Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

Domains: forum.doom9.org / forum.doom9.net / forum.doom9.se

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Capturing and Editing Video > Avisynth Usage
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th July 2006, 06:32   #1  |  Link
TonyJibrone
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Tips for encoding video with inherently bad picture

I often encode old 20+ year-old VHS tapes and ultra low budget films, as I am a collector of Bad Cinema. So even with all the wealth of knowledge here, I'm still kind of at a loss. There's no point in maintaining visual integrity when your source looks like



for example.

So I was wondering what things I could try to clean up these videos, keeping in mind that my technical knowledge is fledgeling.

Basically the only things I've messed with are
YlevelsS
Tweak
Hybridfupp (I just used preset="hybridq" for the first time)

and I generally tend to use a low-bitrate quant. matrix. But I'm sure there's a lot out there I could be doing. I appreciate any and all help!
TonyJibrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 20:24   #2  |  Link
Teegedeck
Moderator, Ex(viD)-Mascot
 
Teegedeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,564
Using a low-bitrate matrix is a good idea. Apart from that, questions about filtering have a better place in the AviSynth Usage subforum --> moved.
__________________
It's a man's life in Doom9's 52nd MPEG division.
"The cat sat on the mat."
ATM I'm thoroughly enjoying the Banshee - a fantastic music player/ripper for Linux. Give it a whirl!
Teegedeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 20:31   #3  |  Link
Boulder
Pig on the wing
 
Boulder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 5,844
There have been several threads about treating low-quality material recently, browsing through the posts here should help if the search engine doesn't find any good threads.

I wouldn't say the screenshot looks that bad - it's just blurry to my eyes. I've seen far worse cases here
__________________
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
I'll see you on the dark side of the Moon...
Boulder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 23:19   #4  |  Link
Chainmax
Huh?
 
Chainmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 3,103
I would suggest some very strong LimitedSharpenFaster settings with SMode=4 followed by AddGrain(5,0,0).
__________________
Read Decomb's readmes and tutorials, the IVTC tutorial and the capture guide in order to learn about combing and how to deal with it.
Chainmax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 23:30   #5  |  Link
Heini011
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 148
Warning:

i got errorsafe malware popup while looking at the image link.
Heini011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 04:07   #6  |  Link
Mug Funky
interlace this!
 
Mug Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: i'm in ur transfers, addin noise
Posts: 4,555
probably just crop off the crap at the bottom and encode as-is.

low-bitrate matrix in this case wont have much of an effect - there are no high frequencies for it to hit harder. but it wont hurt either...

i assume it's been TBC'd already, as the picture edges are straight and not wibbly. beyond that there's not much you can do except fake detail. seesaw combined with frfun i've found to be nice looking for over-blurry stuff.
__________________
sucking the life out of your videos since 2004
Mug Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 05:44   #7  |  Link
TonyJibrone
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Here's after adding egde sharpening via hybridfupp



But I will definitely try those other methods in the future. (Sorry about the imageshack popups, it seems to only happen in IE)
TonyJibrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 19:30   #8  |  Link
LocalH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 135
I don't see that video as being that bad, really. Scanline timing seems tight. I can't tell if there is any vertical judder since there is just the one still. The only real problem I see with that video is a lack of detail, which is common with even the best VHS recordings. Now, if you want to see some really bad video, look at these screenshots:

Horizontal jitter all over the place, partially correctable
This particular video must be at least 20th-generation.
LocalH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:19.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.