Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
18th June 2009, 05:36 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
|
FFVDUB Deinterlace filters stopped working
A couple weeks ago I began investigating various techniques for deinterlacing the video from my DV camcorder. After doing a bit of research I came upon FFVDUB, installed it, tried the deinterlace filters and really liked the results I was able to get using TomsMoComp.
A few days later, I tried using the technique on another clip from the camcorder and found that it wasn't working. The preview screen and the output screen looked the same as the input, and saving the video output provided an obviously still-interlaced video. In fact, all of the deinterlace options in FFVDUB ceased to work. However, it seems all the other filters in FFVDUB, like Levels, Blur, Sharpen, etc., all still work just fine. Here's what I've tried so far to fix this: 1. Delete the VDF file from the plugins directory of both VirtualDub and VirtualDubMod and replacing them with the original file (FFVDUB behaves the same in both programs). 2. Installing a newer version of Virtualdub and installing the original VDF. 3. Uninstalling FFDSHOW and reinstalling it. None of those changed anything. So, I'm hoping someone here can clue me in onto what is going wrong here, or perhaps suggest another solution that would be as simple using VirtualDub or Avidemux. Thanks |
13th June 2010, 08:01 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Zinzinnati
Posts: 294
|
I have the same problem sort of. I isntall rev 3466 and all the filters stopped working. I went back to my old rev 2546 and it started working again. Trying to find out what the problem is now.
LA
__________________
Anata wa baka da! REPENT! |
13th June 2010, 14:58 | #3 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Seems to work for me:
http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/7313/ffvdubworks.jpg Test with ffdshow/ffvdub r3472 (ICL11 build) and VirtualDub v1.9.8.
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 13th June 2010 at 15:32. |
17th June 2010, 10:56 | #5 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Try an up-to-date VirtualDub, not an old and outdated fork that wasn't updated for years...
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ |
18th June 2010, 14:48 | #7 | Link | |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?grou...41&atid=867360
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ |
|
19th June 2010, 03:07 | #8 | Link |
Angel of Night
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tangled in the silks
Posts: 9,559
|
ffdshow has always intentionally disabled the postprocessing in vfw import. It probably should have been removed. However the deinterlacing should work fine, though I've never used ffvdub (instead, I use the vfw decoding control panel, which filters the video before vdub touches it), so I can't help much there.
|
19th June 2010, 10:43 | #9 | Link | |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
@lordadmira Goto Start -> Programs -> ffdshow -> VFW configuration. Then setup "post-processing" on the Decoder tab. Also make sure VirtualDub uses ffdshow/ffvfw for decoding your source clip...
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ |
|
21st June 2010, 04:41 | #10 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Zinzinnati
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
And regardless, *that should be documented*. LA
__________________
Anata wa baka da! REPENT! |
|
24th June 2010, 15:04 | #11 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
For the reasons that have already been explained: Using post-proessing (i.e. deblocking) filters as part of the decoding process has the advantage that the deblocker can work adaptively. It can control the deblocking strength per block, depending on each block's quantizer. But if you use the deblocker as a "blind" post-processing filter, which would be the case in ffvdub, this kind of adaptivity isn't possible. Hence you'd smooth each block equally, no matter if a block needs deblcoking or not. Therefore it makes sense to have post-processing enabled in ffdshow and in the ffvfw decoder, but not in the ffvdub filter...
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ |
24th June 2010, 15:36 | #12 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Zinzinnati
Posts: 294
|
That decision should be left to the user. In my application I'm perfectly fine with the blind approach as I'm sure countless people are. Just document it in the dialog and readme.
It's not always possible to do the pp in the decoding stage. In VirtualDubMod when u load up an mpeg2 file, u don't have access to that stage. U don't have access to it in numerous other scenarios as well. U can only have access to it if ffdshow is doing the decoding via VFW. The ffdshow pp works better than any other pp filter I have available. I really can't comprehend why u don't let the user make an informed decision about using it. How about re-enabling it? LA
__________________
Anata wa baka da! REPENT! |
24th June 2010, 16:48 | #13 | Link | |||
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
Also most of the newer video formats, such as H.264, WMV9/VC1 and VP8/WebM, have their own "built-in" deblocking feature. For those formats one should never use an additional post-progressing filter. But again it's impossible to detect this case in ffvdub, as the source video format is unknown at this point of the processing chain. And of course the average user doesn't know that he should disable post-processing for H.264, WMV9 and Co... Quote:
Another alternative would be DirectShowSource() or DSS2() with the 'regular' ffdshow decoder... Quote:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ffdshow-tryout/support
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 24th June 2010 at 16:54. |
|||
24th June 2010, 22:12 | #14 | Link |
Angel of Night
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tangled in the silks
Posts: 9,559
|
When I started working on ffdshow, I actually assumed it had always been disabled. I didn't know it worked at one point, I don't work on it anymore or I'd look into why that is. Blind PP is available through a number of avisynth deblocking filters though, and avisynth's ffms2 source even gives you the ability to do quant-based deblocking with no slowdown compared to loading it directly in vdmod.
Also, is it so hard to type 'you'? |
24th June 2010, 23:03 | #15 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Zinzinnati
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
I'll make the feature request. Those other options u listed are complete non starters. I was rather happy when I discovered ffvdub because it meant I could pull all kinds of functionality into one place. Changing ffdshow installs is easier than bending over backwards to get ffdshow somewhere else in the graph or use a new tool. And incidentally, I'm not so much using it for deblocking. It does a bang up job on getting rid of periodic static. I have diagonal rolling lines in one video source. Knowledge of macroblocks isn't any use in this situation. LA
__________________
Anata wa baka da! REPENT! |
|
|
|