Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
22nd April 2007, 18:18 | #42 | Link |
Pig on the wing
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 5,733
|
I've seen many DVDs that have a progressive movie (encoded as interlaced as I'm talking about PAL DVDs here) and interlaced extras in the same VTS. To get the best out of the source, the encoding mode should be set to progressive for the movie.
My question is: what happens during the rebuild phase when you manually change the encoding mode from progressive to interlaced and does it affect playback in any way? In NTSC it's probably a completely different story but what about PAL?
__________________
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes I'll see you on the dark side of the Moon... |
29th June 2007, 14:44 | #43 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
What is Redistribution?
Thought this is something that ought to be added to the FAQ. The text below was posted by Boulder (the originator of the concept) in the original redistribution discussions.
1) Why did you come up with this silly method? I originally began developing it when I used to cram two movies per DVD. I quickly noticed that the average quant levels between the two movies were very uneven - one would have ~3.5 whereas the other would have ~6.0. This is, of course, not a good thing so I began thinking about how I could fix the situation. One thread by DDogg (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=74141) in the DVD2SVCD forum actually helped me come up with the initial idea. 2) What is the purpose of the method? - to shift bits from less demanding segments to those that need more - to avoid the problems caused by using the original bitrate distribution especially if the original source is CBR or near CBR - to maintain equal quality throughout the whole video 3) What do you do the OPV/CQ pass for? The OPV/CQ encode acts only as a compressibility test. Every segment is encoded using the exact same parameters so a bitrate-hungry segment will have a higher average bitrate than a segment that doesn't need as much to keep the same quality level. This means that from the results of the compressibility test encodes, we can calculate a bitrate ratio which can then be used to redistribute the available space for video between the segments. After the compressibility tests have been run and the bits have been redistributed between segments, the encoding process continues just like in any normal DVD-RB project. For fastest possible processing, you can run the redistribution pass without any filtering. I have not tested the effects of different Q/quant values. I usually use Q30-40 in CCE and q4-5 in HC for doing the pass. IMO the most important thing is that the bitrate stays below the specified maximum because when the bitrate gets close to the maximum, the quants need to be raised. This can prevent the redistribution from being optimal. 4) What are the pros and cons of the method? pros: - equal quality throughout the whole video (and DVD when all VTSs are in the same redistribution pool) - all the pros of OPV/CQ encode apply but you get accurate filesizes cons: - the redistribution pass takes extra time 5) How do you know that the method works? Lately I've been capturing a lot of DVB stuff which I then re-encode as they usually need quite heavy filtering. I often put 3-4 episodes per DVD. I've used the method for determining the average bitrate per episode so that the quality would remain constant. When all the episodes have been encoded and I've checked the log, the average quant levels have been roughly the same. The variance has usually been in the range of 0.1-0.2 units which is a very small difference IMO. If I had encoded every episode at the same average bitrate, the variance would have been much larger. |
30th June 2007, 02:04 | #45 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
You just check the option on the mode menu. It all happens automatically from there. If you're doing a series disc, also add "redist_all=1" to the "[Options]" area of the REBUILDER.INI file. But don't forget to remove it or disable it for non-series discs. It never actually does OPV or CQ except in the analysis (during PREPARE) -- just to equalize quality across the segments -- it is designed for use with normal multi-pass encoding.
|
9th September 2007, 09:12 | #50 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,919
|
Q. The Segment Viewer doesn't work. It just shows a black screen where the video should be. How can I fix it?
Quote:
|
|
20th September 2007, 01:30 | #51 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9
|
RB Pro's Key limit
I donated a while back for RB Pro and over the course of time have had to do multiple fresh installations of windows. upon my last installation, RB Pro informed me that I had exceeded the amount of allowed computer IDs (something along those lines) and RB pro wouldn't run. I sent an e-mail where I was instructed to--how long should I expect to wait until I'll be allowed to run RB Pro again?
|
21st September 2007, 18:38 | #52 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
Sorry, bad timing. You caught me while I was out-of-town for few days and I can't reset your count from here (hitting the key limit is a very rare occurance since it gets reset regularly). You'll get a response later tonight.
Last edited by jdobbs; 21st September 2007 at 18:41. |
11th October 2007, 18:15 | #55 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4
|
Back in June, there was this dialogue:
rack04 said: "So how does one actually run this OPV/CQ and redistribution?" jdojbs replied: "You just check the option on the mode menu... It never actually does OPV or CQ except in the analysis (during PREPARE) -- just to equalize quality across the segments -- it is designed for use with normal multi-pass encoding." I just checked the Mode menu on DVD-RB Pro v1.26.3, and it is not immediately evident to me which is the proper option to check. Could you give the actual line name? (Newbie...) Thanks. |
23rd October 2007, 17:17 | #57 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40
|
Hello.
Dear Mr. jdobbs, thank you very much again for this great program! I've got a question for you, that I wanted to ask for a long time regarding the redistribution phase, I've searched a bit and didn't find reference so my apologies in advance: Is it possible when encoding just 1 single large VTS (i.e. "Main Movie" mode) to get the redistribution going on all available CPUs? Or does this process must remain entirely linear? Regards, Samuel. **subscribed** |
28th October 2007, 10:52 | #59 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|