Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
9th March 2009, 15:00 | #141 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Yep. This one looks goofy also.
This is why I keep using v1.8.4 for my BD-RB muxing -- because, even though I know it isn't perfect, I know what doesn't work right consistently (and I can fix it), and I don't have to worry about new issues that are introduced. Last edited by jdobbs; 9th March 2009 at 15:10. |
9th March 2009, 15:12 | #145 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Is there something odd about the source, or do you have the encode set to some incredibly long GOP length (keyint) or structure? That could affect the spacing of the PTS values used for the EP tables. Also, if you set the chapter values in TSMUXER to something odd, you might get something like this.
Last edited by jdobbs; 9th March 2009 at 15:16. |
9th March 2009, 15:22 | #146 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 305
|
No the source is an original BD demuxed with eac3to (While She Was Out), the video stream is VC1 1080i/50 which tsMuxeR GUI simply refuses to accept. The CLI accepts it, and detects it correctly:
Code:
D:\DEMUX\While She Was Out>"E:\TVIX\tsMuxeR\tsMuxeR_1.8.4(b)\tsMuxeR.exe" "D:\DE MUX\While She Was Out\While She Was Out.meta" "D:\DEMUX\While She Was Out\While She Was Out_184" SmartLabs tsMuxeR. Version 1.8.4(b) http://www.smlabs.net VC-1 muxing fps not set. Get fps from stream. Decoding VC-1 stream (track 1): Profile: Advanced@3 Resolution: 1920:1080i Frame rate: 25 Decoding DTS stream (track 2): Bitrate: 1536Kbps Sample Rate: 48KHz Channels: |
9th March 2009, 16:12 | #147 | Link |
Aging Video Hobbyist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Off the Map
Posts: 2,461
|
Gosh another version 1.8.23 today...obviously with all the recent new releases there is alot of work being done on tsMuxeR at present and we can only hope I guess that Roman or whoever is working on it is paying some attention to these Doom9 threads!!??!! One might also assume they are seeing some very large number of hits on their ftp site and are aware of the outside scrutiny!
|
9th March 2009, 16:59 | #148 | Link |
Aging Video Hobbyist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Off the Map
Posts: 2,461
|
I tried tsMuxeR 1.8.23 (latest as of the time of this post!) and it had one or two messed-up chapter marks/time codes and applied fixclpi 2.31 and it fixed the problems. So tsMuxeR is still broke but thankfully fixclpi still works:
Code:
C:\>fixclpi e:\video.bluray FixCLPI v2.31, jdobbs softworks Fixing CLPI files in directory tree. - e:\video.bluray\BDMV\BACKUP\CLIPINF\00001.clpi packet count fixed - e:\video.bluray\BDMV\BACKUP\CLIPINF\00001.clpi corrected. - e:\video.bluray\BDMV\CLIPINF\00001.clpi packet count fixed - e:\video.bluray\BDMV\CLIPINF\00001.clpi corrected. |
3rd June 2009, 03:52 | #149 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://forum.handbrake.fr/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=6346 http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...ghlight=keyint I downloaded MediaInfo and compared slow AVCHDs vs. fast ones, and guess what? The keyints were vastly different. A fast disc would have a typical keyint of 24 and a minimum of 2, whereas a slow disc would have numbers at least 10 times that size (eg. 240/24). According to the above second link, MeGUI's "SA-Blu-ray" profile defaults to low keyint numbers, which in turn leads towards a smoother scanning & chapter jumping experience. I wish people would use that profile more often. I know it could potentially result in a small sacrifice in video quality, but I would prefer to have the same smooth scanning capabilities as an actual Blu-ray Disc. Thanks guys! I can sleep again. Visor |
||
3rd June 2009, 08:57 | #150 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,076
|
It's actually very simple;
GOP length in Bluray specifications is named as 1 second if you use max bitrate > 15 Mbps. GOP length is 2 sec for max bitrate < 15 Mbps. Out of this it follows that key-int is always equal to the framerate (rounded of to the nearest whole number) when bitrate is > 15 Mbps, and 2 x framerate for streams with < 15 Mbps. In the same spec is determined that minimum key-int is always set to 1. See also this usefull post, where i tried to centralize al these sort of questions; But sadly the thread did not "take off" http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=141376 Last edited by G_M_C; 3rd June 2009 at 09:04. |
3rd June 2009, 17:26 | #151 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
I have been getting the same thing happen with ripbot BD structures on my S350. I too thought it was the S350 causing it. I downloaded mediainfo and loaded a ripbot example in it. It is Keyint= 250 keyint_min =25. RB Builder files are ok and ff/rw as they should. Anyway to change this without have to reencode. |
|
3rd June 2009, 18:18 | #152 | Link |
Programmer (or just 教务长)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 4,251
|
No, unfortunately there is no way. It is good to follow the standards, but it's not the case when software developers build applications for themselves and users suffer from the fact.
I'm, too, glad that jdobbs rejected all "suggestions" for increasing keyint in BD-RB, just because it works for some people. Dean Last edited by deank; 3rd June 2009 at 18:21. |
4th June 2009, 07:20 | #153 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,076
|
Quote:
|
|
10th March 2023, 21:38 | #154 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 117
|
I know this in a very old thread. But I have some issues with MultiAVCHD BDs. It uses tsMuxeR 1.10.6 and SOME of the BDs won't work properly. Skipping to the next chapter either does not work at all or takes ages. If I mux the same files with a recent version of tsMuxeR it works. However, then my player does not recognize (non-standard) EAC3 audio so I'm kinda stuck with the old version.
fixclpi won't change anything on the file it says OK for all. Can someone tell me where exactly the issue was so I can check if I find something in the newer files? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|