Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
11th February 2007, 22:34 | #121 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
A good start would be if we could get more sniffed volume IDs and unencrypted Volume IDs from different discs so we can figure out the patterns in the keys, if there are any. If you can guess the key down to 6 unknown bytes by jst knowing the manufacturer then it's will work, but the more unknown bytes the more impossible it gets. Finding a pattern is the only way i think, and it will work as long as the discs follow these patterns. As soon as they fall outside the box then you have to go sniff again. |
|
11th February 2007, 23:09 | #125 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 90
|
It probably will take 2 months before we start seeing
any changes in the values they use for Processing Key and VID. It would be cool to have a HDDVD-decrypter that can decrypt any disc from the top10 manufactures before this date without memdump/sniffing/keydb.cfg After that it will be a cat and mouse game. Last edited by tonyp12; 11th February 2007 at 23:15. |
11th February 2007, 23:35 | #127 | Link | |
Country Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: is everything!
Posts: 6,499
|
Quote:
Regards
__________________
Les Only use genuine Verbatim or Taiyo Yuden media. |
|
12th February 2007, 00:15 | #129 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
Let's just say we are making copies of their keys just in case they lose them. |
|
12th February 2007, 00:23 | #130 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 202
|
Quote:
I can understand his enthusiasm (it clearly showed from his posts), he was on to something and I know how that feels. But since the current method is still not counteracted, it's better to keep it to yourself ... don't bring other people on ideas ... well, the rabbit is out of the hat now, we will see what happens, but my guess is that a very promising method is wasted now. |
|
12th February 2007, 01:08 | #132 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 142
|
Quote:
Last edited by xyz987; 12th February 2007 at 02:02. |
|
12th February 2007, 01:59 | #133 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 154
|
Some of you are missing the true meaning of this compromise. If they revoke this processing key, we just take a player compatible with a new processing key, put in one of the titles that's already cracked, and go around in memory looking for the known key. We find it, insert a new title, look in the same place and we have a new processing key.
|
12th February 2007, 05:53 | #135 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
give out new device and processing keys. But only after the makers of the software players shows that no keys whatsoever are in memory in plain view at any time. The keys will only be in the CPU's register for a brief time. |
|
12th February 2007, 12:13 | #138 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
|
|
12th February 2007, 12:37 | #139 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
We know what to look for as you just use the new "improved" software player to playback an old hddvd disc. Then we just search for the old vuks. They messed up now and we now know what we are looking for. |
|
12th February 2007, 13:38 | #140 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11
|
The new software players will do everything to hide the vuk's. A simple search for the keys won't work. The keys will be scrambled. They could also do several other things to hide the keys, but I won't give them any good ideas.
|
|
|