Log in

View Full Version : Newest DoCCE4U Version


Pages : 1 [2] 3

hendrix
16th May 2003, 13:10
Sweet - thanks bro

sidders
16th May 2003, 14:28
@69MwS

So, as I am a PAL user, should I just rename them to .mpv, using a batch file?

Which file will ReAuthorist tell Scenarist to look for?

Is there something that tells DoCCE4U that it should run pulldown on it?
I'm sure this has only happened in the last couple of versions.

69Mws
16th May 2003, 14:56
Originally posted by sidders
@69MwS

So, as I am a PAL user, should I just rename them to .mpv, using a batch file?

Which file will ReAuthorist tell Scenarist to look for?

Is there something that tells DoCCE4U that it should run pulldown on it?
I'm sure this has only happened in the last couple of versions.

The new naming came up with DoCCE4U 1.0.1.2

For me RA always points to the mpv, never to the mpv.m2v, so I have to rename the re-encoded Streams. You can easily check that in the RA Script by opening it in any texteditor.

It's up to you whether you use my tiny batchfile or do it manually :)

I don't think that there's really a pulldown running on the files, it's just that they are named in another way.

I'm sure BBWoof will fix that soon :)

Greetz
69Mws

sidders
16th May 2003, 21:44
Cheers mate, thanks for your help

Eyes`Only
16th May 2003, 21:55
If you like to ease up the process of renaming a little bit, just do the following:

- Open any texteditor
- type ren *.mpv.m2v *.
- save it with the ending "bat" (e.g. rename.bat)


For NTSC, this is terribly incorrect, and will screw up most NTSC projects, as we need most of our *mpv.m2v files (just not the ones with nopull in them). Do NOT use this batch file. Rather, use:

ren *.nopull.mpv.m2v *.

69Mws
16th May 2003, 21:58
Originally posted by Eyes`Only
For NTSC, this is terribly incorrect, and will screw up most NTSC projects, as we need most of our *mpv.m2v files (just not the ones with nopull in them). Do NOT use this batch file. Rather, use:

ren *.nopull.mpv.m2v *.

I was wondering too, because it was told that there should be no probs with the file-endings when dealing with NTSC :confused:

Greetz
69Mws

sidders
16th May 2003, 22:01
My filenaes didn't have NOPULL in them, just the ending mpv.m2v.
Should they have NOPULL in the filename if it's a PAL project?

69Mws
16th May 2003, 22:03
Originally posted by sidders
My filenaes didn't have NOPULL in them, just the ending mpv.m2v.
Should they have NOPULL in the filename if it's a PAL project?

I never had nopull in the filename when dealing with PAL. That can only occur with NTSC as far as I understand.

Greetz
69Mws

Eyes`Only
16th May 2003, 22:09
nah you wont see nopull files for PAL. But since NTSC users also read this thread, we need to make sure they dont try the ren *.mpv.m2v *. line, because it will seriously screw up RA's success rate (as in very little possibility of success!)

69Mws
16th May 2003, 22:12
Yup people, read carefully.

My advice is to take a look in the RA Script at first before doing any renaming and not to rename your files in any case, especially when you're dealing with NTSC material!

Hope I made myself clear once and for all.... :devil:

Greetz
69Mws

D3s7
18th May 2003, 23:41
for those of you who are lazy like me use this to rename all the .nopull files

CD to your root rip dir and type:
for /r %a in (*nopull.mpv.mpv) do ren %a *.

works like a charm

Eyes`Only
18th May 2003, 23:46
no need now. 1.0.1.4 is out :D

D3s7
18th May 2003, 23:49
as usual i'm late :D

sidders
18th May 2003, 23:50
Where? It's not on the website yet

D3s7
18th May 2003, 23:50
nawt on da website it's not :D

on doom9dls though :D

sidders
18th May 2003, 23:55
I see....going there now.....

hendrix
19th May 2003, 14:18
Originally posted by Eyes`Only
no need now. 1.0.1.4 is out :D

i agree - 1.0.1.4 is a 1.0.1.3 bugfix :D

FunkeeC
20th May 2003, 19:03
Does these new DoCCE4U work with cce 2.5? The last version i could get to work was 1.0.1.0 Am i missing something? thanks

hendrix
20th May 2003, 23:11
1.0.1.4 works perfectly with cce 2.5

jerschwab
21st May 2003, 03:38
I'm with FunkeeC, I can only get 1.0.1.0 to work properly with CCE v2.50. The newer versions (since adding support for CCE 2.66) haven't worked properly. It does 1st pass, but not 2nd pass.

