View Full Version : RipBot264 v1.18.3 - Simple and easy to use GUI -> IPOD . PSP . CONSOLES . BLURAY
topsham
21st August 2008, 22:27
I don't think anyone has yet built a x64 bit version of x264 I know ffdshow has x64 bit builds of there own codecs and filters but beyond that not much has come out for x64 on the codec end...
Ripbot264 currently as it is works on Vista x64 and it uses the 32bit x264 exe...
If your having problems then maybe post a log so the developer can help you...Thank you. Ripbot is working OK but I'd seen references on Google to a 64 bit version and was hoping for a speed increase.
poisondeathray
21st August 2008, 22:31
Thank you. Ripbot is working OK but I'd seen references on Google to a 64 bit version and was hoping for a speed increase.
You might get a speed increase by using the old 64-bit version, but you lose all the quality enhancements inplemented in the 32-bit version over the last while
Ajax_Undone
22nd August 2008, 00:19
I have most of the code that I used to build the last installer set some is garbled and needs re written so I am going to take this opportunity to build the new installer in inno...
Still banking on a 2.0 release but know the latest installer has an update app so once a new version is released you can just update with no problem...
b@nned
22nd August 2008, 04:22
i am having a problem i hope you guys can help me with...
I ripped entourage: season 1 episode 1 and added it to ripbot and tried to convert it but it comes out like this:
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/ge0rgieee/snapshot20080821231741.jpg
this does not happen with other dvds... what should I do to fix this?
Ajax_Undone
22nd August 2008, 05:06
Its called combing
use deinterlace and decimate to fix it... The decimation will keep audio aligned
It happens in interlaced films not all films are interlaced some are progressive...
Read this it gives really helpful info... http://www.digital-digest.com/nickyguides/interlace.htm
b@nned
22nd August 2008, 05:24
Its called combing
use deinterlace and decimate to fix it... The decimation will keep audio aligned
which one should I pick?
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/ge0rgieee/01-3.jpg
Ajax_Undone
22nd August 2008, 05:34
I usually choose Top Feild 29.97 It really depends on where it starts top or bottom in the pic it looks as if it starts on top so choose top first... Also on the next page select decimate to keep the audio in sync
I also use auto crop so as not to have any residual black lines that take up space in size as well as space in screen
illestdomer2005
22nd August 2008, 06:29
^ it shouldn't take 3 hours but i can see a slight issue which may have a considerable effect here.
you have 1 hard drive.
and yes, it does demux before you can continue to queue.
Pardon my ignorance, but what difference does a single hard drive make? I guess I could understand how the RPMs or cache might have an effect on the time it takes, but not having multiple HDDs in RAID?
I mean, I can use TSMuxer to parse MUCH quicker than RipBot seems to do, and I figured that was one of the tools that the GUI used. I'm currently using XVID4PSP just because it's much easier for me to use, gives me pretty good results, and just seems to jive with my hardware best lol
But no other ideas why it takes RipBot so long? I found that it also took MEGui a really long time (over an hour) to "analyse" my input before I finally got too impatient to wait any longer.
If this really IS a hard drive issue, I might have to look into adding another one or two!
aeroliteflyer
22nd August 2008, 12:25
I have ripbot 1.9.2, used it with no problems. I have many DVD's i ripped to MPEG 2 for my computer, and i use ripbot to conver to h.264, no problems. On all the movies, everyone on the main screen says 29.97, so i assume that means interlaced, so i select deinterlace and tdecimate, no problems. audio sync is also perfect. I started using 1.10.4, and some of the movies are now detect as 23.976, which i assume is progressive. so now the option to deinterlace and tdecimate are gone. but after i convert the movies, the audio is slightly out of sync, which i assume is due to the tdecimate/deinterlace issue. But i go back and use 1.9.2 and everything is fine there? I obviously would like to use the later versions, but not sure what i am doing wrong, everything to this point has been pretty straight forward. Thanks for any info..
chris
aeroliteflyer
22nd August 2008, 12:34
Ok update, sorry for the wrong info, i am using 1.10.5 as the new version and 1.9.2
Chris
dirk362
22nd August 2008, 14:17
Is there any way to add extra x264 command line switches into the .ini files ? When you customise a profile within the interface, only a small set of parameters are there. This is entirely correct for everyday use as we're trying to have a simple easy to use system.
