Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
1st October 2009, 20:51 | #301 | Link |
retired developer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,978
|
__________________
Detritus Software |
1st October 2009, 21:01 | #303 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
Quote:
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
|
2nd October 2009, 09:19 | #305 | Link | |
aka XaS
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: France
Posts: 1,122
|
Quote:
One exception to this is the garbage collector, which I don't like. It saves ZZZ hours coding all the "free(<insert_object_here>)" lines in the right places (which doesn't exist at all in java), but tends to hide the memory allocation problems to novice developers.
__________________
Q9300 OC @ 3.2ghz / Asus P5E3 / 4GB PC10600 / Geforce 8600 GTS |
|
2nd October 2009, 09:49 | #306 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,053
|
Ah, but I am not discussing the library and wealth of functionality available for you. The only thing about it that I do not like is that it is too slow. Other than that, it is great.
However, I am discussing the language itself. This is where the dislike for any dotNet and Java comes in. What do they all have in common? They are slow as heck. Plus they are sort of languages that tries to baby-sit you, which I do not like. |
2nd October 2009, 12:22 | #307 | Link | |
aka XaS
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: France
Posts: 1,122
|
Quote:
__________________
Q9300 OC @ 3.2ghz / Asus P5E3 / 4GB PC10600 / Geforce 8600 GTS |
|
2nd October 2009, 16:40 | #308 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,053
|
Keep in mind that this is subjective, but almost all dotNet apps I see are slow.
Slow to start. Even slow when you push a button. I do most certainly not approve. So well... yes, it is subjective, as I have said, but I have no love for such languages. They are always slow in my opinion, whatever they do. |
2nd October 2009, 16:50 | #309 | Link | |
retired developer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,978
|
Quote:
__________________
Detritus Software |
|
2nd October 2009, 16:56 | #310 | Link | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Oh, you mean the language that something bloated and slow like OOo is written in? Secondly, it's funny that people now going on and on about how C++ is so awesome and fast and sleek and yet in the early 90s the same criticisms lodged against Java and now .NET were also lodged against C++. It was so slow, so bloated, etc etc.
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by PatlaborForce; 2nd October 2009 at 17:00. |
||
2nd October 2009, 17:01 | #311 | Link | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,053
|
Quote:
Quote:
Bloated? I do not think so. Most of the language features exist for a reason. Is there a lot of stuff? Yes. Do they have a use? Yes. So you tell me. Is it bloated? I like to see it as it has a lot of features for different purposes. Hardly bloated. Quote:
|
|||
2nd October 2009, 17:06 | #312 | Link | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
So that's why it's bigger than my Office 2003 install? Because it's not bloated? Considering that Office has more features and has a smaller install size then my current OOo 3.1 install I'd say yes it is bloated. |
|
2nd October 2009, 17:09 | #314 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,053
|
Seriously, you are comparing Office to dotNet? What kind of comparison is that?!
Office is bloated. Pretty much all of Microsoft's applications are. Seriously. You need to compare the languages directly, not via some applications. And if dotNet is truly faster than C++, then I dare you to write x264 in it. But perhaps we should stop for a moment. I would love to argue with your further, but as not to pollute the thread, I would stop until it gets split or simply start a new topic. |
2nd October 2009, 17:12 | #315 | Link | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Never made that claim. So I don't need or want to do such a thing. On the other hand, the speed difference between a .NET GUI and something written say in MFC is going to be marginally different to the point that it's imperceptable. If you're seeing huge lags in a .NET GUI then someone is doing it wrong. |
|||
2nd October 2009, 18:07 | #317 | Link |
retired developer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,978
|
yeah back on topic guys
__________________
Detritus Software |
28th December 2009, 18:50 | #318 | Link |
retired developer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,978
|
Great news everybody! I successfully compiled a version that runs on Vista and Windows 7 (32bit and 64bit). Expect a release in 48h. Still have some cleaning to do and external binaries to update.
[edit] I cannot test this since I'm at work, but here's a test build: [broken, removed]
__________________
Detritus Software Last edited by Sirber; 28th December 2009 at 20:43. Reason: removed download link |
28th December 2009, 20:33 | #319 | Link | |
retired developer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,978
|
erm... I get some kind of errors..
Code:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Bencos\mencoder.exe "**********************.avi" -mc 0 -of rawvideo -ovc x264 -oac pcm -o C:\Users\sirber\AppData\Local\Temp/bencos/video.264 -x264encopts deblock=1,1:bframes=5:frameref=5:threads=auto:b_pyramid:nofast_pskip:nopsnr:bitrate=268:pass=1:turbo=2 -vf harddup MEncoder Sherpya-SVN-r30075-4.2.5 (C) 2000-2009 MPlayer Team Option x264encopts: Bad argument b_pyramid=(null) success: format: 0 data: 0x0 - 0xaa00000 AVI file format detected. AVI: ODML: Building ODML index (2 superindexchunks). VIDEO: [H264] 848x480 24bpp 29.970 fps 820.0 kbps (100.1 kbyte/s) ========================================================================== Opening audio decoder: [mp3lib] MPEG layer-2, layer-3 AUDIO: 48000 Hz, 2 ch, s16le, 128.0 kbit/8.33% (ratio: 16000->192000) Selected audio codec: [mp3] afm: mp3lib (mp3lib MPEG layer-2, layer-3) ========================================================================== Opening video filter: [expand osd=1] Expand: -1 x -1, -1 ; -1, osd: 1, aspect: 0.000000, round: 1 Opening video filter: [harddup] ========================================================================== Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family Unsupported PixelFormat -1 Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264) ========================================================================== Movie-Aspect is 1.77:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect. FATAL: Cannot initialize video driver. Exiting... b_pyramid Quote:
Cannot initialize video driver anyone has an idea?
__________________
Detritus Software Last edited by Sirber; 28th December 2009 at 20:39. |
|
28th December 2009, 20:42 | #320 | Link |
retired developer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,978
|
fixed the "b_pyramid=normal", works now. gonnna post a new build later tonight!
[edit] Code:
Option x264encopts: Unknown suboption bime Option x264encopts: Unknown suboption brdo
__________________
Detritus Software Last edited by Sirber; 28th December 2009 at 20:54. |
Tags |
aac, bencos, gui, webm, x264 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|