BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

[Furiousflea]

When using quick extras --stats parameter is unnecessary.

Also not deinterlacing may allow playback in more players because most menus are 30i and 30p isn't BD standard at the least they will look better at around the same size/effeciency but must use --tff and --bff in x264.

So all the 29.97fps Progressive video BDRB gives from 60i sources isn't compatible BD technically?

I really don't know why BDRB insists on converting my silky smooth 60i extras -> jeryky badly deinterlaced (when they weren't even supposed to be de-interlaced but simply the fields blended with 60fps..) stuttery messes...

Is x264 not capable of encoding proper compliant genuine interlaced video from an interlaced source? Keeping the 60 fields per second...?

? :)

(I never will understand why so many people can't tell the difference between "live action" video and film)...

Hope I'm not being rude, but this has been troubling me for a while. I know encoding as interlaced 60fps isn't as efficient as de-interlacing it down to 30fps...But when you lose the original "making of" feel to a "making of...insert movie hear" due to the "live action" video now looking like film....whats the point?

[turbojet]

So all the 29.97fps Progressive video BDRB gives from 60i sources isn't compatible BD technically?


I don't have the standards but what's going around is 30p is nowhere in the standards.


I really don't know why BDRB insists on converting my silky smooth 60i extras -> jeryky badly deinterlaced (when they weren't even supposed to be de-interlaced but simply the fields blended with 60fps..) stuttery messes...

Is x264 not capable of encoding proper compliant genuine interlaced video from an interlaced source? Keeping the 60 fields per second...?

? :)

x264 can encode interlaced but it doesn't seem to give nearly enough bitrate to scenes in crf mode compared to 24p. It still looks better at a smaller size at 60i then it does at 30p to my eyes.

(I never will understand why so many people can't tell the difference between "live action" video and film)...

Hope I'm not being rude, but this has been troubling me for a while. I know encoding as interlaced 60fps isn't as efficient as de-interlacing it down to 30fps...But when you lose the original "making of" feel to a "making of...insert movie hear" due to the "live action" video now looking like film....whats the point?

Well some extras are still soft telecined unfortunately and they really should be ivtc'd as opposed to kept interlaced.

[laserfan]

Is x264 not capable of encoding proper compliant genuine interlaced video from an interlaced source? Keeping the 60 fields per second...?Look at x264 --longhelp and you'll find --tff and -bff options for producing interlaced .264 output.

Not with BD-RB, but I have done both i.e. deinterlaced then re-encoded progressive, and left interlaced when re-encoding. The latter IIRC was owing to the original being a mix of video & film and I didn't want to bother with trying to sort it all out for progressive.

[turbojet]

Look at x264 --longhelp and you'll find --tff and -bff options for producing interlaced .264 output.

Not with BD-RB, but I have done both i.e. deinterlaced then re-encoded progressive, and left interlaced when re-encoding. The latter IIRC was owing to the original being a mix of video & film and I didn't want to bother with trying to sort it all out for progressive.

And with hybrid source the ability to use interlacing with DVD/BD is your best friend.

From my experiences almost every interlaced extra I've seen on a BD is really interlaced or hybrid.

Actually x264 is pretty good at encoding interlaced at decent settings and higher settings. Now we just need to be able to crf extras with some decent settings. Possible to change non quick extras to use --crf instead of 2 pass?

Although we should be able to choose things that aren't extras too.

[hoagie666]

Dont know exactly how to report a bug, but when loading Black Hawk Down into BDRebuilder v0.20.08 I get the following error..

Stop Statement Encountered

But when I open it in v0.20.07 it works with no problems, have tried to tell it to backup yet.

Thanx hope this helps

[Chiamos]

@Chefkoch_ico

Hi!That's too general a question, as there are a multitude of versions of PowerDVD.

I have found that my intentionally NOT updated version of Power DVD v.7.3 successfully plays all BD-RB conversions...

Same great playback here with that version of PowerDVD.:)

[G_M_C]

It would sure be nice if there was some standardization between players... there are more exceptions than there are rules.

Nah, my guess it that the real problem stems from the fact that the required documentation is really closed source (like it is some national secret). If the required documentation was more open, then we would be able to develop muxers that can make BD's that are fully compliant with the standards. And as per definition, BD's that are fully compliant with the standard should work in any player, no matter what brand, wouldn't they ?

