Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
28th August 2008, 22:23 | #61 | Link | |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
|
Quote:
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
|
|
28th August 2008, 22:46 | #62 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
Off to download now! |
|
28th August 2008, 22:48 | #63 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
I personally don't have any "mobile" device, nor do I have a "standalone" player. So I don't care about profiles, I use MPlayer or MPC+ffdshow. I want to archive captured video clips on my HDD and hence I need some "constant quality" mode. My clips are usually between 3 and 10 minutes, mostly live music. Some clips have a LOT of motion, some are more static. I want to have the "same" quality (more or less) in all my clips and I don't care if some clips are MUCH bigger than others. At the moment x264 + Psy-RD does a great job with it's "CRF" mode. So I use CRF=22 for most of my encodes, I rarely use 2-Pass. If you ever want me to consider DivX H.264 as an serious alternative to x264, you'll have to provide some mode like CRF...
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 28th August 2008 at 23:08. |
29th August 2008, 00:53 | #64 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 936
|
LoRd_MuldeR: Ah Yes! I think there has been some misunderstanding. A CRF-like mode is absolutely something we are considering! I read "constant quality" as fixed qp, although it sounds like Stax still needs a qp mode for compression check.
|
29th August 2008, 01:06 | #65 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
crf like is fine for comp. check.
__________________
https://github.com/stax76/software-list https://www.youtube.com/@stax76/playlists |
29th August 2008, 01:07 | #66 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Good news
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ |
29th August 2008, 06:51 | #68 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,784
|
Sorry to disappoint you:
I won't work much further on my GUI as long as there is only an "Alpha version 1". Means: I may consider more efforts with a next encoder version... Patience. I have less life than ever before. |
29th August 2008, 19:23 | #69 | Link |
Turkey Machine
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lowestoft, UK (but visit lots of places with bribes [beer])
Posts: 1,953
|
Nice going with this BTW! It had to come whilst I was at Greenbelt! How's speed with the same settings as x264 comparable?
__________________
On Discworld it is clearly recognized that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10. If the hero did not overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld |
30th August 2008, 05:08 | #70 | Link |
I dont care so should you
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In hell next to the boiling pit of Lava...
Posts: 989
|
Wow oss still kick butt Divx got to work a bit harder on that...
__________________
My Installer's || |
30th August 2008, 05:16 | #71 | Link |
x264 developer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
|
Speed can still use a lot of work--in my test DivX goes significantly slower in its fastest mode than x264 goes with psy RD and psy trellis (--subme 6 --trellis 1 --bframes 3 etc). This presents a serious problem, for obvious reasons. DivX has a huge amount of room for improvement here, so one can hope that they'll cover some ground in the next release.
|
31st August 2008, 20:19 | #72 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 89
|
Greets,
Really enjoying testing out the new codec. Quality looks great. Encode times seem reasonable. @LigH, thanks for the GUI. Very handy. Cheers, Rick
__________________
Rene: Could you not just wound him a little bit? Hans: Well now, with a 25 pound shell that is not easy. 'Allo 'Allo |
3rd September 2008, 02:11 | #73 | Link |
Un-Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Audio Stream - 0x80
Posts: 341
|
You may want to update a shortcut. Under Start Menu > Programs > DivX > DivX H.264 Codec CLI > Learn about DivX H2.64 Codec CLI, I think it should be "Learn about DivX H.264 Codec CLI"
|
10th January 2009, 11:08 | #76 | Link | |
Swallowed in the Sea
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aix-en-Provence, France
Posts: 5,191
|
found a typo at the end of the stdout...
Quote:
|
|
10th January 2009, 17:57 | #77 | Link |
x264aholic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,752
|
Technically that's not completely wrong, Hertz is used as a measure of frequency, in this case frames per second.
__________________
You can't call your encoding speed slow until you start measuring in seconds per frame. |
Tags |
cli, divx, encoder, h.264, tutorial |
|
|