Log in

View Full Version : Run-time Error '63'


Pages : 1 [2]

jdobbs
13th August 2005, 00:43
@soupdragon

Ok got it. Thanks. I think I have this one fixed -- but since I haven't actually repeated the error I'll wait for your feedback on the next release. I hope to get it out quickly.

soupdragon
13th August 2005, 10:02
@soupdragon

Ok got it. Thanks. I think I have this one fixed -- but since I haven't actually repeated the error I'll wait for your feedback on the next release. I hope to get it out quickly.


Ok no problem :)

ookzDVD
14th August 2005, 23:54
@jdobbs,

Done,
Here is the file which you've been requested.

I hope this could help you.

Thank you.

jdobbs
15th August 2005, 01:06
Thanks much!

soupdragon
16th August 2005, 05:24
Just got RC 5 but am on my way out to work. Will post results of Simpsons as soon as poss................

soupdragon
16th August 2005, 15:36
I'm sad to report that the "Runtime Error 52 - Bad file name or number" on discs 3 + 4 of the Simpsons Season 4 is still present with rc5. Same place, right at the end of the Prepare phase. :confused:

jdobbs
16th August 2005, 16:04
Damn. Are you absolutely positive you are using RC5?

soupdragon
16th August 2005, 17:37
Damn. Are you absolutely positive you are using RC5?

100% certain. I've un-installed all the bits and put AviSynth v2.54 back on then used the installer. I've also re-ripped the files from dvd too just in case anything had got corrupted along the way :(

I'm limited to the time I can get on this machine to view posts (all encoding done on the other machine in my bedroom) as my son is hogging it with World of Warcraft so I've got to bribe him to let me on :mad:

RaistlinMajere
16th August 2005, 19:11
Just running the said discs through rc5 now. Will let you know how I get on asap

RaistlinMajere
16th August 2005, 20:47
Can confirm :(

Jdobbs please read your pms for easier access to working folder lists etc.

ookzDVD
16th August 2005, 23:49
@jdobbs,

Sorry for asking this, I hope you don't mind to answer it:
Can I just perform Rebuild without prepare and re-encode ?
Folder D2VAVS, rebuilder.inf, etc, from RC4.1 (which Error 6), etc is still there.

Thank you.

jdobbs
17th August 2005, 01:23
@ookzDVD

Yes, I think you should be able to.

ookzDVD
17th August 2005, 08:21
@ookzDVD

Yes, I think you should be able to.

I just try the RB-RC5 with the same DVD which failed with RC4.1
(Interactive DVD: My Plaything: Stacy Valentine)

FYI I was re-rebuild only and re-do the whole thing (one click mode)
and the result is still "Run Time Error 6" : Overflow
during rebuild phase: "Updating NAVPACKS for VOBID_89"

I also attach the file which you may need for de-bugging.

If you need other files, just tell me.

Thank you.

jdobbs
17th August 2005, 13:30
Hmm... it seems I only partially fixed it. These files were what led me to the first fix:

08/15/2005 04:55 AM 1,073,739,776 0_VILVU.VOB
08/15/2005 04:57 AM 2,144,710,656 1_VILVU.VOB
08/15/2005 04:59 AM 1,073,739,776 2_VILVU.VOB
08/15/2005 05:01 AM 2,144,843,776 3_VILVU.VOB

This means there is an ILVU section of the DVD that is over 4GB long. These output files should never be over 1GB long -- so I followed the code and found an error in the way the record number was being calculated when you went past the 1GB mark. So I fixed it.

Here is the output from the run with RC5:

08/17/2005 01:08 PM 1,073,739,776 0_VILVU.VOB
08/17/2005 01:10 PM 1,073,739,776 1_VILVU.VOB
08/17/2005 01:14 PM 1,073,739,776 2_VILVU.VOB
08/17/2005 01:50 PM 2,147,395,584 3_VILVU.VOB

Back to the drawing board.... I hope Ms. Valentine understands how much trouble we're going through for her!

ookzDVD
17th August 2005, 14:04
Back to the drawing board.... I hope Ms. Valentine understands how much trouble we're going through for her!

