Log in

View Full Version : BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648

setarip_old
14th August 2009, 01:31
@Elsy

Hi!

I guess you overlooked the title of this thread, which is:BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

GaPony
14th August 2009, 02:27
@ setarip_old

He's preparing to make some bugs to report. :)

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 02:29
How or where can I modify the encoder settings ?Not in this thread. For that matter, not in BD-RB. You can choose the quality level and the settings associated, but not the specific command lines.

Thats purposeful and isn't likely to change. There a certain settings that are required to be Blu-ray compliant -- and I insist that I contol them to ensure it works. I've had too many problems with "creative users" causing a self-inflicted-sucking-chest-wound and then screaming at me...

Sorry.

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 02:38
jdobbs...

Just an update, it seems that Pinnochio is now the ONLY disc I own with PiP problems (obviously containing eac3 and not DTS express).

For now, I would maybe write it off as a quirk of this disc... I'm going to have PiP processing enabled by default in the next release.

I'd still like to see what the issue is on Pinnochio.

Capsbackup
14th August 2009, 02:46
Just completed a full movie backup to BD-25 of Transformers, Region A, a PiP movie with DD Plus secondary audio. The movie backs up successfully, but the secondary video track does not play like the original.
The original starts with some pop up descriptive subtitles surrounded by a border. BD-RB has only the english subtitles to the audio track, not the descriptive ones with the border around it. The PiP video and audio that starts at approx. six minutes into the movie works fine, just like the original.
So only the descriptive portion of the PiP does not seem to work correctly.

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 02:48
Just completed a full movie backup to BD-25 of Transformers, Region A, a PiP movie with DD Plus secondary audio. The movie backs up successfully, but the secondary video track does not play like the original.
The original starts with some pop up descriptive subtitles surrounded by a border. BD-RB has only the english subtitles to the audio track, not the descriptive ones with the border around it. The PiP video and audio that starts at approx. six minutes into the movie works fine, just like the original.
So only the descriptive portion of the PiP does not seem to work correctly. Look at your Subtitle selections in SETUP. For example, if you tell it to keep only one subtitle in a language, it might be stripping the one you're missing.

Capsbackup
14th August 2009, 03:04
Look at your Subtitle selections in SETUP. For example, if you tell it to keep only one subtitle in a language, it might be stripping the one you're missing.

I chose to select all subtitles. BD-RB appears to have hard coded the english subtitles to the english audio language track, and I cannot turn it off or change the selection.
Subtitles available for this 00010.m2ts are 2 eng,1 Fre, 1 Spa, and 1 Port.

EDIT:
Subtitles even play over the PiP video window. On the original, subtitles are not displayed and are not selectable either.
EDIT:
It looks like I missed a subtitle track after all. :o
I should know better, thats what the scroll bar is for. :p
I apologize, and will give it another try.

drmih
14th August 2009, 09:51
Is your Blu-Ray player's audio setup set to "Direct" for audio playback? If so, you may need to change it to "Mixed" to hear the secondary audio being played. I believe this is true for DTS HD Master, but not sure for True HD.( You will still hear your HD audio, it just might not be displayed on your receiver as such).
Thanks to Furiousflea for pointing this out to me. :)

..but the original plays fine on the same kit, and I tend to use TMT3 to check all of the settings to see what's 'on' and what's 'off'. TMT3 on a pc plays the ripped original fine but loses the secondary audio output on the bd-25 version.

baudi
14th August 2009, 10:04
@baudi;
What OS are you using? XP, Vista, W7?
I have an I7 920, using XP Pro 32bit, and have backed up many region 1, NTSC, VC-1 discs to BD-25 full movie and BD-5 movie only, and have never had a problem like this. I don't recall if these are field based VC-1 or not, just whats on the disc works. You will need to provide more info than this for any helpful suggestions.

Problem solved!

By installing MS Windows Media Video 11 my VC-1 problems were resolved.

My O.S. is Windows XP Pro 32bit SP3.

