smartLabs tsMuxeR: Transport Stream muxer

[Glorioso]

Roman, i'm having a problem with subtitles. In some files, not all, the subtitles stop a some time in the file and dont reappear. I experienced this problem with multiAVCHD and them tried directly with tsMuseR and same problem. I get the subtitles for 1/3 of the movie then they dint show anymore. Anyone with this problem?

[deank]

Can you try again with this problematic file, but set CUT START and CUT END in seconds so tsMuxer/multiAVCHD will cut the movie 1 minute before subtitles start missing and cut end couple of minutes later?

[Glorioso]

Can you try again with this problematic file, but set CUT START and CUT END in seconds so tsMuxer/multiAVCHD will cut the movie 1 minute before subtitles start missing and cut end couple of minutes later?

Right now!!!

[jamos]

You are aware of the tsremux workaround for TrueHD, eh?

are your referring to converting to pcm..then yes.

[jamos]

It's a little known fact, but (as of somewhere December of last year?) the PS3 actually does support High @ 5.1 Profile now! Sony doesn't generally advertise such info, but it's true nonetheless.

Furthermore,

For 1080p content: reference frames should be < 5 (although 5 reportedly seems to work at times).
For 720p content: reference frames should be < 10 (haven't confirmed this, btw; I thought it was still at max 4).
All content: b-frames should be < 4.

Yes I agree its his ref frames being too high not the lvl that causes the issue. I played with a file recently and just converted it with ffmpeg and took off a ref frame at a time. once I got down to 4 it played on the ps3..but lost half of the video info of course. so the only solution was to reencode. and for 720 the ps3 can handle up to 9.

[Butterfly666]

Originally Posted by GreenOnyx
I received an error code 3 with the error below in the bottom output box. The box with the processing details didn't say anything abnormal. Has anyone seen this, or is there a way I can find out more info? It's dealing with a ripped blu-ray m2ts that I'm stripping everything out of. I'm using v1.8.8b.

"Bitstream exception. It does not have to be! Plase contact the application support team for more information."

hello I have the same problem with the film Troy, nobody has an answer?

Same problem here 2. Look the attachment

I get this error only when I mux it to bluray. For mts or ts it works fine

There is a way 2 get it work: Mux it first to TS and then the TS 2 Bluray output. The error is gone!

Reply if it's working for you...

[kolak]

:rolleyes:Yes I agree its his ref frames being too high not the lvl that causes the issue. I played with a file recently and just converted it with ffmpeg and took off a ref frame at a time. once I got down to 4 it played on the ps3..but lost half of the video info of course. so the only solution was to reencode. and for 720 the ps3 can handle up to 9.

PS3 has to support 1080 with 4 reference frames with 4.1 level upt to 40Mbit and one secodn of GOP size maximum (or 2 seconds if bitarte is below 15Mbit). B frames, no more than 3. This is BD spec and PS3 will do this for 100%. It does more, but there is no official information how much more.
If you want to be sure about playback just keep BD spec.

Andrew

[Glorioso]

Can you try again with this problematic file, but set CUT START and CUT END in seconds so tsMuxer/multiAVCHD will cut the movie 1 minute before subtitles start missing and cut end couple of minutes later?
Didn't work.:mad:

[asarian]

PS3 has to support 1080 with 4 reference frames with 4.1 level up to 40Mbit and one second of GOP size maximum (or 2 seconds if bitarte is below 15Mbit). B frames, no more than 3. This is BD spec and PS3 will do this for 100%. It does more, but there is no official information how much more.
If you want to be sure about playback just keep BD spec.

While it's true that High @ 5.1 Profile isn't specifically mentioned somewhere (it seems Sony likes to brag more about Trophies and Photo Browser support, etc.), I wouldn't go so far as to say it's unofficial. Suddenly it was simpy supported (near the end of last year), much like streaming multi-channel LPCM one day simply arrived. But support for both was nonetheless deliberate and not half-baked: it simply works.

