BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

[KaraokeAmerica]

Hello! Wanted to ask, what about the UHD support in BD rebuilder? Since there are now some decrypted UHD movies, the topic is interesting. Although there is the possibility to edit his files, but the shrinking of the complete movie with selected languages /audio is not yet possible. Is there something new in this topic?

Frankly, I haven't used BDRB much yet, but this comment is interesting.

What would be the advantage to "shrinking" a UHD? Isn't the point of a UHD to have the maximum possible resolution?

By shrinking it do you mean retaining that 4K resolution, but re-encoding to a smaller file size somehow?

<<< newbie.....

[jdobbs]

Hello! Wanted to ask, what about the UHD support in BD rebuilder? Since there are now some decrypted UHD movies, the topic is interesting. Although there is the possibility to edit his files, but the shrinking of the complete movie with selected languages /audio is not yet possible. Is there something new in this topic? A test version will be available probably some time this month. I've started on it, but haven't gotten it to a point where it is ready for testing.

[jdobbs]

Frankly, I haven't used BDRB much yet, but this comment is interesting.

What would be the advantage to "shrinking" a UHD? Isn't the point of a UHD to have the maximum possible resolution?

By shrinking it do you mean retaining that 4K resolution, but re-encoding to a smaller file size somehow?

<<< newbie.....Yes. The main reason is to make it fit on a BD-50 or BD-25. Original discs use a lot more bitrate than is needed for 4K... just like they did with BD. The idea is to use readily available inexpensive media for a backup.

[Blurayhd]

I think I find a tool that we can make a "image backup" of all our Bluray disc and in case of any damage on the disc, we can restore all (?) In a fact the tool is DVDisaster and I find the following;



Is this that I telling you about? or I´m wrong? Or there´s some another tool for this?

ps: I think this is the best idea because eventually we lost the Blura y disc or get the surface damague etc

So, what do you think?

I wish you the best guys

Hi Jdobbs, you told me IMGburn does the same hink that I describe on DVDisaster? I mean, a small backup image copy of the entire Bluray so if any part is illegible or broken you can restore that part. Just like winrar with rar01 and rev files?

If you dont mind could you tell me how to do that? Obviously maybe I´m wrong

[Blurayhd]

Yes. The main reason is to make it fit on a BD-50 or BD-25. Original discs use a lot more bitrate than is needed for 4K... just like they did with BD. The idea is to use readily available inexpensive media for a backup.

if I get it you are talking about to fit a 4k movie on a BD25?

Theres some movies with some languages that are I wish to keep so if I get it, you´ll start soon with a new build BD rebuilder that can recognize that languages so we can choose to keep?

really? I use Bd rebuilder with close eyes but, if you say, dear Jdobbs, that 4k resolution can be untouch on a BD25 I´m on it

[jdobbs]

I really don't know anything about DVDisaster so I can't say what it can and can't do. I just said IMGBURN has the ability to do image backups. If you want to discuss DVDisaster more, I would suggest you open a thread in another topic area -- as it isn't related to BD Rebuilder in any way. if you say, dear Jdobbs, that 4k resolution can be untouch on a BD25 I´m on itNot likely. The maximum bitrate was increased on BD-66 and BD-100 discs beyond what can be used for a BD-25/50. So reencoding is almost always required. I've found a few extras that can be kept intact but that's about it.

[MrVideo]

Hi Jdobbs, you told me IMGburn does the same hink that I describe on DVDisaster? I mean, a small backup image copy of the entire Bluray so if any part is illegible or broken you can restore that part. Just like winrar with rar01 and rev files?
No, it can't. No program can "fix" a CD/DVD/Blu-ray disc. There is no repair data. There is simple CRCC, but, if there are too many missing bits, that sector is gone for good.

As jdobbs suggests, if you want to continue this discussion, search Doom9 for topics on this very thing.

[kufo]

Thanks for your quick reply jdobbs! Im glad to hear that. At the moment there is only one way to make it fit on a BD DL: Take the main movie. When burning to a BD DL it works on my xBox one s with shuttering sequences all the time.
That related to the bitrate wich can' t be shown on this media. Shrinking whould force a lower bitrate, I think and with this no shuttering while playback.