BBWoof
21st May 2003, 19:37
It appears that I've broken support for 2.50. I have a 4 day weekend this week, so I should have more than enough time to figure it out and get another release out.

BBWoof

hendrix
21st May 2003, 22:57
i have no problems with 1.0.1.4 w/cce 2.5 in multipass mode

Discoboy
23rd May 2003, 07:54
Hi,
Very minor issue. I found with 1.0.1.4. when starting up DoCCE4U, CCE ver. 2.66.00.10 is reported, but I am using CCE ver. 2.67.00.10.

BBWoof
23rd May 2003, 16:37
Originally posted by Discoboy
Hi,
Very minor issue. I found with 1.0.1.4. when starting up DoCCE4U, CCE ver. 2.66.00.10 is reported, but I am using CCE ver. 2.67.00.10.

Whoops, gotta fix that.

BBWoof

BBWoof
23rd May 2003, 16:39
I've been working on the program this morning trying to fix the bug with CCE 2.50, and have discovered that the only way it can be fixed is to revert to EclCCE 1.4b. Without modifying any of my code, I switched back to 1.4b and CCE 2.50 works fine.

BBWoof

trigger638
24th May 2003, 06:30
BB looks like your site is down. Or at least the link to the DoCCE4U.

By the way I was using version 1.0.1.2 just fine with cce2.5, but 1.0.1.3 it was deffinatly broke if that helps.

Thanks

ShaneZ
24th May 2003, 17:22
Originally posted by trigger638
BB looks like your site is down. Or at least the link to the DoCCE4U.

By the way I was using version 1.0.1.2 just fine with cce2.5, but 1.0.1.3 it was deffinatly broke if that helps.

Thanks

The site went down for a while because the ISP was having trouble. Everything should be up and running fine. You must have caught it during downtime.

:(

SVCD4Me
25th May 2003, 03:03
.

R3VOLV3R
29th May 2003, 13:43
I don't know if this a bug in ReAuthorist or DoCCE4U but...

The BIAS value does not show up correctly in DoCCE4U 1.0.1.4
whenever it is passed from ReAuthorist RC3.

The highest BIAS value in DoCCE4U that appears is 50 even
though ReAuthorist assigns the BIAS value to let's say 62.
BIAS value 50 and lower shows up correctly in DoCCE4U.

I always have to manually adjust the BIAS value in DoCCE4U
to match that of ReAuthorist.

Like I stated at the top, or maybe it is a bug in ReAuthorist
calculations and the BIAS value shouldn't go any higher than 50.

Well just something I discovered.

BBWoof
3rd June 2003, 01:33
It's not a bug with either. It's something that hasn't been implemented yet. Aqua is working on exporting all the data, which he has finished with RA 1.0.0 and DoCCE4U 1.0.1.5 will import and save it.

BBWoof

stopthepain
3rd June 2003, 22:48
I hope this is not a stupid question, I looked through the forums (and even gave google a shot ;) )
Does anyone know where I can get a copy of EclCCE 1.4b? I am having the problem when DoCCE4U finishes, I end up with a 1kb m2v file. It sounds like the fix is going to EclCCE 1.4b, but I cant for the life of me find it. Can anyone help?

hendrix
3rd June 2003, 23:28
actually you may want to download eclcce 1.5a - its in the downloads

Eyes`Only
4th June 2003, 00:13
You are either kidding, or you have the search skills of a braised donut. A simple forum search for "eclcce" will suffice.

RB
4th June 2003, 07:28
Latest version of EclCCE can always be found in the CCE forum, sticky thread labeled "EclCCE...".

brashquido
4th June 2003, 07:40
Originally posted by Eyes`Only
You are either kidding, or you have the search skills of a braised donut. A simple forum search for "eclcce" will suffice.

Mmmmm.....braised donut ;)

benf2
5th June 2003, 11:08
I just bought CCE Basic and seems that this prog only wants a trial exe with ecl so I am unable to use DoCCe4u. Any plans on making it compatible?

D3s7
5th June 2003, 11:57
good question.

eclcce, the utility used to help along CCE is really only needed because of the limitations due to the trial version... however, it should work just fine w/ the full blown version I'd think

da_SPiN
5th June 2003, 13:07
Hi guys,

first of all, thanks for this nice tool.. second, is it possible that CCE SP 2.66.01.01 (Trial)is not supported by version 1.0.1.4 (BETA) of DoCCE4U? I always get the error:

CCE Executable associated with EclCCE is not supported by DoCCE4U. Please reconfigure EclCCE and restart DoCCE4U.

