Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

Domains: forum.doom9.org / forum.doom9.net / forum.doom9.se

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 Encoder GUIs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th June 2012, 12:16   #21  |  Link
defalopii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
How about if using more ports, 16, 32, 64 etc ??
Just in case if 8 ports still not be able to maximize the existing core
defalopii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2012, 12:50   #22  |  Link
Atak_Snajpera
RipBot264 author
 
Atak_Snajpera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,947
I doubt that eight instances of x264 encoder in second pass won't be able to saturate all 32 cores. Besides with one x264 running you got 30% in MeGUI. 4 instances will easily saturate your server at 100%.
Atak_Snajpera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2012, 13:37   #23  |  Link
defalopii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
i am sure if user will happy if they can maximize the CPU usage to boost speed in the 1st pass
defalopii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2012, 13:58   #24  |  Link
Atak_Snajpera
RipBot264 author
 
Atak_Snajpera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,947
Quote:
i am sure if user will happy if they can maximize the CPU usage to boost speed in the 1st pass
so you are saying that 8 encoders can't use all 32 cores in first pass?


Besides most people use CRF these days instead of 2-pass. (no need to store movies on CD/DVD when we have big portable HDDs)
Atak_Snajpera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2012, 16:37   #25  |  Link
Keiyakusha
契約者
 
Keiyakusha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,576
1st pass in 2-pass encode is not efficient when it comes to multithreading. Never was, unless sometime recently DS rewrote it and magically optimized all that can and can not be optimized. If you managed to get 100% load on all your cores in 1st pass - maybe this is because all extra power wasted on something else, like on running your virtual machines. You should make sure that second pass or CRF uses 100% cpu. If you have that - don't expect more.

Last edited by Keiyakusha; 16th June 2012 at 16:39.
Keiyakusha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2012, 17:00   #26  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keiyakusha View Post
1st pass in 2-pass encode is not efficient when it comes to multithreading. Never was, unless sometime recently DS rewrote it
lookahead-threads (though the auto isn't tuned for multipass yet, you can set it manually).
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2012, 01:38   #27  |  Link
defalopii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera View Post
so you are saying that 8 encoders can't use all 32 cores in first pass?

Besides most people use CRF these days instead of 2-pass. (no need to store movies on CD/DVD when we have big portable HDDs)
Yes, 8 encoders still cant utilize the all CPU in the 1st pass, i am sure about that

Maybe i am still in old era, bcoz still using 2-pass
defalopii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2012, 02:11   #28  |  Link
Groucho2004
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 5,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by defalopii View Post
Maybe i am still in old era, bcoz still using 2-pass
There is nothing wrong or antiquated about 2 pass encoding. If you have to hit a certain target size, that's what you have to do.

Some people just think that their opinion should be the measure of all things.
Groucho2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2012, 09:13   #29  |  Link
Atak_Snajpera
RipBot264 author
 
Atak_Snajpera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,947
2pass is only usefull if you aiming for certain size .for example you want to use all available space on cd dvd bd ... if you store movies on hdd then you should use crf. in cq mode x264 will better determine how much bitrate is needed for specific source. anime requires alot less bitrate than most of movies for example. i don't care whether you agree or not. that's the fact. period.
Atak_Snajpera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2012, 10:15   #30  |  Link
Groucho2004
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 5,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera View Post
2pass is only usefull if you aiming for certain size .for example you want to use all available space on cd dvd bd
I believe I just made that point but thanks for the refresh.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera View Post
i don't care whether you agree or not.
Nor should you.
Groucho2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.