There are however a couple of parameters I'd really like to use into the ini file. I can of course edit the two batch files for the two passes to add these, but its a pain to remember, and also you have to recognise the differences between pass1 and pass2 in terms of parameters to pass.
I don't want to complicate the product as I find its straight-forward approach refreshing when you compare to other options out there. But then again, its always nice to be able to put the odd extra tweak in via some form of advanced settings...
duramaximus
22nd August 2008, 20:14
Is it possible to keep the HD audio track in a Bluray and still re-encode the video?
I would like to shrink down all my Blurays keeping the main video file, english subtitle and the best audio track in HD form.
My future goal is to back up all my Blurays to BD-25 someday.
I am not sure if ripbot can achieve this all by itself or is other software required.
Thanks :)
duramaximus
22nd August 2008, 21:51
Ok, upon further reading of the forums I have a couple more questions about lossless audio.
COPY STREAM option in audio will convert to FLAC.
Is FLAC the same as TrueHD and DTS-HD?
Thanks
jtheripper
23rd August 2008, 08:05
I have backed up a couple of Blurays keeping the main movie and the lossless audio only. True that copy stream converts lossless audio but that does not matter. You can use TSMUXer after you encode the movie in ripbot. First I rip the bluray disc to my HD and then use tsmuxer to select only the main movie and lossless audio from the m2ts file. Then I demux them. , if less then 22.5GB total then you dont need to do anything else except mux them together. If it is over that (which most dual layer BD are that have lossless audio) then you need to shrink the size in ripbot. In tsmuxer you select the m2ts file you created in ripbot then uncheck the audio track and check the h.264 track . Next you open the original m2ts bluray file in tsmuxer and uncheck the h.264 file and check the lossless audio file. Then mux the 2 selected files into bluray. Works great. only problem is that it seems that there is some video stuttering sometimes in high action scenes on the ripbot encode. Probably the parameters the program uses for the encode.
hdpete
23rd August 2008, 08:41
Is it possible to keep the HD audio track in a Bluray and still re-encode the video?
I would like to shrink down all my Blurays keeping the main video file, english subtitle and the best audio track in HD form.
My future goal is to back up all my Blurays to BD-25 someday.
I am not sure if ripbot can achieve this all by itself or is other software required.
Thanks :)
I agree, this is what I want but unfortunately Audio Copy Stream doesn't mean that for DD+, DTS HD, TRUEHD or LPCM, they all get converted to FLAC. It would be nice to have the option of leaving them intact and have a Lock Size for a 25gb BD-R. Instead I'm doing the same as jtheripper, doing a video only shrink where necessary using RipBot and using TSMuxer to add the HD audio after. Not too much of a problem but just takes more time and a bit of guess work to make sure your finished file size isn't too big!
Auzentech are soon bringing out a soundcard which links to you graphics card and will then output a video/audio signal via HDMI. This will have the capability to stream HD Audio from your PC to a suitable amp. Having just bought an Onkyo TX-NR905, I can't wait.
duramaximus
23rd August 2008, 14:42
I have backed up a couple of Blurays keeping the main movie and the lossless audio only. True that copy stream converts lossless audio but that does not matter. You can use TSMUXer after you encode the movie in ripbot. First I rip the bluray disc to my HD and then use tsmuxer to select only the main movie and lossless audio from the m2ts file. Then I demux them. , if less then 22.5GB total then you dont need to do anything else except mux them together. If it is over that (which most dual layer BD are that have lossless audio) then you need to shrink the size in ripbot. In tsmuxer you select the m2ts file you created in ripbot then uncheck the audio track and check the h.264 track . Next you open the original m2ts bluray file in tsmuxer and uncheck the h.264 file and check the lossless audio file. Then mux the 2 selected files into bluray. Works great. only problem is that it seems that there is some video stuttering sometimes in high action scenes on the ripbot encode. Probably the parameters the program uses for the encode.