[DaMacFunkin]

@jdobbs:
beside your Sony Player, do you have PowerDVD available for testing?

Full Backups of most european Universal titles (for example The mummy 3, Bourne Triology), dont work with PowerDVD and some Panasonic Players.

The menu starts fine, but pressing "Play Movie" menu item results in black screen ( I waited more than 1 hour ).

For other players, its OK. Anyway, I assume other players will have this problem too.

Bye
I'm with you on this problem m8, maybe it is the PiP problem for these titles, and maybe when he sorts that problem these will automatically be fixed...? It's got to be a concern for him because there are an increasing number of titles not working in full back up mode, so to bring his fruits to bear so to speak he will have to sort it out eventually, heres hoping it is soon. :thanks:

[Furiousflea]

jdobbs...

Have you given this

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=138417

Anymore thought as a perfect solution to tracks with LPCM audio to be backed up correctly maintaing the HD LPCM audio. I understand the only problem prohibiting backup of LPCM is due to tsmuxer not accepting it's own LPCM demuxed output as it will only take a .wav file with proper headers...

This utility should fit the bill and solve the problem.

[datman]

jdobbs...

Have you given this

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=138417

Anymore thought as a perfect solution to tracks with LPCM audio to be backed up correctly maintaing the HD LPCM audio. I understand the only problem prohibiting backup of LPCM is due to tsmuxer not accepting it's own LPCM demuxed output as it will only take a .wav file with proper headers...

This utility should fit the bill and solve the problem.

is this the reason why my last 2 encodes the HD audio was converted to 448?

I tried Passion of Christ and Apocalypto and no matter what I did the audio is converted to 448.

[Furiousflea]

is this the reason why my last 2 encodes the HD audio was converted to 448?

I tried Passion of Christ and Apocalypto and no matter what I did the audio is converted to 448.

If it's LPCM, yes.

[massiah]

OK...
I have used BD-RB since version 17. I have not had any problems with it except for the LPCM issue not converting.

I have ran the program perfectly up to and including 20.05.
I tried to encode NOTORIOUS and BABYLON AD and they both freeze my PC at the 11% mark in overall progress.

I have restarted my PC and tried to restart the encode from the resume and from a fresh starting point. SAME RESULT.
This was about a week to a week and half ago.

I have not installed any programs except for FlashFXP and AnyDVD updates in that time period.
I do not run any other programs in the background.
I have all the encoding applications(AviSynth, Matroska,tsMuxer,ffdShow ) up to date.
I have also tried to uninstall everything, used CCcleaner to clean my registry of any dangling files and restarted my PC.
I even re-downloaded and reinstalled everything(with the correct settings)including version 20.05 and 20.08 at separate times to see if this works and I still get the same result.
I also restarted my PC after those re-installations.

RipBot 264 doesn't even work.


I am stuck and I do not have anything to reencode my BluRays completely. I am a little ticked because it worked on every disc I had so far except AMERICAN GANGSTER and WAR(LPCM issue).

I am running my PC with these specs:
Q9650(No OC)
Vista 64
8GB RAM
Multiple Hard Drives:
1 for the program to run
1 for the program to build the encode
1 for the source

I would greatly appreciate help from anyone at this point and I posted just in case it happens to anyone else.

I have attached my Programs list to see if there could be a conflict which anyone knows of... thanks, guys.
Thanks Jdobbs for the great program.


--------------------------------------------------

UPDATE:
I tried changing the settings in ffdshow for VC-1 to wmv9 and it seemed to make the encode I was doing go past the 11% mark.

It froze my PC up again at about the 25-26% mark...I restarted and resumed and then it froze again at about the 28% and 45% marks.

No errors listed in the log to speak of.
I changed the VC-1 setting to disabled and restarted the encode from the beginning and still no go . It froze up at about the 6% mark again.

Seems like no one has any ideas...so I may not have helped myself but, I hope I helped someone else if it happens to them.

Thanks, again for what I am sure will become a great program once jdobbs has the time to commit to it.

[datman]

If it's LPCM, yes.

