View Full Version : Media Player Classic (patched build)
Pages :
1
2
[
3]
4
5
6
7
8
9
Tery
5th September 2007, 21:01
Hi,
I'm trying to read a file x264/mkv, and everytime MPC is crashing with this message
http://tery.free.fr/pix/clip.png
Graphedit says, there's some flows it can't deal with.
It's seems to be subtitle flow, present in the video file.
Any ideas ?
Tery.
clsid
5th September 2007, 21:23
The error comes from your H.264 decoder, not from Media Player Classic.
Tery
5th September 2007, 21:53
i'm currently using coreavc 1.5.0.0, I don't understand.
Thank you for your answer i'm gonna look for this with them.
Tery.
zambelli
6th September 2007, 09:24
Unless people suddenly start submitting new patches, I don't foresee any new builds in the future. That is also why I won't start a new project. It will likely be dead right from the beginning. If anyone else really sees a need for a new project, go ahead and create it.
One has to assume that most users find MPC by googling for it.... and the results typically take them to Guliverkli SF, or to one of the many free video software websites. So until the patched builds show up there and are available to the casual user - all this good work will only be seen by the few hardcore MPC fans who frequent these forums... which is a shame.
Taurus
6th September 2007, 12:01
@Zambelli
Yeah, you're right. All the people looking for an alternative player will be directed to the google searches,
mostly overaged releases. And they will end up with the feeling: Booah, what an old fashion mess.
They will never see all the hard work of the new maintainers.
clsid
6th September 2007, 12:24
They will never see all the hard work of the new maintainers.That's the problem. People start thinking that MPC is being developed again. Which is not the case (except for Casimir's mod).
I will consider creating a new project at sf.net if I have some time. With a big fat note about the development state (or lack thereof).
foxyshadis
6th September 2007, 13:43
Maybe Casimir would be amenable to having a branch with these basic patches off the original. Most of the codec sites are already stocking MPC HC instead of the original now, so it's not as big a deal, but it'd still be very useful until gabest responds.
boyumeow
7th September 2007, 04:44
Juz to let U all be much more happy than b4, I was directed to this forum when I try to find latest update about MPC. I m glad that clsid and casimir are willing to let us have whatever they have done for MPC. Thanks.
Martin H
8th September 2007, 02:30
@clsid
1. Could you please tell me why you decided to make these changes :
* disable internal AVI/Matroska/MPEG/MP4/OGG source filters
* disable internal AAC/AC3/DTS/LPCM/Vorbis/MPEG2 transform filters
I myself only use MPC and ffdshow tryouts and then was wondering if ffdshow tryouts would be able to do by itself what you had disabled MPC to do ? What i mean, is if i then would need to re-enable some of the MPC internal filters again, or if i didn't need to do that, since ffdshow tryouts maybe allready supported everything that you had disabled in MPC ?
2. Why did you change the default renderer into 'Overlay Mixer' ?
3. Do you know if i can just place the directx dll into the MPC program folder under %programfiles%, or if i will have to place it in '%windir%\system32' for it to be picked up correctly by MPC ?
Thank's in advance and also many thank's for your efforts in both MPC and ffdshow tryouts :)
Also, i apologise in advance for the nature of my questions, as i'm a complete newbie when these matters are concerned...
foxyshadis
8th September 2007, 03:41
Haali's does the first set better, and ffdshow does the other half better.
The dll can be in either the program folder or either windows folder, correct.
I'd guess overlay was for compatibility or color-correctness reasons, but I don't really know.
Martin H
8th September 2007, 03:50
@foxyshadis
Thank you very much for your kind help, my friend :)
Also many thanks to you too for all your efforts on ffdshow tryouts :)
CU, Martin.
Delerue
8th September 2007, 03:52
Haali's does the first set better, and ffdshow does the other half better.
Better how? Do you have any bench? :)
I'd guess overlay was for compatibility or color-correctness reasons, but I don't really know.
Unfortunately Overlay Render has a few problems with some video aspect ratio. Here's an example: http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/a/d/eadb9b42-728b-42b0-bfdf-b472fa2a2464/Step_into_Liquid_1080.exe
foxyshadis
8th September 2007, 04:18
Better how? Do you have any bench? :)
Compatibility is much higher (strange/old/broken streams, newer formats like evob/m2ts, tags, advanced container features, multichannel), that's unequivocally better in my opinion even if it was a bit slower. There shouldn't be any significant speed differences, though I'd expect lavc to be faster if there are.
And yeah, overlay is broken on some things, in fact it's very badly broken on a lot of older chipsets (flipped, green, distorted, etc), and it's a bit underfeatured, so I wouldn't have made that change.
clsid
8th September 2007, 11:04
That is why there is an option to change it.
I personally prefer Overlay above System Default (= VMR-7 on XP).
