BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

[jdobbs]

I'm starting to wonder why you still consider it in beta, actually. :) It's because I'm always making changes, many significant, between versions, and calling it a beta keeps the user warned. Also... I like to fantasize that someday Wikipedia will list it as the "longest beta project on record".

[Lathe]

It's because I'm always making changes, many significant, between versions, and calling it a beta keeps the user warned. Also... I like to fantasize that someday Wikipedia will list it as the "longest beta project on record".

I'll make an entry right now! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gif

[AmigaFuture]

It's because I'm always making changes, many significant, between versions, and calling it a beta keeps the user warned. Also... I like to fantasize that someday Wikipedia will list it as the "longest beta project on record".

I'll make an entry right now! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gif

Haaa, haaa, haa!!


@ All

My new Pioneer arrived 2 days ago, through a strange FedEx route...to the City where I live, then to a City an hour away, then next day back to my City again. Odd. It's nice to have burns that are actually recognized by my LG Blu-ray player every time. I have TDK and Verbatim BD-RE DL discs. I burned a processed but not rerendered "Let's Be Cops" on both kind. The Fox intro plays pretty well, a slight video glitch, but soon the menu shows. Choose extras, and pick "Deleted Scenes" and then whatever scene. What happens is interesting. The name of the Scene file is separate from the video, so once it plays and fades to the deleted scene the scene "hurries" to get in sync with the audio. This does not happen with my original, of course.

I'm thinking it's not the burner, and not sure about the media. I'm really not sure if it's related to BD-RB. Does anyone else have the movie to verify or not with? Meanwhile, I'm going to check some other movies..to see if this happens with them. Is this an affect of "age" of the player due to how a lot of mastering is done now? Hmm.. Any ideas or suggestions?

[Lathe]

Is this an affect of "age" of the player due to how a lot of mastering is done now? Hmm.. Any ideas or suggestions?

I think it's more likely the 'age' of the user... :)

[mparade]

just got this error report from BD-RB:

----------------------
[11. 22. 18] BD Rebuilder v0.60.04
[00:35:15] Source: UP_(2009).COMPLETE
- Input BD size: 43,64 GB
- Approximate total content: [03:27:49.205]
- Target BD size: 46,26 GB
- Windows Version: 6.2 [9200]
- Quality: Ultra-High (Extremely Slow), CRF
- X264 Tweak(s) enabled
- Output folder: E:\OUTPUT\
- Decoding/Frame serving: DGDecNV [4-way]
- Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=1 HD=0 Kbs=640
[00:35:41] PHASE ONE, Encoding

- [04:06:03] Processing: VID_00086 (73 of 75)
- [04:06:03] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00086]
- [04:06:42] Reencoding video [VID_00086]
- [04:06:42] Reencoding secondary video [TRK_02]
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 20 581 frames
- [04:07:32] Encoding using constant rate factor.
- [04:20:31] Video Encode complete
- [04:20:31] Processing audio tracks
- Track 4352 (eng): Reencoding audio to AC3...
- Track 4353 (eng): Keeping original audio
- Track 4356 (hun): Keeping original audio
- Track 4358 (eng): Keeping original audio
- [04:20:49] Multiplexing M2TS
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00086.meta
- Can't open file: D:\WORKING\WORKFILES\VID_00086_2.AVS.1.264
[04:20:53] - Failed to build structure, aborted

[Ch3vr0n]

Probably this is the cause

[00:35:15] Source: UP_(2009).COMPLETE

Pretty sure that's a volume name for a downloaded rip. There's just about ZERO chance that's an original disc. Retail discs don't use such volume names as such there's no way of knowing what kind or preprocess has been done, that causes problems for bdrb.

Get the original disc and try again.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn Nexus 6P met Tapatalk

[mparade]

Thanks for the "insulting" assumption. It is just following my personal naming convention, anyway.
I assume the problem is using multiprocessing with a disc including a secondary stream as well.
I am not going to report any possible bug here to get punches in the stomach anymore, bye.

[AmigaFuture]

@ Ch3vr0n

You might suspect some names I use as well. Not everyone keeps a disc name exactly as it is after a decrypter. Some BD names don't make sense and thus are renamed for later recognition. I know it's tricky sometimes, but assuming can cause Witch Hunts. Which is also a fantastic long song by Rush. Some renames I use reflect what I want to do, check and how it was processed with BD-RB.

Update: I think I know what's happening with some BDs and their "out of sync" as I most recently asked about. I didn't know anything about BDFix, so I'm checking into it now.