[m.rup]

Hi, when I try to process Blu Ray LOTR Extended Edition Return of the King disc 2, region B, I get an error:

Error Condition
BD Master Toolkit experienced an error 2603 [21:55:52] ScanDirectory()
00006 2603

When I confirm the message, I get:

Error Condition
BD Master Toolkit experienced an error 2705 [21:55:52] BuildTreeList()
00009 2705

This happens with the original disc as well as with a replacement disc.

Some times, when clicking around after the first errors, also this happens:

Error Condition
BD Master Toolkit experienced an error 2501 [22:03:49] SourceCheck()
00055 2501

When I confirm the message, I get:

Illegal Source
Selected source is not BD format.

The discs have been ripped with AnyDVD 8.2.1.0.
Both discs are playable in my Panasonic BD player and can be processed by MultiAVCHD.

All other discs of LOTR are handled well.

Any ideas what's going on?

Edit: BD Rebuilder, v0.50.25 Windows 7 Ultimate 64

[gonca]

Can you post the Inspect results and generated log

[Lathe]

Can you post the Inspect results and generated log

You seem to have an unhealthy fascination with 'generated logs'...

I'm kinda worried about you... http://lathe-of-heaven.com/no.gif

[m.rup]

Here is the result of Inspect:

- [23:07:53] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
- [23:07:55] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
[01.15.18] Checking System Settings
- BD-Rebuilder v0.50.25
- Windows Version: 6.1 [7601]
- Working Path Free Space: 337,86GB
- AVISYNTH Version: 2.5.8.0, Ok
- LAVFILTERS: Ok
- AnyDVD settings check: Ok.
- X264: Ok
- AFTEN: Ok
- FAAC: Ok
- MP4BOX: Ok
- WAVI: Ok
- TSMUXER: Ok
- FRIMEncode: Ok
- FRIMDecode: Ok
[01.15.18] Systems Settings Check complete

And Errorlog.txt:

01.15.18 [21:26:36] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [21:26:39] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
01.15.18 [21:55:52] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [21:57:47] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
01.15.18 [22:03:49] SourceCheck() 00055 2501
01.15.18 [22:10:08] SourceCheck() 00055 2501
01.15.18 [22:11:56] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [22:12:07] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
01.15.18 [23:07:53] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [23:07:55] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705

[gonca]

You seem to have an unhealthy fascination with 'generated logs'...

I'm kinda worried about you... http://lathe-of-heaven.com/no.gif

And you seem to have an overwhelming fascination with me, now that is sick

[gonca]

Here is the result of Inspect:

- [23:07:53] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
- [23:07:55] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
[01.15.18] Checking System Settings
- BD-Rebuilder v0.50.25
- Windows Version: 6.1 [7601]
- Working Path Free Space: 337,86GB
- AVISYNTH Version: 2.5.8.0, Ok
- LAVFILTERS: Ok
- AnyDVD settings check: Ok.
- X264: Ok
- AFTEN: Ok
- FAAC: Ok
- MP4BOX: Ok
- WAVI: Ok
- TSMUXER: Ok
- FRIMEncode: Ok
- FRIMDecode: Ok
[01.15.18] Systems Settings Check complete

And Errorlog.txt:

01.15.18 [21:26:36] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [21:26:39] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
01.15.18 [21:55:52] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [21:57:47] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
01.15.18 [22:03:49] SourceCheck() 00055 2501
01.15.18 [22:10:08] SourceCheck() 00055 2501
01.15.18 [22:11:56] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [22:12:07] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705
01.15.18 [23:07:53] ScanDirectory() 00006 2603
01.15.18 [23:07:55] BuildTreeList() 00009 2705

You will have to wait until jdobbs answers
But it might be a bad source

[Lathe]

And you seem to have an overwhelming fascination with me, now that is sick

Good point! :cool:

[jdobbs]

Hi, when I try to process Blu Ray LOTR Extended Edition Return of the King disc 2, region B, I get an error:

Error Condition
BD Master Toolkit experienced an error 2603 [21:55:52] ScanDirectory()
00006 2603
...
Any ideas what's going on?

