Dogway's Filters Packs

[kedautinh12]

I don't know why they need develop back to old ver (2012) when avs+ still development???

[Dogway]

Don't worry I'll open a poll tomorrow and see what people decide, fragmentation or unification.

Originally Posted by coolgit

Does this updating the rest of the filters includes filters that QTGMC is relying on. I have downloaded all the necessary files and about to test your QTGMC and do some comparison. Should i hold off a bit until you finish your update or what?

You can use it, there's nothing in the new updates that affect QTGMCp.

[gispos]

I'm not that far behind. Had already posted my Version, 'QTGMC 3.382 2021 mod by A.SONY, based on v3.33d by Dogway'
With QTGMC I don't want to start discussions and stress now. Leave everything as it is, I just have to find a solution myself.

I also understand Dogway, everything neatly in one file, and so that there are not multiple versions using the same names. At first glance, that's also kind of reasonable.
In my opinion, however, this is not the right way. Functions are replaced in the background. Of course, this can also happen the other way. Someone wants to use Dogway's filter but a filter with the same name is loaded later and so Dogway's filter is replaced.

For me, the whole thing then becomes opaque, and I have to look everywhere to see what is now being used.
And if a version of Dogway should require other values or even have other parameters, it will be cruel.

[real.finder]

ok, so I will bring back this https://pastebin.com/raw/SYMD7ij5 QTGMC to https://github.com/realfinder/AVS-Stuff and make the STGMC as a wrapper for QTGMC but with TV_range as true by default

[Ceppo]

Now I'm going to make my QTGMC as well just to confuse everyone more thanks for the mod versions!

[gispos]

Originally Posted by real.finder

ok, so I will bring back this https://pastebin.com/raw/SYMD7ij5 QTGMC to https://github.com/realfinder/AVS-Stuff and make the STGMC as a wrapper for QTGMC but with TV_range as true by default

You don't have to do this for my sake. Do what is best for you and others.
Thanks!

[2ndR]

ChromaReconstructor does not work with the following error message
ChromaReconstructor_faster is working

Expr:All inputs mus have the same number of planes and the same dimensions, subsampling included
(ExTools.avsi, line 459)
(ChromaReconstructor v3mod.avsi, line 54)

ImageSource("chroma-444.png", pixel_type = "RGB48")
ConvertToYUV420(matrix = "Rec709")
u = ExtractU().nnedi3_rpow2(rfactor = 2, nns = 4, qual = 2, pscrn = 4, opt = 3).Spline36Resize(width, height, src_top = -0.5)
v = ExtractV().nnedi3_rpow2(rfactor = 2, nns = 4, qual = 2, pscrn = 4, opt = 3).Spline36Resize(width, height, src_top = -0.5)
YToUV(u, v, last)
ChromaReconstructor()

[Dogway]

Yes, it seems to be broken, I made an annotation in the offending line here. I have to look closer though. Can you use the faster version?

EDIT: Ok, saw the issue, will be uploading soon along a batch of other updates.

EDIT2: Done, check here.

[2ndR]

Confirmed to work properly
Thanks for the quick turnaround!

[gispos]

Dogway,
you can have a look at ex_contrast the lower code gives a division by 0 if cont == 0.0

    cont   = pow(cont + sign(cont), 3.)
    rcont  = 1. / cont

[Dogway]

Originally Posted by gispos

you can have a look at ex_contrast the lower code gives a division by 0 if cont == 0.0

Does it output any error? I saw it but it works fine on my end.

[Ceppo]

Dogway,
you can have a look at ex_contrast the lower code gives a division by 0 if cont == 0.0

If you do 1/0 you get the division by zero error, if you do 1./0 it gives infinity and won't give you an error.

[Dogway]

Originally Posted by Ceppo

If you do 1/0 you get the division by zero error, if you do 1./0 it gives infinity and won't give you an error.

Nice to know, wasn't aware of that.

By the way, I plan to upload a kind of special video/tutorial for AvsPMod to feature function definitions, sliders and preview filters, so beginners can get a handle of how things work and also get to know more about some of the more complex filters of my packs like ConvertFormat(). Maybe in a few weeks.

[Blankmedia]

With

QTGMCp( Preset="Slower", InputType=2 )

and

QTGMCp( Preset="Slower", InputType=3 )

I got an error in line 832 of QTGMCp

mt_merge( innerClip.nonyuy2clipin(true), edi1.nonyuy2clipin(true), inputTypeBlend, U=2,V=2 ))

MT_MERGE : Clip should have identical bit depths

Thank you for your good work

[Dogway]

in HBD right. Will have a look.

EDIT: Fixed.

[gispos]

Originally Posted by Dogway

Does it output any error? I saw it but it works fine on my end.

Originally Posted by Ceppo

If you do 1/0 you get the division by zero error, if you do 1./0 it gives infinity and won't give you an error.

Is already so written 1./0, nevertheless with me an error message comes if I use the avisynth.dll with another program 'AvsPThumb'.
I don't know what the problem is, there must be a hidden switch in avisynth that I haven't turned on. So it would be desirable to fix that. Thanks.

Originally Posted by Dogway

By the way, I plan to upload a kind of special video/tutorial for AvsPMod to feature function definitions, sliders and preview filters...

Now that is surprising, I had also planned. Time saved...

[Dogway]

Ok, I added epsilon. This issue could be in other functions though so it needs reporting when that happens.

Originally Posted by gispos

Now that is surprising, I had also planned. Time saved...

I don't know when I'm gonna do it, if I do it at all, I still have ton of things to finish before.

[anton_foy]

Included at the first page are benchmarks of sharpeners. What is XshapenPlus and CasP? These I cannot find them anywhere.

[Dogway]

I just renamed the functions (update SharpenersPack), it's better to keep some consistency so I'm renaming some filters (especially mods) with the "ex_" prefix so you can search them starting from their original name.

[gispos]

Originally Posted by Dogway

I don't know when I'm gonna do it, if I do it at all, I still have ton of things to finish before.

It's the same with me, I've only had it in my head for about 2 weeks. But when I will really start it...
it doesn't matter if there will be more than one video... so who tackles it first doesn't matter.
If it suits you, go for it.

Another topic.
I have read through my recent responses to your postings. I can't find an angry response.
Only the last sentence of mine could be misinterpreted. I forgot to put a smile on it.

I think the whole thing is a misunderstanding, you think I'm annoying and I sometimes think your posts don't read like feedback but more like nagging.
In these times we need peace.