Bitrates, honestly, are a laugh, really, in that almost no manufacturer, including Sony, seems to care about how high you go with it. On High @ 4.1 Profile, the PS3 will handle well in excess of > 400Mbps (!), and I bet you're not even near pushing the envelope with that number. A high @ 4.1 Profile has an 'official' max of 62.5Mbps, btw.

[asarian]

You are aware of the tsremux workaround for TrueHD, eh?

Not to be unnecessarily rude, but isn't it time this longstanding bug got fixed?

[jamos]

Not to be unnecessarily rude, but isn't it time this longstanding bug got fixed?

Also I'm not clear on what he was saying about the tsremux workaround..if you extracting from the original m2ts then yes it may work but tsremux does not split files into 4 gig parts as far as I know. Which is what you need to create a AVCHD structure on a flash/harddrive.
If you have raw streams like I do (ie 720p reendcoded video) TSremux will not work with them unless they are in a container and the only way to put them into one is tsmuxer which breaks the True-HD. Can you elaborate Odin on how to do this?

[odin24]

Yeah, I was referring to an uncut TrueHD track... sorry for the confusion. I guess I should have read the post a little more carefully. :p

For all that is interested, I have recoded 1080p rips to DVD9 and kept the TrueHD in some cases. The best I have done so far is a 1hr50min movie with a 24bit TrueHD track. The video looks great. It's even better if the movie is shorter in length or has a 16 bit track. I have tested out on a PS3 and Sony BDP350, both playback fine.

Also, animation movies compress extremely well... I have kept a DTS HD-MA track, which are generally larger than TrueHD, and compressed to DVD9, results were flawless.

Figuring out the m2ts overhead is the tricky part, it's different than a typical AC3 or DTS track, I alway mux the THD or DTSHD track alone, that will give the exact overhead for the audio. The video overhead is generally 4% for a 2hr movie, maybe 3.5% for a 1hr45min or lower.

[jamos]

Yeah, I was referring to an uncut TrueHD track... sorry for the confusion. I guess I should have read the post a little more carefully. :p

For all that is interested, I have recoded 1080p rips to DVD9 and kept the TrueHD in some cases. The best I have done so far is a 1hr50min movie with a 24bit TrueHD track. The video looks great. It's even better if the movie is shorter in length or has a 16 bit track. I have tested out on a PS3 and Sony BDP350, both playback fine.

Also, animation movies compress extremely well... I have kept a DTS HD-MA track, which are generally larger than TrueHD, and compressed to DVD9, results were flawless.

Figuring out the m2ts overhead is the tricky part, it's different than a typical AC3 or DTS track, I alway mux the THD or DTSHD track alone, that will give the exact overhead for the audio. The video overhead is generally 4% for a 2hr movie, maybe 3.5% for a 1hr45min or lower.


So to get TRUE-HD to work you muxed the video with the true hd audio with tsmuxer into a m2ts file, then used tsremux to remux it into a BD structure? is that correct?

[Digi]

Yeah, I was referring to an uncut TrueHD track... sorry for the confusion. I guess I should have read the post a little more carefully. :p

For all that is interested, I have recoded 1080p rips to DVD9 and kept the TrueHD in some cases. The best I have done so far is a 1hr50min movie with a 24bit TrueHD track. The video looks great. It's even better if the movie is shorter in length or has a 16 bit track. I have tested out on a PS3 and Sony BDP350, both playback fine.

Also, animation movies compress extremely well... I have kept a DTS HD-MA track, which are generally larger than TrueHD, and compressed to DVD9, results were flawless.

Figuring out the m2ts overhead is the tricky part, it's different than a typical AC3 or DTS track, I alway mux the THD or DTSHD track alone, that will give the exact overhead for the audio. The video overhead is generally 4% for a 2hr movie, maybe 3.5% for a 1hr45min or lower.


I would love to know how you got a recoded 1080p with DolbyTrueHD to playback on the Sony S350 as i can only get legacy DTS and Dolby to playback, and as far as testing goes the S350 with firmware over 009 will not playback DTS through the HDMI.

