Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
27th May 2008, 22:36 | #81 | Link | ||||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7
|
3 more good old Xeon Prestonia systems:
2x Xeon Prestonia @ 3.06GHz (HyperThreading enabled): Quote:
Quote:
1x Xeon Prestonia @ 2.80Ghz (HyperThreading enabled): Quote:
AMD Opteron 275 (DP): Quote:
Last edited by Platinum; 28th May 2008 at 01:02. |
||||
27th May 2008, 22:37 | #82 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
|
|
28th May 2008, 00:35 | #83 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7
|
Earlier one I posted was a dual system. This one is a single Irwindale.
1x Xeon Irwindale @ 3.60Ghz (HyperThreading enabled): Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Platinum; 28th May 2008 at 15:14. |
||
28th May 2008, 23:37 | #85 | Link | |||||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
As for really old servers, here's a few from the past millennium.. Not something worth using for x264 encoding (I'm more interested in top of the line for fast transcode or realtime HD) but it's still impressive as comparison to see how CPU performance has improved over the years. So here are the results 2x Coppermine Pentium III @ 600Mhz: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Platinum; 29th May 2008 at 21:16. |
|||||
31st May 2008, 15:28 | #87 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 96
|
My c2d-e4500 results
Hi not mutch slower than huffyuv (10fps @ 720p)
Results for x264.exe v0.58.747 encoded 1442 frames, 24.14 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 24.20 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 23.87 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 24.83 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.19 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.18 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.22 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.18 fps, 3942.92 kb/s Results for x264.exe v0.59.819M (13% faster than v0.58.747) encoded 1442 frames, 27.53 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 27.41 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 27.51 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 27.48 fps, 3889.96 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.93 fps, 3953.35 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.93 fps, 3953.35 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.94 fps, 3953.35 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 6.93 fps, 3953.35 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Codename Conroe Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz Core Stepping M0 Technology 65 nm Stock frequency 2200 MHz Core Speed 2200.1 MHz (11.0 x 200.0 MHz) FID range 6.0x - 11.0x Northbridge Intel P35/G33/G31 rev. A2 Southbridge Intel 82801IR (ICH9R) rev. 02 CAS# 5.0 RAS# to CAS# 5 RAS# Precharge 5 Cycle Time (tRAS) 18 Command Rate 2T Memory Frequency 400.0 MHz (1:2) Memory Type DDR2 Memory Size 4094 MBytes Channels Dual (Symmetric) Windows Version Microsoft Windows Vista (6.0) Home Premium Edition Service Pack 1 (Build 6001) max VID 1.263 V Voltage sensor 0 1.20 Volts [0x4B] (CPU VCORE) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 2 Number of threads 2 (max 2) L2 cache 2048 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T Package Socket 775 LGA (platform ID = 0h) Temperature sensor 0 36°C (96°F) [0x24] (TMPIN0) Temperature sensor 1 42°C (107°F) [0x2A] (TMPIN1) Temperature sensor 0 62°C (143°F) [0x26] (core #0) Temperature sensor 1 63°C (145°F) [0x25] (core #1) Temperature sensor 0 37°C (98°F) [0x25] (GPU Core) |
5th June 2008, 07:39 | #89 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 87
|
big thanks to Graysky for doing this, this thread compared all the chips i was looking at as well as some old ones very comparable to what i was running already, benchmarked using the exact app that I had in mind for an upgrade. I started out encoding Divx 3.11 with flask, then divx using Nandub, then xvid, and now after looking through this thread I was convinced that CPU speeds had sufficiently increased (but still at a reasonable price) enough to upgrade and now i will start encoding in x264.
