Log in

View Full Version : New release of Media Player 6.4


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46

celtic_druid
15th January 2005, 03:01
Just tried an mkv with two textsub streams and it plays fine here.
Win2k SP4, DX9.0c, AMD 64 3500+.

ernstblaauw
17th January 2005, 21:46
Using the latest version of the CVS compiles (2004.12.17), I cannot drag a 'VIDEO_TS' folder into MPC. It does not show video or play audio. It does not matter if I activate the internal MPEG2 decoder or not.
If I drag the separate files which are inside the VIDEO_TS folder into MPC, it plays fine.
I did not have this problem with 6.4.8.2.

edit:
I also do not have this problem with the 2004.12.09 build

rotflol
19th January 2005, 18:03
Hey, celtic_druid, I've noticed that the last compile of MPC (4460 KB) is much bigger than the previous one (3860 KB). What gives?

V_ICE
20th January 2005, 01:21
I think the increased size is due to the addition of DX9 shader filters in the play menu.

Leak
20th January 2005, 08:54
Originally posted by V_ICE
I think the increased size is due to the addition of DX9 shader filters in the play menu.

:eek:

Now that you mention it - that really was out of the blue... :D

iron2000
28th January 2005, 17:14
I find the MPC takes a few seconds to really close after I click the close button.

nicco
28th January 2005, 19:03
Is there here someone who is planning to make MPC full compatible with the new .divx format?

gino25
29th January 2005, 12:33
i have a simply question

Is (media player classic' s) lastest version 6.4.8.2 ?


Is development stopped? Because version 6.4.8.2 (maybe the last) was out in march 2004

Yong
29th January 2005, 14:32
Originally posted by nicco
Is there here someone who is planning to make MPC full compatible with the new .divx format?
.divx?
I think it's a AVI container(.avi),
It should be safe renamed to *.avi.:p

Yong
29th January 2005, 14:34
Originally posted by gino25
i have a simply question

Is (media player classic' s) lastest version 6.4.8.2 ?


Is development stopped? Because version 6.4.8.2 (maybe the last) was out in march 2004

Latest version at here (http://www.aziendeassociate.it/cd.asp?dir=/Media%20Player%20Classic);)

nicco
29th January 2005, 14:39
divx?
I think it's a AVI container(.avi),
It should be safe renamed to *.avi.
not exact:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=88988

Liisachan
29th January 2005, 15:11
Originally posted by Yong
.divx?
I think it's a AVI container(.avi),
It should be safe renamed to *.avi.:p You can read about DivX Media Format here.
http://labs.divx.com/archives/000050.html

Sgt_Strider
29th January 2005, 21:30
What's new in the latest release of MPC?

LigH
30th January 2005, 07:39
Originally posted by Sgt_Strider
What's new in the latest release of MPC?
"Read the last dozen pages..." :D

Sorry - just a stupid joke; missing a complete changelog, too. You probably would have to scan the CVS.

Liisachan
30th January 2005, 07:54
some of the most noticeable new features in 6.4.8.3 include:
- Better support for VBR MP3 Audio
- MKV muxed with mkvmerge 0.9.5 is now seekable
- online subtitle database, which is somewhat like CDDB/FreeDB
- fancy sahders
- Dirac support (but the external filter is better atm)

As another note, i think this thread is obviously too long, now with 99 pages...

cweb
30th January 2005, 22:03
I was looking for the latest version of mpc and I found it at this mirror site:
http://m17n.cool.ne.jp/freeware/mpc/

Liisachan
31st January 2005, 00:31
@cweb
Altho this thread is very long and something has to be done about it, you can at least read back a few pages of this thread before you begin bothering to try to "look for" the latest version. A few links include that one are posted already. They are the same binaries compiled by celtic_druid. What you should really find is, kudos to him/her for doing that.

gruppo_sd
1st February 2005, 11:16
with the last mplayerc2005.01.31 for xp I have a problem to play wmv file, the player it's very slow.

celtic_druid
1st February 2005, 11:34
Just tried it here and everything seemed fine. Win2k SP4 though. So previous versions the playback was ok?