[Ch3vr0n]

Thanks for the "insulting" assumption. It is just following my personal naming convention, anyway.
I assume the problem is using multiprocessing with a disc including a secondary stream as well.
I am not going to report any possible bug here to get punches in the stomach anymore, bye.

If you say thats done because of your personal naming convention, then you have my apologies. It's just that it wouldn't be the first time someone reports an issue with a title, that had a volume name like that, and blames BDRB. While in fact it was their questionable source that was the problem.

Now that that's out of the way. The culprit is then most likely this one

- [04:20:49] Multiplexing M2TS
- Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00086.meta
- Can't open file: D:\WORKING\WORKFILES\VID_00086_2.AVS.1.264

According to the last line it can't open that specific 264 stream. Does the file exist? If so, then you may be right that multiplexing is to blame. I'd try to decrease the number of x264 instances in that case first.

[AmigaFuture]

I assume the problem is using multiprocessing with a disc including a secondary stream as well.

@ Ch3vr0n

You might have missed that part. I reported some time ago about some BD I encountered that with. Switched that option off and it was solved. Usually it functions very, very well, and I'm very glad JD hasn't removed it. ;) But other times, snagggggggg...

[jdobbs]

Thanks for the "insulting" assumption. It is just following my personal naming convention, anyway.
I assume the problem is using multiprocessing with a disc including a secondary stream as well.
I am not going to report any possible bug here to get punches in the stomach anymore, bye.Yeah. That filename is one that is created when using multiple instance processing. I'd suggest you turn it off until I see if something has changed that causes that issue.

[Lathe]

Thanks for the "insulting" assumption. It is just following my personal naming convention, anyway.
I assume the problem is using multiprocessing with a disc including a secondary stream as well.
I am not going to report any possible bug here to get punches in the stomach anymore, bye.

You've always been a very helpful and contributing member here in my lowly and wretched opinion. There are some here who are VERY VERY quick to condemn, even though it really does not have anything to do with what is asked. JD may be a bit senile and hard of hearing, but HE is the Boss here and I'm sure will mention anything that needs to be corrected. Let's let HIM do his job while the rest of us just try to help (and gonca, just try to keep up...)

Keep up the good work mate! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/thumbsup.gif

[mparade]

Sure&completely agreed :)! I am just missing this multiprocessing feature very much. It can reduce encode times with my machine to ~1/4 compared to encodes without that. :(
Maybe it has only something to do with discs that have secondary streams as well.

[AmigaFuture]

You've always been a very helpful and contributing member here in my lowly and wretched opinion.[/IMG]

Ohhhhh, you can be sooo (melo)dramatic..

[Lathe]

Ohhhhh, you can be sooo (melo)dramatic..

Oh yeah...? http://lathe-of-heaven.com/wantsome.gif http://lathe-of-heaven.com/wantsome.gif http://lathe-of-heaven.com/wantsome.gif

[AmigaFuture]

Oh yeah...? http://lathe-of-heaven.com/wantsome.gif http://lathe-of-heaven.com/wantsome.gif http://lathe-of-heaven.com/wantsome.gif

There it is... The "." is close again...thought so. Also, you're not fast or slick enough to catch me. Ha!

[Lathe]

There it is... The "." is close again...thought so. Also, you're not fast or slick enough to catch me. Ha!

You are so bad man... If I were a woman, I think I WOULD find you and beat you... (and, I would wait until my '.' to make sure you get all that's coming to you... ) http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gif

[AmigaFuture]

If I were one of the many that actually subscribe to that wonky superstition of "Karma is a bitch, it'll get you." then I'd be quaking in whatever shoes or boots I wear. But I'm well, well past ignorance on that one. C'mon, tough one...give it your best..

Smiling. Funny how all this stuff can SEEM to be all kinds of bravado without the voices heard laughter, huh?? Haaa!

[Wizzu]

Has anyone found issues with the Quick-Play menus in the most recent build?
I used BD-RB for the first time in a long time last week, and the final disc was unplayable. All the files were right and the new menu appeared to be present, but the disc would start to spin up then freeze my player.

I know that's vague, and I'm going to do more testing, probably rolling back a version, but I was curious if this was something anyone else had come across.
[...]
Edit:
1) v0.50.24 - No luck with Mummy 3/quickplay burned disc again.
2) v0.50.25 - Tested a different BD (Indiscreet) with quickplay. Burned disc plays fine.
3) v0.50.25 - Mummy 3 again, unchecked "Attempt to find original background/menu" options. Burned disc freezes in player.
Just experienced the same issue here with a BD-25 quick-play backup of Mad Max Fury Road. My player (Panasonic BD-75) freezed when trying to play the disc.