Thank you.

daberti
14th August 2009, 10:42
Defaults are:

NTSC @ 23.976
SAMPLE_GROUP=4800
SAMPLE_SIZE = "48"

NTSC @ 29.97
SAMPLE_GROUP=6000
SAMPLE_SIZE=60

PAL @ 25
SAMPLE_GROUP=5000
SAMPLE_SIZE=50

Thanks :)

One thing I cannot understand, though: all of my Blurays are labelled as Region B and PAL. Yet they are 23.976 .
Where is the trick?

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 12:57
Thanks :)

One thing I cannot understand, though: all of my Blurays are labelled as Region B and PAL. Yet they are 23.976 .
Where is the trick? If it's 23.976 it will use 4800/48 -- I guess I shouldn't have labeled that one as NTSC, since it's used in both (it wasn't in DVD).

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 13:08
To test the theory of potentially system instability, I ran 2 BD-RB jobs (different software versions) and one other CPU intensive job over the last 24 hours. MAD MEN SEASON2 DISC1 using v026.3 finished successfully having the correct output size of 23.4 GB. CAPOTE running v0.28.3 has not completed and is at 54%. Note both jobs have the same setup and initialization settings. MAD MEN was the larger of the two initial file sizes. Max CPU temperature reached 28C. My other job not related to BD-RB is still running as well. The odd thing is that v0.28.3 launched x264 and seems to have hung, I'm monitoring the memory and CPU usage through task manager as well as watching Haali's properties graphic. I'll update later with its status. Well no matter what results you get -- here's the bottom line. Your system isn't finishing a full encode. No one else is reporting the same problem as you. I ran the exact same disc on my computer and it came out right.

Just those three things alone make it virtually 100% clear that it is your system that is the issue, not BD-RB or X264. So no matter how the tests come out -- your system (the only remaining variable) is the issue.

Sorry -- but I've been doing this a long time, and when you remove the things that are proven ok from the equation, the problem is somewhere in the part that is remaining.

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 13:13
I sit possible that the new version is slower than the previous one? I use the default quality settings every time. Good enough for me. But I`ve lost about 5 frames per second on the first pass with the new version. Any idea? I'm wondering too. I'm in the middle of an encode at High Quality that is running at 4.59fps. While there's always the possibility that it could just be something peculiar in this source, I've always run at 8-9fps before and would only occasionally drop into the 7's.

After this pass is over I'll run a side-by-side comparison.

[Update] My virus scanner was running in background... duhhh.... I guess I'm not wondering anymore. :)

Dark Shikari
14th August 2009, 13:15
(assuming you're using a recent x264) MB-tree requires more processing in the lookahead of the first pass, so with large numbers of cores the first pass may be significantly slower. Second pass should be faster though.

This will be mostly mitigated when the threaded slicetype patch is done--it almost is.

Also, the Handbrake guys' testing has reported gains on TV and DVD sources of about 10-30%+ quality-wise with MB-tree, so I'd say it's worth it.

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 13:18
This is the second pass (using r1210). It's on four cores (all running at 100%). It's too early to report as fact, though. This movie has 2 1/2 hours of encoding left. When it's done I'll do some testing with old/new versions.

I've definitely seen improvement in quality with MB-tree, especially when the bitrate gets challenging. I have a Firefly series disc with 5 hours of HD video on it that never looked quite good enough in a backup to me before -- the newer versions cleaned it up nicely.

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 14:18
(assuming you're using a recent x264) MB-tree requires more processing in the lookahead of the first pass, so with large numbers of cores the first pass may be significantly slower. Second pass should be faster though.

This will be mostly mitigated when the threaded slicetype patch is done--it almost is.

Also, the Handbrake guys' testing has reported gains on TV and DVD sources of about 10-30%+ quality-wise with MB-tree, so I'd say it's worth it. Whatever it is it has nothing to do with MB-tree. I just killed the job and then took the commandline and ran it (pass 2) in two dos windows (exact same settings except --no-mbtree in one).

The window with mb-tree enabled is running about 6% faster than the "--no-mbtree" command.

