.350 Kbs
- [01:45:22] Reencoding: VID_00407, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:45:46] Video Encode complete
- [01:45:46] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:45:46] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:45:50] Processing: VID_00408 (7 of 39)
- [01:45:50] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00408]
- [01:46:01] Reencoding video [VID_00408]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 3.302 frames
- Bitrate: 10.301 Kbs
- [01:46:01] Reencoding: VID_00408, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:47:17] Video Encode complete
- [01:47:17] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:47:17] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:47:23] Processing: VID_00409 (8 of 39)
- [01:47:23] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00409]
- [01:47:31] Reencoding video [VID_00409]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 1.771 frames
- Bitrate: 10.357 Kbs
- [01:47:31] Reencoding: VID_00409, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:48:12] Video Encode complete
- [01:48:12] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:48:12] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:48:16] Processing: VID_00410 (9 of 39)
- [01:48:16] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00410]
- [01:48:27] Reencoding video [VID_00410]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 3.143 frames
- Bitrate: 10.321 Kbs
- [01:48:27] Reencoding: VID_00410, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:49:40] Video Encode complete
- [01:49:40] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:49:40] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:49:47] Processing: VID_00411 (10 of 39)
- [01:49:47] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00411]
- [01:49:57] Reencoding video [VID_00411]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 2.862 frames
- Bitrate: 10.338 Kbs
- [01:49:57] Reencoding: VID_00411, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:51:07] Video Encode complete
- [01:51:07] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:51:07] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:51:12] Processing: VID_00412 (11 of 39)
- [01:51:12] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00412]
- [01:51:21] Reencoding video [VID_00412]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 2.274 frames
- Bitrate: 10.330 Kbs
- [01:51:21] Reencoding: VID_00412, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:52:13] Video Encode complete
- [01:52:13] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:52:13] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:52:18] Processing: VID_00417 (12 of 39)
- [01:52:18] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00417]
- [01:52:22] Reencoding video [VID_00417]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 148 frames
- Bitrate: 10.379 Kbs
- [01:52:22] Reencoding: VID_00417, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:52:25] Video Encode complete
- [01:52:25] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:52:25] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:52:28] Processing: VID_00418 (13 of 39)
- [01:52:28] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00418]
- [01:52:32] Reencoding video [VID_00418]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 25 frames
- Bitrate: 1.915 Kbs
- [01:52:32] Reencoding: VID_00418, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:52:33] Video Encode complete
- [01:52:33] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:52:33] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:52:37] Processing: VID_00424 (14 of 39)
- [01:52:37] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00424]
- [01:53:07] Reencoding video [VID_00424]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 13.589 frames
- Bitrate: 10.298 Kbs
- [01:53:07] Reencoding: VID_00424, Pass 1 of 1
- [01:58:29] Video Encode complete
- [01:58:29] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [01:58:29] Multiplexing M2TS
- [01:58:39] Processing: VID_00425 (15 of 39)
- [01:58:39] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00425]
- [01:59:18] Reencoding video [VID_00425]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 13.157 frames
- Bitrate: 10.310 Kbs
- [01:59:18] Reencoding: VID_00425, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:04:27] Video Encode complete
- [02:04:27] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [02:04:27] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:04:36] Processing: VID_00443 (16 of 39)
- [02:04:36] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00443]
- [02:04:54] Reencoding video [VID_00443]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 1.131 frames
- Bitrate: 5.362 Kbs
- [02:04:54] Reencoding: VID_00443, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:05:16] Video Encode complete
- [02:05:16] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:05:16] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:05:21] Processing: VID_00444 (17 of 39)
- [02:05:21] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00444]
- [02:05:28] Reencoding video [VID_00444]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 979 frames
- Bitrate: 5.358 Kbs
- [02:05:28] Reencoding: VID_00444, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:05:47] Video Encode complete
- [02:05:47] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:05:47] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:05:52] Processing: VID_00445 (18 of 39)
- [02:05:52] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00445]
- [02:06:05] Reencoding video [VID_00445]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 2.580 frames
- Bitrate: 5.294 Kbs
- [02:06:05] Reencoding: VID_00445, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:06:55] Video Encode complete
- [02:06:55] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:06:55] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:07:01] Processing: VID_00446 (19 of 39)
- [02:07:01] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00446]
- [02:07:09] Reencoding video [VID_00446]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 1.078 frames
- Bitrate: 6.757 Kbs
- [02:07:09] Reencoding: VID_00446, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:07:31] Video Encode complete
- [02:07:31] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:07:31] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:07:36] Processing: VID_00447 (20 of 39)
- [02:07:36] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00447]
- [02:07:45] Reencoding video [VID_00447]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 1.481 frames
- Bitrate: 3.364 Kbs
- [02:07:45] Reencoding: VID_00447, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:08:13] Video Encode complete
- [02:08:13] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:08:13] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:08:19] Processing: VID_00448 (21 of 39)
- [02:08:19] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00448]
- [02:10:58] Reencoding video [VID_00448]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 47.620 frames
- Bitrate: 5.411 Kbs
- [02:10:58] Reencoding: VID_00448, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:25:52] Video Encode complete
- [02:25:52] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:25:52] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:27:14] Processing: VID_00449 (22 of 39)
- [02:27:14] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00449]
- [02:27:50] Reencoding video [VID_00449]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 9.588 frames
- Bitrate: 5.769 Kbs
- [02:27:50] Reencoding: VID_00449, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:30:51] Video Encode complete
- [02:30:51] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:30:51] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:31:09] Processing: VID_00450 (23 of 39)
- [02:31:09] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00450]
- [02:31:18] Reencoding video [VID_00450]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 1.011 frames
- Bitrate: 5.472 Kbs
- [02:31:19] Reencoding: VID_00450, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:31:38] Video Encode complete
- [02:31:38] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:31:38] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:31:43] Processing: VID_00451 (24 of 39)
- [02:31:43] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00451]
- [02:32:21] Reencoding video [VID_00451]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 9.859 frames
- Bitrate: 4.960 Kbs
- [02:32:21] Reencoding: VID_00451, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:35:25] Video Encode complete
- [02:35:25] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:35:25] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:35:44] Processing: VID_00452 (25 of 39)
- [02:35:44] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00452]
- [02:35:51] Reencoding video [VID_00452]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 794 frames
- Bitrate: 4.692 Kbs
- [02:35:51] Reencoding: VID_00452, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:36:06] Video Encode complete
- [02:36:06] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:36:06] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:36:11] Processing: VID_00453 (26 of 39)
- [02:36:11] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00453]
- [02:37:37] Reencoding video [VID_00453]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 24.014 frames
- Bitrate: 4.688 Kbs
- [02:37:37] Reencoding: VID_00453, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:45:56] Video Encode complete
- [02:45:57] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:45:57] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:46:38] Processing: VID_00455 (27 of 39)
- [02:46:38] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00455]
- [02:47:02] Reencoding video [VID_00455]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 5.874 frames
- Bitrate: 5.333 Kbs
- [02:47:02] Reencoding: VID_00455, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:48:53] Video Encode complete
- [02:48:53] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:48:53] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:49:04] Processing: VID_00456 (28 of 39)
- [02:49:04] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00456]
- [02:49:13] Reencoding video [VID_00456]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 1.287 frames
- Bitrate: 5.411 Kbs
- [02:49:13] Reencoding: VID_00456, Pass 1 of 1
- [02:49:40] Video Encode complete
- [02:49:40] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4353 (deu): Keeping original audio
- [02:49:40] Multiplexing M2TS
- [02:49:45] Processing: VID_00457 (29 of 39)
- [02:49:45] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00457]
- Extracting video streams [VID_00457]
- Extracting audio streams [VID_00457]
- Error in attempt to extract audio/subs.
- Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not syncronized. Please, verify stream fps. File name: H:\BDMV\STREAM\00457.m2ts
- Error in attempt to extract audio/subs.
- Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not syncronized. Please, verify stream fps. File name: H:\BDMV\STREAM\00457.m2ts
[02:53:49] - Failed to retrieve audio, aborted