I tried lots of stuff but what finally worked was to uncheck "Go to menu at disc start" in Quick-play settings. This way the disc loads and plays, but any attempt to access the menu still leads to freezing.

So it's definitly something fishy with the quick-play menu, with this title. Maybe you can confirm that it's the same with Mummy 3 (assuming you read this post... :-))

[MrVideo]

My new Pioneer arrived 2 days ago, through a strange FedEx route...to the City where I live, then to a City an hour away, then next day back to my City again.
Sounds like a FedEx worker put it on the wrong truck.

[AmigaFuture]

The person I talked to attempted to assure me about SmartPost. I said 3 times in different parts of the conversation, "It was delivered to my hands by a guy wearing FedEx clothing." So, SmartPost now is handled by FedEx?? Blank look, then, literally, "Uhh...no..." and I though the same as you. I'm not mad, and I know stuff happens. I'm not a fan of FedEx or UPS - leaving packages as they do sometimes. USPS has never left a package openly accessible.

[MrVideo]

USPS has never left a package openly accessible.
If a package doesn't fit in my mailbox, it is left below the mailbox (attached to the house), or right next to my door (which is 8' from the mailbox). So, yes, the package is out in the open.

[Lathe]

If a package doesn't fit in my mailbox, it is left below the mailbox (attached to the house), or right next to my door (which is 8' from the mailbox). So, yes, the package is out in the open.

Aha! Now I know where to wait whilst you are at work! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/evil.gif

[AmigaFuture]

My original reply about FedEx had a note at the end about Lathe, something along the lines he replied to you with. Oh, how we know how the Parrot drinker in the Basement thinks..that watches the kiddies go by.. Heeeh, heeh, heeh...

[MrVideo]

Aha! Now I know where to wait whilst you are at work! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/evil.gif
Not at work anymore. :devil:

[MrVideo]

My original reply about FedEx had a note at the end about Lathe, something along the lines he replied to you with. Oh, how we know how the Parrot drinker in the Basement thinks..that watches the kiddies go by.. Heeeh, heeh, heeh...
A little tough to watch anyone go by from within a basement. My X-ray glasses are broken. :mad:

[Lathe]

A little tough to watch anyone go by from within a basement. My X-ray glasses are broken. :mad:

http://lathe-of-heaven.com/laugh.gif

[AmigaFuture]

A little tough to watch anyone go by from within a basement. My X-ray glasses are broken. :mad:

Lathe...not you. gonca had created that one about Lathe. :) Many basements have windows or holes of some kind.

--

Because I haven't really checked into copy protection removal, and how some of them affect playback, it seems I've found a solve to the problem(s) I've noticed for a while with BDs using multi-.m2ts files. Hmm...testing.. I was starting to wonder if BD-RB wasn't rebuilding correctly but...then, wouldn't a lot of people complained about it here?

[Wizzu]

Mmm... Has this place become social media instead of Bd-rebuilder talk? :D
------------------------------------------------
Twice now that trying to import DVD episodes with the latest version (0.60.04), I get a Runtime error "6" - overflow during import.

- 1st time with DVD episodes from Twin Peaks - the return
- 2nd time with "" "" "" Legion - Season 1

Strangely, for BOTH, the runtime error comes up between 65% and 70% import of the 1st episode.

I'll have to eat my words about BD-Rebuilder not being in beta anymore? ;)

Tried older versions (0.50.23, 0.50.18), same issue.

[MrVideo]

Many basements have windows or holes of some kind.
Even so, if one is sitting, the view angle would be such that you would only be able to see above anyone walking by. One would have to stand on something in order to view anyone going by. Easier to go upstairs and do it.

In my case, there are zero windows street side.

[MrVideo]

Twice now that trying to import DVD episodes with the latest version (0.60.04), I get a Runtime error "6" - overflow during import.
Something is wrong with your setup, as I've had zero issues importing files from DVDs. Other than the stuff that was reported and fixed by JD. But never your runtime error issue.

[Lathe]

Even so, if one is sitting, the view angle would be such that you would only be able to see above anyone walking by. One would have to stand on something in order to view anyone going by. Easier to go upstairs and do it.

In my case, there are zero windows street side.

I SWEAR this guy is SO damn literal! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/doh.gif

[AmigaFuture]

Something is wrong with your setup, as I've had zero issues importing files from DVDs. Other than the stuff that was reported and fixed by JD. But never your runtime error issue.

DVDs, BDs, not any problems here..but MKVs and MP4's, yeah...at times. But not that error.

I SWEAR this guy is SO damn literal!