Yeah, I hope she'll understand :)

jdobbs
17th August 2005, 21:32
@ookzDVD

I think I have this fixed. Check your PM.

jdobbs
17th August 2005, 21:36
Could someone send me (or post) a REBUILDER.LOG file from one of the two Simpsons Discs that get the "Runtime Error 52"?

RaistlinMajere
17th August 2005, 22:24
Could someone send me (or post) a REBUILDER.LOG file from one of the two Simpsons Discs that get the "Runtime Error 52"?
Simpsons S4 Disc 3 log


- Detected ANGLE and/or INTERLEAVING on source.
[22:03:38] One Click encoding activated...
-----------------
[22:03:40] Phase I, PREPARATION started.
- CCE SP ECLCCE encoder selected.
- VTS_01: 3,260,519 sectors.
-- ANGLE and/or INTERLEAVING is present.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
- Processed 561.3MB ILVU section...
- Processed 1,067.0MB ILVU section...


Simpsons S4 Disc 4 log


- Detected ANGLE and/or INTERLEAVING on source.
[22:12:33] One Click encoding activated...
-----------------
[22:12:34] Phase I, PREPARATION started.
- CCE SP ECLCCE encoder selected.
- VTS_01: 3,218,199 sectors.
-- ANGLE and/or INTERLEAVING is present.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
- Processed 593.7MB ILVU section...



Not much to post i'm afraid jdobbs. Both discs produce error 52 just as the progress bar for vts01 reaches the very end.

RaistlinMajere
18th August 2005, 06:45
disc 3 passes through the prepare stage with rc51 :) great work jdobbs

I have batched both disc 3 and 4 while I'm at work today so fingers crossed they have no problems.
I let you know how they get on tonight

jdobbs
18th August 2005, 06:52
It was a simple error -- but very hard to find. I'm glad to put it behind me.

RaistlinMajere
18th August 2005, 15:53
Well just got home from work, Disc 3 is done and a quick watch through the multiangled sections and its flawless. Disc 4 is about 70% through stage II.

As ever, great work Jdobbs :thanks:

edit : disc 4 performing flawlessly too :)

soupdragon
19th August 2005, 05:23
I'm more than happy to confirm the success of Simpsons Season 4 disc 3........ I've got disc 4 on now but am confident that it will be fine. ;)
Well done that man. You never give up do you Jdobbs? Thanks again........

ookzDVD
19th August 2005, 15:04
@jdobbs,

Sorry for the late update, there was electricity problem on my city, the latest one was failed due of power shutdown :(
Finally I can try the RC5.1 and the result is OK! I can see Miss Valentine smilling at me now :)

Thank you for your great job Jdobbs. :)

soupdragon
19th August 2005, 21:45
Been at work all day :( I'm happy to add Simpsons season disc 4 to the list of completed back-ups :cool: Brilliant work by the man.......
Many thanks

jdobbs
19th August 2005, 21:48
Thanks for your help. I love it when a plan comes together. These were the last of the errors I was really worried about. I think DVD-RB may be ready for final release of v1.00.

jptheripper
19th August 2005, 21:49
sweet!!!

ookzDVD
19th August 2005, 23:33
Just try with VCA - RAW, and the result is OK! :)

apfraats
20th August 2005, 00:37
Are you doing any other processing? I just ran it through DVD-RB again just to see if I could repeat it as you described, and I imported the output into DVDRemake Pro (v2.6.4) without any problems.


While you have time to answer this thread, mine you skipped, HUH....
(see the one before this) :sly: :) :) :)

But to be seriously, DVD-REMAKE-PRO has a 3.1.3 version already...........

Maybe time to do an update ????

jdobbs
20th August 2005, 01:21
I'm not sure what your referring to... the problem described there was fixed???

