Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > General > Subtitles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14th February 2023, 04:39   #1  |  Link
wswartzendruber
hlg-tools Maintainer
 
wswartzendruber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 412
A New Subtitle Format

Greetings.

I have two PGS projects on GitHub. One is written in Rust and seeks to crop subtitles and also adjust their brightness levels. It's basically in working order. The other is a .NET Standard 2.0 library that hopes to eventually support intuitive manipulation of PGS streams. Others could then incorporate it into their own applications.

Now for those who don't know, PGS uses RLE compression for the actual bitmap data. This isn't so efficient, and my experimentation shows that using PNG requires only 61% of the bytes needed.

Now to be honest, a lot of this is just the desire for a graphical subtitle format to appear that isn't as convoluted as PGS. I'm thinking that it could actually be quite simple. Each frame could have:

timestamp-ms: 4 bytes
duration-ms: 2 bytes
x-location: 2 bytes
y-location: 2 bytes
png-length: 4 bytes
png-buffer: [png-length] bytes

With the way subtitles are used to today, the above proposal should be the sum total for the new format's complexity. If this format could gain popularity within the ripping community, vendors could be incentivized to implement it due to its simplicity.

All right, now let's all have at it: Why wouldn't this work?
wswartzendruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2023, 15:47   #2  |  Link
wswartzendruber
hlg-tools Maintainer
 
wswartzendruber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 412
To further elaborate, a simpler (much simpler) subtitle format could allow more competent editing utilities to proliferate since we as developers would no longer be working against an obfuscated format.

In short, I would like to get to a place where converting from PGS to (whatever this gets called) is synonymous with decrypting physical media. One shouldn't attempt to work with PGS anymore than they would attempt to work with encrypted bitstreams.
wswartzendruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.