Care to share your encoding methods:)

[odin24]

So to get TRUE-HD to work you muxed the video with the true hd audio with tsmuxer into a m2ts file, then used tsremux to remux it into a BD structure? is that correct?

Correct.


I would love to know how you got a recoded 1080p with DolbyTrueHD to playback on the Sony S350 as i can only get legacy DTS and Dolby to playback, and as far as testing goes the S350 with firmware over 009 will not playback DTS through the HDMI.

Care to share your encoding methods

Without going into extreme detail, recode as usual... just the m2ts overhead is astronomical compared to all other streams. I mux it alone to figure it out.

I tested TrueHD and DTS HD-MA on a DVD9 on a non-HDMI receiver hooked up through optical on a v009 unit. Legacy audio played for both formats.

[Digi]

Correct.




Without going into extreme detail, recode as usual... just the m2ts overhead is astronomical compared to all other streams. I mux it alone to figure it out.

I tested TrueHD and DTS HD-MA on a DVD9 on a non-HDMI receiver hooked up through optical on a v009 unit. Legacy audio played for both formats.

I see i think you will find that the S350 will not playback those full High Definition audio tracks at all via HDMI as i have done some testing with all available Hi-Def tracks and can only get the Legacy ones to play even through HDMI.

I would save space on your DVD9's and just allow room for thelegacy tracks as the HD audio tracks will never on this player. Infact as far as i know only the panasonic BD35/55 models will playback the full DTS-HD audio track in bitstream format through HDMI no other players will.

[odin24]

I see i think you will find that the S350 will not playback those full High Definition audio tracks at all via HDMI as i have done some testing with all available Hi-Def tracks and can only get the Legacy ones to play even through HDMI.

I would save space on your DVD9's and just allow room for thelegacy tracks as the HD audio tracks will never on this player. Infact as far as i know only the panasonic BD35/55 models will playback the full DTS-HD audio track in bitstream format through HDMI no other players will.

The BDP350 that I used is my inlaws, and they do not have an HD audio receiver. I hope to get a BDP350 in the near future so hopefully I can report back soon. My player is the PS3, it has no problems decoding TrueHD and DTS HD-MA tracks on DVD9.

[Digi]

The BDP350 that I used is my inlaws, and they do not have an HD audio receiver. I hope to get a BDP350 in the near future so hopefully I can report back soon. My player is the PS3, it has no problems decoding TrueHD and DTS HD-MA tracks on DVD9.

odin24 i do have the Denon 3808 HD audio receiver and i can tell you now none of the HD full bitrate audio tracks played back from the Sony S350 work through HDMI only Dolby digital @ 640kbps works if you have upgraded the firmware past .009, If not then DTS works as well through HDMI.

My S350 is on V.013 firmware and through Optical and Coaxial i can get DTS and DD but as said the full HD tracks through HDMI will not play. The only test that i have not done is to try a recoded BD25 disc and that is only because i do not have a burner.

The PS3 can play the Full HD audio as it internaly decodes it and outputs PCM but the PS3 cannot bitstream the HD Audio

[odin24]

Thanks, at least DTS @1536kb/s sends through optical with the latest FW.

[asarian]

Is roman76r actually still developing this app? If not, perhaps he'd be willing to make it opensource, so folks like Madshi (of eac3to) can fix outstanding issues like the TrueHD bug.

[ultratoto14]

Just a question. I burned numerous 8Gb Blu-ray structure generated by tsMuxer on double-layer DVD. I've got no problem reading the DVD on my desktop PC. But the PS3 always freeze during the layer switch.
Is there something to do to prevent this from happening ?

[odin24]

Just a question. I burned numerous 8Gb Blu-ray structure generated by tsMuxer on double-layer DVD. I've got no problem reading the DVD on my desktop PC. But the PS3 always freeze during the layer switch.
Is there something to do to prevent this from happening ?

I had the exact same problem, it was Nero. I have since switched to Cyberlink an the problem went away. Cyberlink came with my BD burner. Maybe you should try IMGBurn.

