tsMuxer Open Source

[Hellboy.]

I found a bug. When add a UHD, tsmuxer automatically check "Force BD-ROM V3 format". When remove everything in "input files" and add a 1080p bluray "Force BD-ROM V3 format" keep checked. And when add a 1080p bluray to create a Blu-ray folder, the 1080p bluray dont work. You need to uncheck "Force BD-ROM V3 format" when everything is remove in "input files".

This is using the playlists and Blu-ray folder.

[a5180007]

@Hellboy. please try tomorrow's release.

[Overrighter]

Hello, Everybody!
I hope my post will be somewhat useful, coz I couldn't find out an answer as to how to make Sony UBP-X800M2 trigger Dolby Vision (DV) input when playing an original m2ts file from the BD 4k DV disk using a USB flashdrive. Long story short. I run the m2ts file though tsMuxeR GUI git-2c58285 ("tsMuxeR 2022-08-14 Nightly Portable Windows 64-bit") from m2ts into the same m2ts only de-clicking unnecessary audio tracks and, Bingo!, x800m2 indicates Dolby Vision as input, while for the non-modified file it indicates just HDR. It was Uncharted 4k uhd disk. tsMuxeR shows two video tracks: 4k and 1080p for both original m2ts and after remuxing. If I could feedback anything more for the purpose of developing this wonderful utility, please ask. I'll do my best.

[Hellboy.]

Is fixed. Thanks.

Question: What this mean? Is something bad?
H264 warn: SPS parameters is not consistent throughout a stream

[a5180007]

@Hellboy. It is just a warning, sometimes a Sequence Parameter Set changes throughout the stream.

[von Suppé]

I'm encountering issues when muxing TrueHD without embedded AC3 with elementary videostream(s) from imported 3DBD ISO.

Right from the start, tsMuxer is giving a lot of errors saying "TRUE-HD stream (track 3): bad frame detected at position... Resync stream."
Playback of resulting ISO gives major A/V sync issues. It makes no difference whether I choose to mux 3D (AVC + MVC) or 2D (AVC only).

Is this inherent to MVC-3D and supposed to be? When I mux TrueHD+AC3 track, things go without errors.

[Hart2hart]

What is the overall state of tsmuxer? It’s been a historically fabulous tool and I’m still using last good version from years ago which handles all contemporary audio formats but I believe drops a subtitle on occasion. It does video up to at leafy AVC H.264 maybe H.265 . I want to move on to 4k and hdr (DV, HDR10+).

Looks of work has been completed that is highly technical. Is it in good shape to handle this snd/or is there a list of known issues/limitations? More importantly is development / core developer(s) active?

[Sakura-chan]

This is not really a bug, more of a question. I'm fairly new to tsmuxer.

Why do m2ts files remuxed with tsmuxer to the same format end up being smaller? For example, I grab a 5,820,604,416 bytes m2ts from a BD, containing an h264 and lpcm track (nothing complex). I remux it as is with tsmuxer to m2ts, nothing changed. I end up with a 5,806,061,568 bytes file. That's 14,542,848 bytes less than the original (13.87 MB).

Upon demuxing the tracks from both they are identical (compared checksums). So no issues, but why? I understand mkv having less overhead so the resulting remuxes will be smaller, but I expected staying in the same format would result in the same file sizes.

[staina]

What is that error "DTS-HD stream (track 3): bad frame detected at position02:45:07,402. Resync stream".

Why tsMuxer resync DTS-HD MA stream created in DTS HD Encoder Suite and completely DTS_HD MA stream will change? DTS HD Encoder Suite no detected bad frame.

Thank for answer

[Hart2hart]

Originally Posted by Hart2hart

What is the overall state of tsmuxer? It’s been a historically fabulous tool and I’m still using last good version from years ago which handles all contemporary audio formats but I believe drops a subtitle on occasion. It does video up to at leafy AVC H.264 maybe H.265 . I want to move on to 4k and hdr (DV, HDR10+).

Looks of work has been completed that is highly technical. Is it in good shape to handle this snd/or is there a list of known issues/limitations? More importantly is development / core developer(s) active?

Guess my answer is in but it’s not what I had hoped it would be.

[Emulgator]

4..5 builds per month, see github repo. I would call this a very active development.
If you find a fault you may report it and upload files to reproduce the fault.
And it has been taken care of many, many times. 125 pages of actions since 2020-12
I couldn't ask for more and give big thank you's to a5180007, justdan96, xavery, jcdr408, and of course to the original developer.

[Emulgator]

Why do m2ts files remuxed with tsmuxer to the same format end up being smaller?

BD muxers (Scenarist, Sony, DoStudio) have provisions to accommodate all possible streams and their combinations
which are populated only if needed, but these PID positions will lead to more container overhead even if the stream is empty.

[Hart2hart]

Originally Posted by Emulgator

4..5 builds per month, see github repo. I would call this a very active development.
If you find a fault you may report it and upload files to reproduce the fault.
And it has been taken care of many, many times. 125 pages of actions since 2020-12
I couldn't ask for more and give big thank you's to a5180007, justdan96, xavery, jcdr408, and of course to the original developer.

Thanks. I didn’t think to look at GitHub. The developers were very active in forum when this started so I was expecting to see them here. Specifically, I was looking to understand if an “official” release was coming that would list what was included and any issues to avoid.

Many thanks for developers’ work.