Updates cost money (which isn't something I get a lot of from DVD-RB) and this version does everything I've needed.

soupdragon
20th August 2005, 10:09
I'm just glad you have so much patience :cool: The only thing that I can think of now that would make it perfect for me is the encoding of menu's as some of the ones I've done are around the 650mb mark. I know I could use shrink on them but it's just not the same :( I know it's on your list of "things to do" so I'll say no more on the subject. Thanks again Jdobbs. You ARE a star :thanks:

apfraats
20th August 2005, 18:50
I'm not sure what your referring to... the problem described there was fixed???

Updates cost money (which isn't something I get a lot of from DVD-RB) and this version does everything I've needed.


I donated you ! and probably more do.

I know, it's probably not in balance with the time and effort you spend on it.

But if you are going to 'the market' with DVD-RB-PRO sure you will get a lot more out of it.

Just make sure it's almost impossible for people to use 'illegal' copies.

As it's going now, with a keyfile with youre email, it'look fine, but i'm not a carck and hacking expert and I don't know how easy of difficult it is te crack.

But let's go back to DVD-REMAKE 3.1.3

I have bought old versions (before 3) a few months ago.

The improvements made in 3+ version are awesome.

It now automatically points out incinsistencies when you edit a DVD-STRUCTURE, has a video-player preview option with selectable sound an subtitle tarck, had an UNDO-function which is very very handy !

And it's much more strict in checking DVD-structure.

It's much more enjoyable to work with, and (that will cut down costs too) is much faster in loading and saving.

And it's not really that highly priced.

About the same as DVD-RB-PRO would be...... ;) :)

RaistlinMajere
20th August 2005, 23:28
It now automatically points out incinsistencies when you edit a DVD-STRUCTURE

And it's much more strict in checking DVD-structure. (refering to dvd-remake)

It's much more enjoyable to work with, and (that will cut down costs too) is much faster in loading and saving.

And it's not really that highly priced.

About the same as DVD-RB-PRO would be...... ;) :)

1) The majority of dvd originals have inconsistances, this probably causes more headaches for jdobbs than anything else. If truth be known dvd-rb keeps the structure closer to the original than any other program I have used. Top marks to jdobbs on that score

2) I doubt very much Dvd-remake is more strict in checking dvd-structure. I have not tried the very latest versions but this certainly wasn't the case before.

3) Dvd-remake does nothing for me that can't be done neater with pgcedit, a bit of knowledge. And pgcedit is free

4) DVD-rb is simply the best program for doing what it does, resizing a dvd at top quality. And as far as I am concerned jdobbs can never get enough appreciation or donations for the very obvious hard work and hours he puts into the program.

Its better to be master of a few skills , than a "jack of all trades, master of none"

apfraats
21st August 2005, 00:10
The point was improvements of DVD-REMAKE 3+, not anything else.

So I don't give a reaction on the other subjesct you mentioned.

By the way, I would like a tool wichever it is, not to keep te structure to be as closed as possible to the ORIGINAL but to the STANDARDS !!!
That's much more important, as if you day lot's of DVD's have inconsistencies.

I see you probably don't have DVD-REMAKE 3.1.3.

As the things you are saying are completely rubbish....

It's in now way comparable to Ifoedit en other tools.

Just try to split a DVD into two parts with a nice ending screen on the first DVD saying "Please insert next DVD" just to mention a little example.

You maybe can do it with PGCedit/Ifoedit or something else, but with DVD-REMAKE pro I can instantly do it within 1 minute........

And any incostencies, not checked by other programs (ie you can really mess things up) are checked with the new DVD-REMAKE_PRO 3.1.3 version.

It's like comapring programming machine code with C+.

I prefer C+.

So I prefer DVDREMAKE-PRO.

With DVD-REMAKE-PRO you also can edit internal navigation structures in a very user-friendly way. That's not possible with the other programms.

You can acccess and use and modify user- en systemregisters with DVDREMAKE-PRO.

Try doing that with other tools.......

RaistlinMajere
21st August 2005, 10:39
The point was improvements of DVD-REMAKE 3+, not anything else.

So I don't give a reaction on the other subjesct you mentioned.