Delerue
13th September 2007, 03:26
Compatibility is much higher (strange/old/broken streams, newer formats like evob/m2ts, tags, advanced container features, multichannel), that's unequivocally better in my opinion even if it was a bit slower. There shouldn't be any significant speed differences, though I'd expect lavc to be faster if there are.
And yeah, overlay is broken on some things, in fact it's very badly broken on a lot of older chipsets (flipped, green, distorted, etc), and it's a bit underfeatured, so I wouldn't have made that change.
I got it. Thanks for your explanation, man. ;)
Skyfish
13th September 2007, 10:57
I seem to have the same problem as Amour on page 3 but not with
an MP3 but with an .avi.
That .avi does not open in VLC or WMP and I am at a loss on how I can solve it, thanks for your help.
Here is the error message I get from MPC
The following pin(s) failed to find a connectable filter :
xxx.avi :: Output
Media Type 0:
--------------------------
Unknown
AM_MEDIA_TYPE:
majortype: MEDIATYPE_Stream {E436EB83-524F-11CE-9F53-0020AF0BA770}
subtype: MEDIASUBTYPE_Avi {E436EB88-524F-11CE-9F53-0020AF0BA770}
formattype: TIME_FORMAT_NONE {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}
bFixedSizeSamples: 1
bTemporalCompression: 0
lSampleSize: 1
cbFormat: 0
Media Type 1:
--------------------------
Unknown
AM_MEDIA_TYPE:
majortype: MEDIATYPE_Stream {E436EB83-524F-11CE-9F53-0020AF0BA770}
subtype: TIME_FORMAT_NONE {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}
formattype: TIME_FORMAT_NONE {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}
bFixedSizeSamples: 1
bTemporalCompression: 0
lSampleSize: 1
Delerue
13th September 2007, 12:59
I seem to have the same problem as Amour on page 3 but not with
an MP3 but with an .avi.
That .avi does not open in VLC or WMP and I am at a loss on how I can solve it, thanks for your help.
Here is the error message I get from MPC
Can you open with at least one player? Can you provide a sample?
Skyfish
13th September 2007, 17:07
VLC opens and shows snow and a weird very high pitched sound.
Both other players can't open, with MPC giving this error message.
The file is 700MB so how do I make a smaller one for samples ?
Delerue
13th September 2007, 18:57
VLC opens and shows snow and a weird very high pitched sound.
Both other players can't open, with MPC giving this error message.
The file is 700MB so how do I make a smaller one for samples ?
I'm afraid I can't teach you this, because I'm not a good Virtualdub (probably the program that you'll have to use) user. With the sample in hand, come here and I'll try to help you. ;)
clsid
13th September 2007, 19:12
If even VLC fails to play an AVI file, then it is 99% certain that the file is b0rked/damaged/corrupt/fake.
Delerue
13th September 2007, 20:51
If even VLC fails to play an AVI file, then it is 99% certain that the file is b0rked/damaged/corrupt/fake.
Yeah. Probably he got a DRMed file.
Lilien
13th September 2007, 21:01
Code injection using avi files in Media Player Classic and MPlayer (http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/95964)
Is someone working on a patch/fix?
thomaz909
13th September 2007, 22:29
yeahh wtf is going on with gabest ??? leaving the best m player on earth unpatched sucks. pls fix it.
KoD
14th September 2007, 10:48
Pls die.
clsid
14th September 2007, 12:40
Gabest has no time to work on the Guliverkli project.
A workaround for the vulnerability is to disable the internal AVI source filter. It is disabled by default in my build.
raynor
14th September 2007, 17:39
A workaround for the vulnerability is to disable the internal AVI source filter. It is disabled by default in my build.
May I ask why you chose to disable it by default ?
Is the internal AVI splitter worse than the system's default one ?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the internal
AVI splitter on the one hand and the system default on the other hand ??
clsid
14th September 2007, 17:57
Advantages:
- works better with partially downloaded files
- works with files that don't have an index
Disadvantages
- the newly discovered vulnerability
- doesn't work with files that are non-interleaved
Kado
14th September 2007, 18:50
what about haali splitter avi support?
KoD
14th September 2007, 21:04
what about haali splitter avi support?
Haali would know better, but I do remember having met some avi files that did not work with his splitter.
As a side note, I got a rule 4 violation for my above post, so I'll behave nicely from now on.
clsid
14th September 2007, 22:47
The recently discovered security vulnerabilities have been fixed. Big thanks to Casimir666.
Fresh build can be found in opening post.
Lilien
15th September 2007, 02:31
Great news, thanks!
raynor
15th September 2007, 02:52
Advantages:
- works better with partially downloaded files
- works with files that don't have an index
Disadvantages
- the newly discovered vulnerability
- doesn't work with files that are non-interleaved
Sounds to me (now that the vulnerability has been fixed (thx casimir)), that the INTERNAL splitter has more advantages, am
I right ? :confused:
wyrd
15th September 2007, 03:24
clsid, Thanks for update.
mirrored here;)
http://tirnanog.fate.jp/mirror/Misc%20(not%20by%20celtic_druid)/guliverkli-clsid/20070914/
KoD
15th September 2007, 10:15
If I'd have to chose between:
1) Microsoft's splitter that works with all complete files
2) gabest's splitter that works on incomplete files but doesn't work with a portion of the complete ones,
I'd chose option (1).
