Log in

View Full Version : smartLabs tsMuxeR: Transport Stream muxer


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85

odin24
26th August 2008, 12:09
It will demux the first DTS track in the m2ts file. If there's no DTS track, it will transcode the first audio track in the m2ts file.


Surcode sometimes creates DTS files with zero padding which tsMuxeR doesn't like. You don't need to run them through mkvmerge/extract. Instead just run them through eac3to again. That's much faster...

Thanks madshi and rica, will do.

Also, even though I will continue to use the GUIs it is still good to know that piece of information about the command line process... thanks again.

veggav
26th August 2008, 12:38
@veggav

Hi!

I don't have an answer for you, but I'm curious to understand how and why you created the .MKV file as other than 720p compliant (or at least all MOD16)?

Because, most of the downloaded movies on mkv format are ripped from a blu-ray that has anamorphic widescreen and to reduce the size of the file they cut part of the black bars up and down.
That's why it's not blu-ray compilant.
I've heard that there is a way to re-add the bars but it need to re-enconde and seems very complicated.

There is any solution for a movie like 1280x588 get back to 1280x720 ?

hdpete
26th August 2008, 12:50
OK, the recipe is eac3to

eac3to.exe "input folder\input file (*.m2ts)" track no: "output folder\output file (*.wavs)"

Like this:

eac3to v2.57
command line: eac3to\eac3to.exe "F:\BD name\BDMV\STREAM\00011.m2ts" 2: "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm_out.wavs"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M2TS, 1 video track, 9 audio tracks, 27 subtitle tracks, 2:19:11
1: h264/AVC, 1080p24 /1.001 (16:9)
2: RAW/PCM, 5.1 channels, 16 bits, 48khz
3: TrueHD/AC3, 5.1 channels, 48khz
4: AC3, 5.1 channels, 640kbit/s, 48khz, dialnorm: -25dB
5: AC3, 5.1 channels, 640kbit/s, 48khz
6: AC3, 5.1 channels, 640kbit/s, 48khz, dialnorm: -30dB
7: AC3, 5.1 channels, 640kbit/s, 48khz
8: AC3, 5.1 channels, 640kbit/s, 48khz, dialnorm: -28dB
9: AC3, 2.0 channels, 192kbit/s, 48khz
10: AC3, 2.0 channels, 192kbit/s, 48khz
11: Subtitle (PGS)
12: Subtitle (PGS)
13: Subtitle (PGS)
14: Subtitle (PGS)
............
[a02] Extracting audio track number 2...
[a02] Reading RAW/PCM...
[a02] Swapping endian...
[a02] Remapping channels...
[a02] Writing WAVs...

[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm_out.R.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm_out.C.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm_out.LFE.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm_out.SL.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm_out.SR.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm_out.L.wav"...

Video track 1 contains 200231 frames.
eac3to processing took 29 minutes, 39 seconds.
Done.






Rica and others, thanks for your help, with a bit of experimenting I've found out where I was going wrong with the command prompts (not used to using them).

eac3to seems to be doing the job now.

Cheers

hdpete
26th August 2008, 12:54
Now that I know how to use eac3to, if I convert a HD DVD video only using RipBot264 and seperatley use eac3to to convert the DD+ sountrack to WAVs and Surcode to DTS, will the resulting audio sync with the video coverted to Blu-Ray format by Ripbot? Cheers.

odin24
26th August 2008, 13:00
Now that I know how to use eac3to, if I convert a HD DVD video only using RipBot264 and seperatley use eac3to to convert the DD+ sountrack to WAVs and Surcode to DTS, will the resulting audio sync with the video coverted to Blu-Ray format by Ripbot? Cheers.

It will, but you will need to remove the pulldown from the HDDVD video stream before you run it through ripbot... I'm not sure how using ripbot. I do this through tsMuxeR then recode using MeGUI.

hdpete
26th August 2008, 13:26
Surcode sometimes creates DTS files with zero padding which tsMuxeR doesn't like. You don't need to run them through mkvmerge/extract. Instead just run them through eac3to again. That's much faster...