Capsbackup
14th August 2009, 14:29
Just to confirm, Transformers does backup successfully with PiP working properly, descriptive subs and video, with PowerDVD 7.3. I will burn to BD-RE for final test on my BX1.
Thanks jdobbs for quickly finding my mistake. :p

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 14:30
Whatever it is it has nothing to do with MB-tree. I just killed the job and then took the commandline and ran it (pass 2) in two dos windows (exact same settings except --no-mbtree in one).

The window with mb-tree enabled is running about 6% faster than the "--no-mbtree" command.Same conclusion between versions. I also just ran two windows side-by-side (using r1195 and r1210) on pass 2 -- and r1210 is faster. So it's obviously something on my system or the source that's slowing it down, and nothing to do with X264 updates.

jdobbs
14th August 2009, 15:12
Problem solved!

By installing MS Windows Media Video 11 my VC-1 problems were resolved.

My O.S. is Windows XP Pro 32bit SP3.

Thank you. We discussed that along the way in this thread -- and the recommendation is that WMV11 should be the codec of choice. Unfortunately it is buried somewhere in this very long thread. I'll add it as a recommendation on the first post.

Capsbackup
14th August 2009, 16:21
..but the original plays fine on the same kit, and I tend to use TMT3 to check all of the settings to see what's 'on' and what's 'off'. TMT3 on a pc plays the ripped original fine but loses the secondary audio output on the bd-25 version.

I don't own TMT3, so I cannot comment there, but if you try to change the audio setup on your S550 to "mixed", I think the secondary audio will now be heard.
I just tested Transformers, which has True HD for the main audio track, and DD Plus for the secondary track. Unless I change my Sony BDP-BX1's audio selector to mixed from direct, I do not hear the secondary audio either. This is true for the original and the BD-RB backup.
This is certainly an inconvenience, a shortcoming on behalf of the Blu-Ray Mfg's and Blu-Ray authoring company's, to have to change a setup for the BD player to be able to enjoy a feature on the disc. ( I believe anyway :rolleyes: )

baudi
14th August 2009, 17:01
We discussed that along the way in this thread -- and the recommendation is that WMV11 should be the codec of choice. Unfortunately it is buried somewhere in this very long thread. I'll add it as a recommendation on the first post.

+1

Thanks master.

drmih
14th August 2009, 23:30
I don't own TMT3, so I cannot comment there, but if you try to change the audio setup on your S550 to "mixed", I think the secondary audio will now be heard.
I just tested Transformers, which has True HD for the main audio track, and DD Plus for the secondary track. Unless I change my Sony BDP-BX1's audio selector to mixed from direct, I do not hear the secondary audio either. This is true for the original and the BD-RB backup.
This is certainly an inconvenience, a shortcoming on behalf of the Blu-Ray Mfg's and Blu-Ray authoring company's, to have to change a setup for the BD player to be able to enjoy a feature on the disc. ( I believe anyway :rolleyes: )

You're quite right that does work on the Sony and therefore it'll do but I do think that as the original ripped version works on a pc with TMT3 and the bd-25 doesn't that something is slightly wrong.

Furiousflea
15th August 2009, 00:22
You're quite right that does work on the Sony and therefore it'll do but I do think that as the original ripped version works on a pc with TMT3 and the bd-25 doesn't that something is slightly wrong.

Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm only saying it to be sure that you're reporting a genuine bug

My suspicion is that you have downloaded the "original" and and mounted that as an ISO on your hard drive and run it on TMT3 and it works with the PiP audio intact (as it should). However you have only tried the ISO on your standalone after running it through BDRB and burning to BD25 and playing that on your standalone...Thereby experiencing the missing audio that happens on the Sony bluray players unless you have the audio output set to "Mix" in the setup menu.

Thus, jumping to the conclusion that the original wouldn't do this because it doesn't with TMT3 having never actually tested the original ISO with the Sony standalone since you don't have a BD50 disc.

Sorry dude for assuming this, but it's defo a likely scenario for some people ain't making a judgment on morals or anything here.

