nnedi3 - OpenCL rewrite - Page 2

yup · 20th November 2013, 06:44

SEt

Test for GTX560

Code:

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
OpenCL 1.1, GeForce GTX 560 compute units:7@1620MHz
FPS (min | max | average):       1.84 | 416268.26 | 7.43
CPU usage (average):             13%

SetMTMode(2,4), version 18 November
yup.

SEt · 20th November 2013, 08:18

yup, was it with MT or without? Need both for statistics.

Selur · 21st November 2013, 12:45

using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ti and

Code:

LoadPlugin("nnedi3ocl.dll")
SetMTMode(2,8)
BlankClip(1000, 1280, 720, "YV12", 24000, 1001, 0)
nnedi3ocl_rpow2(2, nns=2, qual=1)

I got:

Code:

AVSMeter 1.7.2 [AVS2.6] by Groucho2004
AviSynth 2.60, build:Sep 28 2013 [15:09:12]
Active MT Mode: 2

Number of frames:                  1000
Length (hhh:mm:ss.ms):    000:00:41.708
Frame width:                       2560
Frame height:                      1440
Framerate:                       23.976 (24000/1001)
Interlaced:                          No
Colorspace:                        YV12

Frames processed:                1000 (0 - 999)
FPS (min | max | average):       1.93 | 419534.11 | 15.70
CPU usage (average):             13%
Thread count:                    22
Physical Memory usage (peak):    569 MB
Virtual Memory usage (peak):     552 MB
Time (elapsed):                  000:01:03.714

using:

Code:

LoadPlugin("nnedi3ocl.dll")
#SetMTMode(2,8)
BlankClip(1000, 1280, 720, "YV12", 24000, 1001, 0)
nnedi3ocl_rpow2(2, nns=2, qual=1)

I got:

Code:

Active MT Mode: 0

Number of frames:                  1000
Length (hhh:mm:ss.ms):    000:00:41.708
Frame width:                       2560
Frame height:                      1440
Framerate:                       23.976 (24000/1001)
Interlaced:                          No
Colorspace:                        YV12

Frames processed:                1000 (0 - 999)
FPS (min | max | average):       11.83 | 14.50 | 14.24
CPU usage (average):             12%
Thread count:                    8
Physical Memory usage (peak):    540 MB
Virtual Memory usage (peak):     535 MB
Time (elapsed):                  000:01:10.224

using:

Code:

LoadPlugin("nnedi3ocl.dll")
SetMTMode(2,4)
BlankClip(1000, 1280, 720, "YV12", 24000, 1001, 0)
nnedi3ocl_rpow2(2, nns=2, qual=1)

I got:

Code:

Active MT Mode: 2

Number of frames:                  1000
Length (hhh:mm:ss.ms):    000:00:41.708
Frame width:                       2560
Frame height:                      1440
Framerate:                       23.976 (24000/1001)
Interlaced:                          No
Colorspace:                        YV12

Frames processed:                1000 (0 - 999)
FPS (min | max | average):       3.71 | 419534.11 | 15.78
CPU usage (average):             13%
Thread count:                    12
Physical Memory usage (peak):    544 MB
Virtual Memory usage (peak):     540 MB
Time (elapsed):                  000:01:03.379

Cu Selur

SEt · 21st November 2013, 17:18

Given how many people here turned out to use Nvidia cards, I spent some effort optimizing for them. Result is pretty consistent 15% speed boost: https://www.dropbox.com/s/exz8knrygk...ate20131121.7z Don't know why I bothered though, given how Nvidia treats OpenCL (really bad, if you didn't know).

Here you can see how quite minor changes can have noticeable impact on the speed.

If you want your results included in first page table: please provide all the info! Third number (the "efficiency") is computed as your avg FPS with MTMode divided by theoretical TFLOPS on your frequency (so, lookup the reference FLOPS for your card, multiply it by your core frequency and divide by reference core frequency).

Sparktank · 21st November 2013, 17:29

Was trying to participate, but Nvidia just had an update recently and it seems to give me BSOD after benchmark completes.

Currently, siphoning through the Nvidia forum for details and provide input and then falling back to previous version which didn't give me BSOD with this plugin.
And hopefully will be able to get some results up by the end of the day.

