Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
16th May 2008, 06:06 | #42 | Link |
I dont care so should you
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In hell next to the boiling pit of Lava...
Posts: 989
|
Oh my I just might **** and die in the most embarrassing way so Digit how much will this little add-on cost me the consumer.... Once Officially released that is...
__________________
My Installer's || Last edited by Guest; 16th May 2008 at 14:51. Reason: rule 4 |
16th May 2008, 06:49 | #44 | Link |
I dont care so should you
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In hell next to the boiling pit of Lava...
Posts: 989
|
no prob bro by the way sent a pm about 10 min ago...
ps I didnt mean to ask I was just curious and hadnt read the whole post just as yet
__________________
My Installer's || Last edited by Ajax_Undone; 16th May 2008 at 06:51. |
16th May 2008, 07:11 | #45 | Link |
I dont care so should you
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In hell next to the boiling pit of Lava...
Posts: 989
|
Will the Dr or Converter be updated to use this codec or has this been even discussed? Or are you guy making a new encoder app all together...
__________________
My Installer's || |
16th May 2008, 08:06 | #48 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NTSC R1
Posts: 2,046
|
Very good news, and long awaited. What I am awaiting with even more eagerness is the unveiling of the encoder bit of Project Rémoulade. Will have to see how that compares to the other H.264/AVC encoders, namely, x264, Ateme etc. Would we see some DivX-certified AVC standalone players soon then? Let's wait and see...
__________________
|
16th May 2008, 08:44 | #49 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,315
|
Here Divx decoder has comparable speed with last version of fastest H.264 decoder CoreAVC 1.7
CPU E2160 Timecodec. Render: Null. 1080p (300.2006.1080p.BluRay.DTS.x264-CtrlHD.sample.noaudio.mkv) . Divx H.264 decoder crashes in MPC while seeking or repetitve playback Code:
CoreAVC User: 5s, kernel: 0s, total: 5s, real: 33s, fps: 308.5, dfps: 48.5 Divx User: 6s, kernel: 0s, total: 6s, real: 36s, fps: 234.5, dfps: 43.4 Code:
CoreAVC User: 0s, kernel: 0s, total: 0s, real: 3s, fps: 1315.4, dfps: 336.4 Divx User: 0s, kernel: 0s, total: 0s, real: 3s, fps: 1248.5, dfps: 314.7 Code:
Divx User: 22s, kernel: 0s, total: 22s, real: 69s, fps: 161.1, dfps: 51.8 CoreAVC User: 17s, kernel: 0s, total: 17s, real: 60s, fps: 208.4, dfps: 59.2 Code:
divx User: 2s, kernel: 0s, total: 2s, real: 10s, fps: 1414.2, dfps: 353.6 coreavc User: 2s, kernel: 0s, total: 2s, real: 9s, fps: 1515.9, dfps: 370.5 Code:
Coreavc User: 13s, kernel: 0s, total: 13s, real: 55s, fps: 234.3, dfps: 56.2 Divx User: 15s, kernel: 0s, total: 16s, real: 61s, fps: 191.3, dfps: 50.7 Last edited by IgorC; 16th May 2008 at 08:50. |
16th May 2008, 09:12 | #50 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 936
|
Thanks for posting your results. That's a little larger of a difference than we saw, I'm interested in some screenshots of CPU-Z on your box if you don't mind.
I noticed you used the null renderer, how do things play out with the a renderer attached? |
16th May 2008, 09:55 | #51 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 567
|
Is the whole H.264 thing now a result of the MainConcept aggregation?
MainConcept is a pretty good H.264 decoder BTW. It may eat up quite some CPU time but it is the most compatible software-only decoder when it comes to integrating it into a streaming environment. I will have to work out another test with DVBViewer (and PAFF streams) and different H.264 decoders and check/compare DVBSource (buffers/queues) and renderer (jitter, frame dropps) behaviour. [rule 6 material deleted] Think that a streaming environment (push graph scenario) can sometimes be tricky compared to file playback (mostly pull graph scenario).
__________________
Bye Last edited by Guest; 16th May 2008 at 14:54. Reason: rule 6 |
16th May 2008, 10:06 | #52 | Link |
Solaris: burnt by the Sun
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: /etc/default/moo
Posts: 1,923
|
geez, problems with dbviewer everywhere, sounds like they're the ones that really need to pull up their socks eh?
looking forwards to a good product like this in divx, its been a while since something big and nice has happened and just remember, don't let the marketing guys set your price, look at what happened with slysoft, nearly priced themselves out of doom9 |
16th May 2008, 10:13 | #53 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 567
|
"Problem with DVBViewer" here is completely different...
DivX decoder has problems with DVBViewer's DVBSource, CyberLink and Elecard demuxer. And the jitter I have reported may not even be related to DVBViewer at all: http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?...postcount=3803
__________________
Bye Last edited by CiNcH; 16th May 2008 at 12:24. |
16th May 2008, 14:47 | #56 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 55
|
Very interested, although performance isn't quite there yet.......curious how divx labs can post such radically different results than I get (specific settings that help their decoder and hurt CoreAVC?).
Here's some tests I performed, without filenames for "obvious" reasons (bah...doing SS since formatting is a nightmare here.....): Edit: CPU-Z screenshot (guess useless but whatever) Edit 2: OK retested FFDshow with latest rev....I'm impressed, gotten quite a bit faster since I last updated apparently (I switched back to old just to make sure I wasn't testing it differently.....but it is reproducable!) Congrats to FFDShow (and FFMpeg) Team! Last edited by the_corona; 16th May 2008 at 15:40. Reason: added FFDShow Rev 160 |
16th May 2008, 15:05 | #58 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 55
|
Because that's what I had installed on this box and I thought it doesn't really matter....all I really wanted to compare was CoreAVC/Divx.
I can retest the clips with the latest revision, but do you think there is a point? Edit: updated first post with newer versions. Last edited by the_corona; 16th May 2008 at 15:48. |
16th May 2008, 15:06 | #59 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 936
|
the_corona: Yesterday I had to repack our binary. I am wondering if it has affected performance. Stay tuned - I will check it out this morning.
On DVBViewer: Reports are that Beta 1 is not working with live streams which may or may not be related to connections to the splitters mentioned by CiNcH. We'll be looking into that shortly.
__________________
DivX Plus Web Player 2.0 (MKV & AVI) (Embed generator) DivX H.264 Decoder with DXVA support Developer portal Last edited by DigitAl56K; 16th May 2008 at 15:10. |
16th May 2008, 16:47 | #60 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 153
|
So do I see this correctly:
With independent tests CoreAVC ist very considerably faster than DivX (Beta1)?! I personally would have no problem with that, given the early development state of DivX h264 and the fact that CoreAVC is a full price product and currently holds the record for the fastest h264 software decoding. However, since the numbers the DivX guys posted are that much more in favour of DivX, I can not stop to wonder and maybe feel a little kidded... Last edited by Ice =A=; 16th May 2008 at 16:58. |
Tags |
coreavc, divx, h264 decoder, remoulade |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|