GaPony
15th August 2009, 06:39
How does the original Blu-Ray disc act on the SAP. You should be comparing the BD-RB copy to the original disc, not to the ripped file playing on TMT.

Lif3styl3
15th August 2009, 11:43
Hi,

tried reencoding DER_VORLESER, but i'am getting the message reencoding failed every time i tried it.

-----------------------
[10:56:54] BD Rebuilder v0.28.03 (beta)
- Source: DER_VORLESER
- Input BD size: 27,68 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:04:14.688]
- Target BD size: 21,92 GB
- MOVIE-ONLY mode enabled
- SHUTDOWN at completion enabled
[10:56:55] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [10:56:55] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00000]
- [11:07:02] Reencoding: VID_00000 (1 of 1)
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Encode failed. Retrying.
- Reached retry limit. Aborting.
[11:10:19] - Failed video encode, aborted


[Status]
LABEL=DER_VORLESER
VERSION=v0.28.03 (beta)
SOURCE_SIZE=29724641280
SOURCE_VIDEO_SIZE=29724641280
TARGET_SIZE=23540531200
REDUCTION=.791953415963982
RESIZE_1080=0
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=ger;
SUBS_TO_KEEP=all
BACKUP_MODE=1
QUICK=0
ENCODE_STEP=1
[00000]
AUDIO=000
PGS=1
M2TS_TARGET=23540531200
RATE=23450


I'am using windows 7 as Operating System. It's the real Version which is available at MSDNAA since last week. So it's an original licended version and no beta or rc.

Other movies worked fine,....

Any ideas ?

DK
15th August 2009, 12:11
Same title, different settings, no problems

-----------------------
[22:51:50] BD Rebuilder v0.27.01 (beta)
- Source: DER_VORLESER
- Input BD size: 29,62 GB
- Approximate total content: [02:04:14.697]
- Target BD size: 7,72 GB
- MOVIE-ONLY mode enabled
- Resuming from previously started job.
[22:51:52] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [22:51:52] Reencoding: VID_00005 (1 of 1)
[12:13:01]PHASE ONE complete
[12:13:01]PHASE TWO - Rebuild Started
- [12:13:01] Rebuilding BD file Structure
[12:22:02] - Encode and Rebuild complete
- WORKFILES folder removed.
[12:22:02]JOB: DER_VORLESER finished.


[Status]
LABEL=DER_VORLESER
VERSION=v0.27.01 (beta)
SOURCE_SIZE=31802757120
SOURCE_VIDEO_SIZE=31802757120
TARGET_SIZE=8294236160
REDUCTION=.260802424415711
RESIZE_1080=0
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=deu;eng;
SUBS_TO_KEEP=deu;eng;
BACKUP_MODE=1
QUICK=0
ENCODE_STEP=0
REBUILD_COMPLETE=1
COMPLETED=1
[00005]
AUDIO=1100
PGS=1
M2TS_TARGET=8294236160
RATE=7240
NSIZE=7093045248
FLINK=0
MLINK=0

jdobbs
15th August 2009, 13:14
Hi,

tried reencoding DER_VORLESER, but i'am getting the message reencoding failed every time i tried it.







I'am using windows 7 as Operating System. It's the real Version which is available at MSDNAA since last week. So it's an original licended version and no beta or rc.

Other movies worked fine,....

Any ideas ? BD-RB does not currently support Windows 7 (which isn't scheduled to be released until October 22nd). It has been reported to work, but that O/S still has bugs that are being worked.

BTW... if it were the "real" verstion and not a beta or rc, Microsoft would have it on the shelves already. They don't keep a completed product in their development shop for two months awaiting release... more typically they release it before its ready and clean it up afterward. JMHO

Lif3styl3
15th August 2009, 15:13
Hi Jdobbs,

i think you arent't informed correctly. Microsoft has launched a community for universitys a few years ago. There are all microsoft products available for free with licence keys which are downloaded directly via microsoft servers.

The public production for windows 7 and win 2008 r2 was started 3 weeks ago, and since last week microsoft has published the final version for students in their msdnaa community.

