BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

[thebuff]

Thanks for your reply - I'll take a look, but I do the same thing every time and just create a new folder, automatically called New Folder by Windows and then rip using DVDFab, so the structure within is always the same.

But I'll give it another go from scratch.

Many thanks

[Lathe]

Originally Posted by jdobbs

That error code (75) means "Path/File access error". You may want to check the path to your working or source folder(s) and see if it has some unusual characters, or if it is exceptionally long.

"See if it is exceptionally long...?!!"

[Emulgator]

Exceptionally long would be more than 259".
Or characters. Whatever seems more important under given circumstances. ;-}}

[MrVideo]

How does BDRB determine how many frames are in a file? I just had BDRB bail because it only got 167640 frames of 179976 frames. But, there are only 167640 frames in the file. I pulled the file into VRD and it shows 167640 frames. I went to the end of the file and it is not truncated.

So, I thought I would edit the AVS file for the video. Well that didn't work. BDRB rebuilt the file.

Bug?

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

How does BDRB determine how many frames are in a file? I just had BDRB bail because it only got 167640 frames of 179976 frames. But, there are only 167640 frames in the file. I pulled the file into VRD and it shows 167640 frames. I went to the end of the file and it is not truncated.

So, I thought I would edit the AVS file for the video. Well that didn't work. BDRB rebuilt the file.

Bug?

BD-RB gets the frame count from data in the MPLS file (length and framerate). Are you getting an error? If so, what error? It's been a while since I looked at that code, but, if I remember correctly, I don't think it should fail even if the frame count was wrong.

[MrVideo]

Originally Posted by jdobbs

BD-RB gets the frame count from data in the MPLS file (length and framerate). Are you getting an error? If so, what error? It's been a while since I looked at that code, but, if I remember correctly, I don't think it should fail even if the frame count was wrong.

Yep, as indicated in the posting, the frame count is less than what BDRB is told that it should be. When BDRB hits the real frame count, it fails indicating that the frame count was less than expected.

[MrVideo]

I just used BDEdit to look at the playlist and took the length of 1:56:31.985 (6991.95 sec) and came up with 167638.9932 frames. Just one frame shy. I have no idea where BDRB came up with 179976 frames.

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

Yep, as indicated in the posting, the frame count is less than what BDRB is told that it should be. When BDRB hits the real frame count, it fails indicating that the frame count was less than expected.

Could you please post the log so I can see what it says?

[MrVideo]

It says what I've said in the posting, but here it is:

[04/19/25] BD Rebuilder v0.62.12
[21:18:32] Source:  
  - Input BD size: 53.31 GB
  - Approximate total content: [02:27:51.037]
  - Target BD size: 22.95 GB
  - Windows Version: 6.1 [7601]
  - Quality: High Quality (Default), 1-Pass VBR
  - UHD-BD source detected.
  - Decoding/Frame serving: NVENCC
  - Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=640
- Resuming from previously started job.
[21:18:39] PHASE ONE, Encoding
 - [21:18:39] Processing: VID_00001 (1 of 1)
 - [21:18:39] Reencoding video [VID_00001]
   - Source Video: HEVC, 3840x2160
   - Rate/Length: 23.976fps, 179,976 frames
   - Bitrate: 20,665 Kbs
 - [21:18:39] Reencoding: VID_00001, Pass 1 of 1
   - Error: NVENCC prematurely terminated.
   - Encoded: 167640, expected: 179976
[21:51:29] - Failed video encode, aborted

But, I was thinking about supplying the following anyway, as I thought it might come in handy:
http://vidiot.com/images/BDEDIT-BDRB-mpls.jpg
Hopefully there is a clue in there.

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

It says what I've said in the posting, but here it is:

[04/19/25] BD Rebuilder v0.62.12
[21:18:32] Source:  
  - Input BD size: 53.31 GB
  - Approximate total content: [02:27:51.037]
  - Target BD size: 22.95 GB
  - Windows Version: 6.1 [7601]
  - Quality: High Quality (Default), 1-Pass VBR
  - UHD-BD source detected.
  - Decoding/Frame serving: NVENCC
  - Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=640
- Resuming from previously started job.
[21:18:39] PHASE ONE, Encoding
 - [21:18:39] Processing: VID_00001 (1 of 1)
 - [21:18:39] Reencoding video [VID_00001]
   - Source Video: HEVC, 3840x2160
   - Rate/Length: 23.976fps, 179,976 frames
   - Bitrate: 20,665 Kbs
 - [21:18:39] Reencoding: VID_00001, Pass 1 of 1
   - Error: NVENCC prematurely terminated.
   - Encoded: 167640, expected: 179976
[21:51:29] - Failed video encode, aborted

But, I was thinking about supplying the following anyway, as I thought it might come in handy:
http://vidiot.com/images/BDEDIT-BDRB-mpls.jpg
Hopefully there is a clue in there.

I'll look at it. In the meantime, try adding the following to your INI file:

NVENC_NO_FRAMECHK=1

[MrVideo]

BTW, pings to jdobbs.net are fine, but the website does not respond.

[MrVideo]

Originally Posted by jdobbs

I'll look at it. In the meantime, try adding the following to your INI file:

NVENC_NO_FRAMECHK=1

Oh boy, a hidden hidden option.

That worked. Re-encode completed. Thanks.

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

BTW, pings to jdobbs.net are fine, but the website does not respond.

I shut it down.

Originally Posted by MrVideo

Oh boy, a hidden hidden option.

That worked. Re-encode completed. Thanks.

It was created specifically for NVENC support. If I remember correctly, I added the frame count check because it was the only way I could identify when it crashed (at that time). The hidden option was put there as a workaround in case something (like your issue) popped up.

[MrVideo]

Originally Posted by jdobbs

I shut it down.

Does this mean that your website is no more? Or is it temporary as it is still listed in your signature.

The hidden option was put there as a workaround in case something (like your issue) popped up.

Well, it worked.

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

Does this mean that your website is no more? Or is it temporary as it is still listed in your signature.

Well, it worked.

It wasn't getting enough hits to justify the cost. I'll just take it out of my signature.

[MrVideo]

Originally Posted by jdobbs

It wasn't getting enough hits to justify the cost. I'll just take it out of my signature.

Sorry to read that. My website, etc., is on my personal Linux server, about 6 ft from where I am sitting. No paying a 3rd party to host it. Much cheaper.

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

Sorry to read that. My website, etc., is on my personal Linux server, about 6 ft from where I am sitting. No paying a 3rd party to host it. Much cheaper.

Yeah. I had mine running on my server here too. It's the fixed IP VPN costs that I was referring to. The VPN stopped working (quit forwarding ports) for the umpteenth time last week and I decided to call it quits before I had to renew it.

[MrVideo]

I have a static IP business account, that I recently updated to 1Gbps down/50 Mbps up. It is a cable connection. They have work to do before the 50 Mbps up can be increased. It is just taking them a long time. No VPN involved. True that it isn't cheap, but not as bad as I thought it was going to be. To go from 100 Mbps down to 10x faster was not 10x the price. It wasn't even double.