[ultratoto14]

I always use IMGburn to burn my AVCHDs. I tried nero in the pass and my old burned DVD freezes as the actual ones.

[ultratoto14]

I'm thinking of using the imgBurn ability to set the layer break of a dual layer DVD. To do this, i need to know which is the size of the first layer, ask tsMuxer to split the video at this size and force imgBurn to burn each part on each layer

[Ryu77]

Is roman76r actually still developing this app? If not, perhaps he'd be willing to make it opensource, so folks like Madshi (of eac3to) can fix outstanding issues like the TrueHD bug.

Agreed... I am very thankful towards Roman for this fantastic application but it does seem strange that there has been absolutely no development for such a long time. It almost feels like it has been abandoned. Surely rectifying the TrueHD issue should be of high priority and there must be knowledge within this community to make this happen with tsMuxeR.

[BZeeme]

Is roman76r actually still developing this app? If not, perhaps he'd be willing to make it opensource, so folks like Madshi (of eac3to) can fix outstanding issues like the TrueHD bug.

As posted:

Info from http://www.smlabs.net/tsmuxer_en.html

tsMuxer's next release is scheduled in the beginning of 2009. Please send your suggestions and recommendations - we will keep them in mind... tsmuxer@smartlabs.tv

[laserfan]

I am very thankful towards Roman for this fantastic application but it does seem strange that there has been absolutely no development for such a long time. It almost feels like it has been abandoned. Surely rectifying the TrueHD issue should be of high priority and there must be knowledge within this community to make this happen with tsMuxeR.But you're just guessing "that there has been absolutely no development for such a long time"; maybe there's been LOTS OF development! It seems to me that SMLabs is (or at least intends to become) a "for-profit" company and thus tsMuxeR was likely exposed here for early feedback and ideas. It would not surprise me if it re-surfaced as a payware product, or otherwise were embedded in their "SmartCONTENT" offering.

As for "knowledge within this community to make this happen", tsMuxeR is not open source so I don't know why you'd hope for this. It does beg the question, after so many months of tsMuxeR continuing to be "the only game in town" relative to freeware muxing solutions, why no one else here has come-out with a similar software. Must be really hard to do!!! :eek:

[smnckl]

But you're just guessing "that there has been absolutely no development for such a long time"; maybe there's been LOTS OF development!

SMlabs did release 1.8.8 just over a month back tho it was not really publicized.

It seems to me that SMLabs is (or at least intends to become) a "for-profit" company and thus tsMuxeR was likely exposed here for early feedback and ideas. It would not surprise me if it re-surfaced as a payware product, or otherwise were embedded in their "SmartCONTENT" offering.

SMlabs is a for-profit and their market segment is definitely not the home video enthusiast. However, we do have to be somewhat grateful that they have released this tool -- even tho it is only to get free beta testing -- as it has simplified the lives of many.

As for "knowledge within this community to make this happen", tsMuxeR is not open source so I don't know why you'd hope for this. It does beg the question, after so many months of tsMuxeR continuing to be "the only game in town" relative to freeware muxing solutions, why no one else here has come-out with a similar software. Must be really hard to do!!! :eek:

I am sure there are many things to be taken into consideration to put together such a tool.

That said, there are many tools which handle different aspects of what tsMuxeR does, and when put together could equal -- maybe surpass -- tsMuxeR. That is dependant on someone starting the ball rolling and getting the developers to agree on a framework and on what they can and will contribute towards an open source tsMuxeR replacement.

Just my $0.02 on this, FWIW in todays economy. :p

[Rodger]

I just burn the BDMV folder and it works fine on a Sony S350 and a Samsung 2500. I leave all the folder intact inside the BDMV.

TESTED....and PROVEN WRONG!!!

On My BD-P2500 Firmware with the software "081217_41_BDP2500_XEF.RUF" it definetly DOES NOT WORK!!!

I need to delete folders!
Backup (Clipinf + Playlist folders in it)
Clipinf
Playlist
Stream

NOT MORE!

