BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

[gonca]

According to IMDB the movie is 2h 4min
My disc has the same run time
You must have a different version

[varekai]

There are only 2 playlists. Both playlists are 1:53 in length.
Try BDInfo, maybe you'll get some other playlist results?
https://www.videohelp.com/software/BDInfo

[BZeeme]

jdobbs

Did you notice that the source code for tsMuxer has been released?

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=176668

[jdobbs]

jdobbs

Did you notice that the source code for tsMuxer has been released?

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=176668WHAT? No I didn't! That could make all the difference in the world. The only thing holding back this latest release is a muxing bug I'm struggling with.

Thanks, BZeeme, you're a life saver.

[zamengo]

WHAT? No I didn't! That could make all the difference in the world. The only thing holding back this latest release is a muxing bug I'm struggling with.

Thanks, BZeeme, you're a life saver.

Nice!

Update note tsMuxeR 2.6.13
- update SEI correction: do not correct SPS/PPS if stream contains different PPS with same pps_id


This help in UHD?

[musiclover]

[QUOTE=zamengo;1880279]
Update note tsMuxeR 2.6.13
- update SEI correction: do not correct SPS/PPS if stream contains different PPS with same pps_id
/QUOTE]

Where can you get the update?

[gonca]

[QUOTE=zamengo;1880279]
Update note tsMuxeR 2.6.13
- update SEI correction: do not correct SPS/PPS if stream contains different PPS with same pps_id
/QUOTE]

Where can you get the update?

Here, possibly
just need to compile it
https://github.com/justdan96/tsMuxer/find/master
or here
https://github.com/justdan96/tsMuxer

[musiclover]

[QUOTE=musiclover;1880353]

Here, possibly
just need to compile it
https://github.com/justdan96/tsMuxer/find/master
or here
https://github.com/justdan96/tsMuxer

That goes above my head

[jdobbs]

Can anyone recommend a free site that can host file downloads? I'll be posting another version of BD-RB soon, but (due to a need to reduce expenses) I've had to start hosting my website on my local server (rather than a commercial hosting site). It's fine for hosting a website... but downloads will be very limited in speed.

[Sharc]

Can anyone recommend a free site that can host file downloads? I'll be posting another version of BD-RB soon, but (due to a need to reduce expenses) I've had to start hosting my website on my local server (rather than a commercial hosting site). It's fine for hosting a website... but downloads will be very limited in speed.
Mediafire, for example:
www.mediafire.com

[jdobbs]

I'll give it a try. Thanks.

[jdobbs]

WHAT? No I didn't! That could make all the difference in the world. The only thing holding back this latest release is a muxing bug I'm struggling with.

Thanks, BZeeme, you're a life saver.Happy to report I think I have killed that last UHD bug (it was complex as hell to find -- but easy to fix once I put my finger on it). Of course you never know what others will find when you go public... but I'm moving forward at least.

I'm doing some testing on the next release... if everything goes alright I hope to post it later today.

[CraigWally]

Can anyone recommend a free site that can host file downloads? I'll be posting another version of BD-RB soon, but (due to a need to reduce expenses) I've had to start hosting my website on my local server (rather than a commercial hosting site). It's fine for hosting a website... but downloads will be very limited in speed.

try
https://infinityfree.net/

seems to good to be true ??

[laserfan]

try
https://infinityfree.net/

seems to good to be true ??

Yeah "Free forever!" and no ads, one can only assume that they allow some sort of data mining perhaps, though I dunno how that might be worse than any other data mining vulnerability.

[SeeMoreDigital]

Happy to report I think I have killed that last UHD bug (it was complex as hell to find -- but easy to fix once I put my finger on it). Of course you never know what others will find when you go public... but I'm moving forward at least.This is great to hear. And very nice work :D

[jdobbs]

Probably won't post today... testing is going slow.

[jdobbs]

Yeah "Free forever!" and no ads, one can only assume that they allow some sort of data mining perhaps, though I dunno how that might be worse than any other data mining vulnerability.I played with it a little and then threw up my hands and gave up. I'd upload a zip file (for downloading)... and 30 seconds later it would disappear. I guess it's alright if all you want to do nothing but web display... but it sure didn't like my trying to post a file for downloading.

[Ch3vr0n]

google drive? :) OneDrive?

[Devilman1]

I would suggest easybytez.com or you can try to distribute it through torrent.