Thats the link to our university:
Our MSdnAA (http://msdn40.e-academy.com/elms/Storefront/Storefront.aspx?campus=lah_wirtsch)

Ok,...
Then i will try reencoding this movie on my laptop using win xp.

Furiousflea
15th August 2009, 15:17
BD-RB does not currently support Windows 7 (which isn't scheduled to be released until October 22nd). It has been reported to work, but that O/S still has bugs that are being worked.

BTW... if it were the "real" verstion and not a beta or rc, Microsoft would have it on the shelves already. They don't keep a completed product in their development shop for two months awaiting release... more typically they release it before its ready and clean it up afterward. JMHO

It is the RTM version been available for the past couple of weeks. Similar to the cracked Vista release where a bios emulator is used to maintain activation with an OEM volume license key from that bios manufacturer. Ummm anyways :)

jdobbs
15th August 2009, 15:18
Hi Jdobbs,

i think you arent't informed correctly. Microsoft has launched a community for universitys a few years ago. There are all microsoft products available for free with licence keys which are downloaded directly via microsoft servers.

The public production for windows 7 and win 2008 r2 was started 3 weeks ago, and since last week microsoft has published the final version for students in their msdnaa community.

Thats the link to your university:
Our MSdnAA (http://msdn40.e-academy.com/elms/Storefront/Storefront.aspx?campus=lah_wirtsch)

Ok,...
Then i will try reencoding this movie on my laptop using win xp. Just for the record. It is Microsoft's job to make sure that their Operating System remains compatible with the standards they themselves developed -- not the other way around. If there is an issue with software running on Windows 7 -- they should fix Windows 7, not expect 100,000 software developers to adapt to their poor planning and configuration control. Again JMHO.

The release date I quoted is directly from the Microsoft 7 site. If they're wrong then... well I guess that wouldn't surprise me either.

Frankly I'm tired of having to clean up their mess every two years or so.

Furiousflea
15th August 2009, 15:21
Hi Jdobbs,

i think you arent't informed correctly. Microsoft has launched a community for universitys a few years ago. There are all microsoft products available for free with licence keys which are downloaded directly via microsoft servers.

The public production for windows 7 and win 2008 r2 was started 3 weeks ago, and since last week microsoft has published the final version for students in their msdnaa community.

Thats the link to our university:
Our MSdnAA (http://msdn40.e-academy.com/elms/Storefront/Storefront.aspx?campus=lah_wirtsch)

Ok,...
Then i will try reencoding this movie on my laptop using win xp.

You will have problems encoding VC1 material in Windows 7 unless you do some registry editing? Is that m2ts that is failing encoded in VC1? Were the other successful discs encoded in VC1? I'm using an evaluation RTM version of Windows 7 and have done a good 10-15 discs with no problem after setting the registry correctly.

jdobbs
15th August 2009, 15:30
You will have problems encoding VC1 material in Windows 7 unless you do some registry editing? Is that m2ts that is failing encoded in VC1? Were the other successful discs encoded in VC1? I'm using an evaluation RTM version of Windows 7 and have done a good 10-15 discs with no problem after setting the registry correctly. I guess I'm going to have to make BD-RB look at those registry settings and change them when is sees Windows 7 so their Operating System remains consistent with it's previous version. Otherwise I'll keep getting bug reports for Microsoft's FU. I was kinda' hoping they'd correct that when they get to a final release.

If I sound pissed at MS its because I am. I got an automatic Windows Update for Vista yesterday that screwed my system up, rearranged my desktop, and reset my video to the wrong resolution. So I won't be saying anything nice about them for a while. Buncha' Dicks. :)

Lif3styl3
15th August 2009, 15:31
hi,

you 're right its my first disc in vc1 since i'am using windows 7

which value has to be changed ??

Lif3styl3
15th August 2009, 15:35
jdobbs, you are right about the release date.
Since Windows Vista Microsoft do a pre Release for all msdnaa users after the final version started to be produced.