Edit: BD Rebuilder, v0.50.25 Windows 7 Ultimate 64
You're getting an overflow error -- meaning that some variable is being assigned a value that is too large for it when an attempt is made to scan the disc's directory. The rest of the symptoms are just the result of the scan failure. The question is: Where and how I get the overflow, and, unfortunately, I can't really tell (very easily) without having access to that particular disc.

[AmigaFuture]

Good point! :cool:

Does this mean less Trump-like humor now? Or do we have to put guards around gonca and lower gonca? Haa.....haaa...


Anyway...

JD: TiVo H.264 videos edited .TS files and then SRT added to MKV files are producing BD's with Subtitles that play collectly with PowerDVD 12 and LG BD Player. It's DVD's as previously commented about that the CC ripped subs aren't..

[Lathe]

do we have to put guards around gonca and lower gonca? Haa.....haaa...



I don't think gonca can get much lower...

[Blurayhd]

I have a problem, my copy of The Mummy (1999) one of my favorites, when I tried to watch any Bluray device (computer, Bluray player) can´t read the disc. So I get the movie in MKV but in UFHD with English audio and some subtitles and I so need to pass it to Full HD 1920x1080.... Bd rebuilder can do the job I´m right? How? I´m very worry about it

I hope you can help me, have a nice day

[Yordan5]

This issue with the movie was also mentioned in its 4K review on blu-ray.com. Although the reviewer mentioned it was due to scratches.

[kufo]

I have a problem, my copy of The Mummy (1999) one of my favorites, when I tried to watch any Bluray device (computer, Bluray player) can´t read the disc. So I get the movie in MKV but in UFHD with English audio and some subtitles and I so need to pass it to Full HD 1920x1080.... Bd rebuilder can do the job I´m right? How? I´m very worry about it

I hope you can help me, have a nice day
There is no chance to convert an UHD file to Full HD with BDrebuilder.
Jdobbs promised an UHD update fpor BDrebuilder, later this month.
With this this update the job can be done, I think.
Also look at #26953 on previous page.

[gonca]

I don't think gonca can get much lower...

You are a cyber stalker plain and simple
You need some stronger meds, or a life

[LowDead]

There is no chance to convert an UHD file to Full HD with BDrebuilder.
Jdobbs promised an UHD update fpor BDrebuilder, later this month.
With this this update the job can be done, I think.
Also look at #26953 on previous page.

Promised is a big word.. It will come when the time is right :)

//LD

[Blurayhd]

There is no chance to convert an UHD file to Full HD with BDrebuilder.
Jdobbs promised an UHD update fpor BDrebuilder, later this month.
With this this update the job can be done, I think.
Also look at #26953 on previous page.

Thank you for answer me, so the import option (that you can add MKVs..) doesn´t works anyway?

[Lathe]

You are a cyber stalker plain and simple
You need some stronger meds, or a life

Stronger meds isn't a bad idea...

http://lathe-of-heaven.com/shroom.gif

[jdobbs]

Thank you for answer me, so the import option (that you can add MKVs..) doesn´t works anyway?When I release it for test you will be able to import a 2160p MKV.

[kufo]

When I release it for test you will be able to import a 2160p MKV.

Thanks, that shows me that I was right.

[Blurayhd]

When I release it for test you will be able to import a 2160p MKV.

Thank you Jdobbs

[Blurayhd]

Hi guys, Hi Jdobbs first I really hope posting in the right section

I was creating an image from a Bluray disc and the ISO image was created just fine but imgburn in the process gave me this error and I don´t know if the ISO (considering that error) is successfully created (just like imgburn indicates) or that imagen can be damage or something?

