Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
31st December 2009, 21:07 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 129
|
High Quality Up-Conversion filter
Hi guys. In your experience, what would you consider to be AVISynth filter equivalents closest to commercially available up-scaling plug-ins like InstantHD, BlowUp, Genuine Fractals, etc. The rez of some 640x360p vids need doublin' but I'm looking for something sharper than what the conventional bi-linear, bi-cubic, etc algorithms have to offer.
I looked for some pages comparing images produced with various AVISynth filters aimed at that but couldn't find anything satisfying. Thank you in advance.
__________________
CPU: Intel® Core™i7 930 @ 2.80GFz 2.79 GHz (8 cores) GPU: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTS 250 SYS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RAM: 6.00 GB |
1st January 2010, 01:54 | #6 | Link |
Sleepy overworked fellow
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maple syrup's homeland
Posts: 933
|
Don't forget the new (and still in testing) eedi3 - http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...68#post1343668
__________________
AnimeIVTC() - v2.00 -http://boinc.berkeley.edu/- Let all geeks use their incredibly powerful comps for the greater good (no, no, it won't slow your filtering/encoding :p) |
1st January 2010, 07:07 | #9 | Link |
Derek Prestegard IRL
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,989
|
Using nnedi / nnedi2 in double height mode will probably be your best option
If you're doing upscaling, you might want to look into some form of noise reduction, and possibly sharpening - though you should probably go easy on them both! Over filtering is always a bad idea. Take a look at LSFMod for sharpening, and FFT3DFilter / MDegrain are both excellent denoisers. Tune them carefully. ~MiSfit
__________________
These are all my personal statements, not those of my employer :) |
1st January 2010, 18:18 | #10 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,391
|
If you think about what NNEDI actually is doing, you'll come to the conclusion that the result of NNEDI-upscaling *should* be sharpened in some way. Remember that NNEDI is not a scaler, but an interpolator for missing-by-decimation data. In a smooth progressive frame, there is not any data missing in this special way. E.g. a 1-pixel line with 1-pixel antialiasing on either side will be much broader in the upscaled frame than it should be ideally.
orig: 10 10 14 20 14 10 10 NNEDI: 10 xx 10 xx 14 xx 20 xx 14 xx 10 xx 10 Not quite sure how to put this in a few words ... what about "Nyquist interpolation / restoring" ? Those parts of detail that are somehow close to Nyquist frequency in the source frame, those need to be thinned in the NNEDI-upscaled frame.
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) Last edited by Didée; 1st January 2010 at 18:23. |
1st January 2010, 18:28 | #11 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
But the basic idea is that because NNEDI is trying to restore lost (or missing?) data, and a progressive frame has no lost data, what happens is that some stuff which NNEDI *thinks* is lost data, gets strengthened, I think, no? |
|
3rd January 2010, 04:10 | #14 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
It is an interesting one though... To be honest though, I didn't find much difference between lanczs and nnedi... Maybe I wasn't lookign good enought? *shrugs* |
|
3rd January 2010, 04:37 | #15 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Tags |
upscaling |
|
|