Holy crapper batman! I didn't know you could do that.
Thanks, I am trying it out as we speak.
duramaximus
23rd August 2008, 15:15
I have backed up a couple of Blurays keeping the main movie and the lossless audio only. True that copy stream converts lossless audio but that does not matter. You can use TSMUXer after you encode the movie in ripbot. First I rip the bluray disc to my HD and then use tsmuxer to select only the main movie and lossless audio from the m2ts file. Then I demux them. , if less then 22.5GB total then you dont need to do anything else except mux them together. If it is over that (which most dual layer BD are that have lossless audio) then you need to shrink the size in ripbot. In tsmuxer you select the m2ts file you created in ripbot then uncheck the audio track and check the h.264 track . Next you open the original m2ts bluray file in tsmuxer and uncheck the h.264 file and check the lossless audio file. Then mux the 2 selected files into bluray. Works great. only problem is that it seems that there is some video stuttering sometimes in high action scenes on the ripbot encode. Probably the parameters the program uses for the encode.
OK, let me see if I heard you correctly.
Tools needed.....
Ripbot264
tsMuxeR
1. Open movie in tsMuxeR and check main movie, HD audio and english and click demux.
2. After demuxing, check to see if the files all add up to 22.5GB or less.
3. If files above are 22.5GB or less use Imgburn (UDF2.5) and create an image to burn.
4. If files above are 22.5 or greater then use Ripbot to re-encode m2ts file demuxed by tsMuxeR.
5. Open Ripbot264 and select m2ts and ac3 file demuxed by tsMuxeR, re-encode file's to desired size.
6. Open tsMuxeR and select the m2ts file you created in ripbot then uncheck the audio track and check the h.264 track.
7. Open the original m2ts bluray file in tsmuxer and uncheck the h.264 file and check the lossless audio file.
8. Then mux the 2 selected files into bluray.
Does that sound correct?
dirk362
23rd August 2008, 15:21
In job1_EncodeVideoPass1.cmd settings are
--subme 2
--me dia
--analyse none
In job1_EncodeVideoPass2.cmd settings are the final output of
--subme 6 (or whatever is set in profile)
--me umh (or whatver is set in profile)
--analyse all
I appreciate there is some evidence that a speedy first-pass using no analysis and dia motion will not dramatically affect quality. But for those of us striving (with HD-DVD/BluRay source) for quality, is there any benefit in me editing the files before running them ?
Ajax_Undone
23rd August 2008, 15:47
In job1_EncodeVideoPass1.cmd settings are
--subme 2
--me dia
--analyse none
In job1_EncodeVideoPass2.cmd settings are the final output of
--subme 6 (or whatever is set in profile)
--me umh (or whatver is set in profile)
--analyse all
I appreciate there is some evidence that a speedy first-pass using no analysis and dia motion will not dramatically affect quality. But for those of us striving (with HD-DVD/BluRay source) for quality, is there any benefit in me editing the files before running them ?
If you feel that the presets are not satisfactory you can edit them and run them separate from ripbot or write a new ini file that holds your specific presets... As far as quality is concerned if you want a lot of quality CQ22 is pretty good at maintaining as much as possible with out a overly huge file.
If your doing bitrate which it looks like you are. Most of the quality is spread about by the amount of bits selected and can result in poor or great quality dependent on source and amount of bits selected vs length of Video. Video encoding is a variable based on length and source that is why vbr encoding exists it allows a quantisizer value to use a variable instruction set to measure quality not bitrate.
A speedie first pass just breaks down the video really fast and a lot of bits of information can be lost in the process. you might as well upscale the DVD forum and encode using 1 pass. You'd get about the same quality...