SEt · 21st November 2013, 17:41

Yeah, that's Nvidia drivers today. That they are more stable than AMD is pure myth. I also got BSODs recently only from Nvidia ones.

Speed of nnedi3ocl really depends on how wise/stupid OpenCL compiler in driver was, so it's worth trying several driver versions and see if it changes anything.

Groucho2004 · 21st November 2013, 18:15

Code:

0.91, 0.91, 2.35, GeForce GT 240, 550, 2, i5-2500K@4GHz, 2013.11.21

I grabbed the number for FLOPS from here, I hope that's the right place.

olcifaraga · 21st November 2013, 20:29

5.28 5.48 GeForce GT 750M, 967, 1.1, i7-4700HQ@2.4 2013.11.21

mikeyakame · 21st November 2013, 20:51

@SEt

I get about a 1.6% speed increase with the 2013.11.21 build and 331.82 drivers.
I'll check more later, off to work.

lansing · 22nd November 2013, 00:14

well mine went from 9.60fps to 10.69fps with mt on with the new build, 11% increase, not bad

Overdrive80 · 22nd November 2013, 05:16

Hi, when I execute this code:

Code:

LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files (x86)\AviSynth 2.5\plugins\nnedi3ocl.dll")
SetMTMode(2,4)
BlankClip(1000, 1280, 720, "YV12", 24000, 1001, 0)
nnedi3ocl_rpow2(2, nns=2, qual=1)

I get this error message:

Build used is 2013.11.18. Graphic: AMD Radeon HD 4870.

What am I doing wrong??

Keiyakusha · 22nd November 2013, 05:42

Did a quick test on GTX 570 with latest stable drivers, no MT mode and default settings, but there are no speed differences between the old and new version. The difference is always within 0.03 fps plus or minus with around 14.46 in total. I checked 3 times. Maybe later I'll check once more after I'll get some sleep...

BTW I used real 720p video. blankclip is a up to 80% faster even though source filter is capable of providing input with more than 500fps

yup · 22nd November 2013, 07:35

Hi all!
I was out my working horse, testing both version

Code:

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
OpenCL 1.1, GeForce GTX 560 compute units:7@1620MHz
18 November cl code
SetMTMode(2,4)
FPS (min | max | average):       1.84 | 416268.26 | 7.43
CPU usage (average):             13%
noMT
FPS (min | max | average):       6.83 | 7.29 | 7.20
CPU usage (average):             13%
20 November cl code
SetMTMode(2,4)
FPS (min | max | average):       2.17 | 416267.00 | 8.73
CPU usage (average):             13%
noMT
FPS (min | max | average):       7.95 | 8.53 | 8.44
CPU usage (average):             14%

Last version give speed up more than 10%.
yup.

SEt · 22nd November 2013, 12:13

Overdrive80, try this version: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oz1xz9k8mx...cl_fixocl10.7z Your card only supports OpenCL 1.0 while I used 1.1 feature on it. Also note that Radeon HD4xxx not fully OpenCL "capable" (their local memory isn't conformant and emulated with global memory), so "efficiency" will be less than newer Radeons.

Keiyakusha, your speed is faster than it should be on previous version but slower than it should be on new one, huh...
The problem with real scripts is that even with MTMode Avisynth scheduling is pretty bad and you likely see not 100% GPU load. Try putting source in MTMode 2 and/or increasing number of threads.

Overdrive80 · 23rd November 2013, 00:00

Ok, thanks SEt. Here go my results:

- Four Threads:

Code:

LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files (x86)\AviSynth 2.5\plugins\nnedi3ocl.dll")
SetMTMode(2,4)
BlankClip(1000, 1280, 720, "YV12", 24000, 1001, 0)
nnedi3ocl_rpow2(2, nns=2, qual=1)

Code:

Frames processed:                1000 (0 - 999)
FPS (min | max | average):       0.63 | 325290.06 | 2.55
CPU usage (average):             6%
Thread count:                    9
Physical Memory usage (peak):    1123 MB
Virtual Memory usage (peak):     1123 MB
Time (elapsed):                  000:06:32.524

