Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

Domains: forum.doom9.org / forum.doom9.net / forum.doom9.se

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 AVC / H.264

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st February 2010, 18:12   #41  |  Link
shon3i
BluRay Maniac
 
shon3i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieranrk View Post
Just out of interest does Blu-ray let you code 1080p25 without using interlacing? Can you use 1080p25 will pic_struct or something?

Also is there anything about NumClockTS?
Not without --interlaced switch (scenarist) and earler version of HRD patches. I will now test with or without pic_struct. Please give me few hours
shon3i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010, 21:45   #42  |  Link
Trahald
Wewkiee
 
Trahald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: kashyyyk
Posts: 2,269
While in practice it may be different, 1080p25 is not allowed.
__________________
...yeah...but...why on earth would I compare apples with apples?
Trahald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010, 22:17   #43  |  Link
shon3i
BluRay Maniac
 
shon3i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trahald View Post
While in practice it may be different, 1080p25 is not allowed.
Encocoding progressive material with interlaced switch you get interlaced video 1080i25 which is allowed, and scenarist detect it as 1080i25.
shon3i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010, 22:25   #44  |  Link
kolak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trahald View Post
While in practice it may be different, 1080p25 is not allowed.
You ave to encode it as it would be 50i and it does work.
If you have a good player you may get original 25p on your TV.

Andrew
kolak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2010, 00:23   #45  |  Link
Atak_Snajpera
RipBot264 author
 
Atak_Snajpera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,946
PS3 plays 1080p 25fps without problems. I wouldn't be surprised if this also applies to other good brands.
Atak_Snajpera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2010, 16:43   #46  |  Link
kolak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera View Post
PS3 plays 1080p 25fps without problems. I wouldn't be surprised if this also applies to other good brands.
It's not about what PS3 or even any other player can play- BD doesn't support pure 25p/30p modes.
PS3 can play much more than BD spec allows- it did play 100Mbit AVC, but at maybe 5fps


Andrew
kolak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2010, 16:49   #47  |  Link
mp3dom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,136
Back to the NAL patch: At the end I'm not understanding if the current patch version (1.22) match the specs posted by Emulgator.
mp3dom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2010, 18:39   #48  |  Link
kieranrk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp3dom View Post
Back to the NAL patch: At the end I'm not understanding if the current patch version (1.22) match the specs posted by Emulgator.
It does.
kieranrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2010, 20:18   #49  |  Link
shon3i
BluRay Maniac
 
shon3i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by kolak
BD doesn't support pure 25p/30p modes.
Well support it as Secondary video, so is generaly supported. That's why i liked HDDVD, maybe is less overall bitrate and storage, but twice more Video and Audio combination are allowed.
shon3i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2010, 16:23   #50  |  Link
renqian
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
here some primary question:
which Splitter Filter should i use to keep the field won't loss when i encoding?
and which decoder can playback the product correctly in 60fps on LCD or LCD TV?(i mean if i use the HTPC)
renqian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2010, 16:45   #51  |  Link
rack04
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,538
Is anyone able to patch the latest git with v1.22?
rack04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2010, 23:49   #52  |  Link
rallymax
Rallymax
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Santa Clara CA
Posts: 55
no. I've just manually done the change . When I get home I'll copy it onto my SVN tree so that I can generate a diff and post it.
rallymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 00:00   #53  |  Link
mp3dom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieranrk View Post
It does.
Thank you very much! Since you're so kind, can I ask what are the next steps before final commit? Is there something new that need to be tested? (with the Interra verifier I cannot test anything more). Thanks again!
mp3dom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 13:10   #54  |  Link
alwa
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by rack04 View Post
Is anyone able to patch the latest git with v1.22?
Ready to patch. The @@ get removed by patebin...
alwa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 13:55   #55  |  Link
jpsdr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: France
Posts: 2,637
Can someone make a patch with it and the autoVAQ ?

Thanks.
jpsdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 16:14   #56  |  Link
kieranrk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp3dom View Post
Thank you very much! Since you're so kind, can I ask what are the next steps before final commit? Is there something new that need to be tested? (with the Interra verifier I cannot test anything more). Thanks again!
Need to fix max_cpb_delay_length with pulldown changes because it's wrong.
Also need to fix bug with calculation of displayed frames because it doesn't take into account any new parameters pass with the frame.

Needs a pengvado review.

Quote:
Ready to patch. The @@ get removed by patebin...
Use the download button in pastebin.
kieranrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 18:28   #57  |  Link
rallymax
Rallymax
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Santa Clara CA
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieranrk View Post
Use the download button in pastebin.
I did that and it still wouldn't apply.
what are you all using as your patching command line - and is in on Msys?
rallymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 18:52   #58  |  Link
kieranrk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 707
patch -p1 <in.diff

If it doesn't work I'll post a new one.
kieranrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 19:20   #59  |  Link
rallymax
Rallymax
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Santa Clara CA
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieranrk View Post
Version 1.22.

Patch: http://pastebin.com/m6ed0b13a
I used the above URL and did "download" and saved it as "nal-hrd-1.2.2.diff".

I then applied it in a Msys to a vanilla git checkout on Windows7 and got this error...

rallymax@CARTMAN /c/SVN/x264 <--- don't let the SVN throw you off. it is a git directory.
$ patch -p1 < nal-hrd-1.2.2.diff
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input.

So I have no idea what's wrong. Note, that I've never applied a patch before so it could be the host that's screwed up not the patch itself.
rallymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010, 19:22   #60  |  Link
alwa
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieranrk View Post
Use the download button in pastebin.
That does not help, the @@ are still missing... Try yourself if you don't believe me.


The file i uploaded on mediafire contains them, it works with the following command:

Code:
patch -p1 < nal-hrd1.22_fix.diff

Last edited by alwa; 4th February 2010 at 19:31. Reason: reread the thread a bit :)
alwa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.