Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Hardware & Software > Hardware players

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd January 2015, 13:52   #1  |  Link
kenny1999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 62
does CD/DVD degrade with number of playback?

it is said that the laser inside DVD players wear a groove on the surface of the DVD discs, so as you play the disc more, as you play it more, the quality of it degrades more, even it is not noticeable to naked eyes, is that true? Of course assume the disc is always kept well and out of dust and any other harmful environmental conditions
kenny1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2015, 14:43   #2  |  Link
foxyshadis
ангел смерти
 
foxyshadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lost
Posts: 9,558
It would take millions, possibly billions of plays for that to happen, because the lasers just don't have that much energy. By that time, dust would have caked every surface and rotational stresses would have long since cracked the disc.
foxyshadis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2015, 16:08   #3  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,769
Who told you, Kenny, this nonsense?

While it's true that the laser heats the metallic grooves, it's warmth is simply not sufficient to perform any changes. There are players (in particular caraudios) that output the CD warm, but this comes from their heatsinks (and car heat itself). Not even this heat will damage the disc. Aluminium melts down at 660°C, that will be so hot that you'll have no fingers to keep it (that's more or less the temperature of the branding iron for cattle or slaves, if you have some around and need to know). For gold add 400°C more.

Therefore, relax, your discs will fail much earlier from different causes, like scratches.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2015, 17:44   #4  |  Link
kenny1999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxyshadis View Post
It would take millions, possibly billions of plays for that to happen, because the lasers just don't have that much energy. By that time, dust would have caked every surface and rotational stresses would have long since cracked the disc.

hi so how can I clean the dust or dirt already inside the DVD ROM?
kenny1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2015, 17:47   #5  |  Link
kenny1999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu View Post
Who told you, Kenny, this nonsense?

While it's true that the laser heats the metallic grooves, it's warmth is simply not sufficient to perform any changes. There are players (in particular caraudios) that output the CD warm, but this comes from their heatsinks (and car heat itself). Not even this heat will damage the disc. Aluminium melts down at 660°C, that will be so hot that you'll have no fingers to keep it (that's more or less the temperature of the branding iron for cattle or slaves, if you have some around and need to know). For gold add 400°C more.

Therefore, relax, your discs will fail much earlier from different causes, like scratches.
It was said by a professor in university, I guess most Professors like to speak in a very theoretical but impractical manner or I have missed some of his other words.
kenny1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2015, 19:11   #6  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny1999 View Post
... I guess most Professors like to speak in a very theoretical but impractical manner ...
I reckon this too

For the sake of completeness, even the recorded ones are relatively insensible to the reading laser.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2015, 20:54   #7  |  Link
kenny1999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu View Post
I reckon this too

For the sake of completeness, even the recorded ones are relatively insensible to the reading laser.
recorded one? what did you mean? I don't understand. (I Don't speak English very well)
kenny1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2015, 02:06   #8  |  Link
Asmodian
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,406
Burned discs (e.g. DVD+R) are much more affected by the reading laser. The signal on a DVR+R is from an organic dye not aluminium. Even sitting in a dark box this dye degrades, reading the disc does not increase this rate of decay very much but it does increase it. Do not use burned optical discs for archival storage.

I imagine the reading laser will damage the poly carbonate before it damages the aluminium data layer of a pressed disc.
Asmodian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2015, 07:33   #9  |  Link
foxyshadis
ангел смерти
 
foxyshadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lost
Posts: 9,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asmodian View Post
Burned discs (e.g. DVD+R) are much more affected by the reading laser. The signal on a DVR+R is from an organic dye not aluminium. Even sitting in a dark box this dye degrades, reading the disc does not increase this rate of decay very much but it does increase it. Do not use burned optical discs for archival storage.