Sorry to be nieve, but when you say run the dts file through eac3to, what do you mean, please show a command example. Thanks

sehgal.v7
26th August 2008, 13:42
Can anyone share what's error -1073741819 & it's solution?

rica
26th August 2008, 17:24
sorry to be nieve, but when you say run the dts file through eac3to, what do you mean, please show a command example. Thanks



yes i always use this:

eac3to input.dts output.dts


note: Input file is dts created by eac3to -re-encoded into dts via surcode- (or extracted by eac3to directly), output file is dts again which has revized by eac3to.

ok ? :)

rica
26th August 2008, 19:36
Let me clarify a little bit more:

Extracting re-encoding lpcm to dts (via surcode) with eac3to:

eac3to v2.57
command line: eac3to\eac3to.exe "F:\SPIDER_MAN_3\BDMV\STREAM\New Folder\00011.m2ts" 2: "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.dts"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M2TS, 1 video track, 9 audio tracks, 27 subtitle tracks, 2:19:11
1: h264/AVC, 1080p24 /1.001 (16:9)
2: RAW/PCM, 5.1 channels, 16 bits, 48khz
3: TrueHD/AC3, 5.1 channels, 48khz
4: AC3, 5.1 channels, 640kbit/s, 48khz, dialnorm: -25dB

*************
[a02] Extracting audio track number 2...
[a02] Reading RAW/PCM...
[a02] Swapping endian...
[a02] Remapping channels...
[a02] Writing WAVs...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.R.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.L.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.SL.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.C.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.LFE.wav"...
[a02] Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.SR.wav"...
Found Surcode DTS Encoder version 1.0.21.0.
Surcode encoding successfully started. Please wait...
Closing Surcode...
Video track 1 contains 200231 frames.
eac3to processing took 27 minutes, 58 seconds.
Surcode encoding took 21 minutes, 43 seconds.
Done.


Trying to open with TSMuxer:

http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/8362/hdpete01gd3.th.jpg (http://img159.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hdpete01gd3.jpg)



Lets revize that dts with eac3to:

eac3to v2.57
command line: eac3to\eac3to.exe "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\lpcm.dts" "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\out.dts"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DTS, 5.1 channels, 2:19:11, 24 bits, 1536kbit/s, 48khz

Removing DTS zero padding...

Creating file "C:\Users\rica\Desktop\Try\out.dts"...
eac3to processing took 1 minute, 49 seconds.
Done.

Now it's ready to be opened by TSMuxer after "zero padding removal":

http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/433/hdpete02ow1.th.jpg (http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hdpete02ow1.jpg)

EPiPH0NE
26th August 2008, 20:43
^^^

Eac3to should be doing the zero padding removal from the start :?

rica
26th August 2008, 20:48
^^^

Eac3to should be doing the zero padding removal from the start :?

No; you see.
BTW, here in first step eac3to just extracts (or dumps ) waves and later surcode takes the job from eac3to for re-encoding and surcode itsellf creates this zero padding. So until surcode encodes, eac3to has nothing to remove.

In second step eac3to this time removes that :)

odin24
26th August 2008, 21:54
No; you see.
BTW, here in first step eac3to just extracts (or dumps ) waves and later surcode takes the job from eac3to for re-encoding and surcode itsellf creates this zero padding. So until surcode encodes, eac3to has nothing to remove.

In second step eac3to this time removes that :)

Is removing the zero padding with eac3to the same thing as running through mkvtoolnix? Obviously the command line method is far more easier and faster, I was just wondering if it was the same result just different methods.

rica
26th August 2008, 22:33
Is removing the zero padding with eac3to the same thing as running through mkvtoolnix? Obviously the command line method is far more easier and faster, I was just wondering if it was the same result just different methods.

Mkvtoolnix directly accepts the dts without zero padding removal; but really to me, mkv is just an intermediate format(sorry it was a container) which i'll never use finally but for just creating non-remuxed final re-encodes with MeGui.
CMD method is the best way if you don't need to type lots of parameters (i 'd newer prefer x264 in command line) and bla-bla...

EPiPH0NE
27th August 2008, 01:14
No; you see.
BTW, here in first step eac3to just extracts (or dumps ) waves and later surcode takes the job from eac3to for re-encoding and surcode itsellf creates this zero padding. So until surcode encodes, eac3to has nothing to remove.