Wow, I'm surprised he's been brushed with that and I haven't. Observation is really a good thing as long as we are playful about it. Many women I know, don't really like it (Lathe....?)...and have said so. Lathe, stay away from the older and newer TV shows MacGyver if you're bugged about that stuff.:scared: :D

Social media?? I think it's fun to be able to discuss technical topics and have banter mixed in some. But social media like Facebook, eh..

Ahh...this new Pioneer BDR-2209 is pretty cool. Not a bad burn or a "misread" from my LG Player yet. I had to reformat all the RE-DL's I was using, which is okay. The ripping speed is a little slower than my ASUS's..but if that means better quality (read/write) then cool. Firmware update didn't change that.

[Wizzu]

Something is wrong with your setupMaybe so. Any idea as what could be wrong with my setup? Considering that I've just backed up my whole BD collection (127 titles) without issues except for 3-4 odd recent titles (Mad max Fury Road being one), and I'm having issues only when importing DVDs with episodes, I'm at a loss where to start to look for problems with my setup.

I've been using Bd-Rebuilder since 2011. This "Runtime "6" Overflow" error when importing DVDs, was a known risk in older versions of Bd-Rebuilder but was taken care of by Jdobbs in version 0.43.6 in... 2013! And I haven't been experiencing it in years. It's very strange for me to see this again.

I recently re-installed MPC-HC, maybe it's got something to do with it (codecs?).

[Wizzu]

I think it's fun to be able to discuss technical topics and have banter mixed in some. Of course, but don't you think it's injecting a lot of off-topic clutter into an already extremely long and dense thread? :)

This thread used to be dedicated to bug reports and possible discussions with JDobbs about them. Haven't been back for a couple of years. I'm surprised that it's changed so much.

[Lathe]

Of course, but don't you think it's injecting a lot of off-topic clutter into an already extremely long and dense thread? :)

This thread used to be dedicated to bug reports and possible discussions with JDobbs about them. Haven't been back for a couple of years. I'm surprised that it's changed so much.

... and, we can easily arrange for another 2 year absence http://lathe-of-heaven.com/wantsome.gif

We've all been doing just fine so far. If JD doesn't like something, I'm sure he will let us know... It isn't excessive; there just are little bursts from time to time. If a person happened to come back to this thread after two years without any participation in all that time, and happened to stumble upon a little banter , I would suggest that that person should perhaps not feel free to complain... Besides, the thread is linear... So, I would think that it really does not matter at any given time if there is a bit of back and forth. If you are deeply searching the entire thread for something important, fine... that won't hurt. Otherwise, all one has to do is simply keep up with the current posts.

I feel that we have a very nice, constructive, communal atmosphere here where everyone truly does put forth an effort to help others when it is needed.

Just my lowly opinion... :)

[Sharc]

…..If JD doesn't like something, I'm sure he will let us know...
Well, I think he has become very forgiving :)

[gonca]

@Wizzu

I recently re-installed MPC-HC, maybe it's got something to do with it (codecs?).
Doesn't MPC_HC install LAV
Are you using DirectShowSource
By the way, the only dense thing around here is Lathe

[Lathe]

Well, I think he has become very forgiving :)

Yes, he's a good man... Slow, but fair...

[Lathe]

@Wizzu


Doesn't MPC_HC install LAV
Are you using DirectShowSource
By the way, the only dense thing around here is Lathe

http://lathe-of-heaven.com/rolleyes2.gif

[AmigaFuture]

I recently re-installed MPC-HC, maybe it's got something to do with it (codecs?).

I have been using MPC-HC exclusively other than PowerDVD 12. VLAN is a great program, but I was very bothered that it didn't save/respect GUI settings/positions. Otherwise, a fantastic program. I prefer the settings of MPC-HC a lot, and always conforms to a file's Video resolutions and I've never had to adjust it..unlike VLAN.

MPC-HC doesn't install LAV. Installing LAV would prompt for replacement if so. Always has with previous versions.

Of course, but don't you think it's injecting a lot of off-topic clutter into an already extremely long and dense thread? :)

This thread used to be dedicated to bug reports and possible discussions with JDobbs about them. Haven't been back for a couple of years. I'm surprised that it's changed so much.

The thread IS dedicated to bug reports. When there is one presented look at the replies. Look at the Help that comes across and even the silent people come out and support. Freely, I'll add. A Serious Mindset is a stagnant one. Pixar is a company that has replaced animation as it used to be. They have often breaks from the "Seriousness" of animations; to just be silly. That really helps to inspire creativity; being goofy or a Stooge of The 3 Stooges or Alan Alda from M*A*S*H*...he was very funny in situation deemed serious.

