Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
20th September 2008, 00:25 | #261 | Link | ||
@DVBPortal
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
Between the passes? No. I was using my normal "production" batches for ATV (Main Profile 5 MB/s), which are optimized on multi pass. There is even some heavy preprocessing (LFS) on pass #2. Without it would be a lot faster. I think, I redo the tests with some simpler scripts. Quote:
I would also add: high boost on fast first passes and on single pass encodes at high fps (HD realtime encoding) All in all a big win. Thanks Don. |
||
20th September 2008, 08:57 | #265 | Link | |
@DVBPortal
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
I know, that there is currently no place for additional features, but would it be possible to access the scaler via CUDA maybe in a similar way like the deinterlacer. |
|
20th September 2008, 15:00 | #267 | Link | |
Mr. Sandman
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 11,768
|
Quote:
so if you cant to a stackorizontal or stackvertical with 2 avc sources is still an "issue of the GUI"? i dont think so.
__________________
MPEG-4 ASP Custom Matrices: EQM V1(old), EQM AutoGK Sharpmatrix (aka EQM V2), EQM V3HR (updated 01/10/2004), EQM V3LR, EQM V3ULR (updated 04/02/2005), EQM V3UHR (updated 17/12/2004) and EQM V3EHR (updated 05/10/2004) Info about my ASP matrices. MPEG-4 AVC Custom Matrices: EQM AVC-HR Info about my AVC matrices My x264 builds. Mooo!!! |
|
20th September 2008, 15:25 | #268 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Hey Sharktooth,
Why does MeGUI have to open the script twice? Why can't you open the script once and then just start requesting at frame 0 again for the encode phase? And if preview is disabled, why do you open the script for it anyway? I found that you can do multipass DivX in VirtualDub because it opens the filter once only and then starts requesting again at frame 0 for the second pass. HCEnc also opens the script twice. It makes no sense to me, even for other reasons such as memory efficiency. Last edited by Guest; 20th September 2008 at 15:28. |
20th September 2008, 22:20 | #269 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Only thing worth mentioning would be that seeking is still slow. i'm not really into h264 encoding so this is the best way for me test something, heh. |
|
21st September 2008, 21:20 | #270 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,339
|
I've been feeding it AVCHD camcorder files from various sources and the vast majority have worked flawlessly. The two I'm posting seem to seize the transcoding 4-6 frames short of completion when running them through x264 or VirtualDub
17MB http://www.mediafire.com/?jamzuytnvso 8MB http://www.mediafire.com/?tg1pysyytfw |
21st September 2008, 23:45 | #271 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Thanks, Pookie, I'll have a look at it. I can always rely on you for good trouble reports giving me everything I need to duplicate it without me having to ask!
On another front... Woo hoo! I have multi instance working. And it supports interleaving from different processes, too, not just serialized (most of the GUIs are serial, however, and I can't vouch for the performance if you do interleaved access). I tested it in 2-pass HCEnc, which went mammary glands up before (gotta watch out for rule 4, doncha know). New package coming tonight or tomorrow then. What I did was move all CUDA code and variables into the filter instance DGAVCDecoder object. Then each new filter instance starts up an entire complete new CUDA instance. CUDA already manages context switching between threads. I can open a script in two instances of VirtualDub and step and seek independently without them interfering with each other. I was shocked to see CUDA managing that without me having to explicitly push/pop contexts, but hey, no complaints from me. I also did it for DGAVCIndexNV, so that you can open multiple DGAVCIndexNV instances at once if you so desire, although I don't see much reason for that. Last edited by Guest; 22nd September 2008 at 00:05. |
21st September 2008, 23:49 | #272 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
|
|
22nd September 2008, 00:13 | #273 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,815
|
Can somebody check if .avs with hardware decoding work in Sony Vegas or adobe premiere
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
22nd September 2008, 00:22 | #275 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,815
|
now I am really thinking about selling my just bought 4850. Hardware decoding AVCHD footage via avs in premiere or vegas = priceless ATI WEAK UP!!!!
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
22nd September 2008, 00:42 | #276 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 80
|
Can you tell CUDA which field to keep when Deinterlacing? Then, with two instances of DGAVCDecodeNV, one could hack together a CUDA bobber.
Code:
a=DGAVCDecodeNV_AVCSource("00001_NV.dga", deinterlace=true, order=1) b=DGAVCDecodeNV_AVCSource("00001_NV.dga", deinterlace=true, order=0) Interleave(a,b) |
22nd September 2008, 00:52 | #277 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
|
|
22nd September 2008, 00:52 | #278 | Link | |
Mr. Sandman
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 11,768
|
Quote:
__________________
MPEG-4 ASP Custom Matrices: EQM V1(old), EQM AutoGK Sharpmatrix (aka EQM V2), EQM V3HR (updated 01/10/2004), EQM V3LR, EQM V3ULR (updated 04/02/2005), EQM V3UHR (updated 17/12/2004) and EQM V3EHR (updated 05/10/2004) Info about my ASP matrices. MPEG-4 AVC Custom Matrices: EQM AVC-HR Info about my AVC matrices My x264 builds. Mooo!!! |
|
22nd September 2008, 01:20 | #280 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Your not telling us what the reasons are suggests that you don't know what they are.
Quote:
Anyway, it's a moot point as I have multi-instance working, but I was curious about that design decision. Last edited by Guest; 22nd September 2008 at 01:23. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|