In second step eac3to this time removes that :)

Every time I have done source -> DTS with eac3to, at least 100+ times, zero padding removal has always been automatic and I have never had to re-run the DTS through eac3to for the zero padding to be removed so someone is doing something wrong here.

hdpete
27th August 2008, 07:31
HD DVD's - I've demuxed the video and audio (usually Dolby Digital Plus) using EVOdemux, fixed the video using either vc1conv or h264info and added the resulting fixed video file to TSMuxer. I change the file extension of the demuxed DD+ soundtrack to .ac3 and then add that to TSMuxer. Then mux together to form a blu-ray file.
Whilst the audio shows as DD+ in TSMuxer, I'm not sure that this is compliant blu-ray audio, until I play the resulting BD-R back through a standalone player connected to my Onkyo amp via HDMI I can't be sure.
I don't really want to convert the DD+ to wavs and then DTS via Surcode, as you are already converting a compressed lossy soundtrack so the resulting DTS track won't be as good as the original DD+.
Does anyone know about the comapatability of DD+ with blu-ray, is there something I need to do to the audio before?
Thanks for your help.

rica
27th August 2008, 08:59
Every time I have done source -> DTS with eac3to, at least 100+ times, zero padding removal has always been automatic and I have never had to re-run the DTS through eac3to for the zero padding to be removed so someone is doing something wrong here.

Codes are above...

madshi
27th August 2008, 09:07
Every time I have done source -> DTS with eac3to, at least 100+ times, zero padding removal has always been automatic and I have never had to re-run the DTS through eac3to for the zero padding to be removed so someone is doing something wrong here.
I think it depends on the Surcode version.

odin24
27th August 2008, 09:18
HD DVD's - I've demuxed the video and audio (usually Dolby Digital Plus) using EVOdemux, fixed the video using either vc1conv or h264info and added the resulting fixed video file to TSMuxer. I change the file extension of the demuxed DD+ soundtrack to .ac3 and then add that to TSMuxer. Then mux together to form a blu-ray file.
Whilst the audio shows as DD+ in TSMuxer, I'm not sure that this is compliant blu-ray audio, until I play the resulting BD-R back through a standalone player connected to my Onkyo amp via HDMI I can't be sure.
I don't really want to convert the DD+ to wavs and then DTS via Surcode, as you are already converting a compressed lossy soundtrack so the resulting DTS track won't be as good as the original DD+.
Does anyone know about the comapatability of DD+ with blu-ray, is there something I need to do to the audio before?
Thanks for your help.

DD+ is not a compliant BD stream and should be changed to either AC3 or DTS. Usually DD+ is at 1536kb/s so you're not losing any bitrate when recoding to DTS @ 1536kb/s. Also, the wavs extracted from the DD+ stream are uncompressed, the Dolby Digital and DTS formats are what make them lossy.

When you demux using EVOdemux you set the extension of the audio stream to AC3 regardless of what type of Dolby it is. Same with subtitles, set as .sup... run through SUPread to convert to HDDVD .sup to BD .sup.

Don't forget, when demuxing using EVOdemux to "Read XPL" before demuxing, the will auto-join the two Feature_EVO's and identify languages of the streams.

EDIT: Besides removing the pulldown, are you recoding your HDDVD vc1 or h264 video stream before muxing to BD?

SeeMoreDigital
27th August 2008, 09:38
Here's some info regarding DolbyDigital+ (EAC3) audio spec compliance for Blu-ray and HD-DVD: -

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4687/ddxl3.png

odin24
27th August 2008, 09:50
Here's some info regarding DolbyDigital+ (EAC3) audio spec compliance for Blu-ray and HD-DVD: -

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4687/ddxl3.png

OK, I stand corrected... sort of. You cannot just take a HDDVD eac3 track and import it directly to a BD, however BD does support a limited eac3.

Thanks for the clarification SeeMoreDigital.

@ hdpete,
I'm not sure, or even if this is possible, how to take a HDDVD DD+ track and make it a DD+ BD compliant stream, AC3 core with DD+ data.

madshi
27th August 2008, 10:08
I'm not sure, or even if this is possible, how to take a HDDVD DD+ track and make it a DD+ BD compliant stream, AC3 core with DD+ data.
That's not possible, unless you buy a DD+ encoder from Dolby which probably costs a fortune.

hdpete
27th August 2008, 10:23
DD+ is not a compliant BD stream and should be changed to either AC3 or DTS. Usually DD+ is at 1536kb/s so you're not losing any bitrate when recoding to DTS @ 1536kb/s. Also, the wavs extracted from the DD+ stream are uncompressed, the Dolby Digital and DTS formats are what make them lossy.