Esc
1st February 2005, 22:53
Don't know where to address. It would be really nice if MPC could make snapshots not only to bmp file but also to the clipboard (like VDub). Please?
I hope, the right guy will find it here. :rolleyes:

gurabli
2nd February 2005, 11:29
I have two questions, please help me if you can:

I downloaded MPC 6.4.8.2. It won't play some xvid files, saying
"Cannot render stream(s)" How to set the codec to be able to play xvid/divx files using ffdshow or other filter?

And where can I get the newer builds in setup form?

Thanx!

celtic_druid
2nd February 2005, 12:36
You want an installer? It is just a single exe, I can't really see the point.

If ffdshow is installed and enabled for XviD then it should just work (in the absence of any other filter) with MPC for avi's, ogm's and mkv's.

Liisachan
2nd February 2005, 14:15
@celctic_druid: A quick question: why didn't you compile non-unicode version for 2005-02-02?

celtic_druid
2nd February 2005, 15:30
Up now.

Liisachan
5th February 2005, 02:13
Can anyone reproduce this problem?

(1) Use MPC 2005-01-31
1-A. Disable some of the internal filters, for instance the source filter "AVI" and the Transform filter "AAC" by unchecking the 2 checkboxes.
1-B. Restart MPC.
1-C. Look at the internal filter settings--AVI and AAC should be disabled (unchecked), naturally, because you disabled them manually.

(2) Use MPC 2005-02-02 or 2005-02-03
2-A. Do the same as 1-A.
2-B. Restart MPC.
2-C. Look at the current settings--the settings customized in 2-A is gone, and you'll see the default settings in the filter menu. i.e. "AVI" and "AAC" are re-checked automatically tho you unchecked them manually.

Anyone can confirm this? Or is it just for me :confused:

I found this problem when I was trying to test Haali's filter with MPC.
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&postid=606057#post606057

The registry is updated correctly both after 1-A and 2-A, when you close MPC. But looks like a newer build mentioned in (2) cannot load the filter settings from the registry properly even tho it saved the settings by itself.

@celtic_druid: Thx :) There are still a few Win98/me users. Honestly, that's not my problem tho :devil:

celtic_druid
5th February 2005, 05:51
Ah, but this time there was a reason for no ANSI build. The DSM lib release version would not compile.

Yes, I can reproduce that problem.

edit: Big CVS update, looks like hopefully both problems are fixed. Binaries will be up soon.

Ok, still the same problem with the filters. ANSI build up though I had to manually create a project file for basemuxer to get MPC to compile for both release and unicode builds.

fewtch
5th February 2005, 08:07
It's really a pleasure to see MPC is being updated (still)... something about a single-EXE, amazingly nonbloated for the functionality, "does everything yet still does it well" -- this is a unique player, IMHO in many ways nothing quite matches it. I mean, it can replace commercial DVD player softwares without losing much functionality.

I hope this continues to be updated. Thanks out to gabest and celtic druid.

ernstblaauw
7th February 2005, 10:22
Downloading the latest version of the MPC 6.4.8.3 CVS at
http://m17n.cool.ne.jp/freeware/mpc/, i read that the latest versions do not remember the filtersettings. But in my case, it does!
I have downloaded mplayerc2005.02.05.2kxp.7zand I use Windows XP SP2. Maybe does it make a difference if the settings are stored in an .ini file? I have enabled that option.

gurabli
7th February 2005, 10:28
A stupid question:

the extension of the mpc file is .7z ? What should I do with it? I mean how to get the exe?

Yod4z
7th February 2005, 11:05
Originally posted by gurabli
A stupid question:

the extension of the mpc file is .7z ? What should I do with it? I mean how to get the exe?
.7z file is just an compressed file, it compressed with 7zip format. Use the 7zip decompressor.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sevenzip/

Leak
7th February 2005, 11:06
Originally posted by gurabli
A stupid question:

the extension of the mpc file is .7z ? What should I do with it? I mean how to get the exe?