The error message is on all 3 movies the same but on other xxx.m2ts files.

The two 2D movies I have encoded with another prog without any probs but not the SMURFS 3D multiangel movie because the other prog don't support multiangel.

What can I do to encode the complete BD50 to BD25 without any probs and errors? If I use tsmuxer to create one movie only BD (without menu) from the multipart files I have no errors or buffer overflows. I don't know why it happens on BD-Rebuilder.

I have tested it with BD-Reb since v0.50.20.

many thx and kind regards

[jdobbs]

- Error in attempt to extract audio/subs.
- Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not syncronized. Please, verify stream fps. File name: H:\BDMV\STREAM\00457.m2ts

The error message is on all 3 movies the same but on other xxx.m2ts files.

The two 2D movies I have encoded with another prog without any probs but not the SMURFS 3D multiangel movie because the other prog don't support multiangel.

What can I do to encode the complete BD50 to BD25 without any probs and errors? If I use tsmuxer to create one movie only BD (without menu) from the multipart files I have no errors or buffer overflows. I don't know why it happens on BD-Rebuilder.

I have tested it with BD-Reb since v0.50.20.

many thx and kind regardsIn every instance where that message has been seen before, the problem is a bad rip. You might want to try ripping with different software and see how that goes.

[andref4]

In every instance where that message has been seen before, the problem is a bad rip. You might want to try ripping with different software and see how that goes.

Hmmm it can't be a bad rip because I used always newest AnyDVD Version and also testet ist with DVDfab and Passkey (Trial Versions) on two PCs. The ripped BD50 isos are full playabel! And I also have made with anydvd complete isos including the copy protection. All ripped BDs have had no read errors and all BD50 isos (with and without copy protection) can played fine with PowerDVD and free blurayplayer software.

And my mistake... BAYWATCH is from Paramount not Sony.

Any other ideas?

P.S. I can rip all the movies again because I have all the movies on original BD but I did it at least 3 times in two weeks with different AnyDVD Versions and DVDfab Passkey on 2 different PCs without any read errors on the BDs. :(

[jdobbs]

Any other ideas?Nope. That error can't occur unless there is a corrupt source. It actually has nothing to do with BD-RB -- the error is reported by TSMUXER as it tries to demux.

BD Rebuilder automatically attempts separate demuxing for video when this type of error occurs. It looks like it got an error when trying to do all tracks, then the video demuxed correctly, but the audio/subs portion failed. It's possible that some audio or subtitle track was added purposely (new protection?) that is corrupt -- but is never used during playback. I'd just be guessing.

Try using TSMUXER directly on that M2TS. If it works, compare the .meta file in the working folder to the one you see onscreen in TSMUXER. That's about all I can recommend. There's always a chance that BD-RB is creating a bad meta (but it is highly unlikely, since that code get's exercised every time it is run).

Has anyone else successfully backed up "Baywatch"?

Have you tried ripping with MakeMKV? It's free and I've seen reports where it works when other ripping software has failed.