Log in

View Full Version : Advanced Benchmark v.2 for H264, H265, AV1 and H266


Pages : 1 2 [3]

Sagittaire
17th August 2025, 13:44
Is there a setting somewhere to change ?

You can change priority to "high" at each encoding time or change the priority in register:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FN8HcLa87A

renq
31st August 2025, 14:02
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 134.768 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 168.442 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 197.742 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 318.505 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 826.828 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
Stock cooler, ASUS Prime X570-Pro , 2x8GB DDR4-2400 ECC, Win 8.1

It's my ECC NAS hardware, Win 8.1 just happened to be on a random SSD I found and I just booted it up.

RanmaCanada
8th September 2025, 04:18
https://i.postimg.cc/bNgSZXYx/image.png

In case anyone is wondering about some of the "new" AMD offerings.

renq
9th September 2025, 10:43
https://i.postimg.cc/bNgSZXYx/image.png

In case anyone is wondering about some of the "new" AMD offerings.
Which laptop?

So 4xZen 5 + 4xZen 5c is about 1% faster than 6xZen 3 (5600X (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=2015181#post2015181))

RanmaCanada
9th September 2025, 22:22
Which laptop?

So 4xZen 5 + 4xZen 5c is about 1% faster than 6xZen 3 (5600X (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=2015181#post2015181))

It's a Dell DB16255. Nice unit, powered by USB-C, and is relatively light.

rwill
12th September 2025, 07:11
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X 32-Cores
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 17.892 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 23.863 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 27.758 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 55.586 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 167.228 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------



Faster than my Zen2 Threadripper...

jpsdr
12th September 2025, 19:51
And faster than my AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 32-Cores, as should be expected. There is nevertheless around 20%, not bad, but not worth spending again around 5000$... :D

Sagittaire
16th September 2025, 21:46
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X 32-Cores
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 17.892 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 23.863 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 27.758 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 55.586 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 167.228 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------



Faster than my Zen2 Threadripper...

https://i.ibb.co/Cs6mBbDN/Bench.png (https://ibb.co/XkDjX7MN)

Really impressive result for this 9970X .... simply 2 times more powerful than the previous 3970x.

My Advanced Benchmark v.2 is simply the only benchmark in area that is currently able to show the real encoding power with such Threadripper CPUs.

And this will be particularly the case with the next generation of Intel's next-gen "Nova Lake-S" CPUs, which will have up to 52 cores.

Sagittaire
16th September 2025, 21:50
Nobody to bench the Intel 285K ... ???

I'am really curious to see result versus 14900K and 9950X ...

huhn
17th September 2025, 08:57
someone has to actually buy that CPU to bench it.

renq
20th September 2025, 08:47
Given that Ryzen does much better in Linux, would be nice to get comparative results..

for instance, Phoronix tests for 9950x -

https://phoronix.com/benchmark/result/windows-11-25h2-vs-ubuntu-linux-cpu-benchmarks/geometric-mean-of-all-test-results-result-composite-w12vulcb.svgz
https://www.phoronix.com/review/windows-11-25h2-ubuntu-2510/6

jpsdr
20th September 2025, 10:44
Would be nice to have also Windows 10, because i had great differences between Windows 10 and Windows 11 with my 7975WX.

benwaggoner
20th September 2025, 20:37
Given that Ryzen does much better in Linux, would be nice to get comparative results..

for instance, Phoronix tests for 9950x -

https://phoronix.com/benchmark/result/windows-11-25h2-vs-ubuntu-linux-cpu-benchmarks/geometric-mean-of-all-test-results-result-composite-w12vulcb.svgz
https://www.phoronix.com/review/windows-11-25h2-ubuntu-2510/6
I note that the ASTC Encoder benchmark, probably the closest to video encoding, shows a slight performance advantage for Windows.

https://www.phoronix.com/review/windows-11-25h2-ubuntu-2510/4

Z2697
20th September 2025, 21:11
I note that the ASTC Encoder benchmark, probably the closest to video encoding, shows a slight performance advantage for Windows.

https://www.phoronix.com/review/windows-11-25h2-ubuntu-2510/4

There're OpenAPV tests as well, which is another story.

TEB
21st September 2025, 00:05
IFP is enabled. For better performance, AlfUnitSize is adjusted to the CTUSize.
Using IFP at low number of threads (<12) does not provide more speedup, consider disabling IFP.
run.sh: line 82: warning: command substitution: ignored null byte in input
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700KF
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 50.279 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 61.127 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 68.972 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 119.728 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 336.502 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

Sagittaire
21st September 2025, 09:13
IFP is enabled. For better performance, AlfUnitSize is adjusted to the CTUSize.
Using IFP at low number of threads (<12) does not provide more speedup, consider disabling IFP.
run.sh: line 82: warning: command substitution: ignored null byte in input
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700KF
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 50.279 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 61.127 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 68.972 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 119.728 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 336.502 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

There is problem with your 14700KF bench.

The result should be closer to a 14900K with only 4 fewer ECore.

TEB
22nd September 2025, 10:55
There is problem with your 14700KF bench.

The result should be closer to a 14900K with only 4 fewer ECore.

Please elaborate and post a suggestion action

Sagittaire
22nd September 2025, 21:36
Please elaborate and post a suggestion action

14900K at stock frequencies produce these result:

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Core i9-14900K
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 33.965 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 43.507 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 51.432 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 86.797 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 241.588 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------


Are you sure that your 14700KF is at stock frequencies?

You must don't use another application during bench for best result.

TEB
25th September 2025, 11:55
yes, everything is stock. No over or underclocking afaik!
Windows 11, beta run


14900K at stock frequencies produce these result:

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Core i9-14900K
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 33.965 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 43.507 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 51.432 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 86.797 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 241.588 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------


Are you sure that your 14700KF is at stock frequencies?

