Vine, cutting edge quality de-halo filter and morphology stuff

[WaxCyl]

Here is the error message:

2023-05-28 22:03:32.061
Failed to evaluate the script:
Python exception: No attribute with the name NLmeans exists. Did you mistype a plugin namespace?

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "src\cython\vapoursynth.pyx", line 3115, in vapoursynth._vpy_evaluate
File "src\cython\vapoursynth.pyx", line 3116, in vapoursynth._vpy_evaluate
File "E:/VapourProject.vpy", line 30, in 
ref = Vine.Basic(clip, h=31.18, sharp=0.48)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "C:\Program Files\Python311\Lib\site-packages\Vine.py", line 208, in Basic
clip = internal.basic(core, src, a, h, sharp, cutoff)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "C:\Program Files\Python311\Lib\site-packages\Vine.py", line 115, in basic
upsampled = core.NLmeans(upsampled, a, 0, h, None)
^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "src\cython\vapoursynth.pyx", line 2628, in vapoursynth._CoreProxy.__getattr__
File "src\cython\vapoursynth.pyx", line 2483, in vapoursynth.Core.__getattr__
AttributeError: No attribute with the name NLmeans exists. Did you mistype a plugin namespace?

I will be very appreciative of any assistance

[richardpl]

Am I only one to spot that those morphological filters in here are using extremely inefficient algorithm?

[WaxCyl]

I think it it may be because Feisty2 placed the highest possible priority on image quality, above all else?

[richardpl]

I get same quality/output if not much better quality with much faster algorithm. Feel free to keep wasting CPU cycles on crappy morphological implementations.

[WaxCyl]

OK thanks for your thoughts. I have found Vine to be extremely good and found others to be not very effective. Maybe I am not fine tuning them effectively? What other halo remover would you suggest?

[richardpl]

I havent looked at dehalo quality, but I just noticed part of code use slow algorithms.

[WaxCyl]

I have noticed that Dogway has updated Feisty2's Plum and Oyster . Hopefully Vine gets updated eventually!