Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
#121 | Link |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,125
|
Also, lots of patents have been granted to EVC and AV1 for use with those codecs. The patents weren't released to the public domain, and potentially could be enforced when used outside of the technology free use was given to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | Link | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#123 | Link | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
It's not the first time it's happened, Samsung has removed some expired patents from the MPEG-4 Part 2 pool in the past: http://web.archive.org/web/201907061...s/m4v-att1.pdf Last edited by kurkosdr; 11th September 2024 at 19:40. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 131
|
Here it is all remaining patents with a priority date <= 2005-03-01 and known expiration date (patents with unknown priority or expiration date are omitted) sorted by their expiration dates (on the first field; the second field is the priority date), according to Google Patents. The patent is clickable.
Part 1 Quote:
Last edited by oibaf; 23rd October 2024 at 10:49. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 131
|
Part 2
Quote:
Last edited by oibaf; 23rd October 2024 at 10:49. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 | Link |
|
Broadcast Encoder
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, UK
Posts: 3,364
|
Looks like 2025 is gonna be a very big year for patents expiration. Still, it's a bit insane that some patents from 2002 are gonna be pushed over 2030 and into 2031...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,224
|
nokia has won an injunction against amazon in germany: https://ipfray.com/breaking-nokia-wi...fire-tv-stick/
here is the patent:EP2375749 |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
|
I always wondered: how do they even get those extensions legally? Aren't post-TRIPS patents supposed to last 20 years after the filing date? I understand giving patents an extra year or so to cover for any USPTO delays, but 8 years is insane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#130 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,224
|
nokia has ended their lawsuit against HP. HP will licence nokia's patents: https://www.mobileworldlive.com/noki...-case-with-hp/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
![]() The good news is that the patent has a priority date after the publication of the High Profile, and the fact it's cited by "Scalable Video Coding - Working Draft 3" indicates it's related to SVC, so it's not essential for decoding the High Profile in a basic manner (that is, like the reference decoder does it). That said, do we have a list of the non-US patents Nokia is suing over? Last edited by kurkosdr; 17th November 2024 at 00:56. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,224
|
patent list was updated today, not sure what changes there are: https://www.via-la.com/wp-content/up...tachment-1.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
|
As an aside, it's been more than 3 months since VIA-LA last updated their patent lists for H.264 and VC-1:
https://via-la.com/licensing-program...4/#patent-list https://via-la.com/licensing-programs/vc-1/#patent-list Is this just them being slower than usual, or have they switched to a slower update cadence (it was every 3 months until now)? Who knows.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,224
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
https://via-la.com/wp-content/upload...tachment-1.pdf With the exception of the US and Brazil, VC-1 will become royalty-free by the end of the year, making it a royalty-free option for Blu-ray discs not to be sold in the US and Brazil (that is, if you are willing to throw some more bitrate at it compared to H.264, since VC-1 is not as efficient as H.264). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#136 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,224
|
patent list was updated today: https://via-la.com/wp-content/upload...tachment-1.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 131
|
Here it is all remaining patents with a priority date <= 2005-03-01 and known expiration date (patents with unknown priority or expiration date are omitted) sorted by their expiration dates (on the first field; the second field is the priority date), according to Google Patents. The patent is clickable.
Part 1/2 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 131
|
Part 2/2
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
|
Something I just noticed. In their "essentiality overview", VIA-LA considers the patents to be essential for versions of the standard published in 2008 or later:
https://via-la.com/licensing-program...ality-overview (basically, the oldest standard cited is this one) Could be a typo, could be anything, but I find it funny that everyone buys a license from VIA-LA to implement the 2005 version of the standard (aka this one), except the people making Blu-ray 3D players I guess, and yet VIA-LA is like "nah, you don't need a license for that old revision of AVC/H.264". EDIT: I am not saying that H.264 High Profile should be declared clear of patents, VIA-LA's "essentiality overview" is not legally binding anyway Last edited by kurkosdr; 14th December 2025 at 16:39. |
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
Last edited by kurkosdr; 14th December 2025 at 16:46. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|