This is the log

I 14:31:56 Operation Started!
I 14:31:56 Source Device: [0:0:0] HL-DT-ST BD-RE BH16NS40 1.02 (R:) (USB)
I 14:31:56 Source Media Type: BD-R (Disc ID: RITEK-BR2-000)
I 14:31:56 Source Media Supported Read Speeds: 2x; 4x; 6x; 7x; 10x; 12x
I 14:31:56 Source Media Supported Write Speeds: 4x; 6x; 8x
I 14:31:56 Source Media Sectors: 11.826.176
I 14:31:56 Source Media Size: 24.220.008.448 bytes
I 14:31:56 Source Media Volume Identifier: 0853_30012013
I 14:31:56 Source Media Volume Set Identifier: 510909B8
I 14:31:56 Source Media Implementation Identifier: FoxBurner
I 14:31:56 Source Media File System(s): UDF (1.02)
I 14:31:57 Read Speed (Data/Audio): MAX / 8x
I 14:31:57 Destination File: H:\BD\0853_30012013.ISO
I 14:31:57 Destination Free Space: 64.713.154.560 Bytes (63.196.440,00 KiB) (61.715,27 MiB) (60,27 GiB)
I 14:31:57 Destination File System: NTFS
I 14:31:57 File Splitting: Auto
I 14:31:58 Read Speed - Effective: 5x - 12x
I 14:32:02 Reading Session 1 of 1... (1 Track, LBA: 0 - 11826175)
I 14:32:02 Reading Track 1 of 1... (MODE1/2048, LBA: 0 - 11826175)
W 14:42:11 Failed to Read Sectors 11471296 - 11471327 - Reason: Logical Block Address out of Range
W 14:42:11 Found end of Disc! - Sector: 11471296
I 14:42:12 Exporting Graph Data...
I 14:42:12 Graph Data File: C:\Users\Gamer\AppData\Roaming\ImgBurn\Graph Data Files\HL-DT-ST_BD-RE_BH16NS40_1.02_DOMINGO-21-DE-ENERO-DE-2018_14-31_RITEK-BR2-000.ibg
I 14:42:12 Export Successfully Completed!
I 14:42:12 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:10:15
I 14:42:12 Average Read Rate: 37.305 KiB/s (8.5x) - Maximum Read Rate: 52.529 KiB/s (12.0x)


Thank you for your time and pacience

[Ch3vr0n]

That has absolutely nothing to do with bd-rebuilder. You're getting a burn error and the reason is your cheap crappy ritek blanks you're using. Get better quality like verbatim bd-r's. That iso also wasn't created with bdrb I'm pretty sure. Unless I'm mistaking 'foxburner' application identifier is used by elby's CloneBD. But that's besides the point. Your problem is the blank discs.

Sent from my Nexus 6P with Tapatalk

[MrVideo]

I'm confused by the MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR setting, as it appears to do nothing.

When I set MENU_ACTIVE_COLOR to "0xA7A7A7", in order to have a gray active text, the non-active text is not the value of MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR. It is a little (very little) darker value of MENU_ACTIVE_COLOR, resulting in one not being able to see a difference in the active/non-active colors (unless one changes the selection and then it is barely visible).

I set MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR=green and that resulted in no green non-active text.

How do I set the non-active text so that the difference can be seen? Maybe a MENU_NONACTIVE_COLOR setting? If set to "", then the BDRB default value is used.

By having a MENU_NONACTIVE_COLOR setting, then the menu can have three colors: non-active, active and selected (default white).

[jdobbs]

I'm confused by the MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR setting, as it appears to do nothing.

When I set MENU_ACTIVE_COLOR to "0xA7A7A7", in order to have a gray active text, the non-active text is not the value of MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR. It is a little (very little) darker value of MENU_ACTIVE_COLOR, resulting in one not being able to see a difference in the active/non-active colors (unless one changes the selection and then it is barely visible).

I set MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR=green and that resulted in no green non-active text.

How do I set the non-active text so that the difference can be seen? Maybe a MENU_NONACTIVE_COLOR setting? If set to "", then the BDRB default value is used.