I imagine the reading laser will damage the poly carbonate before it damages the aluminium data layer of a pressed disc.
The laser doesn't affect it at all (a tenth of a degree or less of heating), but UV will easily destroy them. Ambient heat isn't a sure killer, nor is time; I've read CDs that were stored in a garage for a decade that routinely hit 130F in summer, but most of them had unreadable spots. Only the initial writing laser will be hot enough to ruin the disc.
foxyshadis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2015, 20:54   #10  |  Link
kenny1999
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 62
hi guys

I find that when I simply 'play' the DVD, the DVD writer doesn't make a lot of noise, but when I try to burn or copy the disc, the DVD writer gives loud noise during the process. Does burning or copying harm the DVD disc so much for each time?
kenny1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2015, 15:27   #11  |  Link
StainlessS
HeartlessS Usurer
 
StainlessS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 10,980
From what I read 'somewhere', burned CD-R recordable have a lifetime of about 10 years if kept in dark cool condition,
whereas CD-RW re-writable have a life expectancy of 100 years under same conditions (probably WikiPedia).

EDIT:
Something from WikiPedia
Quote:
Lifespan

Real-life (not accelerated aging) tests have revealed that some CD-Rs degrade quickly even if stored normally.[5][6] The quality of a CD-R disc has a large and direct influence on longevity—low quality discs should not be expected to last very long. According to research conducted by J. Perdereau, CD-Rs are expected to have an average life expectancy of 10 years.[7] Branding isn't a reliable guide to quality, because many brands (major as well as no name) do not manufacture their own discs. Instead they are sourced from different manufacturers of varying quality. For best results, the actual manufacturer and material components of each batch of discs should be verified.
An example of a CD-R burned in 2000 showing dye degradation in 2008. Part of the data on it has been lost.

Burned CD-Rs suffer from material degradation, just like most writable media. CD-R media have an internal layer of dye used to store data. In a CD-RW disc, the recording layer is made of an alloy of silver and other metals—indium, antimony, and tellurium.[8] In CD-R media, the dye itself can degrade, causing data to become unreadable.

As well as degradation of the dye, failure of a CD-R can be due to the reflective surface. While silver is less expensive and more widely used, it is more prone to oxidation resulting in a non-reflecting surface. Gold on the other hand, although more expensive and no longer widely used, is an inert material, so gold-based CD-Rs do not suffer from this problem. Manufacturers have estimated that the longevity of gold-based CD-Rs to be as high as 100 years.[9]
However if you look around, you get all kinds of conflicting estimates on lifespan.
__________________
I sometimes post sober.
StainlessS@MediaFire ::: AND/OR ::: StainlessS@SendSpace

"Some infinities are bigger than other infinities", but how many of them are infinitely bigger ???

Last edited by StainlessS; 28th January 2015 at 16:05.
StainlessS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2015, 19:17   #12  |  Link
hello_hello
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessS View Post
From what I read 'somewhere', burned CD-R recordable have a lifetime of about 10 years if kept in dark cool condition
Nobody got old CD-Rs they can check?

I could find some easily enough, but I'd probably have some more if I went hunting for them. The problem is, the ones I found have been living on a large spindle with the oldest discs on the bottom, and as a rule they're a bit scratched, and I have no way of knowing what the burn quality was like in the first place. However......

The discs I checked were all burned between 2004 and 2006 according to Nero.
I checked the quality with Nero and double checked Nero by copying the contents of a few discs. If Nero reported 100% quality they copied fine. If it didn't they copied very slowly or failed to copy.

Circumstantial evidence seems to suggest so far failure is probably related to the quality of the disc and the quality of the burn, and not age specifically (given they're all about the same age and the low quality discs could have been low quality ten years ago for all I know). And I do have a burner that's never been all that good with Verbatim CDs.

Many of the discs were TDK with CMC dye. The ones I tested all looked pretty good (100% quality according to Nero).
Two LG discs with CMC dye were low quality (passed but very slow to read).
A Kodak disc passed 100%.
Two Verbatim with a "Prodisc" ID. One looked pretty good and the other failed.
Two Philips discs (Ritek). One Passed, one failed.
Two "Prime" discs (probably some cheap supermarket brand) with a "Plasmon" ID both failed.

If I was motivated I'd mark them and test again in five years time. If I was clever I'd have marked them as I was testing this time. Maybe I'll re-test properly later and it least mark the good ones with a date so I'll know they've changed if I test again down the road.