Based on reading this thread yesterday I went out and bought the parts for a computer today, unfortunatly for this thread, I only got a q6600 which is already well represented here, sorry I didn't get anything more exotic althou i nearly got a q9300 but other research showed that for encoding x264 it was essentially a waste of $70 AUD. Here are the results from my old rig thou. And once again, thanks Results for x264.exe v0.58.747 encoded 1442 frames, 20.99 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 20.98 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 20.88 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 20.88 fps, 3905.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 4.83 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 4.83 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 4.82 fps, 3942.92 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 4.84 fps, 3942.92 kb/s Results for x264.exe v0.59.819M encoded 1442 frames, 21.93 fps, 3887.74 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 21.91 fps, 3887.42 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 21.91 fps, 3887.19 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 21.92 fps, 3887.30 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 5.09 fps, 3955.32 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 5.10 fps, 3954.76 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 5.09 fps, 3955.19 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 5.10 fps, 3953.51 kb/s System Details -------------- Name AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Codename Manchester Specification AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ Core Stepping BH-E4 Technology 90 nm Stock frequency 2000 MHz Core Speed 2010.3 MHz (10.0 x 201.0 MHz) Northbridge NVIDIA nForce4 rev. A3 Southbridge NVIDIA nForce4 MCP rev. A3 CAS# 2.5 RAS# to CAS# 3 RAS# Precharge 3 Cycle Time (tRAS) 6 Command Rate 2T Memory Frequency 201.0 MHz (CPU/10) Memory Type DDR Memory Size 1024 MBytes Channels Dual Windows Version Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (Build 2600) Voltage sensor 0 1.36 Volts [0x55] (CPU VCORE) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 2 Number of threads 2 (max 2) L2 cache 2 x 512 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX (+), 3DNow! (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, x86-64 Package Socket 939 Temperature sensor 0 41°C (105°F) [0x29] (TMPIN0) Temperature sensor 1 41°C (105°F) [0x29] (TMPIN1) Temperature sensor 2 39°C (102°F) [0x27] (TMPIN2) Temperature sensor 0 45°C (112°F) [0x5E] (core #0) Temperature sensor 1 47°C (116°F) [0x60] (core #1) Temperature sensor 0 69°C (156°F) [0x45] (GPU Core) |
5th June 2008, 19:32 | #90 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 38
|
so here my results
x264 HD BENCHMARK RESULTS Please copy/paste everything below the line into the forum post to report your data ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x264.exe v0.58.747 encoded 1442 frames, 55.59 fps, 3905.42 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 55.80 fps, 3905.42 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 55.87 fps, 3905.42 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 55.43 fps, 3905.42 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 15.26 fps, 3952.85 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 15.25 fps, 3952.85 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 15.28 fps, 3952.85 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 15.24 fps, 3952.85 kb/s Results for x264.exe v0.59.819M encoded 1442 frames, 60.01 fps, 3889.39 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 59.66 fps, 3888.65 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 59.85 fps, 3888.58 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 60.05 fps, 3891.55 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 17.07 fps, 3963.57 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 17.07 fps, 3963.19 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 17.04 fps, 3963.52 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 17.06 fps, 3963.43 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Codename Kentsfield Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Core Stepping G0 Technology 65 nm Stock frequency 2400 MHz Core Speed 2698.4 MHz (9.0 x 299.8 MHz) FID range 6.0x - 9.0x Northbridge Intel P965/G965 rev. C1 Southbridge Intel 82801HB/HR (ICH8/R) rev. 02 CAS# 5.0 RAS# to CAS# 5 RAS# Precharge 5 Cycle Time (tRAS) 15 Command Rate 2T Memory Frequency 374.8 MHz (4:5) Memory Type DDR2 Memory Size 1024 MBytes Channels Dual (Symmetric) Windows Version Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600) max VID 1.313 V Voltage sensor 0 1.25 Volts [0x9C] (CPU VCORE) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 4) L2 cache 2 x 4096 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T Package Socket 775 LGA (platform ID = 4h) Temperature sensor 0 40°C (103°F) [0x28] (SYSTIN) Temperature sensor 1 58°C (136°F) [0x74] (CPUTIN) Temperature sensor 2 127°C (260°F) [0xFE] (AUXTIN) Temperature sensor 0 75°C (166°F) [0x19] (core #0) Temperature sensor 1 74°C (165°F) [0x1A] (core #1) Temperature sensor 2 69°C (156°F) [0x1F] (core #2) Temperature sensor 3 70°C (157°F) [0x1E] (core #3) |
7th June 2008, 13:36 | #91 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
@napalm - got it thanks! |
|
9th June 2008, 02:12 | #92 | Link | |
x264 developer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
|
Quote:
With this massive revision, there have been dramatic speed changes on many processors, especially the Phenom (for which people are reporting a 20% speed improvement), but also the Pentium-M, Athlon 64, Core 1, and Penryn. |
|
9th June 2008, 20:44 | #93 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
|
@dark - I wonder when that will get incorporated into one of these builds? As of today, 859-3 seems to be the most recent with a date of 29-May.
