Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Capturing and Editing Video > VapourSynth

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28th September 2021, 04:24   #1  |  Link
markfilipak
Registered User
 
markfilipak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Mansfield, Ohio (formerly San Jose, California)
Posts: 262
motion vector interpolation

Are the calling parameters for these:
  • vapoursynth.core.svp1.Super()
  • vapoursynth.core.svp1.Analyse()
  • vapoursynth.core.svp2.SmoothFps()
identical to the calling parameters for these:If not, are the vapoursynth svp1 & svp2 namespace functions documented? Where?
If so, is there any other place where the functions are documented/discussed. I ask because I find the svp-team docs to be somewhat vague and would appreciate a different perspective.

Also:
What is your opinion of the Super()-Analyse()-SmoothFps() workflow?
What are some other workflows I should consider?
Apparently, no one uses the motion vectors stored in the source frames. Do you know why?

Note: I'm not streaming and don't need/don't want motion vector interpolation in real time.

Thanks for guidance,
Mark.

Last edited by markfilipak; 28th September 2021 at 04:27.
markfilipak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2021, 22:43   #2  |  Link
Milardo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by markfilipak View Post
Are the calling parameters for these:
  • vapoursynth.core.svp1.Super()
  • vapoursynth.core.svp1.Analyse()
  • vapoursynth.core.svp2.SmoothFps()
identical to the calling parameters for these:If not, are the vapoursynth svp1 & svp2 namespace functions documented? Where?
If so, is there any other place where the functions are documented/discussed. I ask because I find the svp-team docs to be somewhat vague and would appreciate a different perspective.

Also:
What is your opinion of the Super()-Analyse()-SmoothFps() workflow?
What are some other workflows I should consider?
Apparently, no one uses the motion vectors stored in the source frames. Do you know why?

Note: I'm not streaming and don't need/don't want motion vector interpolation in real time.

Thanks for guidance,
Mark.

Hi, although not complete: this site gives a bit of explanation and sample scriipts auto generated:

https://bare7a.github.io/SVP-Flow-Sc...generator.html
Milardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2021, 23:36   #3  |  Link
ChaosKing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,706
Why not simply ask the creator of SVP? https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewforum.php?id=7
__________________
AVSRepoGUI // VSRepoGUI - Package Manager for AviSynth // VapourSynth
VapourSynth Portable FATPACK || VapourSynth Database || https://github.com/avisynth-repository
ChaosKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2021, 16:06   #4  |  Link
Selur
Registered User
 
Selur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,766
There's no SVConvert in Vapoursynth, but the mentioned parameters are the same as SV.. ones.
__________________
Hybrid here in the forum, homepage
Notice: Since email notifications do not work here any more, it might take me quite some time to notice a reply to a thread,..
Selur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
analyse, mv interpolation, smoothfps, super

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.