Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > New and alternative video codecs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13th January 2022, 03:29   #621  |  Link
benwaggoner
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksec View Post
That is not strictly true. Qualcomm was "one" of them, not the main. There were lots of companies in the MPEG-LA camp that prevented the single pool. Including Apple.

In terms of Smartphone, it is Qualcomm which has the power. You want 4G / 5G along with other Modem technology? You need to deal with Qualcomm no matter what. And I would be surprised if that patent agreement doesn't include video compression, since Qualcomm lumped everything from CPU, power management to other things all in one package anyway.

AV1 and VVC will likely live side by side in the future. Since the industry doesn't seems to agree on anything.
If VVC looks like a clear market winner for premium content, that could result in Qualcomm and others not including it on their SoCs. AV1 takes a whole lot of gates, and leakage means just the existence of AV1 HW support hurts thermals and battery life some. VVC outperforms AV1 in compression while needing less mm^2. AV1 in software works well enough for short form DRM-free user generated content ala YouTube and Facebook.
__________________
Ben Waggoner
Principal Video Specialist, Amazon Prime Video

My Compression Book
benwaggoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2022, 12:29   #622  |  Link
PCU
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by benwaggoner View Post
If VVC looks like a clear market winner for premium content, that could result in Qualcomm and others not including it on their SoCs. AV1 takes a whole lot of gates, and leakage means just the existence of AV1 HW support hurts thermals and battery life some. VVC outperforms AV1 in compression while needing less mm^2. AV1 in software works well enough for short form DRM-free user generated content ala YouTube and Facebook.
AV1 is a competitor to H.265, AV2 is also a competitor to H.266. Most streaming services prefer AV1 and in the future AV2. (Only Apple is swimming in the opposite direction of the water!). This is what happened in the video game industry: using Vorbis instead of MP3/AAC/WMA/DD, etc.
But I prefer H.26x formats because comparing YouTube/Facebook/Insta/Twitter's H.264 with VP9/AV1, the quality of H.264 (call it x264) was always better. (VP9/AV1 is too blurry)

Last edited by PCU; 14th January 2022 at 12:42.
PCU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2022, 12:48   #623  |  Link
birdie
Artem S. Tashkinov
 
birdie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCU View Post
AV1 is a competitor to H.265, AV2 is also a competitor to H.266. Most streaming services prefer AV1 and in the future AV2. (Only Apple is swimming in the opposite direction of the water!). This is what happened in the video game industry: using Vorbis instead of MP3/AAC/WMA/DD, etc.
But I prefer H.26x formats because comparing YouTube/Facebook/Insta/Twitter's H.264 with VP9/AV1, the quality of H.264 (call it x264) was always better. (VP9/AV1 is too blurry)
VP9 encoded YouTube videos are much better than H.264 encoded ones by a large margin. Would be nice if you showed at least one where "H.264 is better".
birdie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2022, 15:40   #624  |  Link
PCU
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by birdie View Post
VP9 encoded YouTube videos are much better than H.264 encoded ones by a large margin. Would be nice if you showed at least one where "H.264 is better".
Just download the H.264 and VP9 version of this video and compare it (download using IDM):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GOR5gvQwDI
PCU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2022, 16:04   #625  |  Link
birdie
Artem S. Tashkinov
 
birdie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCU View Post
Just download the H.264 and VP9 version of this video and compare it (download using IDM):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GOR5gvQwDI
The source is just 480p and is very low quality. Both encodes are quite bad but H.264 retrains a lot more details.

It's not obvious when youtube encoded the video, looks like 3.5 years ago, probably at the time their VP9 encoder was not good or/and didn't have enough bitrate.

Code:
20092622 Oct 25  2018 'Simple Plan - I'\''m Just A Kid (Official Video)-_GOR5gvQwDI.mp4'
12959041 Oct 25  2018 'Simple Plan - I'\''m Just A Kid (Official Video)-_GOR5gvQwDI.webm'

Last edited by birdie; 14th January 2022 at 16:14.
birdie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2022, 17:26   #626  |  Link
PCU
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by birdie View Post
The source is just 480p and is very low quality. Both encodes are quite bad but H.264 retrains a lot more details.

It's not obvious when youtube encoded the video, looks like 3.5 years ago, probably at the time their VP9 encoder was not good or/and didn't have enough bitrate.

Code:
20092622 Oct 25  2018 'Simple Plan - I'\''m Just A Kid (Official Video)-_GOR5gvQwDI.mp4'
12959041 Oct 25  2018 'Simple Plan - I'\''m Just A Kid (Official Video)-_GOR5gvQwDI.webm'
What program did you download with?
Also, AV1 still is bad, just download one of the Gamers Nexus videos and check how bad is the AV1 version.

Last edited by PCU; 14th January 2022 at 17:32.
PCU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2022, 20:18   #627  |  Link
birdie
Artem S. Tashkinov
 
birdie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCU View Post
What program did you download with?
Also, AV1 still is bad, just download one of the Gamers Nexus videos and check how bad is the AV1 version.
https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl

or its more advanced fork

https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp
birdie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2022, 01:17   #628  |  Link
LigH
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
 
LigH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,501
Also remember: YouTube recodes all videos with a rather constant bitrate as target for streaming over a limited bandwidth; this returns anything but optimal quality per bitrate. Different codecs may use substantially different strategies to distribute the bitrate across a video playback buffer. Especially a patent-free codec may need to avoid patented algorithms which may be useful for this specific use case. Disclaimer: I may or may not be wrong in my claims.
__________________

New German Gleitz board
MediaFire: x264 | x265 | VPx | AOM | Xvid
LigH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2022, 16:20   #629  |  Link
PCU
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 276
20 decade is the decade of streaming!
PCU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:41   #630  |  Link
Gravitator
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 278
Quote:
Originally Posted by benwaggoner View Post
If VVC looks like a clear market winner for premium content, that could result in Qualcomm and others not including it on their SoCs. AV1 takes a whole lot of gates, and leakage means just the existence of AV1 HW support hurts thermals and battery life some. VVC outperforms AV1 in compression while needing less mm^2. AV1 in software works well enough for short form DRM-free user generated content ala YouTube and Facebook.
At what settings and resolution? Is there a comparative demo available?
__________________
Win10x64, Xeon E5450, GTX 750 2GB, DDR3 8GB.
Gravitator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:58   #631  |  Link
ksec
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by benwaggoner View Post
If VVC looks like a clear market winner for premium content, that could result in Qualcomm and others not including it on their SoCs. AV1 takes a whole lot of gates, and leakage means just the existence of AV1 HW support hurts thermals and battery life some. VVC outperforms AV1 in compression while needing less mm^2. AV1 in software works well enough for short form DRM-free user generated content ala YouTube and Facebook.
Both VVC and AV1 decoding are definitely coming in the next Qualcomm SoC flagship update. It was suppose to be 2021 but the IP got delayed. ( Not sure about encoding, especially AV1 )

Die Size and Area are less of a problem with leading edge node. But yes thermals and energy usage. Especially Apple which has a stringent requirement. Both VP9 and HEVC decode 4K content on Apple SoC with less than 150mW. There are three ( or four ) hardware decoding IP, but I am not aware of any of them that offer this low level of of AV1 decoding energy usage. And Samsung just announced Exynos 2200 with AV1 decoding, but no EVC decoding or encoding support.

But I am getting a little frustrated and losing patient with the lack of progress. AV2 is nowhere to be seen. x266 no show. EVC missing.
__________________
Previously iwod

Last edited by ksec; Today at 08:51.
ksec is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.