Fast is good if you don't care for quality but it defeats the purpose of using HD source... If you give the processor the time to work on the file using a slow first pass you will retain a lot of the quality and the second pass can do the same...
hdpete
23rd August 2008, 18:39
OK, let me see if I heard you correctly.
Tools needed.....
Ripbot264
tsMuxeR
1. Open movie in tsMuxeR and check main movie, HD audio and english and click demux.
2. After demuxing, check to see if the files all add up to 22.5GB or less.
3. If files above are 22.5GB or less use Imgburn (UDF2.5) and create an image to burn.
4. If files above are 22.5 or greater then use Ripbot to re-encode m2ts file demuxed by tsMuxeR.
5. Open Ripbot264 and select m2ts and ac3 file demuxed by tsMuxeR, re-encode file's to desired size.
6. Open tsMuxeR and select the m2ts file you created in ripbot then uncheck the audio track and check the h.264 track.
7. Open the original m2ts bluray file in tsmuxer and uncheck the h.264 file and check the lossless audio file.
8. Then mux the 2 selected files into bluray.
Does that sound correct?
Assuming you can't get the size below 22.5gb by just re-muxing using TSMuxer....
1. Select the demux option in TSMuxer and then tick any of the audio and subtitle streams you want to keep for your BD-25 disc. This is really just to find out what their total size is.
2. Import the main movie M2TS file into Ripbot and select NO AUDIO and NO SUBTITLES.
3. Re-encode the video only in Ripbot using the Blu-Ray option, 2-pass. Subtract the total size of the demuxed audio and subtitle stream(s) you want to keep from 22500mb (I think 23000mb should be OK, but stick to 22500mb to be on the safe side) to give you the lock size which you can overtype the presets, this should then mean that the resulting video size will be small enough to allow the addition of your demuxed audio later.
4. In properties, do automatic crop and then select Full HD in resize.
5. Add the Ripbot re-encoded blu-ray movie stream to TSMuxer and then add the earlier demuxed audio/subtitle file(s), and mux together using the Blu-Ray option.
If you did your maths right you'll have a blu-ray with original audio intact and a slightly reduced video that'll fit on a BD-25.
duramaximus
23rd August 2008, 21:05
Assuming you can't get the size below 22.5gb by just re-muxing using TSMuxer....
1. Select the demux option in TSMuxer and then tick any of the audio and subtitle streams you want to keep for your BD-25 disc. This is really just to find out what their total size is.
2. Import the main movie M2TS file into Ripbot and select NO AUDIO and NO SUBTITLES.
3. Re-encode the video only in Ripbot using the Blu-Ray option, 2-pass. Subtract the total size of the demuxed audio and subtitle stream(s) you want to keep from 22500mb (I think 23000mb should be OK, but stick to 22500mb to be on the safe side) to give you the lock size which you can overtype the presets, this should then mean that the resulting video size will be small enough to allow the addition of your demuxed audio later.
4. In properties, do automatic crop and then select Full HD in resize.
5. Add the Ripbot re-encoded blu-ray movie stream to TSMuxer and then add the earlier demuxed audio/subtitle file(s), and mux together using the Blu-Ray option.
If you did your maths right you'll have a blu-ray with original audio intact and a slightly reduced video that'll fit on a BD-25.
Why do you do an automatic crop in step 4?
Isnt the Bluray already in Full HD?
~bT~
23rd August 2008, 22:07
^ ignore step 4
duramaximus
23rd August 2008, 23:02
Oooops, I forgot about BDedit.
How does this sound so far?
Tools needed.....