Only THEN the discs are playable. In case I didn´t mention before. The discs burned just like the are created by tsmuxer are perfectly fine on a Panasonic DMP-BD30 AND a Samsung BD-P1400! I have totally no clue why they did make the BD-P2500 that bitchy?!

New Problem occured then when the disc finally ran.
See here: http://www.bilder-space.de/thumb/04.02BH5O05mKupalFlF.jpg (http://www.bilder-space.de/show.php?file=04.02BH5O05mKupalFlF.jpg)

I´m just guessing....because well....the movie ran and everything I was able to see was a about 2cm high stripe on my LE32A656A! DAMN! :eek:
Same disc OF COURSE plays perfectly fine on my panasonic. If the BD-P2500 wouldn´t play DVDs like a young god...I shurely already would have done ungodly things to it. :devil:

[laserfan]

SMlabs did release 1.8.8 just over a month back tho it was not really publicized.Actually it was a lot longer ago than that; the date on mine is Sept. 26.

Who knows, either they've stopped working on it altogether, or maybe Roman realized he'd built a unique tool and rather than continue to give it away is instead trying to figure-out how to capital-ize upon it.

[Ryu77]

But you're just guessing "that there has been absolutely no development for such a long time"; maybe there's been LOTS OF development! It seems to me that SMLabs is (or at least intends to become) a "for-profit" company and thus tsMuxeR was likely exposed here for early feedback and ideas. It would not surprise me if it re-surfaced as a payware product, or otherwise were embedded in their "SmartCONTENT" offering.

Ok, I should have said that there have been no released developments in such a long time (and I have been using v1.8.8 since release). I guess I need to be specific here or somebody like yourself will come along and attempt to make my post look invalid. The fact that no releases of this application have been made in such a long time should give reason for query from this community. I mean, roman76r doesn't really frequent this thread as often as we'd like. As much as Roman gave to us with tsMuxeR, we also saved him a lot of time with beta testing.

Edit: It seems like you sort of agree with me anyway...

Who knows, either they've stopped working on it altogether, or maybe Roman realized he'd built a unique tool and rather than continue to give it away is instead trying to figure-out how to capital-ize upon it.

The SmartLabs website does reveal that a release will be coming soon and that it will be offered as part of the SmartCONTENT solution. My post simply pointed out the fact that nothing is available today and it would have been nice to have the TrueHD issue fixed. :)

As for "knowledge within this community to make this happen", tsMuxeR is not open source so I don't know why you'd hope for this. It does beg the question, after so many months of tsMuxeR continuing to be "the only game in town" relative to freeware muxing solutions, why no one else here has come-out with a similar software. Must be really hard to do!!! :eek:

I am not "hoping" for anything. What made you think that I wasn't aware of the fact that tsMuxeR is not open source? Did you read this?...

If not, perhaps he'd be willing to make it opensource, so folks like Madshi (of eac3to) can fix outstanding issues like the TrueHD bug.

I was agreeing with asarian that it would be nice if tsMuxeR's code could be released. However, I am fully aware that the likelihood of this is practically zero. As you also mentioned about why noone else has released a similar application, this was also something I was eluding to.

[setarip_old]

Hi!

If you folks would simply go to the SmartLabs (a commercial enterprise) website homepage and click on "tsmuxer", you'd discover the following:
tsMuxeR is a part of SmartCONTENT, content preparation solutionand

tsMuxer's next release is scheduled in the beginning of 2009. Please send or post in our blog your suggestions and recommendations - we will keep them in mind...

[Ryu77]

Hi!

If you folks would simply go to the SmartLabs (a commercial enterprise) website homepage and click on "tsmuxer", you'd discover the following:

Yes, sorry for going off track for a little bit. I am aware that most Authors (including roman76r) host a bug tracker etc. on their website. I simply wanted to make 2 basic points.

1) It would be nice if there were an application available now that would enable TrueHD muxing etc.

2) If roman76r could frequent this thread every now and then to offer help and progress reports etc. It would be a much more efficient way to gain information to develop his application. As mentioned previously, that is why he released a beta here in the first place.