[gonca]

Can anyone recommend a free site that can host file downloads? I'll be posting another version of BD-RB soon, but (due to a need to reduce expenses) I've had to start hosting my website on my local server (rather than a commercial hosting site). It's fine for hosting a website... but downloads will be very limited in speed.
Mediafire
or
Pro, enough to cover expenses, discs etc.
Maybe reduce reliance on donations

[FilipeAmadeuO]

google drive? :) OneDrive?
Dropbox -> 2Gb free

[jdobbs]

I have updated the first post of this thread with a link to the latest version of BD Rebuilder. Changes for this release:- Added muxing routines that remux HEVC
UHD M2TS files, recover lost frames, and
corrects TSMUXER timing issues. Please
remember that UHD capability is still
under development and may need further
work.
- Corrected an error in which imported input
files that have SRT files muxed in a
format other than sequential might set
languages incorrectly or even fail during
output to ALTERNATE formats.
- Corrected an error in which attempts to
extract HEVC secondary streams could
cause BD-RB to fail.
- Added a check during start-up that will
prevent a "Runtime Error 52" issue when
some network or other paths previously
specified are not reachable.
- Made changes that correct audio sync
issues when outputting to UHD-BD.
- Created a workaround for issues in which
the combination of X265 and TSMUXER can
cause stutter issues at higher bitrates.
- Added hidden option FIXED_BITRATE which
is similar to FIXED_CRF. If set, the
source will be reecoded at that bitrate
and any output sizing control is removed.
- Corrected an issue that could result in
audio sync problems after reencode of
certain imported sources.
- Corrected an issue in which imported SRT
files that start at offset 0 could, under
certain conditions, clear the first spoken
subtitle.
- Fixed an issue in which the ALTERNATE_BLURAY
hidden setting was allowing long keyint
sequences (outside bluray compatibility).
This can be overridden by turning it off or
setting a fixed vKeyint value in the
ALTERNATE.TXT preset being used.
- Added code to perform MPA to AC3 conversion
during DVD import. MPA is not supported in
BD format and was previously ignored.
- Added OGG Vorbis as a legal audio format for
imported video files (converted to AC3).
- Updated the included version of X264-64.EXE
to the latest release (r2969).
- Updated the included version of X265-64.EXE
to v3.1+1 10 bit version.
- Other minor corrections and cosmetic fixes.
NOTES:
1. DOLBYVISION is not yet supported.
2. All UHD code is still experimental.

A special thanks to cartman0208 for hosting the download link and making it available at a much improved speed.

If you are planning to do some tests of UHD on this version, you might find it useful to change your encoder settings to VERY GOOD and ONE PASS (ABR) for tests. That will lower quality -- but speed encoding up considerably for testing.

[meadrocks]

Can anyone recommend a free site that can host file downloads? I'll be posting another version of BD-RB soon, but (due to a need to reduce expenses) I've had to start hosting my website on my local server (rather than a commercial hosting site). It's fine for hosting a website... but downloads will be very limited in speed.

How about github?

[musiclover]

Thanks for the update. But ..... Malwarebytes deletes BDRB.exe with the message "MachineLearning/Anomalous.100%"

[Ch3vr0n]

Take control over it, tell MWB to shut up and add an exclusion if you need to. False positive

[jdobbs]

Thanks for the update. But ..... Malwarebytes deletes BDRB.exe with the message "MachineLearning/Anomalous.100%"Which is worse? A virus that deletes your files without your permission -- or anti-virus software that deletes your files without your permission?

I just scanned it with AVG and everything is fine.

[MrVideo]

I have updated the first post of this thread with a link to the latest version of BD Rebuilder. Changes for this release:- Added code to perform MPA to AC3 conversion
during DVD import. MPA is not supported in
BD format and was previously ignored.
MPA was allowed on DVDs?

[SeeMoreDigital]

MPA was allowed on DVDs?If MPA is the same as MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) then yes. And with multiple channels too ;)

[jdobbs]

If MPA is the same as MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) then yes. And with multiple channels too ;)Yessir. Same as MP2.

[wambaz]

Hello, thanks for the update!
I tried to use it on UHD Age of ultron, but it stopped at the end with buffer oveflow.
I used the option UHD_LIMIT_ENCODE=1, was because of that?


[08/02/19] BD Rebuilder v0.60.17
[14:17:18] Source: MARVELS_AVENGERS_AGE_OF_ULTRON_00004
- Input BD size: 53,64 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:21:18.178]
- Target BD size: 46,26 GB
- Windows Version: 6.2 [9200]
- MOVIE-ONLY mode enabled
- Quality: Highest (Very Slow), ABR
- Decoding/Frame serving: FFMPEG
- Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=0 Kbs=640
[14:17:22] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [14:17:22] Processing: VID_00042 (1 of 1)
- [14:17:22] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00042]
- [14:18:04] Reencoding video [VID_00042]
- [14:18:04] Keeping original video (no reencode)
- [14:18:04] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4355 (ita): Keeping original audio
[14:18:04]PHASE ONE complete
[14:18:04]PHASE TWO - Rebuild Started
- [14:18:04] Rebuilding BD file Structure
- Buffer overflow in UHD_Correct_M2TS
- Failed in attempt to update for UHD-BD...
[14:22:52] - Failed to REBUILD

[MrVideo]

I should have pulled my DVD Demystified book. :D

[jdobbs]

Hello, thanks for the update!
I tried to use it on UHD Age of ultron, but it stopped at the end with buffer oveflow.
I used the option UHD_LIMIT_ENCODE=1, was because of that?I don't think so... but I can't be sure. When BD-RB is remuxing the HEVC into to a new M2TS to replace the one created by TSMUXER, it allocates a large buffer to hold information as it collects it for output. That error means that the buffer limit has been reached (which should never happen).