Use 7-Zip (http://www.7-zip.org/), TUGZip (http://www.tugzip.com/) or WinRAR (http://www.rarsoft.com/) to extract it.

Black Evil
9th February 2005, 03:39
There are many other alternatives as well, such as my personal favorite, IZArc (http://www.izsoft.dir.bg/izarc.htm)

FredThompson
11th February 2005, 00:24
6.4.8.3 crashes when exiting "hard" using the close window button. This happens every time with DTiVo-sourced MPEG2. Anyone else seeing this type of thing?

Liisachan
11th February 2005, 11:35
celtic_druid:
mplayerc.exe [CRC 0567DA25] in mplayerc2005.02.11.2kxp.7z is obviously too small, compared to previous versions: 4,091,904 bytes, while the previous versions are around 4,500,000.
And it doesn't start complaining:
"The dynamic link library d3dx9_24.dll could not be found..."


Edit:
dxsdk_feb2005.exe has it:
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA022257/misc/d3dx9_24.zip

celtic_druid
11th February 2005, 12:14
Well I did just switch to dxsdk Feb2005.

ernstblaauw
11th February 2005, 14:09
Originally posted by Liisachan
celtic_druid:
mplayerc.exe [CRC 0567DA25] in mplayerc2005.02.11.2kxp.7z is obviously too small, compared to previous versions: 4,091,904 bytes, while the previous versions are around 4,500,000.
And it doesn't start complaining:
"The dynamic link library d3dx9_24.dll could not be found..."


Edit:
dxsdk_feb2005.exe has it:
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA022257/misc/d3dx9_24.zip
It's logical the latest version is smaller, because is has not the d3dx9_24.dll inside.
Placing that .dll in the same map als MPC 2005.02.11 makes MPC working like a charm!

Liisachan
11th February 2005, 14:53
Originally posted by ernstblaauw
It's logical the latest version is smaller, because is has not the d3dx9_24.dll inside. Yes and no. The fact that the functions in that DLL were not linked statically, is not by design. What happened was rather accidental. It's naturally smaller because some functions that were supposed to be linked statically were not linked statically (and thus should be loaded from the external DLL).

Anyway, what is important is, it's not like Gabest changed MPC so you'd need an external DLL. Like you said, it runs if you put that DLL there, but that is not what it was supposed to be.

Edit: Oh, wait, but that DLL might be in the newer DirectX 9 runtime too. If so, Gabest wants us to update DirectX, and that DLL is supposed to be linked dynamically.

celtic_druid
11th February 2005, 15:39
Well d3dx9.lib from the feb dxsdk is only 83.3kb where as an older version that I have is 4.17MB's. The one from 2004 is over 5MB's.

Ok relinking with an older lib gives 4,611,584bytes.
4,091,904bytes with the feb sdk.

Ok, so the project file had /DELAYLOAD for d3d9.dll. I added d3dx9_24.dll and it is no longer a dependancy.

Liisachan
11th February 2005, 16:44
so far so good, basically it seems working. and smaller size is a nice side-effect :)

But, I keep getting this annoying small MessageBox everytime I start MPC, which says "dsfsf"
Anyone knows what this means?:confused: :confused:

celtic_druid
11th February 2005, 17:34
From the source code looks like it is to do with registry settings and the internal filters.
mplayerc.cpp if you want to look at it.

Liisachan
11th February 2005, 18:09
Originally posted by celtic_druid
Ok, still the same problem with the filters. I can still reproduce this pb too on my Win2K SP4. This doesn't happen on my WinXP SP1 (not SP2). That weird MessageBox only pops up when Im using 2k.
One thing that comes in my mind is "Windows 2000 is no longer a supported platform for the SDK." (readme for DirectX 9.0 SDK (Feb 2005))

So Windows 2000 is obsolete? bakattsura...:angry:

celtic_druid
11th February 2005, 18:18
Yeah I heard that about the SDK, however I installed the SDK fine under win2k and compiled fine under win2k.

Don't think that DirectX and registry issues are related. I had the popup to. Deleting the registry keys fixed it, however you are right the problem is still present.