- Eight Threads:

Code:

LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files (x86)\AviSynth 2.5\plugins\nnedi3ocl.dll")
SetMTMode(2,8)
BlankClip(1000, 1280, 720, "YV12", 24000, 1001, 0)
nnedi3ocl_rpow2(2, nns=2, qual=1)

Code:

Frames processed:                1000 (0 - 999)
FPS (min | max | average):       0.31 | 325290.06 | 2.52
CPU usage (average):             6%
Thread count:                    17
Physical Memory usage (peak):    1169 MB
Virtual Memory usage (peak):     1178 MB
Time (elapsed):                  000:06:37.608

- None Threads:

Code:

Frames processed:                1000 (0 - 999)
FPS (min | max | average):       1.95 | 2.50 | 2.47
CPU usage (average):             2%
Thread count:                    2
Physical Memory usage (peak):    298 MB
Virtual Memory usage (peak):     292 MB
Time (elapsed):                  000:06:44.659

Gser · 23rd November 2013, 00:22

Anybody tried putting this into QTGMC yet?

Selur · 23rd November 2013, 00:32

Quote:

Anybody tried putting this into QTGMC yet?

"Only nsize=0 implemented, other values silently ignored."
and iirc. at least all presets use nsize 1 and up,...

checked:

Code:

	#                                                               Very                                                        Very      Super      Ultra
	# Preset groups:                                     Placebo    Slow      Slower    Slow      Medium    Fast      Faster    Fast      Fast       Fast       Draft
...
	EdiMode      = default( EdiMode,      Select( pNum, "NNEDI3",  "NNEDI3", "NNEDI3", "NNEDI3", "NNEDI3", "NNEDI3", "NNEDI3", "NNEDI3", "NNEDI3",  "RepYadif","Bob"   ) )
	NNSize       = default( NNSize,       Select( pNum,  1,         1,        1,        1,        5,        5,        4,        4,        4,         4,         4      ) )

-> atm. it's not really that interesting for QTGMC

SEt · 23rd November 2013, 01:24

nsize=0 should be better than nsize=4, so shouldn't hurt using 0 instead of it. For other nsize it's effectively quality of connecting horizontal lines, so you can use 0 instead but quality will be worse than expected.

bcn_246 · 24th November 2013, 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by zero9999

use this mod of nnedi3_resize16

Thanks a million. I assume it's just the nnedi3_resize16_rpow2 part thats been modded for OCL?

zero9999 · 26th November 2013, 01:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcn_246

Thanks a million. I assume it's just the nnedi3_resize16_rpow2 part thats been modded for OCL?

yes, ofc also calls to this function to pass on the gpu parameter.

20th November 2013, 06:44	#21 \| Link
yup Registered User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Russia, Moscow Posts: 854	SEt Test for GTX560 Code: GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OpenCL 1.1, GeForce GTX 560 compute units:7@1620MHz FPS (min \| max \| average): 1.84 \| 416268.26 \| 7.43 CPU usage (average): 13% SetMTMode(2,4), version 18 November yup. Last edited by yup; 20th November 2013 at 09:46. Reason: add info

21st November 2013, 17:29	#25 \| Link
Sparktank 47.952fps@71.928Hz Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 940	Was trying to participate, but Nvidia just had an update recently and it seems to give me BSOD after benchmark completes. Currently, siphoning through the Nvidia forum for details and provide input and then falling back to previous version which didn't give me BSOD with this plugin. And hopefully will be able to get some results up by the end of the day. __________________ Win10 (x64) build 19041 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (GP106) 3071MB/GDDR5 \| (r435_95-4) NTSC \| DVD: R1 \| BD: A AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @3.4GHz (6c/12th, I'm on AVX2 now!)

21st November 2013, 18:15	#27 \| Link
Groucho2004 Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Barcelona Posts: 5,034	Code: 0.91, 0.91, 2.35, GeForce GT 240, 550, 2, i5-2500K@4GHz, 2013.11.21 I grabbed the number for FLOPS from here, I hope that's the right place. Last edited by Groucho2004; 21st November 2013 at 18:29.