At the end of the day, I am still extremely thankful to the software Gods for this unique application and look forward to whatever the future brings us in the area of Blu-ray multiplexing/Authoring applications. :D

[Ryu77]

Double Post

[smnckl]

@laserfan

Actually it was a lot longer ago than that; the date on mine is Sept. 26.

My bad... I did not check the release date. And time flies by so quickly. :p

Who knows, either they've stopped working on it altogether, or maybe Roman realized he'd built a unique tool and rather than continue to give it away is instead trying to figure-out how to capital-ize upon it.

From what I saw on their website and blog, they were busy at some conference, most possibly pushing their commercial products.

Since this is freeware, albeit beta, we can not start looking this gift horse in the mouth. Maybe someone could start another thread where the developers of open source tools could be invited to contribute by pooling their talents towards a replacement, whether it be a single tool like tsMuxeR or a suite that is inter-connected via scripts that would do the same (or a better) job.

Just my $0.02, FWIW.

[sylvain07]

Originally Posted by GreenOnyx
I received an error code 3 with the error below in the bottom output box. The box with the processing details didn't say anything abnormal. Has anyone seen this, or is there a way I can find out more info? It's dealing with a ripped blu-ray m2ts that I'm stripping everything out of. I'm using v1.8.8b.

"Bitstream exception. It does not have to be! Plase contact the application support team for more information."



Same problem here 2. Look the attachment

I get this error only when I mux it to bluray. For mts or ts it works fine

There is a way 2 get it work: Mux it first to TS and then the TS 2 Bluray output. The error is gone!

Reply if it's working for you...


hello
I come to test on the 2 ways:
1st ts
2nd create blu ray
is well is similar, always the message error codes 3
the problem is not solved :mad:

[Butterfly666]

hello
I come to test on the 2 ways:
1st ts
2nd create blu ray
is well is similar, always the message error codes 3
the problem is not solved :mad:

Have you put the TS (that you created) as input instead of the mkv for muxing to bluray?

This worked for me with 2 movies with this error.

With one movie it didnt work but I tried a diffrent whey that worked for the (problem) video ('s).

Open the ts with gdmux and mux it to a new mkv. Then try with the new mkv to create a bluray with tsmuxer. If it still gives you the error you can try to mux the new mkv again to TS and then TS->bluray

I hope this helps for you 2.

Do you know the error bufferoverflow that tsmuxer gives sometimes? This can easly fixed when you demux the audio and put the demuxed audio track in tsmuxer instead of the audio track in that mkv.

Maby you can try this 2...

[ericd]

i wrote to smartlabs concerning the subs ,cause for me everything works except the subs....that s still a mystery for me..:confused:

[d2mp]

... for me everything works except the subs...

what subtitle configuration are you using ?
(font size, bottom offset, charset ...)

[ericd]

what subtitle configuration are you using ?
(font size, bottom offset, charset ...)

font size is 40 arial
bottom offset is 30
default charset

subs are srt
but i already try everything, i have to say that most of my files are not 1280x720
or 1920x1080
but this is not the cause the subs are not working cause i try with a 1280x720 and its the same thing it dont works for me !!
i post this one week ago,if you want to know more..thx foe the help.
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1242702#post1242702


ericd

[d2mp]

font size is 40 arial
bottom offset is 30
default charset

subs are srt
but i already try everything, i have to say that most of my files are not 1280x720
or 1920x1080
but this is not the cause the subs are not working cause i try with a 1280x720 and its the same thing it dont works for me !!
i post this one week ago,if you want to know more..thx foe the help.
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1242702#post1242702

ericd

for 1280x720 I use font size = 50, bottom margin = 50
for 1920x1080 I use font size = 70, bottom margin = 70

But subtitles ONLY works with:
a) 1920x1080 or 1280x720 (standard resolutions);
b) blu-ray structure

Note that depending on your player you may have to burn the blu-ray structure to a DVD in UDF 2.5 format (use a burner like nero).
some players, like PS3, plays a blu-ray structure from an external HDD, but only if converted to a 8.3 FAT file system - there are several tools to do this conversion, like:

http://d2mp.homeip.net ;)


Good luck

[deank]

@ericd: You can post your .srt file/s and a sample of your video... or I can send you a sample to check if it works for you.