And your opinion about microsofts behaviour, regarding ignoring there own standards is also right.

I'am programmer too.

by the way for me the problem regarding hd tracks are reencoded to dolby digital tracks isn't solved.
In my case bd rebuilder has got the hd soundfiles in his working directory, but did't use them.

So i have got the oppertunity to change this by myself, but it wouldn't be nicer bd-rebuilder would do the job for me.
I've got this problem since winxp in all of your versions which supported keep hd audio.

jdobbs
15th August 2009, 15:44
hi,

you 're right its my first disc in vc1 since i'am using windows 7

which value has to be changed ??I think it's in this thread (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=146924). But I don't have Windows 7, so I can't really say what works and what doesn't.

jdobbs
15th August 2009, 15:54
jdobbs, you are right about the release date.
Since Windows Vista Microsoft do a pre Release for all msdnaa users after the final version started to be produced.

And your opinion about microsofts behaviour, regarding ignoring there own standards is also right.

I'am programmer too.

by the way for me the problem regarding hd tracks are reencoded to dolby digital tracks isn't solved.
In my case bd rebuilder has got the hd soundfiles in his working directory, but did't use them.

So i have got the oppertunity to change this by myself, but it wouldn't be nicer bd-rebuilder would do the job for me.
I've got this problem since winxp in all of your versions which supported keep hd audio. I don't think I understand. You are selecting to keep HD but it is still being reencoded to AC3? If so, please post your BDREBUILDER.INI file so I can see your settings.

Lif3styl3
15th August 2009, 16:02
I think it's in this thread (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=146924). But I don't have Windows 7, so I can't really say what works and what doesn't.


i have found this thread by myself. Nevertheless thanks.
I give it a try.

Lif3styl3
15th August 2009, 16:08
I don't think I understand. You are selecting to keep HD but it is still being reencoded to AC3? If so, please post your BDREBUILDER.INI file so I can see your settings.

here's my ini file

[Options]
RESIZE=0
MODE=1
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=ger;
SUBS_TO_KEEP=all
COLOR_BOOST=0
RESIZE_1080=0
DTS_REENCODE=0
AC3_REENCODE=0
AC3_640=1
KEEP_HD_AUDIO=1
AVCHD=0
REMOVE_WORKFILES=0
AUDIO_TRACK_LIMIT=1
SUBTITLE_TRACK_LIMIT=1
CUSTOM_TARGET_SIZE=22450
TARGET_SIZE=22450
[Paths]
SOURCE_PATH=C:\USERS\LIFESTYLE\DOCUMENTS\DVDFAB\ISO\DER_VORLESER\
WORKING_PATH=C:\USERS\LIFESTYLE\DESKTOP\DER_VORLESER\

Using the same configuration for every BluRay.
The target_size is reduced by 1Gb, because the hd audio doesn't fit, wehen bd rebuilder has switched to dolby digital.

The Result of ever bd rb disc is, that my hd data is lost, but hd data is still availabe in the workingfile, which i'am using to create a blu ray with hd audio.

After reencoding of DER_VORLESER i could post the newest results.

Lif3styl3
15th August 2009, 16:15
ok,...

after changing the registry and editing the vc1 encoder the reencoding of the vorleser is still running.
So it seems to be working.

Furiousflea
15th August 2009, 17:15
For anyone still having problems with Windows 7 VC1 encoding...

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1283290#post1283290

Do that and it will work, follow the link in his step by step guide. It's pretty simple really. I've got everything working same as Vista by doing that and then even getting interlaced hybrid VC1 working by having TMT2 and the VC1 Tweaker installed...