Ripbot264
tsMuxeR
BDedit
1. Determine if Bluray main movie is one file or several. If movie is several files use BDedit to find play list.
2. Open movie or play list in tsMuxeR and check main movie, HD audio and english and click demux.
3. After demuxing, check to see if the files all add up to 22.5GB or less.
4. If files above are 22.5GB or less use Imgburn (UDF2.5) and create an image to burn.
5. If files above are 22.5GB or greater then use Ripbot to re-encode m2ts file demuxed by tsMuxeR.
6. Open Ripbot264 and import m2ts file (No Audio, No Subtitle) demuxed by tsMuxeR.
7. Re-encode m2ts file (Bluray, 2 Pass, 2250MB Lock Size minus HD Audio and Subtitle size from step 1.
8. Open tsMuxeR and select the m2ts file you created in ripbot (Steps 5 through 8) then uncheck the audio track and check the h.264 track.
9. Open the original m2ts bluray file in tsMuxeR (Step 1) and uncheck the h.264 file and check the lossless audio file.
10. Then mux the 2 selected files into bluray.
11. Use Imgburn (UDF2.5) and create an image to burn.
sethk
24th August 2008, 03:29
Hello - I apologize if this repeats an existing question, but I couldn't find an answer - every time I point the latest build of RibBot264 at any video file(s), it pauses for a minute with a demux message then pops up media player classic. Media Player Classic just says "opening..." and never does anything, although it is consuming about 25% CPU cycles.
I have the latest FFDShow build, latest AVISynth, clean Vista 32bit install. Any clues?
Ajax_Undone
24th August 2008, 05:35
Incorrectly ripped video... (ie still under DRM's crap spell)... What video is it???
hdpete
24th August 2008, 08:04
Why do you do an automatic crop in step 4?
Isnt the Bluray already in Full HD?
The automatic crop is so you're not wasting time encoding the black bars at the top and bottom of the picture, then by resizing, Ripbot puts the bars back to make the image 1920x1080.
IYG
24th August 2008, 09:08
I just checked out the new version and there is an option "denoise"
What is it?
dirk362
24th August 2008, 12:15
After performing dozens of tweaks across a range of parameters against a 10 second section of HD-DVD video, I've identified "my personal preference" for settings. I will perform a longer encode now with these to confirm they work across a range of video. Settings are:-
pass1.cmd
--pass 1 --bitrate 6424 --stats "job1.stats" --level 4.1 --sar 1:1 --aud --nal-hrd --vbv-bufsize 30000 --vbv-maxrate 30000 --filter 0,0 --bframes 16 --trellis 2 --no-fast-pskip --merange 64 --keyint 240 --min-keyint 24 --deadzone-inter 6 --deadzone-intra 4 --b-adapt 1 --b-pyramid --direct auto --subme 2 --analyse none --me dia --threads auto --thread-input --progress --no-psnr --no-ssim
pass2.cmd
--pass 2 --bitrate 6424 --stats "job1.stats" --level 4.1 --sar 1:1 --aud --nal-hrd --vbv-bufsize 30000 --vbv-maxrate 30000 --filter 0,0 --ref 5 --mixed-refs --bframes 16 --trellis 2 --no-fast-pskip --merange 64 --keyint 240 --min-keyint 24 --deadzone-inter 6 --deadzone-intra 4 --deblock 1:0:0 --psy-rd 1.000000 --b-adapt 1 --b-pyramid --b-rdo --bime --weightb --direct auto --subme 7 --analyse all --8x8dct --me umh --threads auto --thread-input --progress --no-psnr --no-ssim
There are some weird ones in here, but they do make a difference. Obviously bitrate is calculated by disc to fit to 8150.
bframes=16 - this just allows x264 to work upto the maximum. With adaptive B-frame decision on (the default behavior), it is safe to use higher values; the encoder will reduce the use of B-frames in scenes where they would hurt compression. The encoder rarely chooses to use more than 3 or 4 B-frames, but setting it to 3 as most people do only forces the encoder to not be able to flex this value as needed.
merange=64 - significantly improves ME by checking larger radius size (64 pixels), this being the most obvious setting to introduce quality over encoding time
trellis=2 - enabled on all mode decisions for RD quantization, and this needs to be set in both passes to ensure consistent behaviour and also to keep bitrate in line
deadzone-inter=6 ) I found using these two values instead of the default of 21,11 improves
deadzone-intra=4 ) quaility (to human eye) without the macroblocking that deblock 1:-1:-1 (or lower) can introduce
True, the above increases encode time by upto 30%, but when working to fixed size 2-pass as I am, I wanted to get the best I can into the 8150Mb, and as encodes run overnight, I'm not worried it takes a bit longer.