Do you have ANY idea how cold and _boring_ many people think Video Editing/Understanding actually ISSS?? Outside of those really into it? This group makes it fun...I think. JD, I also sense understands that. Listen also, to the sound of his Hair being yanked on about 4K and stuff.. He's really pushing the limits of hair growth.

If JD wants to step on Lathe's nuts or breasts to get a message across...we'll laugh as we hear the screams and respect that message. It's HIS program...and we are aware of that. Besides all of that, it's the few the break the rules of Doom9...and JD steps in very well.

...Just my lowly [wretched] opinion... :)

[gonca]

MPC-HC doesn't install LAV
Actually, it does have LAV filters with it
Check the portable version so you don't have to install it
Or look in the internal filters section at the the bottom, MPC_HC uses them by default

[gg72]

I'm upgrading my CPU and I'm wondering which cpu would be more beneficial towards using BD Rebuilder (encoding HD/1080p materials): Intel i5-8600 or Ryzen 7 1800X?

[Wizzu]

... and, we can easily arrange for another 2 year absenceI see. You seem to consider this thread as your own private playing field, then? In you book, those of us who are actually still interested in BD-Rebuilder's evolution are not welcome here anymore, unless they fully accept you as the thread's lord, and kiss your feet?

@Gonca, thanks for the hint, :) I'm currently investigating that.

@AmigaFuture: can you tell me something I don't know already? Your post feels like an overlong Strawman argument: when did I say that I didnt like humour? Or wanted only seriousness?

Actually, I think I WILL be away again from this thread for some time. Not my kind of place. It DOES feel like Facebook. Sorry, JDobbs: I'm still in awe at your work and extremely thankful. :cool:

[Lathe]

I see. You seem to consider this thread as your own private playing field, then? In you book, those of us who are actually still interested in BD-Rebuilder's evolution are not welcome here anymore, unless they fully accept you as the thread's lord, and kiss your feet?

Yep... you hit it dead on my friend...

Wow, I've got to hand it to you mate, you are one sharp, incisive fellow! http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gif

[AmigaFuture]

Actually, it does have LAV filters with it
Check the portable version so you don't have to install it
Or look in the internal filters section at the the bottom, MPC_HC uses them by default

Hmm, then perhaps I sit corrected, g. :)

[AmigaFuture]

My reply was misunderstood by you. Okay. I don't know what an overlong Stawman is and maybe sometime I'll check into it. Anyway, I thought Lathe's post was pretty good, and then the short version was him adding some humor. Which you misread, I thnk. I'm glad gonca was able to help. :) Texts aren't always read as intended, that's why I tend to not take anything too seriously...especially online.

Edit: If I were someone to be offended, even easily, I might be. But I'm not..so, okay.. Funny.

[MrVideo]

Well, this is an unexpected surprise. The 100 S5 D3 was not read correctly. BDRB lists the PlayAll and a :13 piece. It did not list the three special features or the four individual episodes. DVDFab listed all of the titles.

I have no idea how to troubleshoot this one.

UPDATE: Another two DVDs partially not liked: Pretty Little Liars S7 D1. It shows the episodes play all, 3 episodes and 1 bonus. There are actually 6 episodes and 3 bonus. Pretty Little Liars S7 D2, 1 bonus missing from list. VideoReDo lists them all. Extracted with DVDFab just fine.

[jdobbs]

Well, this is an unexpected surprise. The 100 S5 D3 was not read correctly. BDRB lists the PlayAll and a :13 piece. It did not list the three special features or the four individual episodes. DVDFab listed all of the titles.

I have no idea how to troubleshoot this one.Is that a DVD or BD?

[jdobbs]

Just a note on UHD-BD status. I've decided that X265's HEVC output and TSMUXER aren't compatible. The problem, I believe, is fully the fault of TSMUXER -- although I still can't figure why it doesn't have issues with original sources. Maybe it does, and they just aren't obvious, I don't know.

So for the last several days I've been poring over the H.265 specification and writing code to do the muxing (for hevc) myself. I've made a lot of progress. In my next step I'll use TSMUXER to create a disc structure using just the audio/subtitles and a dummy video segment. I will then merge my correctly muxed video into the result. I'll then have to update the MPLS and CLPI to match the new M2TS (packet pointers and PTS's for iframes etc.)

When I complete that... I'll release a version that works with UHD for further testing. Then I will go back and start writing code for other video, audio, and subtitle streams. The eventual goal is that I'll complete a replacement for TSMUXER and integrate it -- but that may take some time.