By having a MENU_NONACTIVE_COLOR setting, then the menu can have three colors: non-active, active and selected (default white).MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR just lets you define a color that can be used outside of the defaults (RED, GREEN, etc). Then you could use it with either MENU_ACTIVE or MENU_INACTIVE. It's a "left over" capability that is just supported for later compatibility. For example you could set:

MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR=0x40FF30
MENU_ACTIVE_COLOR=CUSTOM

Of course you could get the same thing by just using:

MENU_ACTIVE_COLOR=0x40FF30

Note: There is a setting called MENU_INACTIVE_COLOR.

[jdobbs]

That has absolutely nothing to do with bd-rebuilder. You're getting a burn error and the reason is your cheap crappy ritek blanks you're using. Get better quality like verbatim bd-r's. That iso also wasn't created with bdrb I'm pretty sure. Unless I'm mistaking 'foxburner' application identifier is used by elby's CloneBD. But that's besides the point. Your problem is the blank discs.

Sent from my Nexus 6P with TapatalkIt looks to me like the original burning software tried to write past the end of the disc... just guessing, though. The error was:

Failed to Read Sectors 11471296 - 11471327 - Reason: Logical Block Address out of Range

That read reached beyond the last sector written:

Found end of Disc! - Sector: 11471296

So, at a minimum, it is trying to read something that isn't there -- I tend to believe the burning software was at fault.

With that said... it has absolutely nothing to do with BD Rebuilder. It might be a good question for the IMGBURN forum (http://forum.imgburn.com/)

[MrVideo]

MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR just lets you define a color that can be used outside of the defaults (RED, GREEN, etc). Then you could use it with either MENU_ACTIVE or MENU_INACTIVE. It's a "left over" capability that is just supported for later compatibility. For example you could set:

MENU_CUSTOM_COLOR=0x40FF30
MENU_ACTIVE_COLOR=CUSTOM
Ah OK. Now it is clear. Thanks for the info.
Note: There is a setting called MENU_INACTIVE_COLOR.
Oh crap, there it is. Don't know how I missed that. Must be the added year to my birth. :(

[Rich86]

That has absolutely nothing to do with bd-rebuilder. You're getting a burn error and the reason is your cheap crappy ritek blanks you're using. Get better quality like verbatim bd-r's. That iso also wasn't created with bdrb I'm pretty sure. Unless I'm mistaking 'foxburner' application identifier is used by elby's CloneBD. But that's besides the point. Your problem is the blank discs.

Sent from my Nexus 6P with Tapatalk

I've been using ritek blanks" (4x BD-Rs) for a number of years with 100% success and multi-year testing afterwards demonstrating they still play perfectly. Ritek had a period when recordable DVDs were not reliable, but that has nothing to do with their current BD-Rs. My current "goto" BD burner drives are all LGs (internally installed full-size drive plus a slim/portable drive mounted in a portable USB case).- they have performed flawlessly!

[Blurayhd]

When I release it for test you will be able to import a 2160p MKV.

Hi guys hi Jdobbs

Since we comment on this topic UFHD and talking about this, and just out of curiosity if I download a movie in UFHD and then pass it with the next version of bd rebuilder to Full HD, there is a possibility in the final result (considering the source is an ufhd), the fhd quality result could be better than if I do the same from a bd50 fhd to BD25?

I really hope you can undestand it thankyou jdobbs for do it

[MrVideo]

Since we comment on this topic UFHD ...
What is UFHD?

[kufo]

What is UFHD?

I think it should be UHD :o
Just an F tooo much :D

[Blurayhd]

I think it should be UHD :o
Just an F tooo much :D

Sorry for that

[jdobbs]

Just an F tooo much :DI often do that in conversations.

[kufo]

Sorry for that


No need to say sorry -I considered it funny, thats all:rolleyes:

[Lathe]

I often do that in conversations.

http://lathe-of-heaven.com/Wagging2.gif

[Sharc]

@jdobbs
Just a friendly reminder (I know it's not on your current priority list...): Any chance that the --sar bug which I reported here (https://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1811223&postcount=26173) will perhaps be fixed in an upcoming release?
My point is that imported 720x576i 4:3 footage should be encoded with --sar 12:11 rather than 10:11. Depending on the playback scenario the wrong --sar can produce a distorted picture which is a pity because all the rest is just perfect :)
Thank you.