By the way, I would like a tool wichever it is, not to keep te structure to be as closed as possible to the ORIGINAL but to the STANDARDS !!!
That's much more important, as if you day lot's of DVD's have inconsistencies.

I see you probably don't have DVD-REMAKE 3.1.3.

As the things you are saying are completely rubbish....

It's in now way comparable to Ifoedit en other tools.

Just try to split a DVD into two parts with a nice ending screen on the first DVD saying "Please insert next DVD" just to mention a little example.

You maybe can do it with PGCedit/Ifoedit or something else, but with DVD-REMAKE pro I can instantly do it within 1 minute........

And any incostencies, not checked by other programs (ie you can really mess things up) are checked with the new DVD-REMAKE_PRO 3.1.3 version.

It's like comapring programming machine code with C+.

I prefer C+.

So I prefer DVDREMAKE-PRO.

With DVD-REMAKE-PRO you also can edit internal navigation structures in a very user-friendly way. That's not possible with the other programms.

You can acccess and use and modify user- en systemregisters with DVDREMAKE-PRO.

Try doing that with other tools.......


then piss off and program your own program to do everything YOU want to do and stop complaining here, theres just no arguing with ungrateful squirts like you

I suppose you'll be asking jdobbs for dvd-rb to spring clean windows, virus protect and pop up windows with pretty young ladies on to entertain you when it senses you feeling bored.

dvd ifo's are basically logic diagrams , its not hard to alter any register or link, you just need a bit of knowledge as to the commands and to be able to think logically.

ookzDVD
21st August 2005, 11:10
I think this is too far away from the topic.

Zyphon
21st August 2005, 11:21
Not only is it off-topic, RaistlinMajere is in breach of Rule #4 about Insults and Profanities with that p### off comment. :eek:

RaistlinMajere
21st August 2005, 14:37
Not only is it off-topic, RaistlinMajere is in breach of Rule #4 about Insults and Profanities with that p### off comment. :eek:

for that i apologize, hardly hardcore insulting or swearing though. Should be a rule 5 about constant uncalled for whinging

apfraats
21st August 2005, 20:24
Yes you were of topic, and see the community react.........

That you don't understand what the tread is about, it's better to not react at all !!!

It was about the difference of 'old' DVD-REMAKE-PRO with the new one.

I was just suggesting JDOBBS to take a look at 3.1.3 and maybe upgrade to it, cause he is using 2+ version and sees no improvements in the 3+ that schould drive him to buy it, although I think there are.

So please read, read, and read, before using offensive language and going totally of topic.

I was not saying ANYTHING about DVD-RB, it's a tools I use with much pleasure. So quote me if you can about that in this thread, I'm sure it's not gonna work out for you........

Keep playing with PGCedit and live happy forever.....

Trahald
21st August 2005, 21:34
Yes.. please calm it down fellows. both of you are off topic (meaning to this forum dvd-rebuilder ) and this thread. Of course there is no need for personal attacks.

RaistlinMajere
23rd August 2005, 00:37
Yes you were of topic, and see the community react.........

That you don't understand what the tread is about, it's better to not react at all !!!

It was about the difference of 'old' DVD-REMAKE-PRO with the new one.

I was just suggesting JDOBBS to take a look at 3.1.3 and maybe upgrade to it, cause he is using 2+ version and sees no improvements in the 3+ that schould drive him to buy it, although I think there are.

So please read, read, and read, before using offensive language and going totally of topic.

I was not saying ANYTHING about DVD-RB, it's a tools I use with much pleasure. So quote me if you can about that in this thread, I'm sure it's not gonna work out for you........

Keep playing with PGCedit and live happy forever.....

apfraats

the thread title "run time error 63" so why are you going on about dvd-remake, your not even in the right forum. I am just fed up of seeing your name "apfraats" appearing in threads shouting the odds without offering an help as such, like the thread where you claimed dvd-rb changed your pal disc to ntsc. The last I will say on the subject

you might notice I was thanked along with soupdragon by jdobbs in the whats new for version rc5.1 when this error was fixed so maybe this thread can be locked now