22nd November 2013, 05:16	#31 \| Link
Overdrive80 Anime addict Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Spain Posts: 673	Hi, when I execute this code: Code: LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files (x86)\AviSynth 2.5\plugins\nnedi3ocl.dll") SetMTMode(2,4) BlankClip(1000, 1280, 720, "YV12", 24000, 1001, 0) nnedi3ocl_rpow2(2, nns=2, qual=1) I get this error message: Build used is 2013.11.18. Graphic: AMD Radeon HD 4870. What am I doing wrong?? __________________ Intel i7-6700K + Noctua NH-D15 + Z170A XPower G. Titanium + Kingston HyperX Savage DDR4 2x8GB + Radeon RX580 8GB DDR5 + ADATA SX8200 Pro 1 TB + Antec EDG750 80 Plus Gold Mod + Corsair 780T Graphite

22nd November 2013, 05:42	#32 \| Link
Keiyakusha 契約者 Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 1,576	Did a quick test on GTX 570 with latest stable drivers, no MT mode and default settings, but there are no speed differences between the old and new version. The difference is always within 0.03 fps plus or minus with around 14.46 in total. I checked 3 times. Maybe later I'll check once more after I'll get some sleep... BTW I used real 720p video. blankclip is a up to 80% faster even though source filter is capable of providing input with more than 500fps Last edited by Keiyakusha; 22nd November 2013 at 05:53.

20th November 2013, 08:18	#22 \| Link
SEt Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 374	yup, was it with MT or without? Need both for statistics.

21st November 2013, 17:18	#24 \| Link
SEt Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 374	Given how many people here turned out to use Nvidia cards, I spent some effort optimizing for them. Result is pretty consistent 15% speed boost: https://www.dropbox.com/s/exz8knrygk...ate20131121.7z Don't know why I bothered though, given how Nvidia treats OpenCL (really bad, if you didn't know). Here you can see how quite minor changes can have noticeable impact on the speed. If you want your results included in first page table: please provide all the info! Third number (the "efficiency") is computed as your avg FPS with MTMode divided by theoretical TFLOPS on your frequency (so, lookup the reference FLOPS for your card, multiply it by your core frequency and divide by reference core frequency).

21st November 2013, 17:41	#26 \| Link
SEt Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 374	Yeah, that's Nvidia drivers today. That they are more stable than AMD is pure myth. I also got BSODs recently only from Nvidia ones. Speed of nnedi3ocl really depends on how wise/stupid OpenCL compiler in driver was, so it's worth trying several driver versions and see if it changes anything.

21st November 2013, 20:29	#28 \| Link
olcifaraga Registered User Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 4	5.28 5.48 GeForce GT 750M, 967, 1.1, i7-4700HQ@2.4 2013.11.21

21st November 2013, 20:51	#29 \| Link
mikeyakame lookin for my sanity Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: it all depends on the day and which country comes to mind Posts: 42	@SEt I get about a 1.6% speed increase with the 2013.11.21 build and 331.82 drivers. I'll check more later, off to work.

22nd November 2013, 00:14	#30 \| Link
lansing Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,657	well mine went from 9.60fps to 10.69fps with mt on with the new build, 11% increase, not bad

22nd November 2013, 12:13	#34 \| Link
SEt Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 374	Overdrive80, try this version: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oz1xz9k8mx...cl_fixocl10.7z Your card only supports OpenCL 1.0 while I used 1.1 feature on it. Also note that Radeon HD4xxx not fully OpenCL "capable" (their local memory isn't conformant and emulated with global memory), so "efficiency" will be less than newer Radeons. Keiyakusha, your speed is faster than it should be on previous version but slower than it should be on new one, huh... The problem with real scripts is that even with MTMode Avisynth scheduling is pretty bad and you likely see not 100% GPU load. Try putting source in MTMode 2 and/or increasing number of threads.

23rd November 2013, 00:22	#36 \| Link
Gser Registered User Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 418	Anybody tried putting this into QTGMC yet?

23rd November 2013, 01:24	#38 \| Link
SEt Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 374	nsize=0 should be better than nsize=4, so shouldn't hurt using 0 instead of it. For other nsize it's effectively quality of connecting horizontal lines, so you can use 0 instead but quality will be worse than expected.