Apocalypto is LPCM but Passion of Christ is DTS-HD XLL. Dose this audio format work?

[Furiousflea]

Apocalypto is LPCM but Passion of Christ is DTS-HD XLL. Dose this audio format work?

DTS-HD XLL is just the proper technical name for DTS-HD Master Audio :p

[datman]

DTS-HD XLL is just the proper technical name for DTS-HD Master Audio :p

so should BDRB be able to encode this disc? I know other disc have worked fine;)

[Furiousflea]

so should BDRB be able to encode this disc? I know other disc have worked fine;)

YES!!!!!!

There hasn't been a problem with DTSHD\MA for a while.

[datman]

The "strickter AVCHD" option, quite some time ago when this was added after doing a few with it. I found none of them would play after converting to ISO to play from HDD with PDVD-8. Well 20.08 still won't play. Is thar normal or am I not doing something right?

[Jake802]

I FINALLY got to check out The Spirit backup happy to say no Issues what so ever!

[turbojet]

The "strickter AVCHD" option, quite some time ago when this was added after doing a few with it. I found none of them would play after converting to ISO to play from HDD with PDVD-8. Well 20.08 still won't play. Is thar normal or am I not doing something right?

Since 0.28.06 you cannot produce anything that plays in PowerDVD and BD players.

Prior to 0.28.06 if you leave strict AVCHD unchecked it will play in PowerDVD and all but 2 (maybe even 1) BD players but that will probably be 0 soon since samsung already fixed 2 of 4 in the past 2 weeks. Strict AVCHD with these earlier versions will produce files that won't play in PowerDVD and 4 BD players.

[Discoboy]

Since 0.28.06 you cannot produce anything that plays in PowerDVD and BD players.

Prior to 0.28.06 if you leave strict AVCHD unchecked it will play in PowerDVD and all but 2 (maybe even 1) BD players but that will probably be 0 soon since samsung already fixed 2 of 4 in the past 2 weeks. Strict AVCHD with these earlier versions will produce files that won't play in PowerDVD and 4 BD players.

@ turbojet and @ dataman,

I did some deep testing today and found that the latest PowerDVD’s players very strictly comply with AVCHD format!

Tests made with both BD_RB with TsMuxer 1.10.1 and TsMuxer 1.10.3 standalone using stricter AVCHD mode

If you burn the AVCHD ouput files to a DVD and play on PowerDVD, ALL versions of PowerDVD will play no problem and also on a SAP Panasonic BD35

If you make an ISO image of the AVCHD ouput files and mount on a virtual drive on the PC then play on PowerDVD only version 7.3.3119 or below will play it. Versions upto 9.0.1531 will NOT play it.

So it seems the latest versions of PowerDVD will only play AVCHD via DVD media

If add the following empty folders to your AVCHD output files:
BDMV: add “BDJO” + “JAR” + “META”
BDMV\BACKUP: add “BDJO”
Then make an ISO image of the AVCHD output files and mount on a virtual drive on the PC and then play on PowerDVD, ALL versions will play it

So I believe the problem is not with BD_RB or TsMuxer but that PowerDVD very strictly complying with AVCHD format.

To prove this point a DTS 1.5Mbps sound stream is not officially supported in the AVCHD format and if used on a AVCHD burned DVD, PowerDVD’s after version 7.3.3119 will NOT play the DTS sound. If you instead make a ISO image + the missing folders with DTS sound ALL versions of PowerDVD will play the sound

@ dataman

To get your ISO image to play on PowerDVD either:
- Use version 7.3.3119
- Add the above additional folders
- Burn the image to a DVD then play on PowerDVD

Regards
Discoboy

[turbojet]

Ya discoboy I reported all the software player caveats along with most BD players here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=146339)

I've never heard of Panasonic BD35 having problems with all empty folders except it will with tsmuxer's new bluray output.
Is this movie only backup?
If so are you sure you aren't using v0.28.07 or v0.28.08 without strict AVCHD enabled?

