In order to Demux m2ts video track, which one is better, tsMuxeR or eac3to?

zys4416 · 14th November 2011, 03:06

I need demux raw h264 from m2ts for muxing mkv container, which one is better, tsMuxeR or eac3to?

From my experience, the sizes are different for the output files from tsMuxeR and eac3to.

Also, does anyone know the impact of the options "insertSEI" and "contSPS" in tsMuxeR?

tebasuna51 · 14th November 2011, 12:00

Remember rule 12 of this forum:

"...Do not ask "what's best" because this question cannot be answered objectively. Each and everyone has their own view about what's best in a certain area. The best is what works best for you!"

Then please ask, and answers, about differences between methods.

For instance, eac3to can export the track directly to mkv container, then some m2ts container data can be transferred to mkv container.
But I don't know the differences between both methods extracting raw h264.

About "insertSEI" and "contSPS", read http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=142559
I'm not sure but seems referred to convert mkv h264 stream to m2ts container, and not the inverse like you want.

lutinor · 15th November 2011, 19:24

I disagree, eac3to is better cause it never destruct any information from original file. Nonetheless, tsmuxer is more 'easy'.

14th November 2011, 03:06	#1 \| Link
zys4416 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 8	In order to Demux m2ts video track, which one is better, tsMuxeR or eac3to? I need demux raw h264 from m2ts for muxing mkv container, which one is better, tsMuxeR or eac3to? From my experience, the sizes are different for the output files from tsMuxeR and eac3to. Also, does anyone know the impact of the options "insertSEI" and "contSPS" in tsMuxeR?

14th November 2011, 12:00	#2 \| Link
tebasuna51 Moderator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Spain Posts: 6,792	Remember rule 12 of this forum: "...Do not ask "what's best" because this question cannot be answered objectively. Each and everyone has their own view about what's best in a certain area. The best is what works best for you!" Then please ask, and answers, about differences between methods. For instance, eac3to can export the track directly to mkv container, then some m2ts container data can be transferred to mkv container. But I don't know the differences between both methods extracting raw h264. About "insertSEI" and "contSPS", read http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=142559 I'm not sure but seems referred to convert mkv h264 stream to m2ts container, and not the inverse like you want. __________________ BeHappy, AviSynth audio transcoder.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

15th November 2011, 19:24	#3 \| Link
lutinor Registered User Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 287	I disagree, eac3to is better cause it never destruct any information from original file. Nonetheless, tsmuxer is more 'easy'.