When you demux using EVOdemux you set the extension of the audio stream to AC3 regardless of what type of Dolby it is. Same with subtitles, set as .sup... run through SUPread to convert to HDDVD .sup to BD .sup.

Don't forget, when demuxing using EVOdemux to "Read XPL" before demuxing, the will auto-join the two Feature_EVO's and identify languages of the streams.

EDIT: Besides removing the pulldown, are you recoding your HDDVD vc1 or h264 video stream before muxing to BD?

Unfortunately by just converting a a DD+ soundtrack to wavs and then DTS you are losing quality over the origianl DD+ soundtrack. Because the DD+ audio is already lossy, converting it to a wav won't somehow bring back the quality of the original uncompressed source. The original conversion from the uncompressed source to DD+ lost a lot of audio data, you can't put that back once converted. You should ideally only encode to a lossy format from a lossless source, i.e. PCM, TrueHD, DTSHD. This is why I would want to keep the original DD+, but it seems it's not possible.

With regard to video recoding, once the demuxed VC1 video has been fixed using vc1conv, it shows as a 1080p video in TSMuxer with a 23.976fps. I've burned this to a BD-RE and it plays fine, with the exception of the DD+ audio which we already know won't work.

odin24
27th August 2008, 10:50
Unfortunately by just converting a a DD+ soundtrack to wavs and then DTS you are losing quality over the origianl DD+ soundtrack. Because the DD+ audio is already lossy, converting it to a wav won't somehow bring back the quality of the original uncompressed source. The original conversion from the uncompressed source to DD+ lost a lot of audio data, you can't put that back once converted. You should ideally only encode to a lossy format from a lossless source, i.e. PCM, TrueHD, DTSHD. This is why I would want to keep the original DD+, but it seems it's not possible.

I may be misunderstanding how this lossy/lossless thing works then. How is it that each monowav from a AC3/DTS track has a bitrate of ~2300kb/s, recoded to LPCM, 16bit, with a final bitrate of ~4.6mb/s... from a DD+ or DTS source of 1.5mb/s.

With regard to video recoding, once the demuxed VC1 video has been fixed using vc1conv, it shows as a 1080p video in TSMuxer with the a 23.976fps. I've burned this to a BD-RE and it plays fine, with the exception of the DD+ audio which we already know won't work.

Thanks for this info, a few questions; How long does it take to "fix" the vc1 stream, and is this the same as just removing the pulldown? Also, I've searched high and low for vc1conv, where can I find it?

hdpete
27th August 2008, 11:00
I may be misunderstanding how this lossy/lossless thing works then. How is it that each monowav from a AC3/DTS track has a bitrate of ~2300kb/s, recoded to LPCM, 16bit, with a final bitrate of ~4.6mb/s... from a DD+ or DTS source of 1.5mb/s.



Thanks for this info, a few questions; How long does it take to "fix" the vc1 stream, and is this the same as just removing the pulldown? Also, I've searched high and low for vc1conv, where can I find it?

This guide shows gives you links to vc1conv and h264info, depending on the codec used on the HD DVD http://www.glenharrison.com/bluray/, I found that once you've fixed the video file, you can do the rest in tsMuxer. The vc1conv takes up to an hour.
Although coverting a lossy audio format back to a WAV will still give you a large file, that wav will only have the audio data in from the lossy file you coverted it from. Think of it as converting a CD to 192kbps mp3, that only gives you average sound quality beacuse to get the file size small you've lost audio data, that's now gone forever. If you convert the mp3 back to a wav, it won't restore the original quality of the CD but you'll get a big file size because the audio data on a wav takes up more space.

odin24
27th August 2008, 11:16
This guide shows gives you links to vc1conv and h264info, depending on the codec used on the HD DVD http://www.glenharrison.com/bluray/, I found that once you've fixed the video file, you can do the rest in tsMuxer. The vc1conv takes up to an hour.
Although coverting a lossy audio format back to a WAV will still give you a large file, that wav will only have the audio data in from the lossy file you coverted it from. Think of it as converting a CD to 192kbps mp3, that only gives you average sound quality beacuse to get the file size small you've lost audio data, that's now gone forever. If you convert the mp3 back to a wav, it won't restore the original quality of the CD but you'll get a big file size because the audio data on a wav takes up more space.