[AmigaFuture]

I often do that in conversations.

Funnnny! I've noticed your cunning linguistic ability, and wouldn't peg you has every other sentence F-er. My girlfriend is pretty skilled that way also, but Whhhhhew, she can produce some Fing tones if someone is really overboard to get a point across to them to stop. She usually receives some surprising looks because she's pretty creative and a looker....and does a lot with winks and slight expressions.

Orrrrr...were you meaning F from the other end, while engaged in conversations? ;-)

[Lathe]

Funnnny! I've noticed your cunning linguistic ability, and wouldn't peg you has every other sentence F-er. My girlfriend is pretty skilled that way also, but Whhhhhew, she can produce some Fing tones if someone is really overboard to get a point across to them to stop. She usually receives some surprising looks because she's pretty creative and a looker....and does a lot with winks and slight expressions.

Orrrrr...were you meaning F from the other end, while engaged in conversations? ;-)

AF... you honestly think WAY too much... http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gif

[ggtop]

Hi jdobbs,

I just ran into a small issue backing up Star Wars (Epidsode 5) into MP4 container. BDRB created a file with forced subs for ENG and hardcoded them. My setting is SUPTITLE=1 of course and
FORCED_SUB_LANG=deu;ger;
DEU and GER had no forced subs, but a ENG commentary stream had some. They were extracted to a 9999 file.
Disabling SUPTITLE for that title did the trick.

If you need some more info please let me know.

ggtop

[jdobbs]

Hi jdobbs,

I just ran into a small issue backing up Star Wars (Epidsode 5) into MP4 container. BDRB created a file with forced subs for ENG and hardcoded them. My setting is SUPTITLE=1 of course and
FORCED_SUB_LANG=deu;ger;
DEU and GER had no forced subs, but a ENG commentary stream had some. They were extracted to a 9999 file.
Disabling SUPTITLE for that title did the trick.

If you need some more info please let me know.

ggtopInteresting that there weren't any forced subtitles in the German track. The language being spoken at the time wasn't German was it? I'll change it so that when you have a forced subtitle language selected it won't default to the English forced subs when there aren't any others. It would be annoying to have hardcoded subtitles in a language other than your own native language.

[ggtop]

I'll change it so that when you have a forced subtitle language selected it won't default to the English forced subs when there aren't any others. It would be annoying to have hardcoded subtitles in a language other than your own native language.

Thank you very much. If you want me test some some combinations let me know. I currently have quite a large number of discs I want to encode to MP4.

Interesting that there weren't any forced subtitles in the German track. The language being spoken at the time wasn't German was it?

No, the subtitle stream in question is an additional commentary stream with just the names of the persons currently speaking in the director's comments audio stream. Saw that on other discs as well.

That brings me to a request: As the anylysis of the correct subtitle stream can be done only after extraction would it be possible to add a (hidden) option to stop BDRB from starting the first video Encoding segment? Background: As long as the first video segment hasn't been encoded successfullly I still have the chance to enable a subtitle stream and to turn it on if the subtitles aren't flagged as forced and then to continue...
Right now I wait for the extraction/indexing to be completed and press "Abort" for subtitle analyzing.
50% of my discs do not have forced subtitles. They have a stream of their own without flags.

EDIT: Such an option would only be useful (for me) in non batch mode.

ggtop

[AmigaFuture]

AF... you honestly think WAY too much... http://lathe-of-heaven.com/yes.gif

Ohh, Mr. Mascot, Mr. Guru?

Any time someone tells me I think too much (or meditate too much)...my alarms begin to chime a warning towards that person. ;-)

[Lathe]

Ohh, Mr. Mascot, Mr. Guru?

Any time someone tells me I think too much (or meditate too much)...my alarms begin to chime a warning towards that person. ;-)

Uh huh... Uh... it's called 'Irony' mate :D