The odds are that it is a bug in my muxing code I will have to hunt down.

[jdobbs]

I don't think so... but I can't be sure. When BD-RB is remuxing the HEVC into to a new M2TS to replace the one created by TSMUXER, it allocates a large buffer to hold information as it collects it for output. That error means that the buffer limit has been reached (which should never happen).

The odds are that it is a bug in my muxing code I will have to hunt down.Actually, after thinking about it... it could very possibly be from that hidden option. I made a lot of changes to the UHD code, and didn't give a lot of thought to that option. I'll do some testing and see.

[cartman0208]

I've never noticed before, and I'm sure, this has nothing to do with the new version, but when I select target output size BD-9 or BD-5, the stream list is a lot longer than when target size BD-25 or custom is selected.
Is that intended?

[jdobbs]

I've never noticed before, and I'm sure, this has nothing to do with the new version, but when I select target output size BD-9 or BD-5, the stream list is a lot longer than when target size BD-25 or custom is selected.
Is that intended?Yes.

BD-RB sets a minimum size limit video files for reencoding. The reason is that many video files on the disc are so small that reencoding them will have no meaningful impact on the overall video quality of the disc. Reencoding them is, essentially, just a waste of time. So they are kept intact and transferred to the newly encoded disc.

But...

When you decide to output to a DVD disc (BD-5/BD-9), reencoding them is no longer an option -- it is a requirement. Blu-Ray discs have a higher maximum bitrate than DVD, and almost all BD video is encoded at a variable rate that uses that maximum (or somewhere in its neighborhood). That bitrate would exceed the transfer rate of the DVD disc/device and would cause stutter or possibly even failure during playback on a BD-5/9.

So when choosing BD5/9, BD-RB has no choice but to reencode everything in order to ensure it meets the lower maximums required by DVD media.

[cartman0208]

Makes sense
:thanks:

[MrVideo]

With BD-25 media as cheap as it is, why destroy video quality by burning to DVD media?

[gonca]

With BD-25 media as cheap as it is, why destroy video quality by burning to DVD media?
Compatibility
More DVD players than BD players out there

AND
cartman0208 has his reasons, I am sure

AND
because he can

[cartman0208]

Actually I was just playing with the settings :D

[FilipeAmadeuO]

@jdobbs
I am trying to rebuild a UHD in order to replace on subtitle/sup file by another with diferent languague (from BD) without reencoding.
Just on the process i have the following error:
"BD Rebuilder experienced an error 1802
UHD_Correct_M2TS() 00006 8102"

I tried to replace the 00062.track_4771.sup subtitle before the m2ts is created. Any sugestion or idea why this error happens ?

[gonca]

Actually I was just playing with the settings :D

So, it is reasons 2 & 3
Could you come up with something for compatibility so I am 3/3?

[jdobbs]

@jdobbs
I am trying to rebuild a UHD in order to replace on subtitle/sup file by another with diferent languague (from BD) without reencoding.
Just on the process i have the following error:
"BD Rebuilder experienced an error 1802
UHD_Correct_M2TS() 00006 8102"

I tried to replace the 00062.track_4771.sup subtitle before the m2ts is created. Any sugestion or idea why this error happens ?All I can tell from that is that it is an overflow error. I'd need more information to figure out why.

[jdobbs]

I've updated the first post of this thread with a link to the latest release of BD-RB. Changes for this version:August 3rd, 2019 - v0.60.18
- Corrected an issue in which attempting to
reencode an imported UHD pseudo-BD that
was encoded in a format other than HEVC
causes a "UHD_Correct_M2TS() 00009 8102"
error during BD-RB'S UHD correction.
- Other minor corrections and cosmetic fixes.