|
9th June 2008, 21:14 | #94 | Link | |
x264 developer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
|
Quote:
You can find more often-updated builds at x264.nl. |
|
2nd July 2008, 19:06 | #95 | Link | |||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
This is for the question mark in: E5450 (dual) Harpertown 4+4=8 45 nm 9.0 x 333 3.00 i5000P ? @ 667 1 DDR 2 Win Server x86 01:07 57.54 34.01 0:48:14 01:02 58.36 38.29 0:44:36 7.5% Quote:
To give you an idea I redid the benchmark with 747, 819 (from x264.nl) and 892 (from x264.nl): Quote:
Last edited by Platinum; 3rd July 2008 at 11:08. |
|||
4th July 2008, 09:37 | #96 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
|
@Platinum - Update the data. I would love to continue to add new builds, but the benchmark would take longer and longer to run with multiple versions of x264. For example, I have two in there now, if I add a third, and eventually a fourth, people won't wanna do it if the benchmark takes 30-40 min. Plus, it was pretty popular when I released it, but I can't see that many folks back filling data at this point.
The nice thing is the rank order of the systems hasn't really changed from the 0.58.747 to 0.59.819 and I suspect this will be true moving forward. |
4th July 2008, 22:11 | #99 | Link | |
x264 developer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
|
Quote:
New CAVLC bitstream writer Various mini-optimizations CABAC encoding and RD optimizations and a few other minor things None of these will have any measurable effect on the order of CPUs in a benchmark. So if you want, just grab the latest version and call it a "milestone" With lowres asm and denoising asm patched in, we've done all the assembly that'll be going in for a while (the next batch will be from Holger, a SoC student, in a few weeks probably). If you want, you could wait for that, though it won't be that significant either. |
|
7th July 2008, 12:38 | #100 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 108
|
Hello to all
I just run the test on my new mac pro with boot camp, xp sp232bits. Only 52% of the processor are use. And boot camp only see 2 G of my ram. Results for x264.exe v0.58.747 encoded 1442 frames, 59.01 fps, 3904.94 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 59.46 fps, 3904.94 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 59.50 fps, 3904.94 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 59.54 fps, 3904.94 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 31.87 fps, 3974.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 31.95 fps, 3974.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 31.93 fps, 3974.08 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 31.85 fps, 3974.08 kb/s Results for x264.exe v0.59.819M encoded 1442 frames, 60.04 fps, 3894.02 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 60.12 fps, 3894.31 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 59.77 fps, 3895.56 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 59.66 fps, 3895.56 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 35.43 fps, 3980.91 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 35.50 fps, 3981.71 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 35.43 fps, 3981.22 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 35.51 fps, 3981.22 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Xeon X5365 Name Intel Xeon X5365 Codename Clovertown Codename Clovertown Specification Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5365 @ 3.00GHz Specification Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5365 @ 3.00GHz Core Stepping B3 Core Stepping B3 Technology 65 nm Technology 65 nm Stock frequency 3000 MHz Stock frequency 3000 MHz Core Speed 2992.9 MHz (9.0 x 332.5 MHz) Core Speed 2992.9 MHz (9.0 x 332.5 MHz) FID range 6.0x - 9.0x FID range 6.0x - 9.0x Northbridge Intel 5000X rev. 31 Southbridge Intel 6321ESB rev. 09 Memory Frequency 332.5 MHz (1:1) Memory Type FB-DDR2 Memory Size 2044 MBytes Windows Version Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600) max VID 1.413 V max VID 1.413 V Number of processors 2 Number of threads 8 Number of threads 4 (max 4) Number of threads 4 (max 4) L2 cache 2 x 4096 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size L2 cache 2 x 4096 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T Package Socket 771 LGA (platform ID = 6h) Package Socket 771 LGA (platform ID = 6h) Temperature sensor 0 89°C (192°F) [0xB] (core #0) Temperature sensor 1 83°C (181°F) [0x11] (core #1) Temperature sensor 2 81°C (177°F) [0x13] (core #2) Temperature sensor 3 85°C (184°F) [0xF] (core #3) Temperature sensor 0 73°C (163°F) [0x1B] (core #0) Temperature sensor 1 71°C (159°F) [0x1D] (core #1) Temperature sensor 3 74°C (165°F) [0x1A] (core #3) Temperature sensor 2 69°C (156°F) [0x1F] (core #2) Temperature sensor 0 67°C (152°F) [0x43] (GPU Core) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|