You didn't say if you're using ANSI charset for your subtitles or they are in chinese/japanese format.

[mike26]

I`ve got this problem.
When i create a blu-ray disk from a MKV file with tsmuxer and plays it on my sony bdp-550 there are two frames/pictures on the television half the picture to the left have the right color, and half the picture to the right is black/white but have wierd shadows and there is an line down the middle on the screen is this some kind of copy protection ? have tried it with many mkv files but all of them end with the same result. Any suggestions?

[Digi]

I`ve got this problem.
When i create a blu-ray disk from a MKV file with tsmuxer and plays it on my sony bdp-550 there are two frames/pictures on the television half the picture to the left have the right color, and half the picture to the right is black/white but have wierd shadows and there is an line down the middle on the screen is this some kind of copy protection ? have tried it with many mkv files but all of them end with the same result. Any suggestions?


I think you will find that the MKV you tried will need re-encoding due to it not having a correct size ratio ie: 1920x1080 or 1280x720

[mike26]

it look like this http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg155/mikeee26/gggggggggggggggggggg.jpg is there any way to fix the frame rate :o

[Digi]

it look like this http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg155/mikeee26/gggggggggggggggggggg.jpg is there any way to fix the frame rate :o

Thats the problem 1280x536 you could try the BDedit hack and see if it will play 9 times out of 10 you are going to have to re-encode with x264 ecoder to add the missing lines to the 536 part.

there is no other way.

[mike26]

Im not sure how the command line should look. `?

[mike26]

is there an x264 ecoder gui insteed

[ericd]

@ericd: You can post your .srt file/s and a sample of your video... or I can send you a sample to check if it works for you.

You didn't say if you're using ANSI charset for your subtitles or they are in chinese/japanese format.

hi deank its me again thx

well here is a sample of the bluray structure done with tsmuxer and also the meta ,i have to say that it is a 1920x1080p mkv as source,i want to make it works with ps3 or powerdvd8 ,but still no subs!! ansi charset is used with,itry cambria font buti also try with others fonts,still a mystery that nothings appears..
here is the meta of the file

MUXOPT --no-pcr-on-video-pid --new-audio-pes --blu-ray --vbr --auto-chapters=5 --vbv-len=500
V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC, "L:\The Searchers.mkv", insertSEI, contSPS, track=1, lang=eng
A_AC3, "L:\The Searchers.mkv", track=2, lang=eng
S_TEXT/UTF8, "L:\The Searchers.srt",font-name="Cambria",font-size=70,font-color=0x00FFFFFF,font-charset=0,bottom-offset=70,font-border=1,text-align=center,video-width=1920,video-height=1080,fps=23.976, lang=fre


and here is a sample of the .ts iinside the bluray structure ,i mean in the stream folder ,you have the subs in atachment

http://rapidshare.com/files/195062291/try.ts.html

subs http://rapidshare.com/files/195065540/The_Searchers.srt.html

thx for helping as usual deank :cool:

[smnckl]

it look like this
...
is there any way to fix the frame rate :o

As Digi stated, you have to read the BD structure using BDedit.

On the PLAYLIST tab, look in the STN box on the right.
You will see at the bottom an dropdown field with the text "PlayItem". To the right you will see 4 more dropdown fields. The third one most probably has a "-" in it.

Next, go to the CLIPINF tab and click on the "Read" button. You will most probably find that it shows the aspect ratio to be 4:3 instead of 16:9.

Open the proper clpi file in the CLIPINF folder and edit it per the screen cap below. Burn to disc and you should be good to go. However, some standalone players and/or TVs will zoom the picture so it fills the screen, thus stretching the picture vertically making circles oval and everything "taller".