August 1st, 2019 - v0.60.17
- Added muxing routines that remux HEVC
UHD M2TS files, recover lost frames, and
corrects TSMUXER timing issues. Please
remember that UHD capability is still
under development and may need further
work.
- Corrected an error in which imported input
files that have SRT files muxed in a
format other than sequential might set
languages incorrectly or even fail during
output to ALTERNATE formats.
- Corrected an error in which attempts to
extract HEVC secondary streams could
cause BD-RB to fail.
- Added a check during start-up that will
prevent a "Runtime Error 52" issue when
some network or other paths previously
specified are not reachable.
- Made changes that correct audio sync
issues when outputting to UHD-BD.
- Created a workaround for issues in which
the combination of X265 and TSMUXER can
cause stutter issues at higher bitrates.
- Added hidden option FIXED_BITRATE which
is similar to FIXED_CRF. If set, the
source will be reecoded at that bitrate
and any output sizing control is removed.
- Corrected an issue that could result in
audio sync problems after reencode of
certain imported sources.
- Corrected an issue in which imported SRT
files that start at offset 0 could, under
certain conditions, clear the first spoken
subtitle.
- Fixed an issue in which the ALTERNATE_BLURAY
hidden setting was allowing long keyint
sequences (outside bluray compatibility).
This can be overridden by turning it off or
setting a fixed vKeyint value in the
ALTERNATE.TXT preset being used.
- Added code to perform MPA to AC3 conversion
during DVD import. MPA is not supported in
BD format and was previously ignored.
- Added OGG Vorbis as a legal audio format for
imported video files (converted to AC3).
- Updated the included version of X264-64.EXE
to the latest release (r2969).
- Updated the included version of X265-64.EXE
to v3.1+1 10 bit version.
- Other minor corrections and cosmetic fixes.
NOTES:
1. DOLBYVISION is not yet supported.
2. All UHD code is still experimental.I noticed a bug shortly after I posted V0.60.17... so I thought I'd fix it and post an update.

[AmigaFuture]

@ MrVideo

DVD is still in the minds of people before Blu-ray players. I talk with people in stores. People looking for interesting new ideas, products..but as cool as BD resolution is, the prices are still high [to them]. Often I also still hear, "I don't see any difference." "Some kind of fancy Upper scaling or something like that?" So, it's DVD players that are bought...lots and lots where I live. Some people come to my residence and get to see Blu-ray in action, and then I go into some depth with them, displaying DVD vs Blu-ray..since a lot of movies came/come with both. The hype does not exceed the people's understanding in this area. It takes a while for minds to change and venture.

When you're around this stuff a lot, you can alter your awareness that not everyone is keenly into newer tech or willing to spend the money on it. Particular "belief systems" are still dominant around the world, though we know so much more now...and meditation is very helpful to the mind, but that's also...still slow to catch on.

I have friends who also have Blu-ray players but only buy DVDs "For now. Maybe some time I'll get into Blu-ray, but DVDs are still a lot cheaper."

[jdobbs]

But, on the other hand, the post being discussed was about creating BD-5/9 output on DVD media. That won't play on a DVD player, it requires a BD player.

When I first created BD-RB a blank DVD-R was a lot cheaper than a blank BD-R. These days BD-R media has gotten so cheap that there rarely is a need to create a BD-5/9. But that's in my little world in my little section of the planet -- so it's still supported to make sure I cover all bases.

[MrVideo]

But, on the other hand, the post being discussed was about creating BD-5/9 output on DVD media. That won't play on a DVD player, it requires a BD player.
I don't remember for sure if it is the old (not connected) Sony player, or the Samsungs that I have, but the player refused the BD authored DVD disc because it wasn't on BD media. So, creating a BD5/9 doesn't mean that your BD player will play it.

[Sharc]

I don't remember for sure if it is the old (not connected) Sony player, or the Samsungs that I have, but the player refused the BD authored DVD disc because it wasn't on BD media. So, creating a BD5/9 doesn't mean that your BD player will play it.
My Samsung player refused to play DVD5/9 which played fine with my old SONY player (BDP-S360), so I had to re-author these for BD25, putting 3 to 4 BD5 on one BD25 using BD-RB.
I didn't try strict AVCHD on BD5/9 as there was no cost advantage any more.

[zamengo]

I've updated the first post of this thread with a link to the latest release of BD-RB. Changes for this version:[code]August 3rd, 2019 - v0.60.18
- Corrected an issue in which attempting to
reencode an imported UHD pseudo-BD that
was encoded in a format other than HEVC
causes a "UHD_Correct_M2TS() 00009 8102"
error during BD-RB'S UHD correction.


Thanks for .18, but I still got this error:

- [13:49:23] Multiplexing M2TS
- [14:17:50] UHD_Correct_M2TS() 00009 8102

[FilipeAmadeuO]

All I can tell from that is that it is an overflow error. I'd need more information to figure out why.

Movie was STAR WARS SOLO 4k and I was trying to replace Korean subtitles by the Portuguese subtitles extracted from BD.
What info can I send to help ?

Same error happens with v0.60.18
It happens at 99,98% of the Adjusting files for UHD-BD format...

[zamengo]

Movie was STAR WARS SOLO 4k and I was trying to replace Korean subtitles by the Portuguese subtitles extracted from BD.
What info can I send to help ?

Me too, but with Avengers Endgame.

I trying without reencode, with no success.

But now I will try with a full encode.