Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 AVC / H.264

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29th September 2011, 12:38   #1  |  Link
k-c-ksum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 268
new bluray 2d/3d encoder

currently a free beta
http://www.fixstars.com/en/

will be intersting to see how it performs
__________________
k-c-ksum
k-c-ksum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2011, 22:49   #2  |  Link
BetaBoy
CoreCodec Founder
 
BetaBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,421
It's x264 http://x264licensing.com/adopters
__________________
Dan "BetaBoy" Marlin
Ubiquitous Multimedia Technologies and Developer Tools

http://corecodec.com
BetaBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2011, 00:01   #3  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
Here's their MVC patch. I have not reviewed a single line of it, and it'll likely require significant changes before final integration to mainline x264, but it's what they gave me.
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2011, 01:20   #4  |  Link
Lyris
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 602
http://www.fixstars.com/en/codec/sup...tarted/system/

Quote:
Disclaimer about Blu-ray Encoding
Blu-ray discs including video encoded by Accelcoder X have been tested and are compatible on most devices, but it is not guaranteed to play on other playback device.
Why include this disclaimer if x264 is BD compatible?
I'm a bit confused, if this is a professional encoder and is... " a Blu-ray and Blu-ray 3D standards compliant H.264 encoder designed for professional use" - then why include this disclaimer?
Lyris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2011, 01:22   #5  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
Most likely because they haven't tested on every Blu-ray player in existence, and they don't want to offer a legal guarantee/warranty as such.
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2011, 01:37   #6  |  Link
deadrats
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 119
i'm curious, is this the same encoder that's accelerated by the Cell/B.E./GigaAccel 180?

http://tmpgenc.pegasys-inc.com/en/pr...ccelcoder.html

if so does that mean that these guys have modified the x264 code to take advantage of hardware acceleration?

is so, can we expect to see that code merged with x264 proper?
deadrats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2011, 01:46   #7  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
No commercial licensee of x264 has modified it to run on any sort of Cell CPU. If they had, the code would have already been made public.
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2011, 02:29   #8  |  Link
shon3i
BluRay Maniac
 
shon3i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,419
Can somebody compile with mvc patch ? Thanks
__________________
ChapterGen - manipulate with chapters in various i/o formats, with CLI support
Official website or Doom9 thread
shon3i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2011, 06:51   #9  |  Link
CruNcher
Registered User
 
CruNcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
Nvidia ? so i guess nvcuvenc will be based on x264 in the future ?
Splitmedia also licensed it, guess will be the encoder for their social game video recording platform
Cri also got owned
Oblong for it's Virtual Editing System
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :)

It is about Time

Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late !

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004

Last edited by CruNcher; 2nd October 2011 at 07:16.
CruNcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2011, 12:35   #10  |  Link
mp3dom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,135
Tested the trial version. It is in fact a (bugged, but it's in beta stage) GUI built on top of a (modified) libx264 (114). There are no userdata on the encode (encoding parameters nor x264 revision used) so I cannot see which parameters was set for e.g. psy-rd, aq, aq-strength and so on. Basic parameters can be changed by the user, some others are grayed out and others are not available at all compared to the CLI (mbtree, trellis, me, psy-rd, aq etc) probably because they're too much specific.
It is a good starting point actually for a good GUI. Segment encoding and/or the possibility to change something after the first encode (zones for example) is actually not supported (don't know if it will support it in later releases)
mp3dom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2011, 20:05   #11  |  Link
kolak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyris View Post
http://www.fixstars.com/en/codec/sup...tarted/system/



Why include this disclaimer if x264 is BD compatible?
I'm a bit confused, if this is a professional encoder and is... " a Blu-ray and Blu-ray 3D standards compliant H.264 encoder designed for professional use" - then why include this disclaimer?
Because it's probably no near to be 3D BD compliant yet, so they don't want to people jumping and using it for production.
They don't say it has been verified by BD verifies- just plays on some players- this is less than pure x264.

For 3D you have to put it through both Sony and Panasonic verifier, as there are still issues with playback on certain players.

It can be nice product if they finish development and sell it at realistic price.

Last edited by kolak; 5th October 2011 at 20:20.
kolak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2020, 18:36   #12  |  Link
Alanick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 17
Hey everyone,

I know its always a bad idea to bump a VERY old thread as this one, but made no sense to create another one.
So my question is, do any of you happen to have saved the last available version of Accelcoder X that was up for trial from Fixstars?
Or any of their PDFs material, anything at all about Accelcoder X.
Alanick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.