Last edited by hello_hello; 8th February 2015 at 19:27.
hello_hello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2015, 19:24   #13  |  Link
hello_hello
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny1999 View Post
hi guys

I find that when I simply 'play' the DVD, the DVD writer doesn't make a lot of noise, but when I try to burn or copy the disc, the DVD writer gives loud noise during the process. Does burning or copying harm the DVD disc so much for each time?
The amount of noise is generally related directly to the speed the disc is spinning. You may have software controlling the speed of the disc on playback to keep the noise down.

Low noise when reading a disc (ie copying it to your hard drive) might mean the drive has slowed down as it's having trouble reading it. Likewise lots of noise when a drive is burning is probably a better sign than little noise, which might indicate the burn quality dropped and the drive slowed the burn down in an attempt to maintain the quality.
hello_hello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2015, 09:03   #14  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessS View Post
From what I read 'somewhere', burned CD-R recordable have a lifetime of about 10 years if kept in dark cool condition,
whereas CD-RW re-writable have a life expectancy of 100 years under same conditions (probably WikiPedia).
It depends.
10 years might be the case for today's written discs. These are cheaply made and the burners are also cheaply made and not tuned. Also the user does not treat them with care.
My first CDRs are now 20 years old, and they happily work also today. These are kept as the other, pressed, CDs in the same place. Most of them I have anyway ripped and FLACed (the best of them as ISO), and have them for making car CDRs, which will fail due to scratches faster than the dye will decay.

The same is for DVDRs, and today for BDRs (the early ones were much better made than the current ones). And the same goes for the hardware, too. Although no current DVDR is made for 1x, but for 4x and above, my old industrial Matsushita, which can only 1x burns them very well, not the amount of errors a premium DVDR would have in a premium burner, but not far away, and definitely classes better than what a "modern" burner can do.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2015, 10:13   #15  |  Link
StainlessS
HeartlessS Usurer
 
StainlessS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 10,980
Come to think of it, I think the figures I quoted may have come from "Upgrading & Repairing PC's" by Scott somebody (I think),
great big tombstone of a book (probably holding a door open somewhere).
Also probably without multiple reads/writes or splodges of jam, archival only in cool dark place.
I still miss my old Lite-On which died about 7 years ago, dead but not forgotten
__________________
I sometimes post sober.
StainlessS@MediaFire ::: AND/OR ::: StainlessS@SendSpace

"Some infinities are bigger than other infinities", but how many of them are infinitely bigger ???
StainlessS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2015, 19:22   #16  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu View Post
My first CDRs are now 20 years old, and they happily work also today.
Hmmm...

I bought my companies first CD burner in late 1996. By the time it was installed within our Windows files server (complete with SCSI card), it cost nearly a £1000.00!!!

It was only used to back-up/store data. Indeed I don't remember there being any software at the time that offered anything else... But we had to have it
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2015, 23:05   #17  |  Link
foxyshadis
ангел смерти
 
foxyshadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lost
Posts: 9,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeMoreDigital View Post
Hmmm...

I bought my companies first CD burner in late 1996. By the time it was installed within our Windows files server (complete with SCSI card), it cost nearly a £1000.00!!!

It was only used to back-up/store data. Indeed I don't remember there being any software at the time that offered anything else... But we had to have it
When the other primary option was a Zip drive, complete with click of death, it's no surprise that a company would invest in a much higher capacity CD burner for data transfer and storage. Man, I haven't seen a Zip disk since high school....
foxyshadis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2015, 10:36   #18  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxyshadis View Post
Man, I haven't seen a Zip disk since high school....
I think I might have the 100MB and 250MB 'external' versions in a box somewhere. Along with a tape drive
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2015, 14:44   #19  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,769
I have the ZIP 250 system (the one without the click-of-death) because my DAW requires a SCSI removable medium and ZIP happened to be there. I also have the USB version (for Windows), so exchanging data among systems is ensured.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2015, 10:30   #20  |  Link
kuchikirukia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu View Post
It depends.
10 years might be the case for today's written discs. These are cheaply made and the burners are also cheaply made and not tuned. Also the user does not treat them with care.
My first CDRs are now 20 years old, and they happily work also today.
Yup, mine are 15 and they work.
kuchikirukia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.