Yes, I'm sure that cq=22 could potentially get me an overall better quality encode, but the randomness of the final filesize isn't what I'm after. Otherwise with hard disk prices as they are, I'd just do 1:1 and mux only what I want to keep as others in this thread have recently been discussing.
I am now working out how to get these into a custom .ini file that gets accepted as, unless I'm doing something wrong, some settings are overwritten by an internal process within Ripbot264.
For those interested, the attached RAR file has the output of all the commands and a comparison from media-info of the two resultant encodes.
poisondeathray
24th August 2008, 15:06
I just checked out the new version and there is an option "denoise"
What is it?
You can look at the changes in the .avs script when selecting the option in the right window.
for denoise film selected:
FFT3DGPU(video,sigma=1.25).gradfun2db
You can google these filters if you want more specific info. There is a specific thread for each on Doom9. If you push the "preview script" button you can visually preview it
duramaximus
24th August 2008, 16:55
The automatic crop is so you're not wasting time encoding the black bars at the top and bottom of the picture, then by resizing, Ripbot puts the bars back to make the image 1920x1080.
OK, I did not know that.
Does this speed up the process at all?
hdpete
24th August 2008, 17:33
OK, I did not know that.
Does this speed up the process at all?
I can't say that I've noticed it, but it makes sense if you think about it. No sense in getting Ripbot to encode black bars which aren't part of the movie you're going to watch. By adding the Full HD option, the bars are put in automatically, I assume after encoding to make a Blu-Ray compliant 1080p video. Most video encoders give you the option to crop for the same reason, e.g. DIVX and Nero Recode.
duramaximus
24th August 2008, 17:54
I can't say that I've noticed it, but it makes sense if you think about it. No sense in getting Ripbot to encode black bars which aren't part of the movie you're going to watch. By adding the Full HD option, the bars are put in automatically, I assume after encoding to make a Blu-Ray compliant 1080p video. Most video encoders give you the option to crop for the same reason, e.g. DIVX and Nero Recode.
OK, i'll bite. I will try this out on my next project.
Thanks
dm1105
25th August 2008, 14:11
OK, i'll bite. I will try this out on my next project.
Thanks
If you don't mind brother, can you tell us here at the forum if this process will speed up the encoding process after you've applied these settings on your next project? Truly, I'm surprised this topic hasn't been mentioned yet.
I believe the reason people like you and I haven't used this feature is because perhaps we were afraid we would end up with an undesired aspect ratio i.e. where the movie seems to be strecthed vertically.
daWsOn_s
25th August 2008, 15:11
Hello,
I've upgraded to 1.50.5 from 1.8.x and now when I set a list of video to convert everytime it finishes one file it say in status "Muxing.." (anyway the file is already finished and ready to play) that lasts for ever. I have to abort and restart every file:confused:
is there anyway I can drag & drop or insert a lot of files together without choosing each one and setting the same global settings?
:confused:
hdpete
25th August 2008, 18:06
If you don't mind brother, can you tell us here at the forum if this process will speed up the encoding process after you've applied these settings on your next project? Truly, I'm surprised this topic hasn't been mentioned yet.
I believe the reason people like you and I haven't used this feature is because perhaps we were afraid we would end up with an undesired aspect ratio i.e. where the movie seems to be strecthed vertically.
It won't stretch the image, but be aware if you do this on a small clip of a film which is quite dark, the automatic setting might not pick up the difference between the black bars and the movie picture. It should normally be no more than about 140 on the top and bottom for a 2:40:1 movie. If you get any numbers to the left or right, I just manually put them back to zero, just crop the black bars at the top and bottom.