[Discoboy]

Hi turbojet,

I know about your linked thread and have been following it for some time ;-)

I just wanted you to know that if using Strict AVCHD in BD_RB (AKA TsMuxer AVCHD mode) ALL PowerDVD versions will play an AVCHD disk if burnt to a DVD media but NOT if via an ISO image mounted on the PC and then played on PowerDVD above version 7.3.3119

I think you misunderstood what I said about the BD35 not playing. With strict AVCHD enabled (AKA Tsmuxer AVCHD mode) and the files missing, the BD35 plays with NO problems

Regards,
Discoboy

[turbojet]

Hi turbojet,

I know about your linked thread and have been following it for some time ;-)

I just wanted you to know that if using Strict AVCHD in BD_RB (AKA TsMuxer AVCHD mode) ALL PowerDVD versions will play a AVCHD disk if burnt to a DVD media but NOT if via an ISO image mounted on the PC and then played on PowerDVD above version 7.3.3119

Oh interesting find.

I think you misunderstood what I said about the BD35 not playing. It will only NOT play if you add the following files:
BDMV: add “BDJO” + “JAR” + “META”
BDMV\BACKUP: add “BDJO”
With strict AVCHD enabled (AKA Tsmuxer AVCHD mode) and the files missing BD35 plays with NO problems

Regards,
Discoboy

Theoretically this should be OLDBD and has been reported to work many times, I've also tested it. Was there some recent firmware that changed this?

[Discoboy]

Oh interesting find.



Theoretically this should be OLDBD and has been reported to work many times, I've also tested it. Was there some recent firmware that changed this?

Just rechecked, my error and you are correct the BD35 does play all OK without the missing folders and also if the folders are manually added again. FW is the latest v1.4

[klas]

Arcsoft Totalmedia Theatre 3 plays everithing. All versions of BD.

[DaMacFunkin]

i have a problem with the latest version and The Day The Earth Stood Still (2009) the main movie file has re-encoded fine, but the next file which is 0.18mb will not re-encode.. so i eneterd the Min_M2TS entry to the ini to get rid of just that file from the list, but now it wants to start from the begining.. which i don't wanna do.
So a). i have a bug with this file..
b). is there anything i can do to get it to skip this file without starting again?

[pbeumer2001]

i have a problem with the latest version and The Day The Earth Stood Still (2009) the main movie file has re-encoded fine, but the next file which is 0.18mb will not re-encode.. so i eneterd the Min_M2TS entry to the ini to get rid of just that file from the list, but now it wants to start from the begining.. which i don't wanna do.
So a). i have a bug with this file..
b). is there anything i can do to get it to skip this file without starting again?


Ones you change the parameters BD Rebuilder sees it as a new job. Maybe you can replace the file with a other m2ts file (a small one because of the target output) set the parameters back ans see if rebuilder except it.

[turbojet]

jdobbs: with tsmuxer 1.10.4 and newer you should safely be able to use --avchd for movie only and do what you used to do with strict AVCHD, removing CERTIFICATE/AUXDATA/BDJO/JAR/META if any of these are missing with full backup they should be created. Plus subtitles are being resized automatically so your subtitle resize code can be disabled. Pcm2TSmu app would fix the issue with keeping LPCM

Sorry for bigger font, I just want him to notice and I don't mean this is as yelling.

[Furiousflea]

i have a problem with the latest version and The Day The Earth Stood Still (2009) the main movie file has re-encoded fine, but the next file which is 0.18mb will not re-encode.. so i eneterd the Min_M2TS entry to the ini to get rid of just that file from the list, but now it wants to start from the begining.. which i don't wanna do.
So a). i have a bug with this file..
b). is there anything i can do to get it to skip this file without starting again?

Sorry dude, tought luck.

Those tiny m2ts <0.5mb often have problems encoding and you will be left with an m2ts of 0kb in size and obviously your output bluray won't play in most cases.

To make sure you don't waste hours of time only to find you have one of them, make sure you do "quciker encode for extras". It should put the small files first...then just check your output folder for any 0kb m2ts\status window for errors.

[Furiousflea]

jdobbs...

Have you given this

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=138417

Anymore thought as a perfect solution to tracks with LPCM audio to be backed up correctly maintaing the HD LPCM audio. I understand the only problem prohibiting backup of LPCM is due to tsmuxer not accepting it's own LPCM demuxed output as it will only take a .wav file with proper headers...