Gotcha, thanks.

rica
27th August 2008, 16:39
Take a look:

http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/1064

cwm9
27th August 2008, 22:15
Has development of this utility stopped? That would be sad... :(

odin24
27th August 2008, 22:33
Has development of this utility stopped? That would be sad... :(

1.8.5 (beta) was just released.

http://www.smlabs.net/tsMuxer/tsMuxeR_1.8.5(b).zip

laserfan
27th August 2008, 23:29
1.8.5 (beta) was just released.

http://www.smlabs.net/tsMuxer/tsMuxeR_1.8.5(b).zipNo, the executables in the zip are still the same 1.8.5 versions from 4/28/08.

nekrosoft13
28th August 2008, 01:03
any one tried ripping Doomsday the movie?

i get a message that some tracks can't be recognized by tsmuxer. what tracks are those?

kennylam
29th August 2008, 17:12
This tools is great...nothing else can handle subtitles perfectly.

It could be awesome if tsMuxeR supports DVB ESTI subtitle remux/demux/convert from PGS. Many set top box users will be amazed that their STB can be a HD Player!

the dvbsub.c in libavcodec project may help

odin24
31st August 2008, 14:54
Does anybody know if tsMuxeR will accept .MLP and mux to Blu-ray in the future?

brogan
1st September 2008, 19:30
Hello all,

I have a quick question, I've been trying to convert a 14 GB .ts file that is 1920x1084, 25 fps & Level 4 to 1920x1080, 23.976 & Level 4.1 w/no loss in quality, I don't need to make the file any smaller at all...I've tried the .ts, .m2ts & Blu-ray format options but I get the same error message each time.
Errors:
Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not synchronized. Please verify stream fps. File name...

The movie is in sync & will play on my computer w/out issue...I attempted to use RipBot w/this file but it played very choppy when finished. Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

:thanks::thanks::thanks::thanks::thanks:

Butterfly666
1st September 2008, 21:03
Hello all,


Errors:
Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not synchronized. Please verify stream fps. File name...



:thanks::thanks::thanks::thanks::thanks:

You can try to demux only the audio with tsmuxer and add the demuxed audio again in tsmuxer with the orginal file without choosing the audio from the orginal file and try again if it works... let us know if it worked, succes!

jangai
3rd September 2008, 22:20
Hi all !

To resample 1080 video sequences (to reduce disk footprint), I currently use open source «codec x264vfw H264/MPEG-4 AVC codec» published by Source Forge (build from july 08). No quality or setting problem, but...

But this codec can't compress video with greater than 9990 Kb/s bitrate...

My purpose would have been to compress with 15000 to 20000 Kb/s bitrates.

Anybody knows an other AVC codec (free or not) which could be drived by AVIsynth/VirtualDubMod as frame server to produce these bitrate values ??

:thanks::thanks::thanks::thanks:

Beastie Boy
4th September 2008, 07:59
Anybody knows an other AVC codec (free or not) which could be drived by AVIsynth/VirtualDubMod as frame server to produce these bitrate values ??

Take a look at MeGUI. It is an encoding GUI that includes Avisynth functions and will download the latest x264 builds, plus other required stuff.

Cheers, Beastie.

EDIT: Why is this in the tsMuxeR thread??

jangai
4th September 2008, 14:47
EDIT: Why is this in the tsMuxeR thread??

Sorry : My "think thread" and some questions in this thread suggested me that tsMuxer users working with "BD stuff" would have frequently to shrink by resampling AVC files... :rolleyes:

But reality is that my question is not in the better thread... I kick my bottom ! (Hard performance for my worthy age...)

Thank you for the answer...

73ChargerFan
5th September 2008, 05:45
EDIT: Why is this in the tsMuxeR thread??
To keep it alive. :p

Beastie Boy
5th September 2008, 08:19
To keep it alive. :p

LOL. Yes, I keep reading this thread hoping to see something from Roman. I would love for development of this tool to continue, but alas...

rolanocalhau
8th September 2008, 20:43
Hi everybody!
I have done several tests with this awesome program but I keep not succeeding in having subtitles in the movie. I press the subtitle button on the PS3 remote and it says no subtitles available.
I'm using the same file names in the same directory and I'm doing just like the bitburners.com guide teaches.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance.

odin24
8th September 2008, 20:46
Hi everybody!
I have done several tests with this awesome program but I keep not succeeding in having subtitles in the movie. I press the subtitle button on the PS3 remote and it says no subtitles available.
I'm using the same file names in the same directory and I'm doing just like the bitburners.com guide teaches.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance.