The reasons are that I have no interest to watch incomplete (corrupted, in other words) files and I'd rather see all the complete files, not only some of them.
But that's only my choice.
Note: well, there are compliant opendml avi files that Microsoft's splitter would choke on, but nobody makes such files as the primary test platform for avi files is Windows and the inability to play those files would be noticed quite quickly by the encoder herself/himself.
LoRd_MuldeR
15th September 2007, 11:39
Thanks a lot :D
mirror: http://mulder.dummwiedeutsch.de/pub/downloads/mplayerc.2007-09-14.zip
(mplayerc.exe + d3dx9_35.dll, UPX'd)
clsid
15th September 2007, 11:40
If you use MPC to preview partially downloaded files, like from eMule or something, then the internal one is very useful.
For any normal AVI files that one would download, I mean backup, it does not matter much which one you use.
Complete files that don't work with one of the two are just plain crap and should be shift+del-entered.
Fonk
15th September 2007, 16:47
Just like to say thanks! For this great Media Player.
And i follow all the updates here. Great to see support for it:)
Keep up the great work you all:)
:thanks:
raynor
15th September 2007, 17:05
1) Microsoft's splitter that works with all complete files
2) gabest's splitter that works on incomplete files but doesn't work with a portion of the complete ones,
Hehe, I've never encountered a file that gabest's splitter choked on,
but maybe thats because I was lucky ... but I figure
"non-interleaved" files (the ones gabest's splitter wont work with)
aren't exactly common, are they ?
LigH
15th September 2007, 17:58
"Non-interleaved AVI" should be avoided like hell if you want to allow people to watch the file from a slowly positioning device, like a CD/DVD drive: The read head would need to jump forth and back to read a piece of video from here, a piece of audio from there, and back to the video...
Interleaving would have had written those pieces into the AVI file close to the time when they are needed, avoiding lots of seeks.
If you ever encounter such a file - remux it! Preferably with AviMux-GUI, VirtualDubMod or similar able tools.
Disabled
18th September 2007, 10:18
"Non-interleaved AVI" should be avoided like hell if you want to allow people to watch the file from a slowly positioning device, like a CD/DVD drive: The read head would need to jump forth and back to read a piece of video from here, a piece of audio from there, and back to the video...
Interleaving would have had written those pieces into the AVI file close to the time when they are needed, avoiding lots of seeks.
If you ever encounter such a file - remux it! Preferably with AviMux-GUI, VirtualDubMod or similar able tools.
Doesn't AVI stand for "Audio Video Interleaved"? Interesting to hear there are non-interleaved AVIs...
Leak
18th September 2007, 12:56
Doesn't AVI stand for "Audio Video Interleaved"? Interesting to hear there are non-interleaved AVIs...
True, but I think the interval at which audio and video are interleaved (usually 500ms IIRC) is configurable - if you use the length of the whole file as interval you'll basically get a non-interleaved file... :D
Thunderbolt8
25th September 2007, 11:36
I have no clue of that, can someone tell me where to copy/how to use/apply all these filters & patches to make them work?
clsid
25th September 2007, 12:05
You don't need to use the patches. Those are for developers. Ignore them.
The filters work like any other DirectShow filter. To enable them you need to register them:
regsvr32.exe "C:\some\folder\example.ax"
Thunderbolt8
25th September 2007, 15:16
are these filter newer than the ones in the old version, or are they included there at all? do these filter also come along with programs that are otherwise installed/regged? if yes, are these newer version of those filters other programs include?
iron2000
25th September 2007, 18:06
Can I know what is the difference between this MPC and MPC HC?
Sharktooth
25th September 2007, 19:06
... yes, sure. head to the MPC HC homepage AND read the first post of this thread ...
Shakey_Jake33
25th September 2007, 19:24
Can I know what is the difference between this MPC and MPC HC?
I don't think this build supports EVR, does it? It's the main thing added in the HC version for me.
Kado
25th September 2007, 22:39
no evr on clsid build. go here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=123537) for info on mpc hc like Sharktooth said.
max24
26th September 2007, 20:02
german version mplayerc_20070918.de (http://rapidshare.com/files/58674147/mplayerc_20070918_FIX.DE.zip)-
FIX
Icon Patcher
Icon Patcher works only in english version, fix for german version coming soon
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/9706/213qh2.png
Translation $ Icon Patcher by www.mom-community.to
Schrade
27th September 2007, 01:15
I don't understand.. that icon is already in the Media Player Classic contained in this thread. What are you patching?
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.