This utility should fit the bill and solve the problem.

turbojet, would you mind passing comment on this ^. I posted this exact message a few weeks ago but nobody seemed interested. Curious if it's a non starter or what?

[turbojet]

I put it in big font type but I have just as much problem getting him to see things as you do.

I was thinking of making another bug reports thread where the first post would be known bugs but I don't think it's really my responsibility to do so.

[MikeyBK]

Don't you think that JD has the prerogative to progress 'HIS' software (which he offers to all of us for FREE!) at a pace of HIS choosing?? I mean come on guys!!... He is doing this for us without any demands towards us.. whether monetary or work. The least that we can do is be thankful just for whatever he has given us to this point.:cool:

I can understand if you paid big bucks for his software, or at the very least, donated a 'HUGE' amount towards his work, considering the constant badgering you guys are doing....

I wouldn't blame him if he just got fed up altogether and shut this thing down.... let's just appreciate what he can get to for the time being....
He Does Have a Real Job in Real Life Guys!! Give it a rest already...PLEASE... before he shuts it down...

[turbojet]

I'm not writing in big letters for any other reason then for him to see an important post.

He's already said before that he didn't see my posts that would have prevented him from getting in this mess of players not playing the output it used to because of incorrect tsmuxer output which jdobbs did change.

I'm not pressuring him in any way to do it, I'm simply letting him know the correct way of doing it so he can get those bugs off his back.

One of the most important things of a solo project is good user feedback and that's what I'm giving him.

Once again when I said I was frustrated because he hasn't been seeing my important bug report posts over the past 3 months should not be taken as offensive but for some reason that's what some people are trying to see it as.

I dont know about jdobbs but personally I'd rather be able to look at one post for bug reports compared to the 2783 posts in this thread, most of which are discussion.

[MikeyBK]

Once again when I said I was frustrated because he hasn't been seeing my important bug report posts over the past 3 months should not be taken as offensive but for some reason that's what some people are trying to see it as.



Does his tone in the posts below sound promising to you??+
Of course the developer could also just turn this whole project off because he also has to make a living. You know what is frustrating? Trying to build something for the convenience of others -- with virtually nothing in return -- and still having to take criticism from those you are helping because you're not moving fast enough.

I do what I can do with the time I have. You can't make the assumption that I've read every post you have put here. I was away for several weeks and there's no way I can catch up.

If that isn't a good enough answer... then screw it.

Is this still an issue with v1.10.1?

They never were meant to be -- doing so causes more issues than it corrects. Instead they should still exist, but point to a PID that is kept.

It isn't really a "problem" -- the subs show large on the screen because the picture resolution was reduced. As I said before, I'll look at it. But I think it is more important to fix the problems that cause discs not to work before attacking the cosmetic problems.

[turbojet]

Does his tone in the posts below sound promising to you??+

Since then he has replied to me, asked me a question about tsmuxer and released a new version.

Take it however you want.

I have helped him in the past with BD-RB and would like to continue helping him develop the software and all I ask for is to be heard.

If I were in jdobbs shoes I wouldn't want all this discussion, as such I'm not going to reply on this matter ever again.

[Nkotok]

OK, guys. I am a new member and was waiting for 5 days to be able to post for the first time.
I don't know if it is a bug of BD RB or something else, but I am concerned with the output size of the final result. It seems to be very inconsistent. Sometimes it gives me folders that are only 20 or 21 GB large, which sucks b.c. I waste space on a BD-R but is not that big of a deal. The main problem though is when BD RB recodes and still gives me too big of a size to fit on a BD-R. Like by about 500MB bigger than fits on a blank. I noticed that it happens mostly when I check Keep HD Audio in the options. That is what I am mostly interested in.

I choose Movie Only, BD25, in audio options I don't check anything BUT Keep HD Audio. That's it.

It also seems that the bigger the movie (like if it is 40Gb or bigger) the chance that BD Rb will screw up with the final size is bigger, too.

Could it be fixed?

Thanks

[GaPony]

As is common in a beta... there are still some issues with the newer feature of keeping the HD audio. For the time being, you might want to either not keep the HD audio, or at least check the size before committing to disc. Using BD-RE media would also be a good idea for the short term.

In any case, jdobbs is working on it... This software has come a long way in just over 4 months, so be patient.