It's not complicated but might take a few times to get it working, for me I wasn't sure which version of the tweaker to install. Also note that TMT2 itself doesn't actually work in Windows 7 but the decoding engine does work. (which is used by BDRB once you have set it to use the TMT2 decoding for VC1 for those interested)

Sharc
15th August 2009, 17:59
@jdobbs
From the discussion going on here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=148826), I wonder if DB-RB should set --level 4.0 for best blu-ray compliance, because x.264 doesn't use slices.
Secondly, is --nal-hrd set by tsmuxer?

jdobbs
15th August 2009, 19:52
@jdobbs
From the discussion going on here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=148826), I wonder if DB-RB should set --level 4.0 for best blu-ray compliance, because x.264 doesn't use slices.
Secondly, is --nal-hrd set by tsmuxer? I'll check out the link, but I've been involved in similar discussions before. Frankly I think its much ado about nothing. If you set to 4.0 you're also limiting other parts of the encode (like bitrate). Level 4.1 is what Blu-ray intended, but 4.0 works. I may set it if I ever hear of problems that appear to be related.

nal-hrd is set by TSMUXER, so you don't have to worry about it in X264. If/when I finish my own muxer module it will do it as well.

leChameleon
15th August 2009, 21:17
Furiousflea and jdobbs, Are either of you running a Intel i7 940 on a x58 architecture? Or is anyone else here running this architecture?

Capsbackup
15th August 2009, 21:55
Furiousflea and jdobbs, Are either of you running a Intel i7 940 on a x58 architecture? Or is anyone else here running this architecture?

I7 920, 2.67GHz, x58, Asus P6T Deluxe, 3 GB triple channel memory(1333), 1000watt PSU, XP Pro SP3.
Very pleased, no stability issues. Fast.

Adbear
15th August 2009, 22:28
I've had no issues on 3 systems running 920's with 6GB ram and Vista 64, my issues have only been on Dual Xeon i7 systems

Lif3styl3
16th August 2009, 09:13
Hi Jdobbs, i've got the same Problem with der_voleser. Every track was reencoded to Dolby Digital, even the normal DTS tracks.

Heres the mux_movie_only.meta where you will see the reencodinh to AC3:

MUXOPT --no-pcr-on-video-pid --new-audio-pes --avchd --vbr --custom-chapters=00:00:00.000;00:06:52.912;00:16:16.308;00:22:53.455;00:27:38.656;00:37:13.689;00:46:02.468;01:04:15.393;01:09:16.443;01:18:17.359;01:25:33.169;01:34:09.644;01:41:52.731;01:53:34.557;02:04:14.447 --vbv-len=500
V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC, "C:\USERS\LIFESTYLE\DESKTOP\DER_VORLESER\WORKFILES\VID_00005.AVS.MKV", fps=23.976, track=1, insertSEI, contSPS
A_AC3, "C:\USERS\LIFESTYLE\DESKTOP\DER_VORLESER\WORKFILES\AUD_00005_4352.AC3", lang=deu
A_AC3, "C:\USERS\LIFESTYLE\DESKTOP\DER_VORLESER\WORKFILES\AUD_00005_4354.AC3", lang=deu
A_AC3, "C:\USERS\LIFESTYLE\DESKTOP\DER_VORLESER\WORKFILES\AUD_00005_4355.AC3", lang=deu
S_HDMV/PGS, "C:\USERS\LIFESTYLE\DESKTOP\DER_VORLESER\WORKFILES\00005.track_4608.SUP",fps=23.976,lang=deu

Category 5
16th August 2009, 11:54
The latest version from the first page is giving me a "expired - try newer version" message. PC date and time are correct and there is no newer version so what gives?

Furiousflea
16th August 2009, 13:20
Furiousflea and jdobbs, Are either of you running a Intel i7 940 on a x58 architecture? Or is anyone else here running this architecture?

Well I got a 920\x58 based motherboard at 4.1Ghz. All i7 chips are the same basically.

jdobbs
16th August 2009, 13:28
The latest version from the first page is giving me a "expired - try newer version" message. PC date and time are correct and there is no newer version so what gives? The one on the first page doesn't expire for over a a month from now... and it's running right now on my system. I think you're mistaken. Are you sure you're pointing to that version?

If the file has been modified/hacked in any way it might also cause that message. I'd suggest you do a virus scan on your system and then download again.

GaPony
16th August 2009, 15:29
His shortcut is probably aimed at an older version. I've done that several times. :)