- In the log window it tells me the following: DoCCE4U 1.0.1.4 BETA by BBWoof started
- OS Kernel = Windows_NT (Good)
- ECLCCE executable 1.4c found
- Unknown or unsopported CCE executable found!

Any help? thx guys...

SPiN

D3s7
5th June 2003, 13:10
I believe 1.4 of ECLCCE was buggy.. 1.5 is out... try deleting your ECLCCE.INI file and drop in the new ecl and point to your ccesp.exe file again..

RB
5th June 2003, 13:21
Originally posted by da_SPiN
CCE Executable associated with EclCCE is not supported by DoCCE4U. Please reconfigure EclCCE and restart DoCCE4U.


DoCCE4U uses EclCCE (see sig) to run CCE. EclCCE also adds support for loading and saving ECL files into CCE 2.66/2.67 (missing in these trial versions). However, this is supported only for CCE 2.66.01.07 and up. So you'll have to use CCE 2.66.01.07 (see Doom9 dowmload section) or CCE 2.67.

da_SPiN
5th June 2003, 13:25
updating to version 1.5b of EclCCE didn`t solve the problem... any other hints? thanx in advance

SPiN

D3s7
5th June 2003, 13:26
Yeah.. read what RB said :D

da_SPiN
5th June 2003, 13:26
ahhhhh, thx RB... you posted the same time I did.... so I`ll try with an upgrade.... thx

SPiN

benf2
5th June 2003, 14:31
is there anyway of turning off the feature of DoCCE4u looking for ecl, since i am using a full version (Basic), this isnt needed. Otherwise i cant make use of the prog.

RB
5th June 2003, 15:17
DoCCE4U will not work with CCE Basic due to some missing features in CCE Basic.

benf2
5th June 2003, 15:31
Not what I wanted to hear, i guess its back to the old way!

Grimlock
5th June 2003, 22:07
Originally posted by da_SPiN
ahhhhh, thx RB... you posted the same time I did.... so I`ll try with an upgrade.... thx

SPiN

I was getting that same error. I don't know if this was your problem, but I when I upgraded EclCCE I put it in the same directory as the trial CCE. Turns out you need to put the new EclCEE files in the DoCEE4u directory and overwrite the old ones in order for the upgrade to actually work. That's what I did and that error went away. Good luck!

BBWoof
6th June 2003, 18:13
Originally posted by benf2
is there anyway of turning off the feature of DoCCE4u looking for ecl, since i am using a full version (Basic), this isnt needed. Otherwise i cant make use of the prog.

When they named it basic, they really meant it. It only supports 2 Pass VBR and CBR I believe. Also there is no option to add chapter points, only auto I-Frame insertion. Two very big limitations.

BBWoof

benf2
7th June 2003, 10:21
Ok, i guess its back to the old way!

Thanks

orandennison
8th June 2003, 09:37
First off- thanks to Woofsoft for all of your great work on DoCCE4U, it's a real time-saver.

This possible bug deals with the "Convert chapters to film" checkbox: It doesn't seem to have an effect if you manually uncheck it to override the automatic setting. I found this to be a minor problem since I had already exported my chapters with chapterXtractor intending to use Doom9's method for backing up NTSC dvds with CCE and dvdmaestro, and then I decided to give DoCCE4U 1.0.1.4 a shot instead.

I had set ChapterXtractor to export the chapter list at film speed, so when I imported the chapter list into DoCCE4U I de-checked the "convert chapters to film" checkbox in DoCCE4U since it was unnecessary. After I added the encoding job in DoCCE4U, I double checked the job's settings and the "convert chapters to film" checkbox was filled and the list of chapter points in the box was wrong. I re-unchecked the box and decided to just run the job and see what happened. DoCCE4U still went ahead and converted my chapters to film speed in the ecl- meaning it had converted my chapter points to 20fps or so..

Of course the fix for me is to just export everything at 29.97fps from chapterXtractor and let DoCCE4U do its thing, but I thought I'd let you know that checkbox didn't seem to be working correctly. DoCCE4U will just do what it wants to do by converting the chapters to film speed- even if your chapter list was already set to film speed before you imported it.