Bootstrap
25th August 2008, 18:33
The automatic crop is so you're not wasting time encoding the black bars at the top and bottom of the picture, then by resizing, Ripbot puts the bars back to make the image 1920x1080.
No, it does not. It can add or remove borders BEFORE you encode by changing your AVS-script. How would you ever do this after you encoded a movie, that's not possible. So, since your original has already got the propper resolution you should ignore step 4.
Bootstrap
25th August 2008, 18:36
ATAK, great program thanks for your hard work on it.
I think there is still a bug in the ass=>srt conversion. The markers are indeed gone but the marker for a new line is not converted to an actual new line in the srt. Lines tend to become too large because of this.
riptorn
25th August 2008, 21:40
I am having issues with crashing; vista seems to bluescreen mid way through the conversion... any ideas? event logs dont tell me much.
Bigmango
25th August 2008, 22:41
How can I update the version of x264 ripbot uses?
Everytime I try to replace the x264.exe (in the tools directory) (today I tried version 949, but I have also tried with other versions) with the latest version of the x264.exe from megui it doesn't work. When I then click on "start" to start encoding a queued project it immediately tells me "All Jobs finished" without encoding anything.
Why doesn't it work and where can I get an updated x264.exe that is working with ripbot?
Thanks
~bT~
25th August 2008, 23:02
^ r941 is the only one from the updates which works for me..
~bT~
25th August 2008, 23:06
No, it does not. It can add or remove borders BEFORE you encode by changing your AVS-script. How would you ever do this after you encoded a movie, that's not possible. So, since your original has already got the propper resolution you should ignore step 4.
not forgetting that resizing will slow the encode down and also in this case is an unnecessary step :)
prettyboy85712
26th August 2008, 07:07
Looking for some direction. I'm attempting to backup a SD-DVD series to Blu-ray disc (BD5). Each disc has 4 episodes, each with subtitles. If I encode each episode as a separate job in the que, choose Blu-ray disc option and use same output path will the resulting BD5 have all 4 episodes? Or, would each job overwrite the previous resulting in just the fourth episode being on the disc?
I'm in the process of testing this, but my machine is slow by today's standards and will take most of the night/day to get the results.
Circuit
27th August 2008, 00:43
Hi all Ive just started to use Ribot and have done one of my HDDVD's Waterworld and everything worked great :)
But I'm now trying to do MI3 and keep getting a small MKV file, I'm trying to convert to 720P and get a file just over 3.5 gig and bitrate is quite small too.
Is there a way that I can adjust the bitrate to a minimum or to get a desired file size?
Ive looked but can't find any obvious adjusment.
Thanks
Edit " After the file was demuxed I started out with a 17gig video file and 3.5gig flac file, have set to 720P and Ac3 640
juGGaKNot
27th August 2008, 09:19
Just got it for some tests
and i must say its GREAT
keep up the good work!
Atak_Snajpera
27th August 2008, 10:15
Ive looked but can't find any obvious adjusment.
You have not looked well. Keep looking!
veggav
27th August 2008, 11:35
Hi,
I have a mkv that is 1280x688 and I want it to be 1280x720 but still be a mkv.
I'm using addborders command on the avisynth scrypt, but it's taking a lot! to finish the work.
How can I add the borders fast ?
Atak_Snajpera
27th August 2008, 11:44
Why do you add borders???? Why do you download rips from internet???
veggav
27th August 2008, 15:29
Because I live in Brazil and a blu-ray here cost 100 usd.
Because, there are movies that are not out in blu-ray like shawshack redenption, that you download a hdtv that is not 720p perfect.
I just want to add a couple of pixels up and down.
There is any way to that and fast ?
Atak_Snajpera
27th August 2008, 16:16
Because I live in Brazil and a blu-ray here cost 100 usd.
If you cannot afford it buy DVD instead. Nobody forces you to buy Blu-Rays!!!!
Bigmango
27th August 2008, 20:44
Hi,
How can I add the borders fast ?
To add borders you need to reencode. There's no way around this.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.