What subtitle format and output method are you using?

rolanocalhau
8th September 2008, 21:39
What subtitle format and output method are you using?

It's srt format.
I've tried both ts and mt2s muxing with the same result.
Thanks odin24

odin24
8th September 2008, 21:47
It's srt format.
I've tried both ts and mt2s muxing with the same result.
Thanks odin24


Ah, there's your problem. Subs are only compatible in Blu-Ray format, your SOL for m2ts. Also your video needs to be a BD complaint size as well, either 1920x1080 (not 1920x800, etc.), or 1280x720 (not 1280x528, etc). Non compliant streams are resizable using re-encoding applicatons.

rolanocalhau
8th September 2008, 21:54
Ah, there's your problem. Subs are only compatible in Blu-Ray format, your SOL for m2ts. Also your video needs to be a BD complaint size as well, either 1920x1080 (not 1920x800, etc.), or 1280x720 (not 1280x528, etc). Non compliant streams are resizable using re-encoding applicatons.

Well, that seems complicated for me.
Does that mean that there is no solution for this?
I don't want to create BD disks, I just want to stream video to my TV set through PS3 with subtitles. And it don't have to be Full HD since I don't have Full HD TV.
What do you suggest?
Another program?

jj666
9th September 2008, 00:19
LOL. Yes, I keep reading this thread hoping to see something from Roman. I would love for development of this tool to continue, but alas...

Given the thread is 95% PS3 spam, no wonder :-)

-jj-

odin24
9th September 2008, 01:54
Well, that seems complicated for me.
Does that mean that there is no solution for this?
I don't want to create BD disks, I just want to stream video to my TV set through PS3 with subtitles. And it don't have to be Full HD since I don't have Full HD TV.
What do you suggest?
Another program?

I don't think it's possible with the PS3, other than hardcoding the subs... which would mean recoding.

Beastie Boy
9th September 2008, 07:49
For those not familiar with eac3to, the program has recently been updated to provide output of a Bluray compatible TrueHD track, ie. TrueHD with AC3. The good news is that this stream is accepted by tsMuxeR and recognised as TrueHD :)

eg. eac3to inputFile Output.thd+ac3

I successfully muxed a m2ts file with tsMuxeR, and eac3to indicated that the resulting file did contain TrueHD data. However, until a buy a NMT based player, I cannot play the file.

As ever, please post any eac3to questions in the eac3to thread.

Cheers, Beastie.

hdpete
9th September 2008, 15:58
For those not familiar with eac3to, the program has recently been updated to provide output of a Bluray compatible TrueHD track, ie. TrueHD with AC3. The good news is that this stream is accepted by tsMuxeR and recognised as TrueHD :)

eg. eac3to inputFile Output.thd+ac3

I successfully muxed a m2ts file with tsMuxeR, and eac3to indicated that the resulting file did contain TrueHD data. However, until a buy a NMT based player, I cannot play the file.

As ever, please post any eac3to questions in the eac3to thread.

Cheers, Beastie.


Thanks, I'll give it a try.

piratburner
9th September 2008, 16:33
Is it OK to use this SW to demux a BD source with LPCM/PCM sound track ?

N1KLAS
9th September 2008, 16:49
Hi,

I've got the following problem by using tsMuxeR.

First of all, I'm happy with the tsMuxeR-programm, it's the best program for me and every video that i "mux" into a Blu-ray structure (also containing subtitles) are playable in my Blu-ray Player without any problems.

But I have one problem with only one video.
When I mux the video with .srt subtitles into a Blu-ray strucure, and open it with MediaInfo then, it says that there is a Video0 Delay about 36min...
look here (below):
Text
ID : 4608 (0x1200)
Menu ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : PGS
Video0 Verzögerung : 36min

In all other videos, there isn't any delay of course, i dont know how it came to this delay here ?
Does anybody know?

What could be the problem?

I hope you could help :)