[DaMacFunkin]

Sorry dude, tought luck.

Those tiny m2ts <0.5mb often have problems encoding and you will be left with an m2ts of 0kb in size and obviously your output bluray won't play in most cases.

To make sure you don't waste hours of time only to find you have one of them, make sure you do "quciker encode for extras". It should put the small files first...then just check your output folder for any 0kb m2ts\status window for errors.

Cheers (oh Fudge!!!) LOL

[old-hack]

I'm getting that "Stop Statement" dialogue box then BDRB automatically closing when I click "OK" on the dialogue box when i set min m2ts to =0 with...

Kung Fu Panda - UK\EU version.
Royal Space Force - The Wings of Honneamise - Jap import.

...Setting it to =10 and I don't get it...defo something wrong there...

I'm also getting the "Stop" statement when processing Monster's Ball with 0.20.08. No log is generated so I can't help out that way. I haven't tried 0.20.07. Just wanted to get this into the bug thread.

[bassnut]

well finally I can post something. I am fairly new to BD Rebuilder but a long time user of DVD Rebuilder and have to say thank Jdobbs for another great program.

I have had a chance not to play with BD Rebuilder for a couple weeks and am surprised with the results ...... of the 17 BLU-RAYS that I have tried I have only had problems with 2 where the movie actually freeze on me and thought I would pass those along to you all. All movies are Canadian Release Region A.

1) Wanted - Freezes in Chapter 11 this is almost the end of the movie just after all the rats explode. Sound contiues to play right to the end but no more video just a frosen still shot.

2) Alien VS Predator - Freezes at chapter 13 this is right after the guy falls to the bottom of the ice shaft and the 2 aliens walk by ..... video and audio though the Audio plays on for a few seconds longer. To shut the movie off you have to unplug the Stand alone player. ..... Sony BDP S350

Now with Alien Vs Predator I can skip this part and the movie will play through without any more problems. I have encoded this one a couple times and burnt a couple time as well with 0.20.05, .07 and .08

3) Mummy 3 - Allot of people seemed to have an issue with this movie but it backed up for me almost without a problem. No video in the extras:

The Making of the Mummy 3
From City To Desert

No video just a white screen though the audio works and can select the menue as well. Everything else seems to be as it should be and working.

Some other movies that did work for me that I think I seen error reports for:

National Treasure II, The Incredible Hulk, Death Race, Punisher, War Zone, Ghost Rider, 300, Quantum Of Solace.

If there is any help you might require shout or PM me. With the exception of 8 movies that have LPCM where I will wait till it is fully supported before I do them I have a computer sitting doing nothing.

:helpful:

[Furiousflea]

Don't you think that JD has the prerogative to progress 'HIS' software (which he offers to all of us for FREE!) at a pace of HIS choosing?? I mean come on guys!!... He is doing this for us without any demands towards us.. whether monetary or work. The least that we can do is be thankful just for whatever he has given us to this point.:cool:

I can understand if you paid big bucks for his software, or at the very least, donated a 'HUGE' amount towards his work, considering the constant badgering you guys are doing....

I wouldn't blame him if he just got fed up altogether and shut this thing down.... let's just appreciate what he can get to for the time being....
He Does Have a Real Job in Real Life Guys!! Give it a rest already...PLEASE... before he shuts it down...

We're trying to help by offering ideas\solutions.

This is a bug report thread and that is what is being discussed - Bugs.

Has political correctness madness reached doom9?

If there's a problem to be reported, it gets reported. This isn't happy teddy bears picnic\talking shop\womens institute...

turbojet obviously knows what he's talking about, maybe jdobbs should be greatful to him. He is literally receiving nothing in return for posting here.

That was a rhetorical question but you get my point. We're all trying to help out :) Haven't always got time to say please and thankyou at the end of every post. I assume it's a given, when a new release comes out I always post a word of thanks etc for problems addressed. It's just an unspoken resepect thing most of the time.

We've been over this already! What's the problem...Just the tone? Well sorry dude, but we're all of different nationality, all of different backgrounds and I think everyone here is curteous most the time.

[Furiousflea]

I'm also getting the "Stop" statement when processing Monster's Ball with 0.20.08. No log is generated so I can't help out that way. I haven't tried 0.20.07. Just wanted to get this into the bug thread.