You must don't use another application during bench for best result.

littleD
6th October 2025, 05:51
Another Ryzen to the chart, my first buy.

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Ryzen 5 8645HS w/ Radeon 760M Graphics
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 131.440 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 143.743 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 173.557 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 253.541 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 669.482 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

Sagittaire
8th October 2025, 16:20
Another Ryzen to the chart, my first buy.

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Ryzen 5 8645HS w/ Radeon 760M Graphics
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 131.440 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 143.743 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 173.557 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 253.541 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 669.482 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

well this little 8645HS is on par with 11900K (top desktop CPU for Intel in 2021).

Marsu42
9th October 2025, 09:40
well this little 8645HS is on par with 11900K (top desktop CPU for Intel in 2021).

...and the older desktop cpu won't be able to match the newer mobile-ish cpu with performance per wats.

Speaking of older, there's my good ol' dual-core Tigerlake mobile cpu:

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | 11th Gen Core i5-1135G7
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 467.611 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 437.727 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 532.568 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 827.772 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 2091.543 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

littleD
9th October 2025, 12:53
...and the older desktop cpu won't be able to match the newer mobile-ish cpu with performance per wats.

Speaking of older, there's my good ol' dual-core Tigerlake mobile cpu:

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | 11th Gen Core i5-1135G7
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 467.611 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 437.727 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 532.568 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 827.772 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 2091.543 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

Funny part is that Ryzen™ 5 8645HS is the same as its first installment 7640HS form half of the 2023.
And this looks same as newer Ryzen 5 240. So AMD just rebranded some processors due to Intel +++process node incompetence.

The next gen is Ryzen AI with perf/eco cores. While the wattage is much smaller, then for example AI 350 from previous page is bit slower than 8645HS with less cores, so this time, its AMD who went to Ultra models (U ment as ultra efficiency).

Not sure how this P/E cores story will end up, since the efficiency clocking is still much better on Android than on Windows with Power Plans from the previous epoque.

hajj_3
15th December 2025, 23:52
Laptop Core i3-1215U with ddr4 sodimm:

encoded 1611 frames in 2087.46s (0.77 fps), 2277.61 kb/s, Avg QP:29.10
[aac @ 000002427035e240] Qavg: 2222.263
run.sh: line 82: warning: command substitution: ignored null byte in input
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-1215U

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 285.732 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 386.295 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 445.209 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 724.074 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 2087.893 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

charliebaby
25th December 2025, 14:20
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 35.075 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 38.385 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 40.828 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 73.365 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 239.468 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

renq
27th December 2025, 17:21
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 35.075 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 38.385 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 40.828 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 73.365 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 239.468 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

Which settings and cooling did you use? There's already a 9950X3D score posted - https://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=2018097&postcount=81 - but their overall score is 195 seconds, an 18% improvement.

Z2697
27th December 2025, 20:22
Anything except SVT-AV1 is a lot slower, I wonder what magic dust he uses on his computer. To make this distinct performance, I mean.
Or he replaced the encoder with newer version, as we all know that SVT-AV1 made major changes to the presets that re-balanced the speed and quality, it was somewhat recent.

Sagittaire
1st January 2026, 20:15
Anything except SVT-AV1 is a lot slower, I wonder what magic dust he uses on his computer. To make this distinct performance, I mean.
Or he replaced the encoder with newer version, as we all know that SVT-AV1 made major changes to the presets that re-balanced the speed and quality, it was somewhat recent.

I don't replace ffmpeg.exe with newer build in original version.

Anyway Within the limits of uncertainty, the result for SVT-AV1 is the same (41.492s vs 40.828s).

To get the best possible result in this test, no background tasks should be running.

And Asmodian result use PBO profil for 9950x3D.

Sagittaire
1st January 2026, 20:22
Always no Intel 285K for test this benchmark ... ???

Z2697
1st January 2026, 21:22
I don't replace ffmpeg.exe with newer build in original version.

So I said "he", charliebaby, if he replaced the binary while others don't, that will make a bit sense, as SVT-AV1 is the only one encoder in the test that has been tweaking presets quite recently.

No other reasonable hardware/software tuning should make such a different effect.

renq
7th February 2026, 20:50
Crank up the fan and leave the computer undisturbed (background programs are limited not completely closed)
I'm planning on 9950X upgrade, gotta do a better comparison when that happens, and perhaps compare that "awful" inter CCD latency with the corresponding AGESA fix.

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 35.127 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 43.569 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 53.986 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 87.040 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 250.485 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

My result for comparison - dirty Win10 install, B650M DS3H, BIOS F37, 2x16GB 6000MHz CL40, CNPS20X air-cooling, PBO Auto etc etc

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 34.212 s -2,6%
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 42.059 s -3,5%
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 53.130 s -1,6%
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 84.831 s -2,5%
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 240.709 s -3,9%
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

I'll install Ubuntu and test that next

rwill
11th February 2026, 09:20
Would be nice to have also Windows 10, because i had great differences between Windows 10 and Windows 11 with my 7975WX.

Going back to this, I would like to note that my 9970X results were with a fresh Windows 11 install with just recent drivers applied...

meto
17th May 2026, 11:41
270K Plus+DDR5 8400

|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 28.853 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 37.008 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 44.141 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 70.217 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 195.205 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------

OC P=5.6 E=5.1 NGU=33 D2D=34
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| CPU | Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 270K Plus
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H264 - x264 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 27.457 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H265 - x265 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 35.316 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| AV1 - SVT-AV1 - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 41.992 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| H266 - VVEnc - 1080p - HDR - Multipart encoding - 1611 frames | 66.884 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------
| Overall - 1080p - HDR - ABR Ladder encoding - 1611 frames | 186.282 s
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------