Rash
12th February 2005, 22:22
Celtic, where could I get your compiles of MPC? Thanks a lot.

esby
13th February 2005, 00:19
google might be your friend...

http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=celticDruid&btnG=Recherche+Google&meta=

esby

Rash
13th February 2005, 05:02
Thank you

Tomir
13th February 2005, 10:45
Ok, I found a two bugs in MPC. First the subs positioning, alas better than that in original MPC, is somewhat buggy. Here you can see what I mean. In window mode subs are positioned correctly as usually (window (http://www.goos.republika.pl/images/el2.jpg)), and here is the full-screen version (full screen (http://www.goos.republika.pl/images/el.jpg)). As you can see text on the signs is moved too high. Here is a another example, window (http://www.goos.republika.pl/images/git2.jpg), and full-screen (http://www.goos.republika.pl/images/git.jpg). The second problem is that the MPC still cannot change (or rather accept) streams when using Haali's MKV splitter.

Liisachan
13th February 2005, 12:01
Tomir: The first problem is a real problem for many subbers, especially when softsubbing something that has the aspect ratio that is largely different than the aspect ratio of the monitor, but this is not a bug: afaik MPC's sub renderer is designed like this.

Let me explain the nature of the problem:
1. Simply put, the upper-left corner is (0, 0).
2. The problem is, where is the upper-left corner?
Here you can see a more decisive demo:
http://park14.wakwak.com/~flower/test.html

As you can see, VSFilter (aka Direct Vobsub) uses the video-frame's pixel-size to decide the coordinates, while MPC uses the window size. The both coordinates are possible because SSA's spec is ambiguous.

Workaround: I'd recommend softsubbers to mux 2 SSAs for each language, one is for VSFilter, the other is for MPC.

Another Note: USF has a spec to clear up this ambiguity:
http://usf.corecodec.org/
"Powerfull element positioning system ... Relative to window or video"
In USF, each <style> has a child called <position> where you can define the "relative-to" attribute (the value is "Window" or "Video")

Tomir
13th February 2005, 12:34
All right, I agree that in MPC 6.4.8.2 the coordinates are taken from the window. But, in the new version 6.4.8.3 compiled by celtic_druid there is a feature called "Position subtitles relative to the video frame" which seems to have correctly scale the subs and position them, but there are some problems, as shown on the screens I provided b4.

Liisachan
13th February 2005, 13:33
Ah, that new feature is cool :) I didn't notice it. This is exactly what I've been wanting. I guess Gabest has special ears that can hear very well............

Okay, so perhaps some of the positioning-related tags in SSA (\pos \move \fscx etc) are related to your problem. If you give me the sample, i'll test it to see if I can reproduce your pb.

I guess you mean Vobsub-compatible (vsfilter.dll & textsub.vdf) when you say "correctly scale," and that should be possible because Gabest is the author of both MPC and Vobsub after all, but there are quite a few delicate problems here (for instance, "Touch window from Inside" vs "Outside"). Plus, you cannot say what is "correct" because SSA specs don't define the coordinates to use. There are (or there will be) other SSA renderes, including VLC, RL, ffdshow. So generally, you have no way to absolutely pinpoint a certain pixel.

As I posted in corecodec (http://corecodec.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=914&start=15)
there are 2 kinds of subs: one should fit to the screen (like Dialogues); the other should be "pinned" to a certain pixel (like Logos). Not just relatively-to-what? ...Think about pan-and-scanning.
I'm feeling that we are facing the limit of SSA. Hopefully Gabest will extend his "Advanced SSA" specs.

Edit:
Tomir: you are right. This new option seems unstable. Sometimes it works, sometimes doesn't. To me, cheking/uncheking "Round up to power of two" several times might fix the problem. (?)

HarryM
14th February 2005, 14:16
In newest alpha versions of MPC 6.4.8.3 is error. External (not muxed!) subtitles (SUB, SRT, etc) running with MKV or OGM files are not corectly synchronized. :scared:

Version 6.4.8.2 synchronize external subtitles corectly.