Aye, there are a couple of discs where the "stop" thingy appears no matter what size you have the min m2ts as, or if the option is removed altogether.

The problem isn't present in any previous versions to my knowledge (only affects 0.20.08).

[Rail-Runner]

Being a newbie not sure if this is a settings or hardware limitation causeing this error to freeze things at 42.82% when reencodeing Crank, my PC is a (new)Lenovo K series dual core,BD25 full movie tried BDRB 2005 & 2008 with same error stopping progress.
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe
Aften:A/52 audio encoder
version SUN
2006-2007
Found PCM audio: 8 channels,48000 Hz,16 bits,5262.260000 seconds.
Writeing WAV file...
Input format: Microsoft WAVE signed 16-bit little-endian 48000 Hz multi- channel
Unsupported # of channels passed to aften_wav_chmask_to_acmod
mismatch in channels, acmod,and lfe params
Error: Could not write to the standard output
Love the program but have only had 2 of 5 make it to a perfect final burn status. Transformers and I am Legend came out as perfect as the original on BD25, but Terminator 2, Shoot Em Up and Crank were no goes, Crank had the above listed error when running both 2005 & 2008 versions of BDRB

[MikeyBK]

Can anyone else verify that the TSMuxer version in 0.20.08 causes no auto play on PS3s?
I've done what JD suggested and placed the TSMuxer version from 0.20.05 into the 0.20.08 Tools folder and all plays fine now on PS3.

@ Turbojet... it's all good Bro, your input is appreciated... just that this wasn't necessary IMHO
http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1283919&postcount=2781

[turbojet]

No auto play meaning you have to navigate to the m2ts to play it?
If so 'strict AVCHD' disabled won't work but if it's enabled with 0.20.08 tsmuxer it should work on PS3 but it won't work in PowerDVD and 1-2 samsung players. To fix PowerDVD playback replace with tsmuxer 1.10.04+. A few weeks and Samsung players may be fixed. I know exactly why it happens (--avchd vs. --bluray) and there's a few posts in this thread from others and me on how to fix it. The tsmuxer (1.8.4) from 0.28.05 works like 1.10.04+ except no TrueHD output.

I just think he gets as frustrated as I have when the person who needs to hear isn't hearing or isn't around to hear you. More organization of the info might help a lot.

[Furiousflea]

I just think he gets as frustrated as I have when the person who needs to hear isn't hearing or isn't around to hear you. More organization of the info might help a lot.

Pretty much :)

[tekmobile]

Being a newbie not sure if this is a settings or hardware limitation causeing this error to freeze things at 42.82% when reencodeing Crank, my PC is a (new)Lenovo K series dual core,BD25 full movie tried BDRB 2005 & 2008 with same error stopping progress.
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe
Aften:A/52 audio encoder
version SUN
2006-2007
Found PCM audio: 8 channels,48000 Hz,16 bits,5262.260000 seconds.
Writeing WAV file...
Input format: Microsoft WAVE signed 16-bit little-endian 48000 Hz multi- channel
Unsupported # of channels passed to aften_wav_chmask_to_acmod
mismatch in channels, acmod,and lfe params
Error: Could not write to the standard output
Love the program but have only had 2 of 5 make it to a perfect final burn status. Transformers and I am Legend came out as perfect as the original on BD25, but Terminator 2, Shoot Em Up and Crank were no goes, Crank had the above listed error when running both 2005 & 2008 versions of BDRB

This is caused by a limitation of aften because it does not support 8 Channel LPCM

[Rail-Runner]

Just wondering if I need a sound card upgrade or is this more of BDRB that may be addressed in a newer beta version, I appoligise for asking a question in the bug report thread, but would greatly appreciate any info that may help out.

[tekmobile]

Just wondering if I need a sound card upgrade or is this more of BDRB that may be addressed in a newer beta version, I appoligise for asking a question in the bug report thread, but would greatly appreciate any info that may help out.

its a BD RB issue its nothing to do with your soundcard and will get addressed when a solution is available.
Aften is a 3rd party tool so out of the hands of jdobbs

[Rail-Runner]

Thank You tekmobile